Scott (AR) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Scott (AR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Scott (AR)
2,272
Total Investors in Scott (AR)
633
Investor Owned SFR in Scott (AR)
512(22.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
576
SFR Owned
458
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
57
SFR Owned
68
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 512 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Scott County's Investor Market, Controlling 93.3% of Properties as Institutions Divest
Investors own 512 single-family homes in Scott County, representing 22.5% of the total market, with individual investors comprising 89.5% of that ownership. In Q1, landlords secured properties at a 20.4% discount compared to homeowners. While smaller landlords are net buyers, institutional investors are net sellers, signaling a clear divergence in market strategy.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 512 SFRs in Scott County (22.5% of market), with individuals holding 89.5% of properties.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (454 properties) rather than financed (58 properties). Individual landlords are the primary market drivers, with 576 entities compared to just 57 company entities.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired properties for 20.4% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $24,292.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been consistently large, reaching a staggering 71.6% ($83,063) in Q3 2025. This reveals a persistent ability for investors to secure properties well below typical market rates.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 20.7% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter, totaling 6 acquisitions.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove nearly all purchasing activity, accounting for 85.7% of investor acquisitions. An institutional investor also made a single purchase, representing 14.3% of the landlord total.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 93.3% of all investor-owned SFRs in Scott County.
Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, owning 406 properties (73.0% of the total). In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just two homes, a mere 0.4% market share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across every portfolio size, holding 92% of single-property rentals.
There is no tier in Scott County where companies are the majority owners. Even in the 11-20 property tier, individuals own a commanding 78.6% share, showing that private capital, not corporate, scales in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in Waldron's 72958 zip code, with 371 investor-owned properties.
While 72958 has the highest volume, other zip codes show higher penetration rates. The 72927 zip code leads with a 29.2% investor ownership rate, followed by 72841 at 27.6%, indicating specific neighborhood targets for investment.
Historical Transactions
While landlords are strong net buyers (9 buys vs 2 sells in Q1), institutional investors are net sellers.
Institutions (1000+ tier) were net sellers over the past year, with 1 buy versus 2 sells in 2025. This contrasts sharply with the overall market, where landlords posted a net gain of 38 properties in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 21.4% of all Q1 property transactions, with 9 total transactions.
A massive price gap exists between buyer tiers: institutional investors paid $196,677 per property in Q1, over 120.7% more than the $89,125 average paid by new single-property landlords. This suggests a focus on different asset qualities.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 512 SFRs in Scott County (22.5% of market), with individuals holding 89.5% of properties.
Detailed Findings

In Scott County, investors hold a significant 22.5% share of the single-family residential market, owning 512 out of 2,272 total SFR properties.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, not corporations. Individuals own 458 properties, accounting for 89.5% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 68 properties (13.3%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 576 individual landlords compared to only 57 company landlords. This highlights a fragmented market composed of many small-scale operators.

A strong preference for all-cash ownership is evident, with 454 properties owned outright versus only 58 that are financed. This suggests a market of financially stable investors who are not highly leveraged.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rentals, with 495 properties classified as rented. This focus on rental income is a core strategy for investors in this region.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired properties for 20.4% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $24,292.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Scott County demonstrate a consistent ability to purchase properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $94,740, which is 20.4% less than the $119,032 average paid by homeowners.

This pricing advantage translates to an average savings of $24,292 per property, giving investors a substantial equity and margin advantage from the moment of acquisition.

The Q1 discount is part of a larger trend of deep price advantages for investors. In previous quarters, the gap was even more pronounced, such as in Q3 2025 when landlords paid 71.6% less ($33,000 vs. $116,063).

Similarly, the discount was 37.6% in Q2 2025 and 42.4% in Q1 2025, signaling that investors are systematically finding and closing on undervalued assets.

This sustained price gap indicates that investors are not competing in the same heated market as traditional buyers, likely targeting off-market deals or properties requiring renovation.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 20.7% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter, totaling 6 acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

Landlord activity accounted for a significant portion of market transactions in the last quarter, with investors purchasing 6 of the 29 total SFRs sold, a market share of 20.7%.

The purchasing activity was dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, owning between 1 and 10 properties, were responsible for 6 acquisitions, or 85.7% of all landlord buys.

New entrants are a key driver of this activity, with 6 new single-property landlords entering the market, demonstrating ongoing interest from first-time investors.

Despite the dominance of small buyers, a large institutional investor (1,000+ properties) also acquired a single property, accounting for the remaining 14.3% of investor purchases for the quarter.

This mix of activity shows a market primarily fueled by new and small investors, but one that still attracts opportunistic buys from the largest players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 93.3% of all investor-owned SFRs in Scott County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Scott County is defined by small, independent operators, not large institutions. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with a 93.3% share of all investor-held SFRs.

First-time or single-property landlords are the backbone of the local rental market. This tier alone owns 406 properties, which constitutes 73.0% of the entire investor portfolio.

Ownership concentration falls off sharply as portfolio size increases. Landlords with 2-10 properties collectively own 20.3% of the stock, further cementing the dominance of small investors.

Mid-size investors (11-100 properties) have a minimal footprint, holding just 5.5% of properties combined across two tiers.

Institutional capital has a nearly nonexistent presence. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier own only 2 homes in the county, representing a tiny 0.4% of the investor market and challenging the narrative of a corporate takeover.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the dominant owners across every portfolio size, holding 92% of single-property rentals.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary force in Scott County's rental market across all portfolio sizes. In the entry-level single-property tier, individuals own 377 homes (92.0%) compared to just 33 for companies (8.0%).

