Neshoba (MS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Neshoba (MS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Neshoba (MS)
6,198
Total Investors in Neshoba (MS)
667
Investor Owned SFR in Neshoba (MS)
600(9.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
591
SFR Owned
508
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
76
SFR Owned
96
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 600 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Neshoba County Investor Market: Dominated by Individual Landlords Amid a Transactional Freeze
Investors own 600 Single-Family Residential properties in Neshoba County, representing 9.7% of the total market. The landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals (84.7% of holdings) and small mom-and-pop landlords (96.1% of properties), with no institutional presence. Recent market activity has come to a standstill, with zero landlord purchases recorded in the latest quarter, preventing any current pricing analysis against homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 600 SFRs in Neshoba County, with individuals owning a dominant 84.7% share.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 560 (93.3%) being cash properties versus just 40 (6.7%) financed. Correspondingly, 585 properties (97.5%) are classified as rented, indicating a strong rental focus. Individual landlords (591 entities) far outnumber company landlords (76 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord purchases were recorded in recent quarters, making a price comparison to homeowners impossible.
The absence of landlord transactions in Q2 and Q3 of 2025 prevents analysis of the landlord-homeowner price gap. The only available historical data shows an average landlord acquisition price of $145,464 during the 2020-2023 period. In contrast, traditional homeowners were active, purchasing at an average of $100,000 in Q2 and $242,000 in Q3.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0% of the two total market sales.
With no acquisitions, mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both recorded zero purchases. The data indicates a complete lack of new investment or portfolio expansion from any investor segment during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 96.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 83.6% of all investor-held housing, with 508 properties. The market has zero presence from institutional investors (1000+ properties), confirming its small-scale, local character.
Ownership by Tier & Type
With no recent purchases, a price comparison between individual and company buyers is not possible.
Analysis of ownership tiers shows that companies never achieve majority ownership. Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, and even in the 11-20 property tier, ownership is split evenly at 50% between individuals (11 properties) and companies (11 properties).
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 39350 zip code, which holds 512 properties.
While 39350 has the highest count, smaller zip codes show higher penetration rates. The 39090 zip code has the highest investor ownership rate at 25.0%, followed by 39346 at 18.2%, despite having few properties.
Historical Transactions
Historical transaction data is unavailable, preventing analysis of net buyer/seller status or inter-landlord trading.
Without buy/sell transaction counts, it is impossible to determine if landlords have been net accumulators or sellers over time. Key metrics like the buy/sell price spread and the percentage of landlord-to-landlord sales cannot be calculated.
Current Quarter Transactions
The landlord share of Q4 2025 transactions was 0%, with zero properties bought or sold by investors.
With no transactions, purchase prices for all investor tiers, from mom-and-pop to institutional, were $0. Consequently, there was no inter-landlord trading activity during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 600 SFRs in Neshoba County, with individuals owning a dominant 84.7% share.
Detailed Findings

In Neshoba County, investors hold a portfolio of 600 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 9.7% of the county's 6,198 total SFRs. This establishes a significant, yet not dominant, investor footprint in the local housing market.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals, who own 508 properties, or 84.7% of the investor-owned market. Companies, in contrast, hold just 96 properties (16.0%). This pattern highlights a market driven by local, small-scale real estate investing rather than large corporate entities.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash ownership. An overwhelming 560 properties (93.3% of the portfolio) are owned outright, while only 40 properties (6.7%) are financed. This suggests investors in this area have high liquidity and may employ a low-leverage strategy.

The portfolio is almost entirely focused on rentals, with 585 of the 600 properties (97.5%) being rented out. This underscores the primary investor objective in Neshoba County: generating rental income over speculative flipping.

The entity count further reinforces the individual-driven nature of the market. There are 591 individual landlords compared to only 76 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 8 to 1. This shows the market's breadth is built on a large number of small players.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord purchases were recorded in recent quarters, making a price comparison to homeowners impossible.
Detailed Findings

A critical finding for Neshoba County is the complete halt in recent investor acquisition activity. Data shows zero properties were purchased by landlords in Q2 2025, Q3 2025, or throughout 2024 and 2025 to date. This signals a significant market pause or a shift in investor strategy in the current economic climate.

