Sumner (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sumner (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sumner (TN)
63,727
Total Investors in Sumner (TN)
12,442
Investor Owned SFR in Sumner (TN)
10,842(17.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
11,226
SFR Owned
8,343
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,216
SFR Owned
2,731
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 10,842 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Sumner County's investor market is dominated by small landlords who command 84% of holdings and are active net buyers.
Investors own 10,842 SFR properties (17.0% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 84.1% versus just 6.9% for institutional investors. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 18.2% of all properties sold, securing them at a 15.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners. Both small and large investors remain net buyers, signaling continued confidence in the Sumner County market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 10,842 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 77.0% share.
The majority of investor-owned homes (64.3%) are held as cash properties rather than financed (35.7%). An overwhelming 97.8% of the investor portfolio consists of non-owner-occupied, rental-focused properties.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired property for 15.8% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $83,546.
The pricing advantage for investors has remained robust, with discounts between 14.6% and 18.8% over the past year. Landlord acquisition prices have appreciated 18.7% in Q1 2026 compared to the 2020-2023 average.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 19.9% of all single-family homes sold in Sumner County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominated acquisition activity, accounting for 85.0% of all properties purchased by investors. In contrast, institutional buyers (1000+ properties) acquired just 3.9% of the investor total.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 84.1% of all investor-owned housing in Sumner County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 6.9% of the investor-held SFR stock. Single-property landlords are the largest group, owning 67.0% of the entire portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in larger portfolios, controlling 89.5% of properties in the 51-100 tier.
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 91.2% of single-property holdings. The ownership crossover from individual to company majority occurs in portfolios of 51-100 properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 37066 holding 3,908 investor-owned properties.
Zip code 37049 has the highest investor penetration rate at an extraordinary 80.0%. The top five zip codes by count hold a combined 9,412 properties, which is 86.8% of all investor-owned homes in the county.
Historical Transactions
Sumner County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 171 properties while selling only 52 in Q1 2026.
This net-buyer trend is consistent, with landlords adding a net 569 properties in 2025 and 714 in 2024. Institutional investors are also net buyers, though on a much smaller scale, adding a net of 1 property in Q1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 18.2% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, purchasing 171 properties.
Institutional investors paid 2.9% less than single-property landlords this quarter ($374,101 vs. $385,402). Mid-size landlords (21-50 tier) were the most active in trading with peers, sourcing 57.1% of their new properties from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 10,842 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 77.0% share.
Detailed Findings

In Sumner County, investors hold a significant 17.0% of all single-family residential properties, totaling 10,842 homes. This demonstrates a substantial investor footprint within the local housing market.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by individual investors, who own 8,343 properties, or 77.0% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties account for the remaining 2,731 homes (25.2%), underscoring the prevalence of small-scale real estate investing.

A strong indicator of market health and investor strategy is the preference for cash ownership. Investors in Sumner County own 6,973 properties outright (cash), compared to 3,869 that are financed. This 1.8-to-1 cash-to-financed ratio suggests that many investors operate with low leverage.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 10,602 properties (97.8% of the total) classified as non-owner-occupied. This high concentration confirms that the primary strategy for SFR investors in the area is generating rental revenue.

When looking at the entities themselves, the disparity is even clearer. There are 11,226 individual landlords compared to just 1,216 company landlords, a ratio of more than 9 to 1. This highlights that the market is driven by a large number of small, independent operators rather than a few large corporations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired property for 15.8% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $83,546.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Sumner County demonstrate a consistent ability to acquire properties at a significant discount. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $446,590, which is $83,546 (15.8%) less than the $530,136 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price advantage is not a recent anomaly. The gap has been consistent and substantial over the past year, ranging from a 14.6% discount in Q1 2025 to an 18.8% discount in Q3 2025, suggesting a durable strategic advantage for investors in sourcing deals.

Despite acquiring properties below the typical market rate, investors have benefited from strong market appreciation. The average Q1 2026 acquisition price of $446,590 represents an 18.7% increase from the pandemic-era average of $376,223 (2020-2023).

Comparing prices across recent quarters reveals a dynamic market. While the Q1 2026 price is lower than the Q4 2025 peak of $459,319, it remains well above the prices seen in mid-2025, indicating recovery and continued strength.

