Lafayette (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lafayette (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lafayette (WI)
4,901
Total Investors in Lafayette (WI)
802
Investor Owned SFR in Lafayette (WI)
678(13.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
697
SFR Owned
595
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
105
SFR Owned
94
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 678 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Command 99.7% of Lafayette County's Quiet Rental Market
Investors own 678 single-family properties in Lafayette County, representing 13.8% of the total market, with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 99.7% of this portfolio. While landlords secured a massive 29.5% price discount compared to homeowners in Q1, the market saw zero recorded investor purchase transactions, a stark contrast to their status as strong net buyers in 2024.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 678 SFRs, with individuals holding a dominant 87.8% share.
The portfolio is overwhelmingly cash-based, with 658 properties owned outright versus only 20 being financed. Of the 678 investor-owned properties, 661 are classified as rentals, a 97.5% rental concentration.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 29.5% discount in Q1, paying $66,116 less than homeowners.
Based on limited Q1 2025 data, landlords paid an average of $158,167 versus $224,283 for traditional homeowners. Pricing has trended upward, with the 2024 average of $148,458 being higher than the 2020-2023 average of $131,248.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchase activity halted, with 0% of market purchases in the last quarter.
There were no recorded SFR purchases by any buyer type in Lafayette County during the most recent quarter. Consequently, mom-and-pop and institutional investors both recorded zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.7% of the market.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence, holding 0.0% of the investor-owned housing. Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, owning 575 properties or 82.3% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier, with no company majority.
Individuals own 86.4% of single-property portfolios and still maintain 95.2% ownership in the 6-10 property tier. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owner in any portfolio size.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highest in zip code 53530, with 189 properties.
While 53530 leads in volume, smaller zip codes like 53599 and 53522 have the highest concentration, with a 25.0% investor ownership rate. Top areas by rate are different from top areas by count.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in 2024, acquiring 60 properties while selling only 3.
This activity reflects a 20-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, indicating strong accumulation and confidence in the market during the previous year. No historical data is available for institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
The transaction market was dormant in Q1, with landlords comprising 0% of 0 total deals.
With no transactions, there was no purchasing activity across any investor tier, from single-property to institutional. Consequently, there were no inter-landlord trades recorded during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 678 SFRs, with individuals holding a dominant 87.8% share.
Detailed Findings

In Lafayette County, investors hold 678 single-family residential properties, accounting for 13.8% of the county's total 4,901 SFRs. This establishes a significant, yet not dominant, investor presence in the local housing market.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals over corporations. Individual landlords own 595 properties (87.8% of the investor portfolio), while companies own just 94 properties (13.9%), underscoring the local, small-scale nature of real estate investing in the area.

A defining characteristic of this market is the reliance on cash. An overwhelming 97.0% of investor-owned properties (658 of 678) were acquired with cash, with only 20 properties carrying financing. This suggests a market of financially stable, debt-averse landlords.

The portfolio is intensely focused on rental income, with 661 of the 678 properties (97.5%) being non-owner-occupied. This high concentration highlights that the primary strategy for the typical real estate investor in Lafayette County is long-term rental holds, not speculation or flipping.

The landlord entity count mirrors the property ownership split. There are 802 distinct landlord entities, of which 697 are individuals and 105 are companies. This near 7-to-1 ratio of individual to company landlords further solidifies the 'mom-and-pop' character of the market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 29.5% discount in Q1, paying $66,116 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Lafayette County demonstrate a significant pricing advantage over traditional homebuyers. Based on available Q1 2025 data, landlords acquired properties for an average of $158,167, a full 29.5% less than the $224,283 paid by homeowners, representing a substantial $66,116 discount per transaction.

This price gap suggests that investors are adept at finding off-market deals, purchasing distressed properties, or leveraging negotiating power that is unavailable to typical retail buyers.

Despite the lack of recent transaction volume, historical data shows clear price appreciation in the market. The average landlord acquisition price in 2024 stood at $148,458, which is a notable increase from the $131,248 average recorded during the 2020-2023 period.

