Dent (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Dent (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Dent (MO)
4,910
Total Investors in Dent (MO)
1,864
Investor Owned SFR in Dent (MO)
1,480(30.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,713
SFR Owned
1,264
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
151
SFR Owned
217
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,480 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Dent County's Investor Market: 97.6% Mom-and-Pop Owned, 100% Cash-Funded, and Currently Frozen
Investors own a significant 30.1% of Single-Family homes in Dent County, MO, a market entirely fueled by cash with zero financed properties. Ownership is overwhelmingly local, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 97.6% of the portfolio and zero institutional presence. However, the market has stalled, recording zero investor purchase transactions in the latest quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,480 SFR properties in Dent County, with 85.4% held by individuals.
The entire investor portfolio of 1,480 homes is owned outright with cash, as there are zero financed properties recorded. Of these, 1,440 properties (97.3%) are actively rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income generation. Individual landlords (1,713) vastly outnumber company landlords (151) by more than 11 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No recent transaction activity in Dent County prevents a price comparison between landlords and homeowners.
The complete lack of purchases in the most recent quarter means no data is available to analyze pricing trends or the typical discount landlords may achieve. The only historical data point shows an average price of $33,810 for zero properties purchased between 2020-2023, underscoring the market's low velocity.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing in Dent County halted in Q4 2025, with 0% of market purchases.
There were zero SFR purchases by landlords or any other buyer type recorded in the last quarter. Consequently, mom-and-pop landlords and institutional investors both accounted for 0 acquisitions. This indicates a complete pause in market activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 97.6% of investor-owned SFRs in Dent County.
Single-property landlords alone account for 75.4% of all investor-owned housing, with 1,158 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single landlord tier in Dent County.
Companies fail to achieve majority ownership at any portfolio size. Even in the largest local tier (6-10 properties), individuals own a commanding 77.4% share. In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 89.7% of homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Dent County is hyper-concentrated, with 84% of properties in a single zip code.
The 65560 zip code contains 1,244 of the 1,480 investor-owned properties. While this area has a high ownership rate of 28.9%, other smaller zip codes show even greater saturation, with 65532 at 71.4% and 63629 at 48.1% investor-owned.
Historical Transactions
A lack of historical transaction data for Dent County prevents analysis of long-term buy/sell trends.
No data on historical buy or sell volumes, prices, or landlord-to-landlord transactions is available. Therefore, it is not possible to determine if landlords have historically been net buyers or sellers or to analyze profit margins from transactions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Dent County's market saw zero landlord transactions in Q1 2026, a 0% share.
The complete halt in activity means no properties were transacted across any investor tier, from mom-and-pops to institutions. Consequently, there is no data on Q1 purchase prices or inter-landlord trading.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,480 SFR properties in Dent County, with 85.4% held by individuals.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial footprint in Dent County, owning 1,480 Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes 30.1% of the total 4,910 SFRs in the market.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards private individuals over corporate entities. Individual real estate investors own 1,264 properties, or 85.4% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies hold the remaining 217 properties (14.7%).

A defining characteristic of this market is its complete reliance on cash. All 1,480 investor-owned properties are classified as cash-owned, with zero properties being financed. This points to a market with low leverage and high equity among property owners.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards rental income, with 1,440 of the 1,480 properties (97.3%) identified as rented. This high rental rate confirms the primary strategy of investors in the area is long-term holds for cash flow.

The disparity between owner types is also clear in entity counts. There are 1,713 individual landlords compared to just 151 company landlords, highlighting that the market is driven by a large volume of small-scale, private investors rather than a few large firms.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No recent transaction activity in Dent County prevents a price comparison between landlords and homeowners.
Detailed Findings

A comparative analysis of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners is not possible for Dent County due to a complete absence of recorded purchase transactions in the recent quarter.

This lack of activity prevents the calculation of any price gap or discount that investors might typically achieve in this market. The market's current stagnation is the primary finding from the pricing data.

Historical pricing information is also extremely limited, with data for the 2020-2023 period indicating an average acquisition price of $33,810 based on zero properties purchased. This suggests a prolonged period of very low transaction volume.

Without active buy-side data, it is impossible to determine price appreciation trends or compare pricing strategies between different investor types or timeframes.

The absence of pricing data is a direct reflection of the market's current freeze in transactional activity, a more significant trend than any price comparison could reveal at this time.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing in Dent County halted in Q4 2025, with 0% of market purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition activity in Dent County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing zero properties out of a total of zero market transactions. This represents a 0.0% share of a dormant market.

The inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords, who dominate ownership in the county, made no new acquisitions during the quarter.

Similarly, institutional investors (1,000+ properties), which have no existing presence in the county, also recorded zero purchases, indicating no new large-scale capital is entering this market.

No new landlords entered the market, as the single-property (Tier 01) category, which typically represents new investors, also saw zero new entities and zero properties acquired.

The data points to a market in a holding pattern, with no transactional momentum from either new or existing investors in the most recent quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 97.6% of investor-owned SFRs in Dent County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Dent County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control 97.6% of all investor-owned SFRs, cementing their role as the foundation of the local rental market.

First-time or single-holding investors (Tier 01) are the largest single group, owning 1,158 properties, which accounts for 75.4% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the market's granular, decentralized ownership structure.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) constitute a very small fraction of the market, collectively owning just 37 properties or 2.4% of the investor-held housing stock.

In a sharp contrast to national narratives, institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties have absolutely no presence in Dent County, holding 0.0% of the market share. The area is not a target for large-scale corporate investment.

