Andrew (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Andrew (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Andrew (MO)
6,068
Total Investors in Andrew (MO)
1,169
Investor Owned SFR in Andrew (MO)
1,204(19.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,012
SFR Owned
927
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
157
SFR Owned
277
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,204 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Andrew County with 92.4% Ownership, Driving All Recent Market Activity
Investors own 1,204 SFR properties in Andrew County (19.8% of the market), with small-scale mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 92.4% of that portfolio versus just 0.1% for institutional firms. In recent quarters, these small investors drove 100% of all SFR purchases and remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 25 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,204 properties, with individuals holding 77.0% (927 SFRs) versus 23.0% for companies.
The portfolio is overwhelmingly owned with cash, with 1,076 properties held free-and-clear versus just 128 that are financed. Of these holdings, 1,152 properties (95.7%) are classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In 2026-Q1, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $72,000, with no comparable homeowner data available.
Pricing trends are highly volatile; landlords paid a 19.1% premium over homeowners in Q3 2025 but secured a massive 81.7% discount in Q2 2025. This suggests a focus on distressed or non-standard properties rather than a consistent pricing strategy.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated the market in Q4 2025, acquiring 100.0% of the 2 SFR properties sold.
All acquisition activity was from the mom-and-pop segment, with three new single-property landlord entities entering the market. No purchases were made by mid-size or institutional investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 92.4% of all investor-owned SFRs in Andrew County.
Single-property landlords are the largest group, owning 58.0% of the total investor portfolio (737 homes). Institutional investors have a near-zero presence, with just one property representing a 0.1% market share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own the vast majority of smaller portfolios, but companies become the dominant owner for larger-scale operations.
The clear crossover point is the 21-50 property tier, where companies own 97.8% of the assets. In the single-property tier, individuals maintain an 87.4% ownership share.
Geographic Distribution
The 64485 zip code contains the highest number of investor properties at 485 SFRs.
However, the highest investor ownership *rate* is in the 64421 zip code, where investors own 36.2% of all single-family homes. The area with the most properties, 64485, has a much lower rate of 17.9%.
Historical Transactions
Investors were aggressive net buyers in 2025, purchasing 25 properties while selling only one.
This activity created a powerful 25-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, resulting in a net portfolio expansion of 24 properties for the year. The second quarter of 2025 was especially active, with 8 purchases versus only 1 sale.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 100% of the 3 SFR transactions that occurred in Q1 2026.
All purchases were made by new, single-property landlords, who paid an average price of $72,000. None of these homes were acquired from other investors, indicating an expansion of the rental market rather than internal churn.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,204 properties, with individuals holding 77.0% (927 SFRs) versus 23.0% for companies.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 19.8% share of the single-family residential market in Andrew County, with a total portfolio of 1,204 properties.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who own 927 properties (77.0% of the total) and represent 1,012 of the 1,169 landlord entities.

Company ownership, while smaller, consists of 157 entities controlling 277 properties, which accounts for the remaining 23.0% of the investor-owned housing stock.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for all-cash ownership. A remarkable 89.4% of investor-owned properties (1,076) are owned outright, compared to a mere 10.6% (128) that carry a mortgage.

The strategic focus is clearly on rentals, as 1,152 properties, or 95.7% of the entire investor portfolio, are non-owner-occupied and designated as rental units.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In 2026-Q1, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $72,000, with no comparable homeowner data available.
Detailed Findings

The price relationship between landlords and traditional homeowners in Andrew County is erratic, likely reflecting low transaction volumes and an opportunistic acquisition strategy.

In a reversal of the typical discount narrative, landlords paid a 19.1% premium in Q3 2025, with an average purchase price of $149,200 compared to the homeowner average of $125,317.

However, the prior quarter saw an extreme discount, with landlords paying just $37,500 on average in Q2 2025, which was 81.7% less than the typical homeowner price of $204,509.

This pattern of paying a premium also occurred in Q1 2025, when the average landlord purchase price of $171,900 was 28.8% higher than the homeowner average.

These dramatic quarterly swings indicate that investors are not competing for typical on-market homes but are likely targeting unique opportunities, such as distressed sales or off-market deals, that do not follow general market pricing.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated the market in Q4 2025, acquiring 100.0% of the 2 SFR properties sold.
Detailed Findings

Investors were the only active buyers in the Andrew County SFR market during Q4 2025, purchasing both of the 2 homes sold during the period.

This activity was driven exclusively by new, small-scale investors, who accounted for 100.0% of all landlord purchases.

The data shows three new landlord entities entered the market, all within the single-property tier, acquiring the two available properties.

The complete absence of acquisitions from mid-size (11-1000 properties) or institutional (1000+) investors highlights a market where growth is fueled by new entrants at the smallest level.

This pattern suggests that market expansion is happening from the ground up, rather than through portfolio consolidation by larger, established players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 92.4% of all investor-owned SFRs in Andrew County.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership structure in Andrew County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Landlords with portfolios of 1-10 properties, known as mom-and-pops, control a massive 92.4% of all investor-owned homes.

The single-property landlord tier is the bedrock of the market, alone accounting for 737 properties, or 58.0% of the total investor portfolio.