The market has seen a slowdown in activity, with zero landlord purchases recorded in Q1 2025 and Q4 2024. This makes quarter-over-quarter trend analysis difficult and points to a recent cooling in investor demand or a lack of available inventory meeting investor criteria.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchase activity halted, with 0% of market purchases in the last quarter.
Detailed Findings

The most recent quarter was marked by a complete absence of investor purchasing activity in Lafayette County's SFR market. Landlords acquired zero properties, accounting for 0.0% of all sales, as the total market itself recorded no transactions.

This market-wide standstill indicates a significant pause in real estate velocity, affecting all buyer types, not just investors. This could be due to seasonal factors, low inventory levels, or broader economic conditions impacting the region.

Both small and large investors were inactive. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) and institutional investors (1000+ properties) each made zero purchases, reflecting the complete lack of transaction volume across the entire investor spectrum.

The lack of new purchases means no new landlords entered the market in the single-property tier this quarter. This is a stark contrast to typical market behavior where new investors are constantly entering.

This inactivity follows a period of strong acquisition in 2024, suggesting the current market pause is a recent development rather than a long-term trend of investor absence.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.7% of the market.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Lafayette County is the epitome of a 'mom-and-pop' market. Landlords with portfolios of 1-10 properties control 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs, a level of dominance that leaves virtually no room for larger players.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no footprint in this market, with a 0.0% ownership share. This complete absence of large-scale corporate ownership is a defining feature of the county's housing market.

The foundation of this market is the single-property landlord. This tier (Tier 01) alone accounts for 575 properties, representing 82.3% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. This indicates that most investors are local individuals with a single rental property.

Ownership concentration dissipates rapidly in larger tiers. The '3-5 properties' tier holds just 8.2% of homes, and the '6-10 properties' tier holds 3.0%. Portfolios larger than 10 properties are exceptionally rare, representing less than 0.3% of the market.

This distribution highlights a market with a very low barrier to entry but limited scalability, likely due to local market size and inventory constraints. The comprehensive property data API reveals a highly fragmented ownership base.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier, with no company majority.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across every single investor tier in Lafayette County, with no signs of corporate consolidation. In the entry-level single-property tier, individuals own 504 of the 575 properties (86.4%).

This pattern of individual dominance persists even as portfolios grow. In the 2-property tier, individuals own 81.8% of homes, and in the 3-5 property tier, they own 93.0%.

Remarkably, there is no crossover point where companies take a majority stake. Even in the largest local tier shown (6-10 properties), individuals own 20 of the 21 properties, a staggering 95.2% share.

This data indicates that the path to portfolio growth in Lafayette County is almost exclusively pursued by private individuals rather than through the formation of investment companies or LLCs.

The minimal corporate presence, with companies owning just 79 single-property rentals and single-digit counts in other tiers, reinforces the county's status as a market driven by personal, small-scale investment.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highest in zip code 53530, with 189 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Lafayette County is geographically concentrated. The zip code 53530 is the clear leader in volume, hosting 189 investor-owned properties, which represents a 14.2% ownership rate for that area.

Other areas with significant investor presence by count include 53586 (92 properties), 53504 (77 properties), and 53803 (77 properties). These top four zip codes collectively account for a substantial portion of the county's rental housing stock.

However, the highest rates of investor penetration are found in smaller zip codes. Both 53599 and 53522 have an investor ownership rate of 25.0%, meaning one in every four SFRs in those areas is investor-owned.

The zip code 53811 also shows a high concentration at 23.3%. This demonstrates the classic pattern where the highest raw counts of investor properties are in larger population centers, while the highest percentage rates are often in smaller, more rural, or specific sub-markets.

This divergence between volume leaders and rate leaders is critical for understanding market dynamics, as it highlights different types of investment opportunities and saturation levels across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in 2024, acquiring 60 properties while selling only 3.
Detailed Findings

While recent quarters have been silent, historical data from 2024 shows that landlords in Lafayette County were overwhelmingly net buyers. They purchased 60 SFR properties throughout the year while selling only 3.