Unlike in larger metro areas, there is no crossover point where corporate ownership surpasses individual ownership. Even as portfolios grow, individuals maintain their majority stake.

In the 6-10 property tier, individuals still hold a 92.2% share. For portfolios of 11-20 properties, individual ownership remains strong at 78.6%.

The largest share for company ownership appears in the 3-5 property tier, where they hold 12 properties, but this still only represents 32.4% of that segment.

This data illustrates that the path to building a rental portfolio in Scott County is overwhelmingly pursued by private individuals and family-run operations rather than by structured corporate entities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in Waldron's 72958 zip code, with 371 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Scott County is not evenly distributed, with significant concentration in specific zip codes. The 72958 zip code, covering Waldron, is the epicenter of activity by volume, containing 371 investor-owned SFRs.

This concentration in 72958 represents 21.9% of that area's housing stock, making it a key hub for rental properties and real estate investing.

However, analysis of ownership rates reveals other hotspots. The 72927 zip code has the highest investor penetration, where 29.2% of SFRs are investor-owned.

Other areas with high investor saturation include 72841 (27.6% ownership rate) and 71953 (26.7% ownership rate), pointing to targeted acquisitions in these smaller communities.

The contrast between the area with the highest count (72958) and those with the highest rates (72927, 72841) shows that investors use different strategies: one of scale in the county's primary town and one of high-density saturation in surrounding areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
While landlords are strong net buyers (9 buys vs 2 sells in Q1), institutional investors are net sellers.
Detailed Findings

A clear divergence in strategy exists between small and large investors in Scott County. Overall, landlords are aggressive accumulators of property, posting a net gain of 7 properties in Q1 2026 with 9 buys and only 2 sells.

This net buyer trend is consistent over time. In 2025, landlords added a net of 9 properties, and in 2024 they added a net of 38 properties, signaling sustained portfolio growth across the market.

Conversely, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) are reducing their exposure. For the full year of 2025, this tier was a net seller, with only 1 purchase compared to 2 sales.

This pattern of institutional divestment continued in Q1 2026, where they bought one property and sold one, resulting in a neutral position but reinforcing their lack of accumulation.

This dynamic indicates that local and regional landlords are capitalizing on opportunities, while large national players are either liquidating non-core assets or see better opportunities elsewhere.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 21.4% of all Q1 property transactions, with 9 total transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q1, landlords participated in 9 of the 42 total SFR transactions in Scott County, capturing a 21.4% share of all market activity.

Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, accounting for 8 of the 9 landlord transactions. This group includes 6 purchases by new single-property investors.

A striking pricing disparity emerged among investor tiers. The institutional investor in the 1,000+ tier paid an average of $196,677 for their acquisition, a 120.7% premium over the $89,125 average paid by single-property landlords.

This significant price difference suggests the institutional buyer targeted a premium or unique asset, while smaller landlords focused on more affordable, traditional rental stock.

Inter-landlord activity was present but minimal. Of the 6 properties purchased by single-property landlords, one (16.7%) was acquired from another investor, indicating a small but functional market for transferring rental assets.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Control 93.3% of Scott County's Investor Market as Institutions Exit
Holdings
Landlords own 512 SFR properties in Scott County, representing 22.5% of the market. Individual investors dominate, holding 458 properties (89.5%) compared to just 68 (13.3%) for companies.
Pricing
Landlords secured a significant 20.4% pricing advantage over homeowners in Q1, paying an average of $94,740 per property, a discount of $24,292.
Activity
In the last quarter, landlords acquired 20.7% of all properties sold. This activity was led by small investors, with 6 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 93.3% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 0.4%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command the majority of properties across all portfolio sizes. There is no tier where companies are the dominant owner, as individuals own 78.6% of even the 11-20 property portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers with a 4.5x buy/sell ratio in Q1 (9 buys vs. 2 sells), but institutional investors are net sellers over the past year (1 buy vs. 2 sells in 2025).
Market Narrative

In Scott County, Arkansas, the single-family rental market is firmly in the hands of small, independent operators. Investors own 512 SFR properties, accounting for 22.5% of the county's total housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 458 properties (89.5%), dwarfing the 68 properties (13.3%) held by companies. The market structure is highly fragmented; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command a 93.3% share of investor-owned homes, while institutional firms (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence with just two properties (0.4%).

Investor behavior in Scott County reveals a strategic and disciplined approach. In Q1, landlords acquired properties for an average of $94,740, a 20.4% discount compared to the $119,032 paid by traditional homeowners. This pattern of securing below-market-value assets is consistent. While landlords collectively are strong net buyers, with 9 purchases versus 2 sales in Q1, a clear split has emerged: institutional investors are net sellers over the last year, signaling a strategic retreat from the area. This leaves local and regional investors to drive market activity, which they did by acquiring 20.7% of all homes sold in the previous quarter.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Scott County's housing market is not being corporatized. Instead, it is a thriving ecosystem for individual real estate investors who are skillfully expanding their portfolios with discounted properties while larger institutional capital exits. This dynamic creates a stable rental market primarily shaped by local stakeholders who are reinvesting in their communities, a trend that defines the investment landscape across the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 20, 2026 at 10:16 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Scott (AR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Scott (AR) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ar-scott/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.