DeKalb (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the DeKalb (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in DeKalb (MO)
1,622
Total Investors in DeKalb (MO)
592
Investor Owned SFR in DeKalb (MO)
521(32.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
529
SFR Owned
444
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
63
SFR Owned
82
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 521 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Investors Dominate DeKalb County, MO, Buying at 46% Discounts While Institutions Remain on Sidelines
Investors own 521 single-family homes in DeKalb County, MO (32.1% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 98.3% of this portfolio. In Q1, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing properties at an average 46.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, while institutional investors were inactive.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 521 properties in DeKalb County, with individuals holding 85.2%.
The vast majority of these holdings are cash-owned, with 418 properties compared to just 103 financed. Nearly all investor-owned properties (518 of 521) are operated as rentals, representing 99.4% of the portfolio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1, landlords paid 46.1% less than homeowners, a discount of $134,029.
This discount has been substantial but volatile, ranging from a 65.9% discount in Q3 2025 to a 16.1% discount in Q2 2025. Prices show appreciation, with the Q1 average of $156,750 up from the 2020-2023 average of $134,580.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 35.0% of all SFR properties sold in DeKalb County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 85.7% of these purchases. In contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.3% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 79.7% of all investor housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 4 homes, representing a mere 0.8% of the investor market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own 90.8% of single-property portfolios, but companies take majority control at the 6-10 property tier.
In the 6-10 property tier, companies own 57.1% of the properties. This marks the clear crossover point where business entities become the dominant ownership structure for larger portfolios in the county.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in the 64469 zip code, which contains 144 investor-owned properties.
The 64497 zip code has the highest investor saturation, with a 70.4% ownership rate. The top 5 zip codes by investor-owned count all have ownership rates exceeding 24%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with landlords buying 52 properties and selling only 12 in 2025. In contrast, institutional investors are neutral or divesting, with an equal number of buys and sells in both 2024 and 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 30.0% of all SFR transactions in Q1, purchasing 9 properties.
Small landlords in the 6-10 property tier were the most active, accounting for 6 of the 9 investor transactions. Only one purchase (11.1%) was from another landlord, indicating a focus on acquiring properties from the general market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 521 properties in DeKalb County, with individuals holding 85.2%.
Detailed Findings

Investor presence is significant, controlling 521 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 32.1% of the total 1,622 SFRs in DeKalb County.

Ownership is overwhelmingly tilted towards individual investors. Individuals own 444 properties (85.2% of the investor portfolio), while companies hold just 82 properties (15.7%).

The market is defined by small-scale operators, with 529 individual landlords compared to only 63 company landlords.

Cash is the preferred method of acquisition for investors in this market. A remarkable 80.2% of investor-owned properties (418 of 521) are owned outright, signaling a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The investor portfolio is almost exclusively focused on providing rental housing. Data shows 518 of the 521 investor properties are non-owner-occupied, confirming their primary use as rental stock for the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1, landlords paid 46.1% less than homeowners, a discount of $134,029.
Detailed Findings

Investors in DeKalb County demonstrate a consistent ability to acquire properties at a significant discount. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $156,750, a staggering 46.1% less than the $290,779 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price advantage translates to an immediate savings of $134,029 per property, giving investors substantial equity from the moment of purchase.

The landlord discount, while consistently present, fluctuates significantly by quarter. It reached a peak of 65.9% in Q3 2025 (a $143,938 gap) before narrowing to 16.1% in Q2 2025 (a $36,262 gap), indicating opportunistic buying behavior.

Overall acquisition prices are trending upward, a key finding in this market reports dashboard. The average landlord purchase price in Q1 2026 ($156,750) is notably higher than the average of $134,580 recorded during the 2020-2023 period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 35.0% of all SFR properties sold in DeKalb County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords represented a major force in the Q4 2025 market, acquiring 7 of the 20 total SFRs sold for a market share of 35.0%.

This activity was driven entirely by smaller investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) purchased 6 of the 7 properties, accounting for 85.7% of all landlord acquisitions.

A single entity in the 6-10 property tier demonstrated concentrated buying power, acquiring 5 properties, or 71.4% of all investor purchases for the quarter.

The market saw the entry of 2 new landlord entities who co-acquired a single property, signaling continued interest from new market participants.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing market in Q4, reinforcing the local, small-scale nature of investment in the county.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.3% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in DeKalb County is defined by small, local landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) control 98.3% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

The backbone of the rental market is the single-property landlord. This tier alone accounts for 421 properties, representing 79.7% of all investor-owned housing.

Media narratives about large corporate landlords do not apply here. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have a negligible footprint, owning just 4 properties, which is only 0.8% of the investor market.

The dominance of small investors is consistent across the smaller portfolio sizes, with the two-property tier holding 9.1% and the 3-5 property tier holding 6.8% of investor properties.

