Carlisle (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Carlisle (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Carlisle (KY)
1,681
Total Investors in Carlisle (KY)
465
Investor Owned SFR in Carlisle (KY)
402(23.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
426
SFR Owned
362
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
39
SFR Owned
46
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 402 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Carlisle, KY, Controlling 96% of Rentals
Investors own 23.9% of all Single-Family Residential properties in Carlisle County, with individual mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 96.2% of that portfolio. In a sharp contrast to national trends, local investors have recently paid premiums over traditional homeowners, and institutional ownership is non-existent. The market is defined by small-scale, local landlords who are consistently net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 402 SFR properties in Carlisle, with individuals holding 90.0%.
Cash purchases dominate the investor market, with 362 properties owned outright compared to just 40 that are financed. Of the 402 investor-owned properties, 389 are classified as rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income generation. Individual investors (426) vastly outnumber company investors (39).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Carlisle County investors defy trends, paying premiums up to 13.5% over homeowners.
Unlike most markets where investors find discounts, Carlisle landlords paid more than homeowners in all three reported quarters of 2025. This premium was most significant in Q3 2025, at 13.5% ($116,250 vs $102,380). No landlord purchase activity was recorded in Q1 2026, preventing a current price comparison.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 33.3% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for 100% of investor purchase activity in the quarter, with one new single-property landlord entering the market. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 96.2% of all investor-owned housing in Carlisle.
Single-property landlords are the largest group, owning 318 properties, a full 75.0% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional ownership is completely absent at 0.0%, demonstrating a market untouched by large-scale investors.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own over 80% of properties in every investor tier in Carlisle County.
There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners; individuals maintain control across all portfolio sizes. In the largest local tier (11-20 properties), individuals own 93.3% of the assets.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 42023 zip code, with 226 properties.
The 42023 zip code has the most investor-owned homes and a high ownership rate of 27.7%. The 42069 zip code shows the highest concentration at 50.0%, but this is based on a very small sample of only 2 investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Carlisle landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 18 properties and selling only 2 in 2025.
The net buying trend was also evident in 2024, when landlords purchased 9 properties and sold just 2. In Q3 2025, the buy-to-sell ratio was 4-to-1. No institutional transaction data is available due to a lack of activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 33.3% of all Q4 2025 transactions, with 1 purchase.
The single transaction was made by a new, single-property landlord. No inter-landlord trading occurred, as the property was not purchased from another investor. No pricing data was available for the tier's purchase.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 402 SFR properties in Carlisle, with individuals holding 90.0%.
Detailed Findings

In Carlisle County, investors hold a significant 23.9% share of the Single-Family Residential market, with a portfolio of 402 properties. This concentration highlights the importance of the rental market in the local housing ecosystem.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly tilted towards individuals, who own 362 properties, or 90.0% of the investor-owned total. In contrast, companies own just 46 properties (11.4%), underscoring a market driven by local, small-scale participants rather than large corporations.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash transactions. An overwhelming 90.0% of investor-owned properties (362) were acquired with cash, while only 40 properties are currently financed. This suggests a fiscally conservative investor base with low leverage.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income, with 389 of the 402 properties classified as rented. This demonstrates that the primary strategy for the vast majority of local investors is long-term holding for rental revenue.

By entity count, the market is composed of 426 individual landlords and 39 company landlords. This 11-to-1 ratio of individual to company entities further cements the 'mom-and-pop' character of the Carlisle County real estate investing landscape.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Carlisle County investors defy trends, paying premiums up to 13.5% over homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In a striking reversal of typical market dynamics, landlords in Carlisle County have consistently paid more for properties than traditional homeowners. In Q3 2025, investors paid an average of $116,250, a 13.5% premium over the $102,380 paid by homeowners.

This trend of paying a premium was not an isolated event. In Q2 2025, investors paid a 1.3% premium ($124,033 vs. $122,417), and in Q1 2025 they paid an 8.9% premium ($495,625 vs. $455,250). This pattern suggests intense competition for limited inventory or a focus on specific property types that command higher prices.