In stark contrast, the institutional tier (1,000+ properties) has a negligible footprint, with its entire portfolio consisting of a single property, which translates to a mere 0.1% market share.

Mid-size investors (holding 11-100 properties) occupy a small niche, collectively owning 95 properties and making up 7.5% of the market.

This distribution firmly establishes the local market as one defined by individual ambition and small portfolios, not by corporate consolidation.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own the vast majority of smaller portfolios, but companies become the dominant owner for larger-scale operations.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type: individuals dominate smaller portfolios while companies take over as portfolios scale.

In the foundational single-property tier, individual investors own 87.4% of the homes (644 properties), establishing them as the primary market participants.

This individual dominance continues through the smaller tiers, with individuals still holding a 63.3% majority in the 11-20 property bracket.

The dynamic shifts decisively in the 21-50 property tier. Here, companies own 44 of the 45 properties, a commanding 97.8% share, marking the point where professionalization and incorporation become the norm.

This trend suggests that while individuals are the engine of market entry and small-portfolio management, scaling operations beyond 20 properties typically involves forming a corporate entity.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 64485 zip code contains the highest number of investor properties at 485 SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Andrew County shows geographic concentration, with the 64485 zip code holding the largest number of investor-owned properties at 485.

However, the highest market penetration is found elsewhere. The 64421 zip code has the greatest density of investor ownership, with 36.2% of its single-family homes owned by landlords.

Other highly saturated zip codes include 64423 and 64480, with investor ownership rates of 33.3% and 31.5%, respectively.

This data reveals a crucial distinction between total volume and market saturation. The zip code with the most investor properties (64485) has a relatively modest ownership rate of 17.9% compared to the top areas.

This suggests divergent investment strategies: some investors target larger areas for volume, while others focus on smaller markets to achieve a higher concentration and potentially greater market influence.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Investors were aggressive net buyers in 2025, purchasing 25 properties while selling only one.
Detailed Findings

Transactional data from 2025 shows that landlords in Andrew County were firmly in an accumulation phase, displaying strong confidence in the local market.

Across the full year, investors were significant net buyers, acquiring 25 single-family homes while disposing of only one.

This resulted in an overwhelming 25-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio and a net addition of 24 properties to the collective investor portfolio.

Momentum was particularly strong in the second quarter of 2025, which saw 8 properties purchased by investors against just a single sale.

No transactional data was available for institutional investors, indicating their activity in the county is effectively zero.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 100% of the 3 SFR transactions that occurred in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, the Andrew County SFR market was driven entirely by investor activity, with landlords accounting for all 3 transactions.

This activity originated exclusively from the smallest investor segment, as all 3 purchases were made by single-property landlords.

The average purchase price for these new market entrants was $72,000.

Significantly, none of these properties were acquired from other landlords. This 0% landlord-to-landlord transaction rate shows that new capital is entering the market by purchasing from homeowners, not from existing investors selling off assets.

This pattern points toward a net expansion of the rental housing supply, fueled by new, small-scale market participants.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Andrew County with 92.4% ownership, aggressively buying all homes sold in recent quarters.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,204 SFR properties, representing 19.8% of Andrew County's market, with individual investors holding 927 (77.0%) and companies owning 277 (23.0%).
Pricing
Investor pricing is highly opportunistic and volatile; landlords paid a 19.1% premium over homeowners in Q3 2025 ($149,200 vs $125,317) but secured an 81.7% discount in Q2 2025 ($37,500 vs $204,509).
Activity
Investors dominated recent activity, purchasing 100.0% of all SFRs sold in Q4 2025 (2 properties). This activity was driven entirely by 3 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 92.4% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.1%, a single property.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the backbone of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios larger than 20 properties, controlling 97.8% of assets in the 21-50 tier.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 25-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025, having acquired 25 properties while only selling one.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Andrew County, MO, is defined by small-scale, local ownership. Analysis of the property ownership by owner type report shows an investor portfolio of 1,204 single-family properties, constituting 19.8% of the total market. This sector is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 77.0% of these properties (927 homes). The market structure heavily favors mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who command a 92.4% share, while institutional firms (1,000+ properties) have a nearly nonexistent footprint with just a single property (0.1%).

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive acquisition and opportunistic pricing. In recent quarters, landlords have driven 100% of all SFR sales activity, with all purchases coming from new, single-property investors. This demonstrates that market growth is fueled by new entrants, not consolidation. Pricing strategy is not based on consistent discounts but rather on opportunistic acquisitions; for example, investors paid a 19.1% premium in one quarter and secured an 81.7% discount in another. Overall, investors are strong net buyers, acquiring 25 homes for every one they sold in 2025.

The key takeaway is that the housing market in Andrew County is a clear example of a market shaped by local, small-scale real estate investing, defying the narrative of corporate consolidation. Growth comes from new mom-and-pop landlords expanding the rental pool, not large institutions trading assets. While overall penetration is 19.8%, certain zip codes like 64421 show much higher concentrations (36.2%), indicating targeted investment pockets within the county. This market remains highly fragmented and driven by individual capital.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 08:58 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Andrew (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Andrew (MO) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mo-andrew/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.