The ownership distribution is heavily concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum, with portfolio sizes dropping off sharply after just a few properties. For example, the two-property tier holds 11.8%, while the 3-5 property tier holds 8.3%.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single landlord tier in Dent County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the Dent County rental market across every portfolio size, with no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. In the single-property tier, individuals own 1,040 homes (89.7%) compared to just 119 for companies.

This pattern of individual dominance continues up the scale. For landlords with 2 properties, individuals hold an 84.0% share. For those with 3-5 properties, individuals own 78.9%.

Even among the relatively larger local investors in the 6-10 property tier, companies only account for 7 properties (22.6%), while individuals own the other 24 (77.4%).

The data clearly shows that corporate ownership plays a supplementary, not a leading, role in this market. The entire rental ecosystem is supported by a large number of private citizens rather than a consolidated group of businesses.

Given the lack of recent purchasing activity, it's not possible to compare acquisition prices or growth patterns between individual and company investors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Dent County is hyper-concentrated, with 84% of properties in a single zip code.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor properties in Dent County is extremely concentrated. The vast majority of activity is in the 65560 zip code, which alone accounts for 1,244 properties, or 84.1% of the total investor portfolio in the county.

While 65560 is the leader by sheer volume, it is not the most saturated market. The investor ownership rate there is 28.9%, but smaller, more rural zip codes exhibit much higher penetration rates.

The highest investor ownership rate is found in 65532, where investors own 71.4% of the SFR housing stock, indicating a market heavily dominated by rental properties.

Other areas with high investor concentration include 63629 (48.1% investor-owned), 65440 (45.2%), and 65401 (44.3%). This reveals pockets within the county where rental housing is the predominant form of tenure.

This pattern suggests that while one central area drives the volume of investor activity, several smaller, surrounding areas have a much higher density of investor ownership relative to their small market size.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
A lack of historical transaction data for Dent County prevents analysis of long-term buy/sell trends.
Detailed Findings

Comprehensive analysis of long-term transaction patterns in Dent County is not feasible due to the absence of available historical data. This includes buys, sells, and pricing information across different timeframes.

Without this data, a buy/sell ratio cannot be calculated to determine whether landlords have been net accumulators or net sellers of property over time.

It is also not possible to assess the degree of market liquidity through inter-landlord transactions. The percentage of properties bought from or sold to other landlords, a key indicator of a mature investor market, remains unknown.

Similarly, a comparison of average buy prices versus sell prices, which can suggest potential profit margins, cannot be performed.

The lack of historical transaction data, combined with zero recent activity, paints a picture of a historically low-velocity market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Dent County's market saw zero landlord transactions in Q1 2026, a 0% share.
Detailed Findings

The first quarter of 2026 was marked by a complete freeze in the Dent County investor market, with zero transactions recorded involving landlords. This gave investors a 0.0% share of what was a totally inactive market.

The lack of activity was consistent across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who own the vast majority of properties, conducted zero transactions.

There was no purchasing or selling from larger investors either, reflecting a market-wide pause in capital deployment and portfolio adjustments.

As a result of zero transactions, no average purchase price can be calculated for any tier, and it is impossible to compare the buying strategies of different investor groups.

Furthermore, data on inter-landlord trading is nonexistent for the quarter. The percentage of properties acquired from other landlords, a measure of internal market churn, was 0%.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dominated by cash-only mom-and-pop landlords, Dent County's 30.1% investor-held market is currently frozen with zero activity.
Holdings
In Dent County, MO, landlords own 1,480 SFR properties, representing a significant 30.1% of the market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors holding 1,264 properties (85.4%), while companies own the remaining 217 (14.7%).
Pricing
A lack of recent market transactions in Dent County prevents a direct price comparison between landlords and homeowners, underscoring a period of extreme market stagnation.
Activity
Investor purchase activity came to a complete halt in Q1 2026, with landlords acquiring 0 properties, representing 0.0% of all sales. No new landlords entered the market during this period of inactivity.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert total control over the market, owning 97.6% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, with no crossover point where companies take control. Companies play a minor role, holding just 14.7% of properties and never achieving dominance at any scale.
Transactions
Due to a complete freeze in market activity, no buy/sell ratio can be calculated for Q1 2026. Both all landlords and institutional investors (which have no presence) recorded zero buys and zero sells.
Market Narrative

The investor market in Dent County, Missouri, presents a unique picture of hyper-local, small-scale ownership. Investors command a substantial 30.1% of the Single-Family Residential market, with a total of 1,480 properties. This entire portfolio is owned outright with cash, as no financed properties were recorded. Ownership is overwhelmingly granular; individual investors hold 85.4% of these homes (1,264 properties), while mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.6% of the investor-owned housing stock. Institutional capital is entirely absent from this market.

Investor behavior in Dent County is currently defined by inaction. The most recent quarter saw a complete halt in transactional flow, with zero properties purchased or sold by investors. This stagnation prevents any analysis of current pricing strategies or comparisons against traditional homeowners. The market's structure, built on a foundation of thousands of individual owners, suggests a stable, long-term hold strategy focused on rental income, as evidenced by the 97.3% of investor properties that are rented.

The key takeaway from Dent County is a market that operates completely outside the national narrative of corporate landlord expansion. It is a deeply-rooted, cash-driven ecosystem dominated by local individuals. While this structure may provide stability, the current freeze in activity signals extreme illiquidity and potential challenges for any owner needing to sell. The heavy geographic concentration in the 65560 zip code further highlights the localized nature of this specific market reports dashboard, which is more a collection of small holdings than a dynamic, transactional environment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 09:08 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Dent (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Dent (MO) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mo-dent/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.