The substantial and persistent discount suggests investors are adept at finding off-market opportunities or properties that require renovation, allowing them to purchase assets for significantly less than retail buyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 19.9% of all single-family homes sold in Sumner County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity represented a significant portion of the Sumner County market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 119 of the 597 total SFR properties sold, a market share of 19.9%.

The backbone of this activity is the small, independent landlord. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for purchasing 108 properties, which constitutes 85.0% of all landlord acquisitions during the quarter.

New entrants are a key driver of the market. In Q4, 107 new entities entered the market by purchasing their first investment property, acquiring 74 homes in total. This represents 58.3% of all properties bought by investors, highlighting a vibrant and growing base of new landlords.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) had a minimal presence, acquiring only 5 properties. Their 3.9% share of purchases is dwarfed by the activity of single-property landlords alone (58.3%).

Mid-size landlords also showed pockets of concentrated buying activity. For example, in the 21-50 property tier, just 3 entities acquired 6 properties, demonstrating efficient portfolio growth among established operators.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 84.1% of all investor-owned housing in Sumner County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investor-held real estate in Sumner County is defined by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, who own 1-10 properties, collectively hold 84.1% of all investor-owned SFRs, showing their foundational role in the local rental market.

This concentration at the small end of the market directly challenges the narrative of corporate dominance. Institutional investors (Tier 09) own just 780 properties, representing a modest 6.9% of the total investor portfolio.

The single-property landlord tier is the most significant segment by a wide margin. These 7,560 properties account for 67.0% of all investor-owned homes, indicating that the vast majority of landlords in Sumner County are first-time or small-scale operators.

Mid-size investors (11-1000 properties) bridge the gap, owning a combined 9.0% of the portfolio. This segment, while smaller than the other two extremes, represents a class of professional and growing real estate businesses.

The data clearly illustrates a highly fragmented market. Ownership is not concentrated in the hands of a few large companies but is instead distributed across thousands of individual and small-business landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in larger portfolios, controlling 89.5% of properties in the 51-100 tier.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Sumner County shifts dramatically with portfolio size. While individual investors form the backbone of the market, companies become the dominant players in larger tiers.

Individuals overwhelmingly control the entry-level tiers. They own 91.2% of single-property portfolios and 78.6% of two-property portfolios, illustrating that most landlords begin their journey as individual operators.

The transition to corporate ownership happens decisively in larger portfolios. The crossover point is the 51-100 property tier, where companies own 77 properties, or 89.5% of the homes, compared to just 9 owned by individuals. This suggests that as portfolios scale, incorporating becomes standard practice.

Even in the mid-range tiers, individual ownership remains strong. For portfolios with 11-20 properties, individuals still own a 57.4% majority, and for the 21-50 tier, they hold 54.9%. This shows that many landlords continue to operate without incorporating even as they grow.

This tiered analysis reveals a clear lifecycle for real estate investors: they typically start as individuals and transition to a corporate structure for legal and financial reasons as their holdings expand beyond 50 properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 37066 holding 3,908 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Sumner County is not evenly distributed but is heavily concentrated in specific areas. The top five zip codes by property count (37066, 37075, 37148, 37072, and 37048) contain 9,412 properties, representing 86.8% of the entire investor portfolio.

The zip code 37066 is the epicenter of investor ownership by volume, with 3,908 properties. This single area accounts for over a third (36.0%) of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

However, the highest concentration rate is found elsewhere. Zip code 37049 has a remarkable 80.0% investor ownership rate, indicating a market almost entirely composed of rental properties. This is an outlier compared to the next highest rate of 26.4% in 37186.

The data highlights a key distinction between total volume and market penetration. While 37066 has the most investor properties, its 19.3% ownership rate is more in line with a typical suburban rental market. In contrast, 37049 represents a unique investment niche.

This clustering of investor activity suggests that landlords are targeting specific neighborhoods, likely driven by factors such as school districts, affordability, and rental demand, creating distinct sub-markets within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Sumner County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 171 properties while selling only 52 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a clear and sustained trend of portfolio growth among Sumner County landlords. In Q1 2026, investors were strong net buyers, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.3 to 1 (171 buys vs. 52 sells).

