Washakie (WY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Washakie (WY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Washakie (WY)
2,547
Total Investors in Washakie (WY)
765
Investor Owned SFR in Washakie (WY)
589(23.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
642
SFR Owned
445
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
123
SFR Owned
157
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 589 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Washakie County with 97.5% ownership, as institutional presence is nearly non-existent.
Investors own 589 single-family properties in Washakie County, representing 23.1% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by small, individual landlords (97.5%), while the single institutional-scale investor is effectively neutral. In the first quarter, landlords were net buyers and secured a 6.5% discount compared to homeowners, reversing a 2025 trend of paying significant premiums.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 589 SFR properties, with individuals controlling 75.6% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 477 paid in cash versus just 112 financed. Nearly the entire portfolio (576 of 589 properties) is non-owner-occupied. There are 642 individual landlords compared to 123 company landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 6.5% less than homeowners in Q1, a $15,223 discount per property.
This Q1 discount marks a sharp reversal from 2025, when landlords consistently paid significant premiums, including a 33.2% premium ($96,536) in Q3 2025. Prices paid by landlords have fallen from a 2025 average of $410,107 to $218,737 in the latest quarter, though this is based on a low volume of transactions.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 21.4% of all single-family homes sold in the last quarter.
All 100% of landlord acquisitions were made by 'mom-and-pop' investors in the smallest tiers (1-10 properties). No purchases were recorded from institutional investors. All 6 properties were bought by 6 new, single-property landlords entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.5% of all investor-owned residential properties.
Single-property landlords alone own 80.9% of the investor-held housing stock (483 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors in the 1000+ property tier own just a single property, accounting for only 0.2% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners starting in the 3-5 property tier.
While individuals own 83.9% of single-property portfolios, companies take majority control (64.2%) in the small landlord tier (3-5 properties). In the two-property tier, ownership is nearly evenly split, with individuals at 51.5% and companies at 48.5%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with a 64.8% rate in zip code 82442.
The county's investor activity is split between two primary zip codes. Zip code 82442 has an extremely high investor penetration of 64.8% (160 properties), while 82401 has a more moderate 18.7% rate but a larger volume of 429 investor-owned homes.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 48 properties while selling only 12 in 2025.
The trend continued into 2026-Q1, with 6 buys versus 4 sells. In stark contrast, the county's single institutional-scale investor was neutral in 2025, with one purchase and one sale, indicating no active accumulation.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 16.7% of all Q1 property transactions.
All 6 landlord transactions were purchases by single-property investors at an average price of $218,737. None of these new landlords purchased their properties from existing landlords, indicating they acquired homes from the traditional market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 589 SFR properties, with individuals controlling 75.6% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Washakie County, investors hold a significant 23.1% share of the single-family residential market, totaling 589 properties. This portfolio is primarily in the hands of private individuals rather than corporations, with individual landlords owning 445 properties (75.6%) compared to 157 (26.7%) owned by companies.

The investor market is composed of 765 distinct landlord entities. The split reveals a strong prevalence of small-scale operators, with 642 individual landlords far outnumbering the 123 company landlords, a ratio of more than 5-to-1.

A defining characteristic of this market is the low reliance on debt. An overwhelming 477 investor-owned properties are owned outright (cash), while only 112 are financed. This suggests a mature investor base with significant equity and lower exposure to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income generation. Of the 589 properties owned by investors, 576 are classified as rented or non-owner-occupied, confirming that the overwhelming majority of these homes serve as rental housing for the community.

Both individual and company landlords primarily focus on rentals, but the financing strategies show a slight difference. The data indicates a market built on long-term holds and cash-flow generation rather than speculative, leveraged acquisitions, a hallmark of a stable real estate investing environment.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 6.5% less than homeowners in Q1, a $15,223 discount per property.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords in Washakie County acquired properties at an average price of $218,737, securing a 6.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners, who paid an average of $233,960. This amounts to a savings of $15,223 per property for investors.

This discount represents a dramatic market shift from the previous year. Throughout 2025, investors consistently paid substantial premiums over homeowners. For example, in Q3 2025, landlords paid $387,695 on average, a striking 33.2% premium ($96,536) over the homeowner price of $291,159.

