Carbon (MT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Carbon (MT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Carbon (MT)
2,350
Total Investors in Carbon (MT)
2,233
Investor Owned SFR in Carbon (MT)
1,666(70.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,073
SFR Owned
1,513
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
160
SFR Owned
195
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,666 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Carbon County, controlling 98.4% of an investor-heavy market.
In Carbon County, MT, investors own 1,666 SFRs, a staggering 70.9% of the market. This ownership is concentrated among small landlords (1-10 properties), who control 98.4% of the investor portfolio, leaving 0.0% for institutional players. While recent transaction volume is low, landlords remain net buyers historically and surprisingly paid a premium over homeowners in their most recent active quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,666 SFRs, a massive 70.9% of the market, with individuals holding 90.8%.
Cash purchases (1,108 properties) outpace financed ones (558) by nearly 2-to-1. Virtually all investor-owned properties (1,665 of 1,666) are classified as rentals, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a surprising 11.4% premium over homeowners in Q2 2025, their last active quarter.
In Q2 2025, landlords paid an average of $376,875, which was $38,437 more than the homeowner average of $338,438. No landlord purchase data was available for 2026-Q1. Prices show significant appreciation from the 2020-2023 average of $328,224.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for 100.0% of the single SFR purchase in Q4 2025.
The lone transaction was made by a new, single-property landlord. This purchase accounted for 100% of activity from mom-and-pop investors, as institutional investors made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.4% of investor SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, owning 1,444 properties or 83.9% of all investor-owned homes. Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence in this market (0.0%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner in portfolios of 6-10 properties, a key business structure crossover point.
While individuals dominate smaller tiers, owning 91.9% of single-property portfolios, companies represent 70.0% of property ownership in the 6-10 unit tier. This indicates a strategic shift to corporate structures as portfolios grow.
Geographic Distribution
The 59068 zip code is the epicenter of investment, with 1,174 properties and a 77.3% ownership rate.
The 59068 zip code alone accounts for 70.5% of all investor-owned properties in the county. Other areas like 59014 and 59041 also show high investor penetration rates of 62.2% and 63.0%, respectively.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring properties at a 4.2-to-1 ratio over sales in 2024.
During 2024, landlords purchased 21 properties while selling only 5. This net buying trend continued into 2025 with 10 purchases against 6 sales. Institutional investors recorded zero transaction activity during these periods.
Current Quarter Transactions
The single transaction in Q4 2025 was by a landlord, giving investors 100.0% market share.
This purchase was made by a new landlord entering the single-property tier. During this period, 0.0% of landlord acquisitions were sourced from other landlords, indicating the property was likely bought from a homeowner.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,666 SFRs, a massive 70.9% of the market, with individuals holding 90.8%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Carbon County, MT is exceptionally high, with landlords holding 1,666 of the 2,350 available Single Family Residential properties, a market penetration of 70.9%.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by individual, small-scale real estate investing. Individual landlords own 1,513 properties (90.8% of the investor portfolio), far surpassing the 195 properties (11.7%) owned by companies.

A similar pattern exists among landlord entities, where 2,073 individuals operate compared to just 160 companies, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local rental market.

Portfolio financing strategies lean heavily towards liquidity, as cash-owned properties (1,108) are nearly double the number of financed properties (558). This suggests many investors have significant equity and are less reliant on leverage.

The rental focus is nearly absolute, with 1,665 of the 1,666 investor-owned homes classified as non-owner-occupied, confirming the portfolio is actively managed for rental income rather than personal use.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a surprising 11.4% premium over homeowners in Q2 2025, their last active quarter.
Detailed Findings

In a reversal of typical market dynamics, landlords in Carbon County paid a significant premium for properties in their last active quarter. In Q2 2025, the average landlord acquisition price was $376,875, which is 11.4% higher than the $338,438 paid by traditional homeowners.

This $38,437 premium per property suggests landlords may be targeting higher-value assets or competing aggressively for limited inventory, a departure from the discount-seeking behavior seen in most markets.

There was no recorded landlord acquisition activity in 2026-Q1, making trend analysis on the price gap difficult. However, the overall market shows clear price appreciation over time.

Investor acquisition prices have climbed from an average of $328,224 during the 2020-2023 period to $453,269 in 2024, signaling a robust and appreciating market for investment properties.

The lack of recent purchasing activity in 2026-Q1 may indicate a market pause or simply a low-volume period, requiring further monitoring to determine if it constitutes a new trend.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 100.0% of the single SFR purchase in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was characterized by extremely low transaction volume in Carbon County, with only one SFR property changing hands.

This single purchase was made by a landlord, giving investors a 100.0% share of market activity for the period. The buyer was a new entrant to the market, falling into the single-property (Tier 01) category.

This activity highlights the market's reliance on small-scale investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100% of all landlord purchases in Q4.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive, recording zero purchases and holding no share of the quarter's acquisition activity.

The data suggests that even in a quiet market, the primary driver of investment is the formation of new, small-scale landlord portfolios rather than the expansion of large existing ones.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.4% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Carbon County is definitively dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), control a combined 98.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) is the bedrock of this market, with this group alone owning 1,444 properties, which translates to 83.9% of the entire investor portfolio.

