Bergen (NJ) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bergen (NJ) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bergen (NJ)
245,101
Total Investors in Bergen (NJ)
48,009
Investor Owned SFR in Bergen (NJ)
37,755(15.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
43,057
SFR Owned
32,043
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
4,952
SFR Owned
6,121
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 37,755 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Bergen County with 98% Ownership as Institutions Retreat
Investors own 37,755 single-family properties in Bergen County (15.4% of the market), with small, individual landlords controlling a staggering 98.1% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties at a 20.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners. While the overall market sees landlords as strong net buyers, institutional-scale investors are actively selling off their holdings.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 37,755 SFR properties, with individuals holding a dominant 84.9%.
Of these holdings, cash purchases (23,159) significantly outnumber financed properties (14,596). The vast majority of the portfolio, 36,656 properties, are classified as rented, confirming a strong focus on generating rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 20.1% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $182,278.
This significant price advantage for landlords has been consistent, with the discount ranging from 16.3% to 23.1% over the past year. Acquisition prices have also risen sharply, with the Q1 2026 average of $722,879 representing a 17.2% increase over the 2020-2023 average of $616,550.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 21.8% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Activity was almost entirely driven by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounting for 98.0% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
This concentration at the small end of the market leaves a negligible share for large operators. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.1% of the investor portfolio, or 23 properties in total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 57.0% of homes.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 86.1% of single-property holdings, a clear strategic shift to corporate structures occurs as portfolios grow. In the 11-20 property tier, company ownership climbs to 71.2%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 07410 alone holding 8,577 investor properties.
This single zip code accounts for a massive 48.5% investor ownership rate. Zip code 07650 also shows heavy investor penetration at 41.9%, indicating specific neighborhood-level targeting by investors.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 6.37x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
This net-acquirer stance is a long-term trend, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.65x in 2025 and 4.13x in 2024. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) are net sellers, disposing of 23 properties while only acquiring 4 in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 19.2% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026.
New, single-property investors paid the highest average price at $720,173, while mid-size investors paid significantly less, as low as $422,500. Inter-landlord trades are uncommon, with only 6.6% of new investor purchases sourced from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 37,755 SFR properties, with individuals holding a dominant 84.9%.
Detailed Findings

In Bergen County, investors hold a significant 15.4% share of the single-family residential market, totaling 37,755 properties out of 245,101 total SFRs.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly tilted towards individuals rather than corporations. Individual investors own 32,043 properties, accounting for 84.9% of the investor-owned market, while companies own the remaining 6,121 properties (16.2%).

This individual dominance is even more pronounced when looking at the number of landlord entities. There are 43,057 individual landlords compared to just 4,952 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 9 to 1, underscoring the granular, small-scale nature of real estate investing in the county.

Financial strategies among landlords lean heavily towards all-cash acquisitions. The portfolio contains 23,159 properties held free and clear, compared to 14,596 that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base that may be less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The primary use of these properties is clear, with 36,656 of the 37,755 investor-owned homes being rented. This high rental concentration confirms that the vast majority of the portfolio is actively used for housing provision rather than sitting vacant or for other uses.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 20.1% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $182,278.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Bergen County consistently purchase properties at a substantial discount compared to traditional homeowners. In Q1 2026, the average landlord acquisition price was $722,879, a full 20.1% lower than the $905,157 average paid by homeowners, which translates to a saving of $182,278 per property.

This pricing advantage is not a recent phenomenon but a persistent market dynamic. Over the past year, the landlord discount has remained significant, hitting a high of 23.1% in Q2 2025 ($759,905 vs $987,598) and a low of 16.3% in Q3 2025 ($797,592 vs $953,004).

The data reveals a clear ability among investors to identify and secure undervalued assets, likely through off-market deals or by targeting properties that require renovation, which are less appealing to typical homebuyers.

While landlords are paying less than homeowners, their acquisition costs are still rising in line with broad market appreciation. The average price in 2024 was $730,774, climbing to $769,969 in 2025, a notable increase from the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $616,550.

