Sarpy (NE) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sarpy (NE) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sarpy (NE)
60,227
Total Investors in Sarpy (NE)
7,969
Investor Owned SFR in Sarpy (NE)
6,143(10.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
7,112
SFR Owned
4,792
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
857
SFR Owned
1,453
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 6,143 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop investors command 92.7% of Sarpy County's rental market as overall investor activity cools
Investors own 6,143 SFR properties in Sarpy County (10.2% of the market), with individual investors comprising 78.0% of all holdings. In Q1 2026, landlords secured a 14.7% discount compared to homeowners but reversed a two-year trend by becoming net sellers, driven by institutional divestment.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 6,143 SFRs in Sarpy County, with individuals holding 78.0% of the portfolio.
Within this portfolio, 3,362 properties are financed while 2,781 are owned outright in cash. Individual landlords (7,112) vastly outnumber company landlords (857), reinforcing the market's small-investor foundation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 14.7% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a discount of $54,446 per property.
This price advantage is volatile, swinging from a massive 24.8% discount in Q1 2025 to a 0.3% premium in Q2 2025. The Q1 2026 discount of $54,446 ($316,648 vs $371,094) marks a return to significant savings for investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors represented a small fraction of the market in Q4 2025, purchasing just 21 properties, or 3.5% of all sales.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 18 of the 21 purchases (85.7%). In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made zero acquisitions during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 92.7% of Sarpy County's investor-owned SFRs.
This contrasts sharply with institutional investors (1,000+ properties), who own just 26 properties, a mere 0.4% of the landlord portfolio. The single-property tier alone accounts for 73.4% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6-10 properties and larger.
While individuals own over 90% of single-property portfolios, their share drops to 28.9% in the 6-10 property tier. In the 21-50 property tier, companies own a staggering 99.6% of the homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 68005 with 1,142 properties, while 68069 has the highest penetration rate at 55.6%.
The top five zip codes by property count hold a combined 4,150 investor-owned homes. Notably, the area with the highest ownership rate (68069) is not among the top five by sheer volume, indicating different pockets of investor strategy.
Historical Transactions
Sarpy County investors flipped from net buyers to net sellers in Q1 2026, a sharp reversal from two years of accumulation.
After purchasing a net 229 properties in 2024 and 87 in 2025, landlords sold a net 21 properties in the first quarter of 2026. Institutional investors have been consistent net sellers, divesting a net 1 property in 2024 and remaining neutral in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for just 3.3% of all Q1 2026 transactions, with 29 purchases out of 876 total sales.
Single-property investors dominated this activity, making 25 of the 29 transactions. These smaller investors paid an average of $322,354, and only 8.0% of their purchases were from other landlords, sourcing most deals from the open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 6,143 SFRs in Sarpy County, with individuals holding 78.0% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Sarpy County, investors hold a significant 6,143 single-family residential properties, accounting for 10.2% of the total 60,227 SFRs in the market. This establishes a notable footprint for real estate investing in the region.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards small-scale operators, with individual investors owning 4,792 properties, or 78.0% of the total investor portfolio. Company-owned properties number 1,453, making up the remaining 23.7%, challenging the narrative of a corporate-dominated rental market.

A look at financing reveals that more properties are leveraged than owned outright. Of the investor-owned homes, 3,362 are financed, compared to 2,781 held in cash, suggesting that access to credit is a key enabler of portfolio growth in the county.

The vast majority of investor-owned properties, 5,958 in total, are classified as rented or non-owner-occupied. This high rental penetration underscores the primary business model for SFR investors in the area.

The disparity between entity types is stark. There are 7,112 individual landlords compared to just 857 company landlords. This 8-to-1 ratio of individual to company entities further demonstrates that the market is primarily driven by small, independent operators rather than large corporations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 14.7% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a discount of $54,446 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $316,648. This was 14.7% less than the $371,094 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a substantial $54,446 in savings on the typical purchase.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown significant volatility over the past year. While investors paid a 0.3% premium in Q2 2025 ($417,770 vs $416,528), they achieved a staggering 24.8% discount just one quarter prior in Q1 2025 ($297,196 vs $394,999). This fluctuation highlights shifting market dynamics and negotiating power.

The most recent quarter's 14.7% discount signals a strong negotiating position for investors compared to the minimal 1.4% discount seen in Q3 2025. This may reflect a cooling market where cash offers and quick closes from investors are more appealing to sellers.