This behavior is part of a long-term pattern of accumulation. Landlords have consistently bought more properties than they have sold, resulting in a net gain of 569 properties in 2025 and 714 properties in 2024. This signals strong, ongoing confidence in the local market.

Even the largest institutional investors (1000+ tier) are in acquisition mode, though their activity is more balanced. In Q1 2026, they purchased 5 properties and sold 4, for a net gain of one property. This follows a pattern of modest net buying in previous years.

The trend of net acquisitions has remained robust through different market conditions, from the high-activity years of 2024 and 2025 into the current quarter. This consistent accumulation indicates a long-term investment horizon for most landlords in the area.

This persistent net buying demonstrates that investors are not flipping properties for short-term gains but are instead building long-term rental portfolios, contributing to the available housing stock for renters in Sumner County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 18.2% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, purchasing 171 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors were a significant force in the transaction market, participating in 18.2% of all SFR sales. This activity was heavily skewed towards acquisitions, with landlords purchasing 171 properties.

Mom-and-pop landlords drove the bulk of the transaction volume. Investors in Tiers 01-04 accounted for 149 of the 171 landlord transactions (87.1%), reinforcing their role as the primary acquirers in the market.

A notable pricing pattern emerged among different investor types. Institutional buyers (Tier 09) paid an average of $374,101 per property, a 2.9% discount compared to the $385,402 average paid by new single-property landlords. This suggests larger players may have access to better pricing through scale or deal structure.

The data also reveals a liquid market for inter-landlord transactions. Investors in the 21-50 property tier were particularly active in this space, acquiring 57.1% of their new properties from other landlords. This contrasts sharply with new landlords (Tier 01), who sourced only 5.3% of their purchases from fellow investors, relying more on the open market.

The lowest purchase prices were seen in the small landlord (6-10) tier, with an average of just $138,250. This indicates a strategy focused on acquiring lower-cost assets, possibly in need of renovation, which differs from the higher-priced assets targeted by new and institutional investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Sumner County's investor market is defined by small landlords who own 84.1% of stock and consistently outpace institutions in acquisitions.
Holdings
Landlords own 10,842 SFR properties, representing 17.0% of Sumner County's market. Individual investors hold a commanding 77.0% of these assets (8,343 properties), while companies own the remaining 25.2% (2,731 properties).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $446,590 per property, securing a 15.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners, which translates to an $83,546 savings per transaction.
Activity
Investors purchased 19.9% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounting for 85.0% of those acquisitions. The market also welcomed 107 new single-property landlords.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market, owning 84.1% of all investor-held SFRs. In stark contrast, large institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minor 6.9% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 51-100 property tier, where they control 89.5% of the homes. This signals a clear shift to corporate structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 3.29x buy/sell ratio in Q1 (171 buys vs. 52 sells). Institutional investors are also accumulating properties, albeit more slowly, positioning themselves as net buyers with 5 purchases and 4 sales.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Sumner County, TN is fundamentally shaped by small, independent operators rather than large corporations. Investors own 10,842 single-family homes, making up 17.0% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a commanding 84.1% share. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own a mere 6.9%. The ownership base itself is composed primarily of individuals, who own 77.0% of all investor-held properties, underscoring the grassroots nature of real estate investment in the region.

In terms of market activity, investors are strategic and aggressive buyers. During the first quarter, they acquired properties at an average 15.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners, saving over $83,000 per home. This purchasing power translated into a 19.9% share of all properties sold in the previous quarter. The market continues to grow, with 107 new single-property landlords entering in Q4 alone. Furthermore, investors across all tiers are net buyers, consistently acquiring more properties than they sell, a trend that has held steady over the past two years and signals long-term confidence in Sumner County.

The key takeaway from this investor pulse report is that the narrative of institutional dominance does not apply here. Sumner County's rental market is supported by thousands of small landlords who are continuously growing their portfolios. Ownership transitions from individual to corporate structures only at a larger scale, typically beyond 50 properties. With strong, consistent net buying and a steady influx of new participants, the investor market in Sumner County remains robust, fragmented, and firmly in the hands of local operators.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 03:01 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Sumner (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Sumner (TN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tn-sumner/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.