Rolette (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Rolette (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Rolette (ND)
783
Total Investors in Rolette (ND)
381
Investor Owned SFR in Rolette (ND)
272(34.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
370
SFR Owned
263
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
11
SFR Owned
10
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 272 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Individual Landlords Dominate Rolette County, Owning 34.7% of a Market Untouched by Institutions
Investors own 272 single-family properties in Rolette County, North Dakota, representing a high 34.7% market penetration. The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals (96.7% of holdings), with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounting for 99.3% of the investor-owned housing stock. In Q1 2026, investors were highly active, comprising 81.8% of all transactions and acting as strong net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 272 properties, 34.7% of the market, with individuals holding 96.7%.
Of these holdings, 189 properties were acquired with cash, more than double the 83 that are financed. All 272 investor-owned properties are classified as non-owner-occupied rentals. Individual landlords (370) vastly outnumber company landlords (11).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired Q1 properties at a 60.1% discount, paying $65,881 vs $165,000 for homeowners.
The price gap is highly volatile, swinging from a massive 252.3% premium paid by landlords in Q3 2025 to the significant 60.1% discount in Q1 2026. This volatility is likely driven by the extremely low transaction volume in the market. There is insufficient data to compare individual and company investor pricing.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025, purchasing 88.9% of all homes sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 75.0% of all investor purchases. No institutional investors were active. The quarter saw the entry of 7 new single-property landlords into the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.3% of investor-owned SFRs in Rolette County.
Single-property landlords alone own 266 properties, representing 97.4% of all investor housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in this market, holding 0.0% of the portfolio. Pricing data by tier is too limited for a meaningful comparison.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own nearly all investor properties, with no price comparison possible due to low volume.
Individuals own 97.0% of single-property portfolios and 100% of two-property portfolios. Companies do not become the majority owners at any tier, holding only a handful of properties in total. There is no institutional company ownership in the county.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 58367, which holds 119 investor-owned properties.
The highest investor penetration rates are in smaller zip codes like 58310, where investors own 100.0% of the SFR housing stock. Zip code 58316 also shows a high concentration with a 51.9% investor ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
This accumulation trend is consistent over time, with landlords maintaining a strong net buyer position in 2025 (23 buys vs. 2 sells) and 2024 (20 buys vs. 1 sell). No data exists for institutional transactions, as they are not active in the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors drove 81.8% of market transactions in Q1 2026.
Single-property landlords were the most active, accounting for 7 of the 9 investor transactions. These new entrants paid an average of $57,050 and acquired all their properties from non-landlords. The one mid-size investor purchase was a landlord-to-landlord deal.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 272 properties, 34.7% of the market, with individuals holding 96.7%.
Detailed Findings

In Rolette County, investors hold a significant 34.7% of the single-family residential market, totaling 272 out of 783 properties. This high concentration indicates a mature rental market where a substantial portion of housing is provided by landlords.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals, who own 263 properties, or 96.7% of the entire investor portfolio. In contrast, companies own just 10 properties (3.7%), highlighting a market driven by local, small-scale real estate investing rather than corporate ownership.

Cash is the preferred financing method for investors in this region. Cash purchases account for 189 properties, more than twice the 83 properties that are financed. This suggests that many investors have high liquidity and can acquire properties without relying on traditional mortgage debt.

The entity count further underscores the market's composition. There are 370 individual landlords compared to only 11 company entities, a ratio of more than 33 to 1. This shows the granular nature of ownership, with many individuals participating in the market.

As expected by the definition of an investor, all 272 properties in the landlord-owned portfolio are classified as rented and non-owner-occupied, confirming their use as rental housing for the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired Q1 properties at a 60.1% discount, paying $65,881 vs $165,000 for homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition pricing in Rolette County shows extreme volatility due to low transaction volumes, but the most recent data points to a significant purchasing advantage. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of just $65,881, which is $99,119 less than the $165,000 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a 60.1% discount.

