Greene (AR) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Greene (AR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Greene (AR)
12,670
Total Investors in Greene (AR)
2,771
Investor Owned SFR in Greene (AR)
2,846(22.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,351
SFR Owned
1,944
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
420
SFR Owned
929
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,846 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Greene County with 85.7% Ownership as Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
In Greene County, AR, investors own 22.5% of the SFR market, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a commanding 85.7% of that share. In Q1, investors purchased properties at a 57.0% discount compared to homeowners, and while the overall market remains in a strong buying phase, institutional investors are net sellers, signaling a clear divergence in strategy.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,846 SFR properties in Greene County, with individuals holding a 68.3% majority share.
Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 1,988 properties owned outright versus 858 that are financed. The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, as 95.2% of these properties (2,709) are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors acquired Q1 properties at a massive 57.0% discount to homeowners, paying $125,827 less per home.
This pricing advantage shows extreme volatility, as it follows a quarter in 2025 (Q2) where investors paid a 26.9% premium. The available data does not provide a pricing breakdown between individual and company buyers.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 24.2% of all SFR properties sold in Greene County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove this activity, accounting for 69.4% of all investor purchases (25 properties). In contrast, institutional investors made up just 5.6% of acquisitions (2 properties).
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 85.7% of investor-owned SFRs in Greene County.
This heavy concentration among small investors dwarfs the institutional share, which stands at just 0.3% (9 properties). Tier-specific pricing data was not available for comparison.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, a key crossover from individual-led portfolios.
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 87.2% of single-property rentals. The shift to corporate ownership solidifies in the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 67.3% of the assets.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Greene County is heavily concentrated in the Paragould zip code of 72450, which contains 2,556 investor-owned properties.
While Paragould leads in volume, smaller zip codes show higher market penetration. The 72453 zip code has the highest investor ownership rate at 75.0%, and 72425 is also a hotspot with a 40.5% rate.
Historical Transactions
A clear divergence emerges: institutional investors are net sellers (-2), while all other landlords are strong net buyers (+30) in Q1.
This institutional retreat was also evident in 2024, when they were net sellers of 1 property. Meanwhile, overall landlord buying has remained robust, with 247 purchases in 2025 closely tracking the 278 purchases in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 22.0% of all Greene County SFR transactions in Q1, making 45 purchases.
A vast pricing gap exists between investor tiers, with institutional buyers paying 103.8% more per property than single-property investors ($185,326 vs $90,917). Mid-size landlords (11-20 properties) sourced 50% of their acquisitions from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,846 SFR properties in Greene County, with individuals holding a 68.3% majority share.
Detailed Findings

In Greene County, AR, real estate investor portfolios comprise 2,846 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 22.5% of the total 12,670 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors form the backbone of the rental market, owning 1,944 properties, which represents a 68.3% majority of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, company-owned portfolios consist of 929 properties, or 32.6% of the total.

The market shows a strong preference for cash transactions, with 1,988 properties owned free and clear, nearly double the 858 properties that are financed. This indicates a highly capitalized and low-leverage investor base in the county.

The primary strategy for investors is clear: providing rental housing. Of the 2,846 investor-owned properties, 2,709 are confirmed as rented, meaning 95.2% of the portfolio is actively used for non-owner-occupied purposes.

The number of individual landlords (2,351) far surpasses the number of company landlords (420), reinforcing that the market is driven by a large volume of small, independent operators rather than a few large corporations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors acquired Q1 properties at a massive 57.0% discount to homeowners, paying $125,827 less per home.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords in Greene County demonstrated remarkable purchasing power, acquiring properties for an average price of $94,897. This was $125,827 less than the $220,724 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a staggering 57.0% discount.

This significant discount marks a dramatic reversal from previous quarters. For instance, in Q2 2025, investors paid a premium of 26.9% over homeowners ($265,150 vs $209,021), highlighting extreme volatility in the price gap between these buyer types.

The Q1 2026 discount is the largest observed in the past year, far exceeding the 52.3% discount in Q3 2025 and the 37.7% discount in Q1 2025. This suggests a highly favorable buying environment for investors at the start of the year.

Analysis of historical prices shows a fluctuating market. The average landlord acquisition price of $94,897 in Q1 2026 is lower than prices seen throughout 2024 ($121,166 avg) and the 2020-2023 period ($143,859 avg), indicating a potential market cool-down or a shift in the types of properties being acquired by investors.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 24.2% of all SFR properties sold in Greene County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the Greene County real estate market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 36 of the 149 total SFRs sold, a market share of 24.2%.

The acquisition landscape was dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 69.4% of all investor purchases, acquiring 25 new properties for their portfolios.

New investors entering the market were a major force, with the single-property tier alone accounting for 15 purchases (41.7% of the total). This activity was spread across 22 distinct new landlord entities, signaling robust growth at the entry level.

Institutional activity was minimal in comparison. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier purchased only 2 properties, representing just 5.6% of landlord acquisitions for the quarter.

Mid-size landlords also showed steady activity, with those owning 11-50 properties adding 7 new homes, and those in the 101-1,000 property tier acquiring 2 homes.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 85.7% of investor-owned SFRs in Greene County.
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned housing market in Greene County is overwhelmingly controlled by small, independent landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) hold a combined 85.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords alone represent the largest segment, owning 1,676 properties. This accounts for 56.4% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, highlighting the fragmented nature of the market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint in the county, owning just 9 properties, which translates to a mere 0.3% of the investor market share.

The ownership distribution clearly shows a gradual drop-off as portfolio sizes increase. Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) collectively own 14.0% of the inventory, demonstrating a market structure built on a broad base of small operators rather than consolidation among large players.