Due to the lack of recent transactions, it is not possible to calculate the current average acquisition price for landlords or compare it to traditional homeowners. This data gap itself is an insight, suggesting investors are either holding their positions or unable to find deals that meet their criteria.

The most recent benchmark for investor pricing comes from the 2020-2023 period, when landlords acquired properties at an average of $145,464. This historical figure provides context but cannot be used to assess current market dynamics.

While the investor market was dormant, traditional homeowners remained active. Homeowners purchased properties at an average price of $100,000 in Q2 2025 and $242,000 in Q3 2025. The significant price fluctuation between these two quarters for homeowners indicates a volatile market, which may be a contributing factor to investor hesitation.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0% of the two total market sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Neshoba County was non-existent in the fourth quarter of 2025. Landlords acquired zero of the two total SFR properties that were sold, resulting in a 0% market share for the period. This points to an exceptionally quiet or stalled market for investors.

The inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords, who constitute the vast majority of owners in the county, made no new purchases. This is particularly noteworthy as these smaller investors are typically the most active segment.

Similarly, larger investors, including institutional-scale players (Tier 09), also recorded zero acquisitions. While this is expected given their absence from the county's overall ownership rolls, it confirms that no new large-scale capital entered the market during the quarter.

The complete lack of acquisitions from any tier underscores a broader trend of investor reticence in Neshoba County. This could be driven by unfavorable pricing, limited inventory, or a strategic decision to hold existing assets rather than expand.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 96.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Neshoba County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords. Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) collectively own 96.1% of all investor-held SFRs, demonstrating a market built almost entirely on small, private capital.

First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market. This group owns 508 properties, which represents 83.6% of the entire investor-owned inventory. This high concentration indicates that the path to rental ownership in this county is primarily through single-home acquisitions.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) have a very small footprint, controlling just 3.8% of the inventory combined. This highlights a significant drop-off in portfolio size after the 10-property mark, suggesting few investors scale up to larger operations here.

There is a complete absence of institutional capital in the Neshoba County SFR market. Tier 09 investors (1000+ properties) own 0.0% of the properties, a stark contrast to narratives of corporate landlord takeovers seen in major metropolitan areas.

This ownership distribution underscores a localized market dynamic, where investment opportunities and capital flows are likely driven by community-level factors rather than national trends, a key finding in this Investor Pulse report.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
With no recent purchases, a price comparison between individual and company buyers is not possible.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across nearly every portfolio size in Neshoba County. In the crucial single-property tier, individuals own 455 properties (89.0%) compared to just 56 for companies (11.0%).

The data reveals there is no clear crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Even in the relatively larger tiers, individuals maintain a strong presence. For portfolios of 3-5 properties, individuals hold a slight majority at 52.9% (18 properties).

The largest tier with any significant activity, the 11-20 property group, shows a perfect split. Both individual and company owners hold 11 properties each (50.0%), indicating this is the peak tier for company penetration in the local market.

This consistent dominance by individual owners across the spectrum suggests that the business model for SFR investment in Neshoba County favors personal ownership over corporate structures, likely due to market scale and local financing conditions.

The lack of recent purchasing data for either owner type prevents any analysis of current acquisition strategies or price points, reinforcing the theme of a dormant transactional market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 39350 zip code, which holds 512 properties.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in Neshoba County is highly concentrated. The vast majority of activity is in the 39350 zip code, which contains 512 of the 600 total investor properties. This area has an investor ownership rate of 10.5%.

The second most active area by property count is the 39365 zip code, with 69 investor-owned homes and a lower ownership rate of 6.5%. This indicates that beyond 39350, investor holdings are much more dispersed.

Analysis of ownership rates reveals a different story, highlighting smaller pockets with high investor concentration. The 39090 zip code leads the county with a 25.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting one in every four SFRs there is investor-owned, though the total count is low.

Similarly, the 39346 (18.2%) and 39354 (10.7%) zip codes also show high investor penetration rates relative to the county average of 9.7%. This demonstrates that while the bulk of properties are in one area, the highest strategic concentrations are elsewhere.