This trend shows that even with their ability to find deals, investors are not immune to the overall price inflation affecting the Bergen County housing market, though their discount provides a significant buffer.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 21.8% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the Bergen County market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 149 of the 682 total SFRs sold, a market share of 21.8%.

The acquisition landscape is completely dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 146 of the 149 investor purchases, making up 98.0% of the quarter's activity.

New entrants are the primary driver of market growth. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone bought 119 properties, representing 79.9% of all investor acquisitions for the quarter. This activity was spread across 137 distinct entities, signaling a fresh wave of individuals entering the rental market.

Conversely, large-scale investors were entirely absent from the market. Institutional landlords (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) made no purchases in Q4, and even mid-size landlords were minimally active, with only 3 properties purchased by investors with more than 10 homes.

This data refutes the narrative of corporate consolidation, instead painting a picture of a highly fragmented market where the barrier to entry remains low and individual ambition fuels investor demand.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of investor-owned properties in Bergen County is extraordinarily concentrated among small landlords. Investors with portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) own a combined 98.1% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the rental market, owning 28,962 properties. This single tier accounts for 73.8% of the entire investor-owned housing stock, highlighting the importance of first-time and small-scale investors.

As portfolio sizes increase, the number of properties drops off dramatically. Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) collectively own just 1.8% of the inventory, demonstrating a steep drop-off in scale.

At the highest level, institutional investors (Tier 09) have a nearly non-existent footprint in Bergen County. This tier controls only 23 properties, representing a mere 0.1% of the market share, a figure that challenges common perceptions of Wall Street dominance in the housing market.

This ownership structure reveals a market characterized by widespread, decentralized ownership rather than corporate control, suggesting that local individuals, not large funds, are the primary providers of single-family rental housing.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 57.0% of homes.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors own the vast majority of properties overall, a clear pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by portfolio size: as investors scale, they increasingly turn to corporate structures.

Individuals overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level tiers. They own 86.1% of single-property portfolios (25,199 properties) and 89.8% of two-property portfolios (5,265 properties). This indicates that most landlords begin their journey as individual owners.

The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04). At this level, companies take a majority stake for the first time, owning 285 properties, or 57.0% of the tier's inventory. This suggests that holding 6 or more properties is a common threshold for incorporation.

Company dominance accelerates in the mid-size tiers. In the 11-20 property bracket, company ownership surges to 71.2% (210 properties). For the 21-50 property tier, it stands at 69.7% (161 properties).

This trend highlights a distinct operational shift. Small-scale investing is largely an individual pursuit, but scaling into a mid-size landlord operation is predominantly done under a corporate entity, likely for liability protection and financial advantages.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 07410 alone holding 8,577 investor properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Bergen County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in specific zip codes. This suggests targeted acquisition strategies focused on particular submarkets.

The zip code 07410 stands out as the epicenter of investor activity. It contains 8,577 investor-owned SFRs, which represents an investor ownership rate of 48.5%. Nearly half of all single-family homes in this area are owned by investors.

Significant investor presence is also found in zip code 07650, where the ownership rate is 41.9%, and 07071, which has 770 investor-owned properties and a 15.9% rate.

The disparity between high-concentration areas and the county-wide average of 15.4% highlights that investor impact is felt much more acutely at the neighborhood level. Residents in these top zip codes are far more likely to have a landlord as a neighbor.

Understanding these pockets of concentration is critical for analyzing market dynamics, as they likely experience different trends in rent prices, property values, and housing availability compared to the rest of the county. The provided property datasets can help identify these localized trends.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 6.37x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that landlords in Bergen County are overwhelmingly net buyers, consistently acquiring more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they purchased 172 SFRs while selling only 27, resulting in a net gain of 145 properties and a strong 6.37-to-1 buy/sell ratio.