The most recent quarter, Q1 2026, saw zero recorded acquisitions by landlords, making a current price comparison impossible. This lack of activity may indicate a pause in purchasing due to pricing or inventory constraints.

Looking at historical trends, the average landlord acquisition price fluctuated significantly, moving from $178,889 in 2024 to $212,928 in 2025. This volatility reflects the low transaction volume typical of a smaller market.

The consistent premiums paid by investors challenge the common assumption that landlords always acquire properties at a discount. In Carlisle County, investors appear willing to pay market rate or higher to secure desirable rental assets.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 33.3% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for one-third of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 1 of the 3 total SFR properties sold. This significant market share, even with low volume, shows continued investor demand in Carlisle County.

The entirety of investor purchasing activity was driven by the smallest players. A single new landlord, acquiring their first property, represented 100% of investor acquisitions for the quarter. This highlights the market's reliance on new, small-scale entrants for growth.

There was zero purchasing activity from mid-size or institutional investors. The data confirms that large-scale portfolio acquisition is not a factor in this market, with all activity concentrated in the 'mom-and-pop' Tiers 01-04.

The low overall transaction volume of just 3 SFR sales in the entire county for the quarter underscores the market's small scale. In such an environment, even a single purchase can represent a substantial portion of activity.

This quarter's activity reinforces the long-term ownership structure, with the market's growth coming exclusively from new, individual investors rather than existing landlords expanding their portfolios or large companies entering the area.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 96.2% of all investor-owned housing in Carlisle.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Carlisle County is the epitome of a 'mom-and-pop' market. Landlords owning between 1 and 10 properties control a staggering 96.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, owning 318 properties. This represents 75.0% of the entire investor portfolio, indicating that the majority of landlords are small, first-time investors.

The next largest tiers are also small-scale: owners with 3-5 properties hold 9.7% of the portfolio, and those with 2 properties hold 6.6%. This distribution reinforces the dominance of small, locally-based ownership.

There is zero presence from institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties). This complete absence confirms that the local rental market operates entirely outside the scope of large, national investment firms often highlighted in media narratives.

The ownership structure is highly concentrated at the smallest end of the spectrum, with very few mid-size landlords. Only 3.5% of properties are held by investors in the 11-20 property tier, showing limited scaling among local players.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own over 80% of properties in every investor tier in Carlisle County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant force across every single portfolio size in Carlisle County. Unlike larger markets where companies take over in higher tiers, individuals here maintain an overwhelming majority, owning 91.3% of properties in the single-property tier and 81.0% in the 6-10 property tier.

There is no tier where corporate ownership comes close to a majority. Even among the largest local portfolios of 11-20 properties, individual landlords own 14 of the 15 properties, a 93.3% share.

Company ownership is sparse and concentrated in smaller portfolios. The largest number of company-owned properties (28) is in the single-property tier, suggesting these are primarily small businesses or LLCs holding one asset, not scalable investment vehicles.

This data illustrates a market where the path to portfolio growth remains an individual pursuit. The lack of a corporate crossover point signifies a barrier or lack of interest for company-led consolidation in the local rental market.

The complete control by individuals across the board reinforces the local, community-based nature of real estate investment in the county, with ownership staying in the hands of private citizens rather than corporate entities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 42023 zip code, with 226 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor activity in Carlisle County is highly concentrated. The 42023 zip code is the clear epicenter, containing 226 investor-owned SFR properties, which is over half of the county's entire investor portfolio of 402.

The concentration in 42023 is not just about raw numbers; it also has a high investor penetration rate of 27.7%. This indicates that more than one in every four SFRs in this area is owned by an investor.

While the 42069 zip code technically has the highest ownership percentage at 50.0%, this figure is based on a tiny sample size of just 2 investor properties out of 4 total SFRs, making it an outlier rather than a representative trend.

Other areas with notable investor presence include 42021 with 95 properties (19.5% rate) and 42035 with 58 properties (21.5% rate), showing a clear hierarchy of investment focus within the county.