This massive discount in the current quarter contrasts sharply with previous periods, highlighting market inconsistency. For instance, in Q3 2025, the single recorded landlord purchase was at $537,246, a 252.3% premium over the homeowner average of $152,500. This swing suggests that quarterly averages are highly influenced by the specific type and condition of the few properties transacted.

Recent history shows minimal purchasing activity, with zero landlord acquisitions recorded for most of 2025 and 2024. This pattern indicates a market with infrequent opportunities, where investors act decisively when suitable properties become available.

The long-term pricing trend shows a gradual increase from the 2020-2023 average of $140,631, but the quarterly data is too sparse to establish a reliable short-term appreciation or depreciation trend.

Due to the limited number of transactions, a meaningful price comparison between individual and company investors is not possible, as both groups have had little to no recent purchasing activity to analyze.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025, purchasing 88.9% of all homes sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in the fourth quarter of 2025, with landlords acquiring 8 of the 9 total SFR properties sold in Rolette County. This 88.9% market share demonstrates near-total dominance of purchasing activity during the period.

The backbone of this activity was mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 6 of the 8 landlord purchases, or 75.0% of the investor total. Institutional investors (Tier 09) had no purchase activity, reinforcing their absence from this market.

New entrants were a key feature of the quarter. The single-property tier alone accounted for 6 property purchases (75.0% of the landlord total), driven by 7 distinct entities. This indicates a healthy influx of new, first-time landlords.

Activity was concentrated at the smallest and largest ends of the local scale. Besides the new entrants, one purchase was made by an investor in the 21-50 property tier and another by a landlord in the 101-1000 property tier.

This concentration of purchases among new, small-scale investors signals a grassroots expansion of the rental market rather than a consolidation by larger players. These new landlords are absorbing the available inventory for rental purposes.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.3% of investor-owned SFRs in Rolette County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Rolette County is the epitome of a market dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control 99.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.

This market is defined by its smallest participants. Landlords with just a single property (Tier 01) own 266 homes, which accounts for an overwhelming 97.4% of the entire investor-owned housing stock. This highlights that the rental market is primarily supported by individuals with one investment property.

The next largest tier, two-property landlords, holds only 5 properties (1.8%), showing a steep drop-off in portfolio size. This distribution confirms that ownership is not concentrated among a few mid-size players but is widely distributed among many small ones.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have absolutely no footprint in Rolette County, with 0.0% ownership. This market is completely independent of large-scale corporate rental operators.

The lack of consistent transaction data across different tiers makes it impossible to draw meaningful conclusions about whether larger or smaller investors pay more or less for properties in this specific geography.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individuals own nearly all investor properties, with no price comparison possible due to low volume.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Rolette County is almost entirely composed of individual owners, leaving little room for a comparative analysis against companies. Individuals own 259 of the 266 single-property portfolios (97.0%) and all 5 of the two-property portfolios (100.0%).

Unlike in larger urban markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Company ownership is minimal, with just 8 properties in the single-property tier, and does not increase in larger tiers.

The minimal presence of corporate entities means that the market's character, from acquisition strategies to landlord-tenant relations, is dictated by the decisions of individual, small-scale investors.

Given the low transaction volumes for both owner types, it is not feasible to compare acquisition prices between individuals and companies within any tier. The available assessor data does not contain enough recent sales to support such an analysis.

This ownership structure defies the trend of professionalization and corporatization seen in other markets, representing a traditional, community-based rental landscape.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 58367, which holds 119 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Within Rolette County, investor ownership is geographically concentrated, with the 58367 zip code serving as the primary hub. This area contains 119 investor-owned SFR properties, representing 43.8% of the county's total investor portfolio, at an ownership rate of 43.9%.

While 58367 leads in raw numbers, other smaller zip codes exhibit even higher saturation rates. The 58310 zip code stands out with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting it may be a small area where all residential properties are rentals.

High penetration is also evident in 58316, where 51.9% of homes are investor-owned, and 58363, with a 40.0% rate. These pockets of intense investor activity indicate specific neighborhoods are particularly attractive for rental investments.

The top five regions by sheer count are 58367 (119 properties), 58366 (46 properties), 58329 (39 properties), 58369 (32 properties), and 58316 (28 properties).