This ownership structure defies the common narrative of corporate dominance, proving that the rental landscape in Greene County is shaped by thousands of individual and small-business decisions.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, a key crossover from individual-led portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure evolves significantly as investors expand their portfolios. While individuals dominate the entry-level tiers, companies take control as portfolio sizes grow.

For single-property landlords, individuals are the overwhelming majority, owning 1,475 properties (87.2%) compared to just 216 (12.8%) for companies. This pattern continues for two-property portfolios, with individuals holding a 78.7% share.

The crucial crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier. At this stage, company ownership surpasses individual ownership, with companies holding 155 properties (56.0%) versus 122 for individuals (44.0%).

This trend toward corporate ownership accelerates in larger tiers. For investors with 11-20 properties, companies control a decisive 67.3% majority, holding 140 properties.

This pattern suggests a typical investor lifecycle: individuals start with one or two properties, but as their holdings scale past five properties, they increasingly shift to a more formal corporate structure for management, liability, and financial purposes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Greene County is heavily concentrated in the Paragould zip code of 72450, which contains 2,556 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in Greene County is highly concentrated, with the Paragould zip code 72450 serving as the epicenter of activity. This single area accounts for 2,556 investor-held SFRs.

Following Paragould, other notable areas by property count include the 72443 zip code with 119 investor properties and 72425 with 47 properties. This demonstrates a significant drop-off in volume outside the primary hub.

Analysis of ownership rates reveals a different story, highlighting markets with the highest investor penetration. The 72453 zip code leads with a 75.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting a market heavily dominated by rental properties.

Other areas with high investor saturation include 72425 (40.5% rate) and 72417 (33.3% rate). These high-percentage regions indicate concentrated investment strategies, even if the total number of properties is smaller than in Paragould.

The data shows a clear distinction between markets with high volume (like 72450) and those with high density. Investors appear to target both the main population center for scale and smaller, specific neighborhoods for higher market control.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
A clear divergence emerges: institutional investors are net sellers (-2), while all other landlords are strong net buyers (+30) in Q1.
Detailed Findings

A significant trend has emerged in Greene County's transaction data: institutional investors are divesting while the broader landlord market continues to acquire properties at a healthy pace.

In Q1 2026, landlords overall were strong net buyers, acquiring 45 properties while selling only 15, for a net gain of 30 properties. This continues a long-term trend of accumulation seen throughout 2025 (net +124) and 2024 (net +144).

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were net sellers in Q1 2026, selling 4 properties while only buying 2, for a net loss of 2 properties. This is not an isolated event, as they were also net sellers in 2024 (net -1).

While institutions showed a slight net buying position in 2025 (net +3), their recent activity points towards a strategic retreat from the Greene County market, even as smaller investors remain bullish.

This divergence signals a potential shift in the market, where large-scale capital is exiting while local and smaller-scale investors are stepping in to absorb inventory and expand their portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 22.0% of all Greene County SFR transactions in Q1, making 45 purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q1, landlords were a significant force in the transaction market, accounting for 45 of the 205 total SFR sales in Greene County, a market share of 22.0%.

The most active buyers were new and small investors. The single-property tier led all groups with 22 transactions, representing nearly half of all investor purchases and indicating a continuous influx of new entrants.

A dramatic price disparity exists across investor tiers. Institutional investors paid the highest average price at $185,326, which is 103.8% more than the $90,917 average paid by single-property landlords. This suggests institutions target higher-value assets compared to smaller buyers.

The smallest investors often find the best prices, with the 11-20 property tier acquiring homes for just $40,000 on average, the lowest of any group.

Inter-landlord trading provided liquidity, particularly for mid-size investors. Landlords in the 11-20 property tier acquired 50% of their new properties from other landlords, the highest rate of any group. In contrast, only 18.2% of purchases by new single-property landlords came from existing investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Greene County with 85.7% Ownership as Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Holdings
In Greene County, AR, landlords own 2,846 SFR properties, representing 22.5% of the total market. Individual investors are the majority, holding 1,944 properties (68.3%) compared to 929 (32.6%) for companies.
Pricing
Investors demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q1, paying 57.0% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $125,827 per property ($94,897 vs. $220,724).
Activity
Landlords acquired 24.2% of properties sold in the last quarter, with 22 new single-property landlords entering the market, underscoring the strength of small-scale investing.
Market Share
The market is highly fragmented, with small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 85.7% of investor housing, while institutional investors own a minimal 0.3%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume majority control in portfolios larger than 6 properties, where they own 56.0% of the assets.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 3-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 (45 buys vs. 15 sells), but institutional investors are moving in the opposite direction, acting as net sellers (2 buys vs. 4 sells).
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Greene County, Arkansas is defined by the dominance of small, independent operators. Investors own 2,846 single-family homes, making up 22.5% of the county's total SFR market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who hold 85.7% of the investor-owned inventory. Individual investors represent the core of this group, owning 68.3% of all properties, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, controlling just 0.3%.

Investor behavior in the first quarter reveals sophisticated acquisition strategies and a diverging market. Landlords purchased properties at a remarkable 57.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners, signaling an ability to find and secure undervalued assets. While the overall investor market continues to expand, evidenced by a 3-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1, a clear split has emerged. Institutional investors are actively divesting, operating as net sellers, while new, smaller investors continue to enter the market, with 22 new single-property landlords making purchases last quarter.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that the Greene County rental market is not corporatizing; rather, it's becoming more fragmented and localized. The retreat of institutional capital, contrasted with the steady influx of small-scale buyers, suggests that local market knowledge and smaller, more agile operations are the winning formula. This trend solidifies the role of the individual investor as the primary provider of rental housing in the region, a dynamic that shapes local market stability and affordability.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 20, 2026 at 09:21 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Greene (AR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Greene (AR) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ar-greene/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.