This geographic clustering suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods or communities, likely those with the most favorable rental demand, amenities, or housing stock suitable for investment, which can be identified using an advanced property search tool.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Carlisle landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 18 properties and selling only 2 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows that landlords in Carlisle County are consistently expanding their portfolios. In 2025, they were strong net buyers, with 18 acquisitions against only 2 sales, resulting in a net gain of 16 properties.

This pattern of accumulation is not new. The prior year, 2024, also saw investors as net buyers, acquiring 9 properties while only selling 2. This consistent trend demonstrates a long-term belief in the local rental market's stability and profitability.

The most recent detailed quarter, Q3 2025, continued this trend with 4 buys and only 1 sale. This steady accumulation, even in a low-volume market, signals a clear strategy of holding assets rather than flipping or frequent trading.

The complete absence of transaction data for institutional investors (1,000+ tier) aligns with all other findings. These large players are neither buying nor selling in Carlisle County, leaving the market entirely to smaller, local investors.

The persistent net-buying behavior suggests that the 23.9% investor market share in the county is likely to grow or remain stable, as existing landlords are holding onto their properties while new ones enter the market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 33.3% of all Q4 2025 transactions, with 1 purchase.
Detailed Findings

In the low-volume market of Q4 2025, landlords played a significant role, participating in 1 of the 3 total SFR transactions, capturing a 33.3% share of all activity.

All investor transaction activity during the quarter was concentrated in the smallest tier. A single purchase by a new, single-property landlord accounted for 100% of the investor-side transactions, reinforcing the market's grassroots nature.

The data indicates zero trading between investors in Q4, with the new landlord acquiring their property from a non-investor. This highlights a market where new inventory is coming from the traditional homeowner market rather than from portfolio churn.

There was no transaction activity from any other investor tier, including mid-size and institutional landlords. This lack of participation from larger players is a consistent theme across all Investor Pulse reports for Carlisle County.

Due to the limited activity, no average purchase price could be calculated for the tier, which is common in smaller datasets where privacy or statistical validity prevents disclosure.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Carlisle County's Real Estate Market: Dominated by Individual Investors Owning 96% of Rentals
Holdings
Investors own 402 SFR properties in Carlisle County, representing 23.9% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 362 properties (90.0%), compared to just 46 properties (11.4%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Contrary to national norms, landlords in Carlisle County have recently paid premiums over traditional homeowners. In 2025, these premiums reached as high as 13.5%, with investors paying an average of $116,250 versus homeowners' $102,380 in Q3.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 33.3% of all homes sold, with all activity coming from new, single-property investors. This singular purchase highlights the market's reliance on new mom-and-pop entrants.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market, owning 96.2% of all investor-held SFRs. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have absolutely no presence, with 0.0% ownership.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, with no crossover point where companies become the majority. Even in the largest local portfolios (11-20 properties), individuals own 93.3% of the assets.
Transactions
Landlords are persistent net buyers, acquiring 18 properties while selling only 2 throughout 2025. This 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio demonstrates a clear strategy of portfolio growth and long-term holding.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Carlisle County, KY, is a microcosm of small-town, main-street capitalism, starkly different from narratives of corporate consolidation. Investors own a significant 23.9% of the SFR market, totaling 402 properties. This market is almost entirely controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a commanding 96.2% of the investor-owned housing stock. Individual investors own 90.0% of these properties, with institutional firms completely absent from the area.

Investor behavior in Carlisle County defies several national trends. Landlords are consistently net buyers, with a 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025, signaling a strong commitment to long-term holds. Most notably, they have recently paid significant premiums over traditional homeowners, in some cases over 13%, suggesting intense competition for a limited supply of desirable rental properties. All recent purchasing activity has come from new, single-property landlords, indicating the market's growth is fueled by new local entrants rather than portfolio expansion from existing players.

The key takeaway is that Carlisle County represents a stable, insulated rental market dominated by small, individual investors who prefer to own their properties outright with cash. The absence of institutional players and the trend of investors paying premiums create a unique dynamic where local knowledge and long-term commitment are the primary drivers of success. This market structure suggests a high degree of stability but limited liquidity, with growth dependent on the financial capacity of local individuals to enter the market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:38 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Carlisle (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Carlisle (KY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ky-carlisle/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.