Overall acquisition prices have risen steadily from the pandemic era. The average price during 2020-2023 was $291,151, which climbed to $324,443 in 2024 and reached a high of $379,376 for the full year 2025, indicating strong market appreciation.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors represented a small fraction of the market in Q4 2025, purchasing just 21 properties, or 3.5% of all sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity was muted in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring only 21 of the 593 total SFRs sold in Sarpy County. This represents a modest 3.5% market share, indicating a cautious approach from investors heading into the new year.

The quarter's activity was overwhelmingly dominated by the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 18 of the 21 acquisitions, or 85.7% of all investor purchases, highlighting the grassroots nature of market entry and expansion.

First-time or single-property investors were the most active group, with 25 new entities acquiring 18 properties. This continuous influx of new participants is the primary driver of growth in the local rental market.

Mid-size landlords in the 21-50 property tier made a small impact, purchasing 3 properties (14.3%), while institutional investors with over 1,000 properties were completely absent from the buying side, recording zero purchases in Q4.

The minimal acquisition volume from larger investors, coupled with the dominance of new entrants, suggests a market environment that favors smaller, more agile operators over large-scale portfolio expansion.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 92.7% of Sarpy County's investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Sarpy County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, collectively hold 92.7% of all investor-owned single-family homes, shaping the core of the local rental market.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of this group, owning 4,634 properties. This single tier represents 73.4% of the entire investor portfolio, indicating that the path to becoming a landlord is the most common form of real estate investment in the county.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000 or more properties have a negligible footprint. Their holdings of just 26 properties amount to only 0.4% of the investor market, debunking any narrative of a Wall Street takeover in Sarpy County.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) occupy a small niche, controlling a combined 7.0% of the market. This group includes small-to-medium operators (4.4% for the 21-50 tier) and larger local players, but their collective share remains minor compared to the mom-and-pop segment.

This distribution, based on comprehensive assessor data, shows a highly fragmented market where ownership is dispersed among thousands of small operators rather than concentrated in the hands of a few large firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6-10 properties and larger.
Detailed Findings

A clear transition in ownership structure occurs as investor portfolios grow in Sarpy County. While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners starting in the 6-10 property tier.

For the smallest investors, individual ownership is the norm. Individuals own 90.3% of single-property portfolios and 70.0% of two-property portfolios. Even in the 3-5 property range, individuals maintain a majority at 56.5%.

The crossover point happens definitively in the 6-10 property tier, where company ownership jumps to 71.1%, leaving individuals with just 28.9%. This suggests that as portfolios scale, investors increasingly adopt formal business structures for liability and management purposes.

This trend accelerates in larger tiers. Companies own 88.8% of properties in the 11-20 tier and an overwhelming 99.6% in the 21-50 property tier. This near-total corporate ownership in larger portfolios is a hallmark of professional real estate operations.

This data reveals two distinct investor paths: the individual who typically owns a few properties as a personal investment, and the professional operator who uses a corporate entity to build a larger, scalable business.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 68005 with 1,142 properties, while 68069 has the highest penetration rate at 55.6%.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals specific hotspots of investor activity in Sarpy County. The zip code 68005 leads by volume, containing 1,142 investor-owned properties, which represents a 17.2% ownership rate for that area.

Following 68005, other key areas for investor concentration by count include 68123 (1,018 properties), 68046 (846 properties), 68136 (645 properties), and 68147 (499 properties). Together, these five zip codes account for a significant portion of the county's rental inventory.

However, the highest concentration by percentage is found elsewhere. The zip code 68069 stands out with an investor ownership rate of 55.6%, meaning more than half of the single-family homes there are owned by investors. This extreme concentration points to a unique local market dynamic or a targeted acquisition strategy.

The distinction between volume and rate leaders is important. While areas like 68005 and 68123 have the most rental homes, smaller areas like 68069 and 68059 (17.8% rate) have the highest density of investor ownership. This suggests different strategies, from broad market participation to niche targeting.

This data highlights that investor presence is not uniform across the county. Certain neighborhoods are clear focal points for rental property acquisition, creating distinct sub-markets with higher-than-average landlord activity.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Sarpy County investors flipped from net buyers to net sellers in Q1 2026, a sharp reversal from two years of accumulation.
Detailed Findings

A significant shift in market behavior occurred in Q1 2026, as landlords in Sarpy County became net sellers for the first time in over two years. They sold 50 properties while buying only 29, resulting in a net disposition of 21 properties.