This divergence between high-volume and high-percentage areas suggests different types of sub-markets within the county, some attracting a larger number of investors and others representing niche opportunities for a select few.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Historical transaction data is unavailable, preventing analysis of net buyer/seller status or inter-landlord trading.
Detailed Findings

A comprehensive analysis of long-term transaction trends in Neshoba County is not possible due to the absence of historical buy and sell data for landlords. This limitation obscures the overall market direction and investor sentiment over time.

Key performance indicators, such as the buy-to-sell ratio, cannot be calculated. Therefore, it remains undetermined whether landlords in the county have been in a phase of portfolio accumulation (net buyers) or divestment (net sellers).

The volume of inter-landlord trading, a crucial measure of market liquidity and sophistication, is also unknown. There is no data on the percentage of purchases from other landlords, which would typically indicate how investors source deals and recycle capital within the community.

Similarly, the average buy and sell prices over time are not available. This prevents an analysis of potential profit margins or price appreciation realized by investors upon disposition of their assets.

The lack of this transactional history from the available assessor data suggests a market with either infrequent turnover or data reporting limitations, which aligns with the observed lack of recent activity.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
The landlord share of Q4 2025 transactions was 0%, with zero properties bought or sold by investors.
Detailed Findings

The final quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete lack of transactional activity among Neshoba County's real estate investors. Landlords were involved in 0% of the 2 total SFR transactions in the market.

Transaction volume was zero across all investor tiers. Single-property landlords (Tier 01), who form the market's backbone, did not record any purchases, signaling that new entrants were not joining the market.

Likewise, all other mom-and-pop tiers (02-04) and mid-size landlords also posted zero transactions. This lack of movement from existing players suggests a holding pattern, with investors neither adding to nor divesting from their portfolios.

Given the zero-transaction environment, the average purchase price for every investor tier was effectively $0. This prevents any analysis of pricing strategies between different-sized investors for the period.

Unsurprisingly, the percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%. The absence of this internal market churn further reinforces the picture of a static, inactive investor community at the close of the year.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Neshoba County's investor market is defined by small, individual landlords and a recent freeze in buying activity.
Holdings
Investors own 600 SFR properties in Neshoba County, representing 9.7% of the market, with individual investors holding a commanding 84.7% (508 properties) of that portfolio.
Pricing
No landlord purchases were recorded in recent quarters, making a current price comparison against homeowners impossible. The last recorded average investor price was $145,464 during 2020-2023.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw zero purchases by landlords, giving them a 0% share of the 2 properties sold. No new single-property landlords entered the market, reflecting a standstill in activity.
Market Share
Small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 96.1% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence at all (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio tiers in Neshoba County. Companies never become the majority, reaching a peak of just 50% ownership in the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Historical transaction data is unavailable, so the net buyer/seller status for landlords is unknown. The Q4 transaction count was zero, indicating a complete halt in investor trading.
Market Narrative

In Neshoba County, the real estate investor market is fundamentally local and small-scale. Investors own a total of 600 single-family properties, which accounts for 9.7% of the county's SFR housing stock. The market's structure is defined by individual ownership, with private investors controlling 508 properties (84.7%) compared to just 96 (16.0%) for companies. This dynamic is further emphasized by the near-total control of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold 96.1% of the investor-owned inventory, while large-scale institutional investors have zero presence.

Recent investor behavior has been characterized by a complete halt in activity. There were no recorded landlord purchases in the most recent quarter, resulting in a 0% share of market transactions. This transactional freeze makes it impossible to compare current investor pricing against homeowners, though historical data from 2020-2023 shows an average acquisition price of $145,464. A striking 93.3% of the existing investor portfolio is owned with cash, indicating a low-risk, low-leverage investment strategy is prevalent in the area.

The key takeaway from the Neshoba County market is its insulation from national, corporate-driven investment trends. It is a market dominated by a large base of single-property landlords, funded by cash, and focused on long-term rentals. The current pause in buying activity suggests these local investors are exercising significant caution, potentially waiting for better pricing or more favorable market conditions. This environment presents a stark contrast to more dynamic, high-turnover markets and signals stability over speculative growth.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 09:51 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Neshoba (MS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Neshoba (MS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ms-neshoba/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.