The trend reversal suggests either a change in investor strategy towards more distressed or off-market properties, or a general cooling in the segment of the market where investors were previously competing most aggressively. The Q1 2026 purchase price of $218,737 is significantly lower than the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $197,669, but well below the 2025 average of $410,107.

The data does not show any acquisitions in the most recent several quarters, indicating sporadic activity. The low transaction volume means that quarterly price averages can be volatile and influenced by the specific mix of properties sold during that period.

Overall, the pricing dynamics have inverted. After a period of paying above-market rates, investors in the most recent quarter have returned to the more traditional model of acquiring properties at a discount relative to the broader retail market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 21.4% of all single-family homes sold in the last quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 21.4% of all SFR sales in the last quarter, with landlords acquiring 6 of the 28 properties sold in Washakie County. This demonstrates a continued and significant presence in the local real estate market.

The acquisition activity was exclusively driven by the smallest investors. All 6 properties were purchased by landlords in the 'mom-and-pop' category (Tiers 01-04), representing 100% of investor buying for the period.

Notably, all investor purchases came from the single-property tier. These 6 acquisitions were made by 6 new entities, indicating that market entry is dominated by first-time landlords rather than portfolio expansion from existing investors.

Mid-size and institutional-scale landlords were completely absent from the market this quarter. No purchases were made by investors in Tiers 05-09, highlighting that recent market dynamics are not being shaped by large-scale capital.

The concentration of activity among new, small-scale landlords suggests that the barrier to entry in Washakie County remains accessible, and the rental market continues to attract new participants at a grassroots level.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.5% of all investor-owned residential properties.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Washakie County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. 'Mom-and-pop' landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), control a massive 97.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The concentration is most extreme at the smallest level. Landlords owning just a single property (Tier 01) represent the backbone of the market, holding 483 properties, which translates to 80.9% of the entire investor portfolio.

In sharp contrast, the presence of large-scale investors is negligible. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) own just one property in the county, making up a mere 0.2% of the investor-owned housing stock. This finding refutes any narrative of large corporate dominance in this market.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also have a very small footprint. Tiers 05 through 08 combined own only 15 properties, or about 2.3% of the total. The market structure clearly shows a long tail of small investors rather than consolidation among larger players.

This distribution underscores a hyper-local market dynamic, where investment opportunities are primarily captured and serviced by community-level individuals and small businesses, not by national or institutional funds.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners starting in the 3-5 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Washakie County undergoes a distinct shift as portfolios grow. While individual investors are the overwhelming force in the entry-level tier, owning 83.9% of single-property portfolios, this dominance quickly wanes.

The crossover point where companies become the majority owners occurs in the small landlord tier (3-5 properties). In this bracket, companies own 34 properties, representing a 64.2% majority share, compared to the 19 properties (35.8%) held by individuals.

The two-property tier acts as a transition zone where ownership is almost perfectly balanced. Individuals hold a slight majority with 17 properties (51.5%), while companies own 16 properties (48.5%), signaling the point where formal business structures become more common.

This pattern suggests that as investors expand beyond a single rental property, they increasingly opt for the legal and financial structure of a company to manage their growing portfolios. The data indicates a clear professionalization trend as portfolio size increases.

Even with this shift, the overall market remains dominated by individuals due to the sheer volume of single-property landlords. The 416 properties owned by individuals in Tier 01 alone are more than double the 157 properties owned by companies across all tiers combined.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with a 64.8% rate in zip code 82442.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Washakie County is not evenly distributed, but rather highly concentrated in specific geographic pockets. The market is primarily defined by two zip codes with vastly different investor ownership profiles.

The highest concentration is found in zip code 82442, where investors own an astonishing 64.8% of the single-family residential properties. This area, with 160 investor-owned homes, represents a market heavily defined by rental housing.

In contrast, zip code 82401 has a much larger volume of investor-owned properties at 429, but the penetration rate is a more moderate 18.7%. This zip code contains the majority of investor properties by count but has a lower density of investor ownership compared to its neighbor.

The data highlights a key analytical distinction: the area with the highest count of investor properties is not the same as the one with the highest rate. This suggests different market dynamics, with 82442 being a specialized rental-heavy submarket.