As portfolio size increases, the number of properties drops off sharply. Two-property landlords hold 9.3%, and those with 3-5 properties hold just 4.6%.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) have a negligible footprint, with the 11-20 property tier holding only 1.4% of properties.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) are entirely absent from Carbon County, holding 0.0% of the market. This confirms the local rental landscape is driven by small, local operators, not large corporations, a key insight available in comprehensive property datasets.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner in portfolios of 6-10 properties, a key business structure crossover point.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges in ownership structure as portfolio sizes grow in Carbon County. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller tiers, owning 1,357 (91.9%) of single-property portfolios and 142 (87.7%) of two-property portfolios.

The balance begins to shift in the 3-5 property tier, where individuals still hold a majority at 74.7%, but company ownership rises to a notable 25.3%.

The definitive crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier. Here, companies become the dominant owners, holding 70.0% of the properties in this segment, while individual ownership falls to just 30.0%.

This trend suggests that as investors scale their operations beyond five properties, they are more likely to adopt a corporate structure for liability, financing, or management purposes.

Even so, the sheer volume of properties in the smallest tiers means that overall, individual ownership (1,513 properties) remains far greater than company ownership (195 properties) across the entire market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 59068 zip code is the epicenter of investment, with 1,174 properties and a 77.3% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Carbon County is highly concentrated geographically. The zip code 59068 stands out as the primary hub, containing 1,174 investor-owned SFRs, which is 70.5% of the county's entire investor portfolio.

This area not only leads by sheer volume but also by market penetration. The investor ownership rate in 59068 is an exceptionally high 77.3%, meaning more than three out of every four SFRs are landlord-owned.

Other zip codes also exhibit significant investor presence. The 59041 area has 143 investor properties with a 63.0% ownership rate, and 59014 has 161 properties with a 62.2% rate.

This geographic concentration suggests that investors are targeting specific communities or neighborhoods within the county, likely driven by factors such as rental demand, property values, or local economic conditions.

Understanding these localized pockets of high ownership is crucial for anyone analyzing the market, a task often simplified by using detailed assessor data to identify regional trends.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring properties at a 4.2-to-1 ratio over sales in 2024.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows that landlords in Carbon County have been actively expanding their portfolios. In 2024, they were strong net buyers, with 21 acquisitions compared to only 5 dispositions, resulting in a net gain of 16 properties.

The trend of accumulation continued through 2025, although at a slightly slower pace. Landlords purchased 10 properties and sold 6, for a net increase of 4 properties in their holdings.

Activity in Q3 2025 specifically showed 2 buys and 1 sell, reinforcing the net buyer status even in lower-volume quarters.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were entirely absent from the transaction market, with zero recorded buys or sells. This confirms that all portfolio growth is being driven by smaller, local investors.

The consistent net positive acquisition rate demonstrates long-term confidence in the Carbon County rental market among its core investor base.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
The single transaction in Q4 2025 was by a landlord, giving investors 100.0% market share.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity represented the entirety of the transaction market in Carbon County during Q4 2025. With only one total transaction recorded, it was made by a landlord, resulting in a 100.0% market share for investors.

The purchase was made by a new entrant into the market, a single-property (Tier 01) landlord. This highlights that market growth, however small, is coming from new participants rather than the expansion of existing large portfolios.

All transactions during the quarter were from mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), with institutional investors recording no activity.

Notably, there was no inter-landlord trading in Q4. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0.0%, suggesting this acquisition came from the traditional homeowner market.

The price data for this transaction was unavailable, precluding any analysis of pricing strategies for the quarter.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 98.4% of Carbon County's Investor-Saturated Housing Market
Holdings
Landlords own 1,666 SFR properties, representing a massive 70.9% of the market in Carbon County, MT. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 1,513 properties (90.8%), compared to 195 (11.7%) for companies.
Pricing
In the last active quarter with data (Q2 2025), landlords paid an average of $376,875, a surprising 11.4% premium over the $338,438 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Landlord activity accounted for 100% of the single SFR purchase in Q4 2025, which was made by one new single-property landlord entering the market.
Market Share
Small "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 98.4% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no holdings (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, controlling 70.0% of the properties in that segment.
Transactions
Landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring properties at a rate of 4.2-to-1 over sales in 2024 (21 buys vs 5 sells). Institutional investors are completely inactive, with zero recorded transactions.
Market Narrative

In Carbon County, Montana, the single-family residential market is uniquely defined by an exceptionally high concentration of investor ownership. Landlords control 1,666 homes, a staggering 70.9% of the county's total SFR inventory. This landscape is not shaped by Wall Street firms, but by local, small-scale operators. Individual investors own 90.8% of this portfolio, and "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties) command an overwhelming 98.4% share, while institutional players are entirely absent. This data, detailed in our market reports, paints a picture of a community where rental housing is predominantly managed by its own residents.

Investor behavior reflects a confident, long-term strategy of accumulation. Historically, landlords have been strong net buyers, acquiring properties at a 4.2-to-1 ratio in 2024. In the most recent quarter with purchase data (Q2 2025), investors surprisingly paid an 11.4% premium over traditional homeowners, suggesting intense competition for desirable assets. While recent transaction volume has been extremely low, with only a single new landlord purchase in Q4 2025, the underlying trend points towards continued portfolio growth among the existing investor base.

The key takeaway from Carbon County is the profound influence of the small landlord. The market structure defies the national narrative of corporate consolidation, showcasing instead a hyper-local ecosystem where investment is granular and widespread. The high ownership rate and net-buyer status signal a stable, mature rental market. For proptech platforms and service providers, this means the target audience consists of thousands of individual owner-operators rather than a handful of large institutions, requiring a fundamentally different engagement strategy.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 10:08 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Carbon (MT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Carbon (MT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mt-carbon/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.