This translates to a powerful 20x buy/sell ratio, signaling a period of aggressive portfolio expansion and strong confidence in the local real estate market during that timeframe.

The net gain of 57 properties in a single year represents a significant increase in the total investor-owned portfolio, which currently stands at 678 properties. This shows that the market was in a clear accumulation phase.

No transaction data is available for institutional investors, which is consistent with their 0.0% ownership share in the county. All recorded historical activity pertains to the mom-and-pop and mid-size landlord tiers.

The strong buying activity in 2024 provides crucial context for the current market pause. It suggests the halt in Q1 2026 is a sharp deviation from recent trends, possibly driven by external factors like interest rate changes or a sudden drop in for-sale inventory.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
The transaction market was dormant in Q1, with landlords comprising 0% of 0 total deals.
Detailed Findings

The first quarter of 2026 was completely static for real estate transactions in Lafayette County, with zero recorded SFR sales. Consequently, landlords' share of the market was 0.0%, as there was no market to participate in.

This lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who dominate ownership, recorded zero transactions, as did the non-existent institutional tier.

With no buying activity, there was no variation in purchase prices by tier. The average purchase price for every tier was $0, reflecting the dormant state of the market.

The absence of deals also meant there was no inter-landlord trading. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%, as no acquisitions of any kind took place.

This complete freeze in market activity is the most significant finding for the quarter, indicating a potential inflection point or a temporary pause for all market participants in Lafayette County.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dominated by Small Landlords, Lafayette County's Investor Market Pauses After a Year of Growth
Holdings
Investors own 678 SFR properties, 13.8% of Lafayette County's market, with individual investors overwhelmingly controlling 87.8% of this portfolio (595 properties) compared to companies at 13.9% (94 properties).
Pricing
Based on limited data, landlords paid 29.5% less than homeowners in Q1, representing a significant discount of $66,116 per property ($158,167 vs. $224,283).
Activity
Investor purchasing came to a halt in Q1 with 0 acquisitions, a sharp reversal from 2024 when investors were highly active net buyers.
Market Share
The market is almost exclusively controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 99.7% of all investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio size category, with no crossover point where companies gain control, maintaining 95.2% ownership even in the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 with a 20x buy/sell ratio (60 buys vs. 3 sells), though transaction volume dropped to zero in the most recent quarter.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Lafayette County, Wisconsin, is fundamentally a 'mom-and-pop' operation. Investors hold 678 properties, or 13.8% of the county's SFR housing stock, a portfolio overwhelmingly controlled by small, private individuals. These individual investors own 87.8% of the rental properties, and when analyzed by portfolio size, landlords with 1-10 properties command a near-total 99.7% market share. Institutional capital has no presence here, with 0% ownership, reinforcing a market structure built on local, small-scale investment. This composition is further confirmed by raw assessor data, showing 697 individual landlords compared to just 105 company entities.

Investor behavior in the county is characterized by savvy acquisition pricing but fluctuating activity levels. When they transact, landlords secure deep discounts, paying 29.5% less than traditional homeowners in Q1. However, the most recent quarter saw a complete freeze in activity, with zero purchases recorded. This starkly contrasts with 2024, when these same investors were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 60 homes while only selling 3. This halt suggests a recent and significant shift in market conditions, possibly related to inventory, pricing, or broader economic factors.

The key takeaway from this market report is that Lafayette County represents a closed ecosystem dominated by cash-heavy individual investors who are currently on the sidelines. The 97.5% rental rate and 97.0% cash ownership rate point to a stable, long-term hold strategy among the existing landlord base. The sudden stop in transactions after a year of strong accumulation signals that the market has either become too expensive for their value-oriented approach or is suffering from a severe lack of desirable inventory, pausing the engine of this deeply local rental economy.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 05:40 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Lafayette (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Lafayette (WI) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-wi-lafayette/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.