This analysis reveals a dual pattern: a central area with a large volume of investor properties, and several smaller, peripheral areas with extremely high percentages of investor ownership, pointing to varied investment strategies across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Rolette County are in a clear accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated this with a 9-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, acquiring 9 properties while only divesting 1.

This behavior is not a recent development but a sustained trend. In the full year of 2025, investors were net buyers by a margin of 21 properties (23 buys vs. 2 sells). Similarly, in 2024, they were net buyers by 19 properties (20 buys vs. 1 sell).

This persistent net buying activity signals strong confidence in the local rental market and a long-term strategy of portfolio growth among the county's investors.

There is insufficient data to analyze inter-landlord transaction trends or compare buy-and-sell pricing, as transaction volumes are too low to provide stable averages. The focus remains on net acquisition.

As institutional investors have no presence in Rolette County, their transaction patterns are not a factor. The market's transactional dynamics are exclusively shaped by the buying and selling behavior of small, local landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors drove 81.8% of market transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were the dominant force in the Rolette County real estate market, participating in 9 of the 11 total SFR transactions, an 81.8% share. This high level of involvement underscores their critical role in market liquidity.

Activity was heavily skewed towards the smallest investors. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were involved in 7 transactions, demonstrating that new and small-scale investors are the most active buyers. In contrast, institutional tiers recorded zero transactions.

A clear difference in sourcing emerges by tier. The 7 purchases by single-property investors were all sourced from non-landlords (0% from landlords), indicating they are acquiring properties from traditional homeowners. Conversely, the single transaction in the 21-50 property tier was a landlord-to-landlord deal (100%), suggesting portfolio trading among more established players.

Purchase prices also varied by tier. The smallest investors in Tier 01 paid the lowest average price at $57,050. The single purchase by a large-tier (101-1000) landlord was significantly higher at $110,040, suggesting different asset targets based on investor size.

This transactional behavior shows a bifurcated market: new investors are buying lower-priced homes from the general public to enter the market, while the few established landlords are trading assets among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Rolette County's housing is 35% investor-owned, with individual mom-and-pop landlords controlling nearly 100% of the rental market.
Holdings
Landlords own 272 SFR properties, representing 34.7% of Rolette County's market, with individual investors holding an overwhelming 263 properties (96.7%) compared to just 10 (3.7%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties for 60.1% less than homeowners, paying an average of $65,881 versus $165,000, though pricing is volatile due to low sales volume.
Activity
Investors dominated Q1 2026 activity, purchasing 8 of 9 available properties (88.9% share), with 7 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.3% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence with 0.0% ownership.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes, owning 96.7% of all investor-held properties; companies never achieve majority status at any tier.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (9 buys vs 1 sell), a trend consistent with prior years. There was no institutional transaction activity.
Market Narrative

In Rolette County, North Dakota, the single-family rental market presents a unique microcosm of hyper-local, small-scale ownership, a stark contrast to national trends. Investors own 272 properties, a significant 34.7% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This market is unequivocally controlled by individuals, who own 263 of these homes (96.7%), leaving a mere 3.7% for companies. The ownership structure is further defined by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a near-total 99.3% share, while institutional investors with portfolios over 1,000 properties are entirely absent.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive acquisition and strategic purchasing. In the most recent quarter, landlords dominated the sales market, accounting for 81.8% of all transactions and operating as decisive net buyers with a 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio. This activity is fueled by new entrants, with 7 single-property investors joining the market. These smaller investors appear to secure significant discounts, paying 60.1% less than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, though this figure reflects a market with very low transaction volume and high price volatility.

The key takeaway for Rolette County is the resilience of a traditional rental market completely untouched by institutional capital. The high investor penetration rate of 34.7% is not a sign of corporate consolidation but of a deeply rooted community of individual landlords providing rental housing. The market's health and direction are dictated by the actions of these small, local players who continue to accumulate properties, signaling strong confidence in the region's long-term rental demand. This makes it a case study in how a rural market can maintain a distinct ownership and operational character.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:10 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Rolette (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Rolette (ND) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nd-rolette/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.