This aggressive accumulation is not a new trend. Throughout 2025, landlords maintained a 3.65x buy/sell ratio (1,914 buys vs. 524 sells), and in 2024, the ratio was even higher at 4.13x (1,844 buys vs. 446 sells). This signals sustained confidence and capital deployment in the local market.

However, a dramatic divergence in strategy appears when isolating institutional investors. Those in the 1,000+ property tier are actively divesting, behaving as net sellers. In 2025, they sold 23 properties while purchasing only 4, a net reduction of 19 properties.

This institutional retreat continued a pattern from 2024, when they sold 18 properties and bought only 2. The data clearly shows large institutions are exiting or trimming their Bergen County portfolios while smaller investors are eagerly absorbing inventory.

The market dynamic is one of decentralization. As large players sell, ownership is being transferred to a wider base of smaller, local landlords, reinforcing the dominance of mom-and-pop investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 19.2% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 172 of the 896 total single-family transactions in Bergen County, capturing 19.2% of the market activity. All of this activity was concentrated among investors with portfolios smaller than 1,000 properties.

A clear inverse relationship between portfolio size and purchase price emerged this quarter. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $720,173. In contrast, mid-size investors in the 11-50 property range paid much less, with averages between $422,500 and $468,500.

This price disparity suggests different acquisition strategies. New and smaller landlords appear to be buying turn-key, retail-priced properties, while more experienced, larger investors are likely targeting distressed or off-market assets that offer a lower entry point.

The market for investor-to-investor sales is relatively small, especially for new entrants. Only 9 of the 137 transactions (6.6%) by single-property landlords involved purchasing from another landlord. This indicates that most new investors are buying from traditional homeowners.

The complete absence of institutional transactions in Q1 reinforces the trend of their disengagement from the Bergen County market, leaving the field open for smaller, local players to drive activity.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small landlords control 98.1% of Bergen County's investor market as institutions divest their holdings
Holdings
Landlords own 37,755 SFR properties, representing 15.4% of Bergen County's market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 32,043 of these properties (84.9%), while companies own the remaining 6,121 (16.2%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $722,879, which is 20.1% less than traditional homeowners ($905,157), securing a substantial discount of $182,278 per property.
Activity
Investors purchased 21.8% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, an effort led by small operators. The quarter saw the emergence of 137 new single-property landlords, who were responsible for 79.9% of all investor acquisitions.
Market Share
The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 98.1% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio reaches the 6-10 property range (57.0% company-owned), a share that grows to 71.2% for portfolios of 11-20 properties.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 6.37x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (172 buys vs 27 sells). However, institutional investors are net sellers, having sold 5.75 times more properties than they acquired in 2025 (23 sells vs 4 buys).
Market Narrative

In Bergen County, the single-family rental market is firmly in the hands of local, small-scale operators. Investors own 37,755 properties, or 15.4% of the total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is not controlled by Wall Street but by individuals, who own 84.9% of these homes (32,043 properties). The data from this Investor Pulse report shows that mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command an astounding 98.1% of the investor-owned market, while institutional firms (1,000+ properties) hold a mere 0.1% share.

Investor behavior reveals a savvy, growing, and decentralized market force. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 21.8% of all homes sold, with 137 new single-property investors entering the market. They consistently achieve significant discounts, paying 20.1% less than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026. This financial advantage fuels their position as strong net buyers, acquiring 6.37 properties for every one they sold in the quarter. In stark contrast, institutional investors are actively divesting from the market, operating as net sellers and transferring ownership to the burgeoning class of smaller landlords.

The key takeaway for Bergen County is that the narrative of corporate consolidation does not apply here. The market's structure is defined by fragmentation and individual enterprise. While large institutions are retreating, small investors are stepping in, demonstrating sustained confidence and capitalizing on their ability to find deals. This dynamic suggests that the future of the local rental market will be shaped not by large funds, but by the cumulative actions of thousands of individual owners operating at a hyperlocal level.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:46 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Bergen (NJ)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Bergen (NJ) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nj-bergen/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.