This distribution highlights a market driven by local real estate investing strategies rather than large-scale institutional capital.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own 90.8% of single-property portfolios, but companies take majority control at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the entry point and foundation of the market, owning 387 of the 421 single-property landlord homes (90.8%).

As portfolios grow, ownership tends to shift towards corporate structures. The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 8 properties (57.1%) compared to individuals' 6 properties (42.9%).

This pattern suggests that as investors scale their operations, they are more likely to incorporate for liability protection and financial management.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, companies have a significant presence, holding 16 properties for a 44.4% share, just shy of the individual majority.

The split between individuals and companies provides insight into the lifecycle of an investor in this market, starting small and incorporating with growth.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in the 64469 zip code, which contains 144 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is not evenly distributed across DeKalb County, showing clear geographic concentration. The zip code 64469 is the epicenter of activity with 144 investor-owned properties.

While 64469 leads in raw count, the 64497 zip code exhibits the most intense investor penetration, where landlords own 70.4% of all SFRs.

The top five zip codes by investor property count (64469, 64429, 64490, 64494, 64474) collectively represent a significant portion of the county's investor activity.

High ownership rates are common in target areas. For example, 64469 has a 36.4% investor rate, and 64490 has a 30.5% rate, indicating specific neighborhoods are investor hotspots.

This geographical clustering suggests investors are targeting specific communities, possibly based on factors like rental demand, property values, or local economic drivers identified through property search tools.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in DeKalb County is in a strong accumulation phase. In Q1 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 9 properties while only selling 1.

This buying trend is not new. Throughout 2025, landlords maintained a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.33, acquiring 52 properties and divesting only 12.

The behavior of institutional investors (1,000+ tier) starkly contrasts with the broader market. They were net neutral in both 2025 and 2024, with one purchase and one sale each year, suggesting a strategy of portfolio maintenance rather than expansion.

This divergence underscores that the market's growth is being fueled by small and mid-size landlords, not large institutions.

The high transaction volume on the buy-side signals strong confidence among local investors in the DeKalb County housing market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 30.0% of all SFR transactions in Q1, purchasing 9 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a pivotal role in the Q1 2026 market, with their 9 purchases accounting for 30.0% of the 30 total SFR transactions in DeKalb County.

Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, responsible for 8 of the 9 total landlord transactions.

The 6-10 property tier was the most active buyer segment, making 6 purchases. This indicates that established small landlords are the primary drivers of portfolio growth in the county.

Investors are primarily sourcing deals from outside the investor community. Only one transaction (11.1%) was a landlord-to-landlord sale, with the vast majority of properties acquired from homeowners or other sellers.

The only recorded average purchase price was $156,750 for a property bought by an investor in the 21-50 property tier, which was part of a landlord-to-landlord transaction.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.3% of DeKalb County investor housing, buying at a 46% discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 521 SFR properties (32.1% of DeKalb County's market), with individual investors holding 444 (85.2%) and companies owning 82 (15.7%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 46.1% less than homeowners in Q1, securing an average discount of $134,029 per property ($156,750 vs $290,779).
Activity
In Q1, landlords accounted for 30.0% of all transactions (9 purchases), while 2 new single-property landlords entered the market in the prior quarter.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.3% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.8%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (90.8% of single-property holdings), but companies take majority control in portfolios of 6-10 properties.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1, while institutional investors have been neutral, with buys matching sells over the past year.
Market Narrative

In DeKalb County, Missouri, the story of real estate investment is one of local dominance. Investors own a substantial 521 single-family properties, making up 32.1% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals (85.2%) rather than companies (15.7%). The market structure completely defies the “Wall Street landlord” narrative; mom-and-pop investors with 1-10 properties own a staggering 98.3% of all investor-held homes, while large institutional firms control a mere 0.8%.

The behavior of these local investors reveals a confident and aggressive strategy of expansion. In Q1 2026, they were involved in 30.0% of all market transactions and operated as strong net buyers, acquiring nine properties for every one sold. This activity is fueled by a remarkable ability to secure properties at deep discounts, paying an average of 46.1% less than traditional homeowners in the first quarter. This contrasts sharply with the activity of institutional investors, who have remained neutral or acted as net sellers, indicating their focus lies elsewhere.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse reports is that DeKalb County's rental market is shaped and supported by small, local entrepreneurs. They are well-capitalized, with over 80% of their properties owned free of financing, and are actively growing their portfolios by purchasing homes at a significant price advantage. This dynamic creates a stable, community-based rental housing stock that is insulated from the strategic shifts of large, national corporations, ensuring the market's future is firmly in local hands.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 09:08 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography DeKalb (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 DeKalb (MO) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mo-dekalb/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.