This marks a clear reversal of a strong accumulation trend. In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers with 359 purchases versus 130 sales (a net gain of 229 properties). This cooled slightly in 2025 but remained positive, with 227 buys and 140 sells (a net gain of 87 properties).

The institutional tier (1,000+ properties) has been a leading indicator of this selling pressure. These large investors were already net sellers in 2024, with 3 buys against 4 sells. In 2025, their activity was neutral, with 2 buys and 2 sells, showing a consistent lack of appetite for expansion.

The Q1 2026 data, showing a negative net transaction count for the entire landlord pool, suggests that the selling trend initiated by institutions may now be spreading to the broader market. This could signal a belief that the market has peaked or a strategic move to reallocate capital.

This trend reversal from aggressive buying to net selling is a critical market signal, potentially indicating a shift in investor sentiment regarding future price appreciation and rental market conditions in Sarpy County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for just 3.3% of all Q1 2026 transactions, with 29 purchases out of 876 total sales.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investor transaction activity remained subdued, with landlords participating in only 29 of the 876 total SFR sales in Sarpy County. This 3.3% market share indicates that the vast majority of transactions involved traditional homeowners or other buyer types.

Activity was almost exclusively driven by the smallest investors. The single-property tier accounted for 25 of the 29 landlord transactions, reinforcing that new and small-scale landlords are the primary source of investor demand in the current market.

Interestingly, these small investors paid one of the highest average prices at $322,354 per property. This is notably higher than the $270,995 paid by the few active mid-size investors (21-50 property tier), suggesting new entrants may be paying a premium to enter the market.

Inter-landlord trading was minimal. Only 8.0% of properties purchased by single-property investors were acquired from other landlords. This indicates that new investors are primarily buying from the general public (i.e., homeowners) rather than participating in a specialized investor-to-investor marketplace.

The low overall transaction share, combined with the concentration of activity among new entrants paying relatively high prices, paints a picture of a cautious but still-functioning entry-level investor market in Sarpy County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 92.7% of Sarpy County's investor market as the sector shifts to net selling in 2026
Holdings
Investors own 6,143 SFR properties, representing 10.2% of Sarpy County's market, with individual investors holding a dominant 78.0% (4,792 properties) compared to companies at 23.7% (1,453 properties).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $316,648, securing a 14.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners ($371,094), a savings of $54,446 per property.
Activity
Investor purchasing was limited in Q4 2025, accounting for only 3.5% of sales, with mom-and-pop landlords responsible for 85.7% of those 21 acquisitions and zero purchases from institutional investors.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 92.7% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.4% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the backbone of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and represent nearly 100% of holdings in tiers above 20 properties.
Transactions
After two years as net buyers, landlords became net sellers in Q1 2026 (29 buys vs 50 sells), a trend led by institutional investors who have been net sellers since 2024.
Market Narrative

This Investor Pulse report for Sarpy County, NE reveals a rental market fundamentally driven by small, independent operators. Landlords own 6,143 single-family homes, or 10.2% of the total market. The structure of this ownership defies the corporate landlord narrative: individual investors own 78.0% of these properties, and small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 homes) control a commanding 92.7% of the entire investor portfolio. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 homes have a minimal presence, holding just 0.4% of investor-owned SFRs.

Investor behavior in early 2026 signals a potential market shift. After two years of steady accumulation, landlords became net sellers in Q1 2026, selling 21 more properties than they acquired. This aligns with a pattern of divestment from institutional investors, who have been net sellers since 2024. Despite this cooling trend, active investors still demonstrate a key advantage, securing properties in Q1 at a 14.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners. Acquisition activity is almost entirely concentrated at the entry-level, with new, single-property landlords dominating the few purchases being made.

The key takeaway for Sarpy County is the resilience and dominance of the mom-and-pop investor. While institutions are retreating and overall activity is slowing, new individuals continue to enter the market. The high concentration of ownership in specific zip codes, such as 68005 by volume and 68069 by rate, highlights that investor strategy is highly localized. The market's future will be shaped not by Wall Street, but by the collective decisions of thousands of small investors navigating local economic conditions.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:37 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Sarpy (NE)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Sarpy (NE) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ne-sarpy/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.