This hyper-local concentration is crucial for understanding the housing market. Any analysis of Washakie County must consider these two distinct sub-markets, as county-wide averages would obscure the intense investor focus within zip code 82442.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 48 properties while selling only 12 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Across all timeframes, landlords in Washakie County have consistently been net buyers, signaling a long-term strategy of portfolio growth and accumulation. In 2025, investors purchased 48 properties while selling only 12, a 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

This acquisitive trend has carried into the new year. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords continued to expand their holdings, with 6 purchases compared to just 4 sales, resulting in a net gain of 2 properties.

The behavior of institutional-scale investors (1000+ tier) presents a completely different picture. In 2025, this segment was perfectly neutral, recording one buy and one sell. This indicates a stable, passive holding strategy rather than active expansion, contrasting sharply with the broader landlord market.

The transaction data from prior years reinforces this pattern of accumulation. In 2024, the buy/sell ratio was even more aggressive, with 46 properties purchased and only 6 sold. This demonstrates sustained confidence in the local rental market among investors.

The persistent net-buyer status across the entire landlord population, juxtaposed with the neutral position of the institutional tier, underscores that market growth is being fueled exclusively by smaller, local operators.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 16.7% of all Q1 property transactions.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords participated in 6 of the 36 total single-family residential transactions in Washakie County, capturing a 16.7% share of market activity. All of this activity was on the purchasing side.

Transaction volume was exclusively concentrated at the entry level of the market. All 6 transactions were conducted by investors in the single-property (Tier 01) category, meaning every active investor was a new landlord.

The average purchase price for these new landlords was $218,737. There was no transaction activity from mid-size or institutional tiers, so no price comparison can be made between small and large investors for this period.

Notably, there was zero inter-landlord trading activity recorded in the quarter. All 6 properties acquired by new landlords were purchased from non-landlord sellers, suggesting that new entrants are sourcing inventory from the general homeowner market rather than from other investors divesting assets.

The transactional data confirms the findings from other sections: the market's dynamism comes from a steady stream of new, small-scale investors entering the rental market, not from the trading activity of established or large-scale players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Washakie County's real estate investor market is defined by small, local landlords who control 97.5% of holdings and are actively accumulating properties.
Holdings
Landlords own 589 single-family properties, representing 23.1% of Washakie County's market. Individual investors hold a commanding 75.6% of these properties (445 homes), with companies owning the remaining 24.4% (157 homes).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured a 6.5% discount compared to homeowners, paying $218,737 versus $233,960. This reverses a 2025 trend where investors frequently paid significant premiums for properties.
Activity
Landlords accounted for 21.4% of purchases in the last quarter (6 of 28 homes). All 6 of these acquisitions were made by new, single-property landlords, signaling grassroots market entry with zero institutional buying activity.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the market, controlling 97.5% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just a single property (0.2%).
Ownership Type
While individuals overwhelm the entry-level tier, companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 3-5 properties. This indicates a trend of professionalization as investors expand their holdings beyond a couple of properties.
Transactions
Landlords remain net buyers, with a 1.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (6 buys vs 4 sells), continuing a multi-year trend of accumulation. The single institutional investor, however, was neutral in 2025, with one buy and one sell.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Washakie County, Wyoming, is fundamentally a local affair, shaped almost entirely by small-scale operators. Investors own a notable 23.1% of the single-family housing market, a total of 589 properties. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a massive 97.5% share. Individual investors own 75.6% of all investor properties, reinforcing the grassroots nature of the market. In stark contrast, institutional capital is virtually absent, with only a single property held by an investor in the 1000+ tier.

Investor behavior in the first quarter of 2026 points to savvy acquisition strategies and continued market growth. Landlords were involved in 16.7% of all transactions and demonstrated a return to disciplined buying, securing a 6.5% price discount compared to traditional homeowners. This marks a significant reversal from 2025, a year characterized by investors paying premiums. Furthermore, landlords continue to be net buyers, with acquisitions outpacing sales, a trend that has held steady for several years. All recent purchasing activity has come from new, single-property investors, indicating a healthy and accessible entry point into the local rental market.

The key takeaway from the data is that Washakie County's rental housing market is not driven by large corporations but by a broad base of local individuals and small businesses. The high concentration of ownership in certain zip codes, like the 64.8% rate in 82442, shows that this investment is hyper-focused. The market's stability is further suggested by the high prevalence of cash-owned properties. For anyone analyzing this market, the story is clear: it is a market of, by, and for the small, local landlord.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 06:16 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Washakie (WY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Washakie (WY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-wy-washakie/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.