Grundy (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Grundy (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Grundy (IA)
4,030
Total Investors in Grundy (IA)
394
Investor Owned SFR in Grundy (IA)
332(8.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
332
SFR Owned
259
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
62
SFR Owned
77
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 332 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Grundy County's investor market is defined by small landlords, with Q1 activity marked by a rare price premium.
Investors own 332 single-family homes in Grundy County, representing 8.2% of the market, with individual investors accounting for 78.0% of these holdings. In a surprising reversal of typical trends, a landlord paid a 90.9% premium over homeowners in Q1. Overall activity remains low, with landlords shifting to a neutral buy-sell position after two years as net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 332 SFR properties in Grundy County, with individuals owning a dominant 78.0% share.
Of the investor-owned properties, 251 were purchased with cash, outnumbering the 81 financed properties by more than three to one. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 314 properties identified as rented. Overall, there are 394 distinct landlords in the county.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a striking Q1 market anomaly, landlords paid $305,000, a 90.9% premium over the typical homeowner price of $159,730.
This Q1 premium of $145,270 marks a dramatic reversal from the previous three quarters, where landlords enjoyed substantial discounts ranging from 51.7% to 72.8%. The average acquisition price for landlords has fluctuated significantly, from a high of $500,500 in Q4 2024 to a low of $63,200 in Q1 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord purchasing activity was minimal in Q4, accounting for just one property, or 3.4% of the 29 total market sales.
Mom-and-pop landlords were the only active investor segment, representing 100% of the single landlord purchase. No institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made any acquisitions in Grundy County during the quarter. This purchase was made by two new entities entering the market as single-property landlords.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 94.8% of Grundy County's investor-owned SFR housing.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.3% of the local investor portfolio. The largest segment by far is the single-property landlord tier, which alone accounts for 228 properties, or 65.7% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors form the backbone of every small-to-mid-size landlord tier in Grundy County, with no company majority in any segment.
In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 197 homes (85.7%) compared to just 33 for companies. This individual dominance persists even in the 6-10 property tier, where individuals still own 69.6% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Grundy County is concentrated in a few key zip codes, with 50638 leading at 105 investor-owned properties.
While 50638 has the highest count, other zip codes show higher penetration rates, such as 50673 (14.1% investor-owned) and 50642 (12.1% investor-owned). The zip codes 50669 and 50680 also show notable investor presence with 62 and 47 properties, respectively.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Grundy County have shifted from net buyers to a neutral position, with Q1 buys (2) perfectly matching sells (2).
This balanced activity in Q1 2026 follows two strong years of accumulation, where landlords were net buyers by 15 properties in 2024 and 8 properties in 2025. Transaction volume has been relatively stable, with quarterly buy-side activity typically ranging from 2 to 5 transactions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord transactions represented a small fraction of Q1 market activity, accounting for just 2 of the 42 total sales (4.8%).
All landlord transaction activity came from new, single-property investors, who paid an average of $305,000 per purchase. Notably, none of these new landlords acquired their properties from existing investors, indicating they purchased from homeowners or new construction.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 332 SFR properties in Grundy County, with individuals owning a dominant 78.0% share.
Detailed Findings

In Grundy County, investors hold a portfolio of 332 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 8.2% of the total 4,030 SFRs in the market. This reflects a modest but notable presence of real estate investing activity in the local housing market.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 259 properties or 78.0% of the investor-held SFR stock. Companies account for the remaining 77 properties (23.2%), underscoring the market's reliance on smaller, non-corporate landlords.

A look at entity counts reinforces this pattern, with 332 individual landlords compared to just 62 company landlords. This nearly 5.4-to-1 ratio of individual-to-company entities highlights the granular, small-scale nature of property investment in the area.

Regarding financing, cash is the preferred method for acquisitions. Investors own 251 properties outright (cash), significantly more than the 81 properties that are financed. This suggests a market of investors with high liquidity who are less reliant on leverage.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards rental income, with 314 of the 332 properties classified as rented. This high concentration confirms that the primary strategy for local investors is generating long-term rental revenue rather than short-term flips or other uses.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a striking Q1 market anomaly, landlords paid $305,000, a 90.9% premium over the typical homeowner price of $159,730.
Detailed Findings

The first quarter of 2026 revealed a highly unusual pricing dynamic in Grundy County. Landlords paid an average acquisition price of $305,000, which was $145,270 more than the traditional homeowner average of $159,730. This represents an extraordinary 90.9% premium, a complete inversion of the typical investor discount.

This Q1 event starkly contrasts with the trend observed throughout 2025. In Q3 2025, landlords secured a 51.7% discount ($155,871 less than homeowners), in Q2 2025 a 67.7% discount ($143,770 less), and in Q1 2025 a 72.8% discount ($168,879 less). The sudden shift to a massive premium suggests a unique, high-value acquisition rather than a broad market trend.

Examining longer-term price trends shows significant volatility. The average landlord purchase price was $252,594 in 2024, but only $93,322 in 2025, indicating that buying patterns and the types of properties acquired can vary dramatically year to year.

The price paid during the 2020-2023 period was $115,900 on average. The Q1 2026 price of $305,000 represents a 163% increase over this pandemic-era average, highlighting the exceptional nature of the most recent transaction.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlord purchasing activity was minimal in Q4, accounting for just one property, or 3.4% of the 29 total market sales.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investor activity in Grundy County's SFR market was extremely limited. Landlords acquired just one distinct property out of a total of 29 SFRs sold, capturing a minimal 3.4% market share of purchases for the quarter.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from the smallest investor tier. The single property was acquired by new 'mom-and-pop' landlords, specifically two entities now in the single-property (Tier 01) category. This highlights that market entry, even at a small scale, continues to be driven by new, small-scale participants.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) and institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing market this quarter, recording zero acquisitions. This lack of activity from larger players reinforces the characterization of Grundy County as a market dominated by local, small-scale investors.

The data indicates that two new entities were responsible for the one property purchase, suggesting a co-ownership arrangement. This is a common entry point for new investors into the rental market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 94.8% of Grundy County's investor-owned SFR housing.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investor-held real estate in Grundy County is definitively concentrated among small-scale operators. 'Mom-and-pop' landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), control a combined 94.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The foundation of this market is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), who alone owns 228 properties, making up 65.7% of the entire investor portfolio. This demonstrates that the market is built upon individuals making their first or only rental property investment.

As portfolio sizes increase, the number of properties drops off significantly. Landlords with 2 properties hold 9.5%, those with 3-5 properties hold 13.0%, and those with 6-10 properties hold 6.6%.

The presence of large-scale investors is negligible. Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) collectively own just 4.9% of the portfolio. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a near-zero footprint, controlling a single property which equates to only 0.3% of the local investor market.

This distribution challenges the narrative of corporate dominance in rural markets, showing instead a landscape almost entirely shaped by small, local investors. Analysis of comprehensive assessor data confirms this granular ownership pattern.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors form the backbone of every small-to-mid-size landlord tier in Grundy County, with no company majority in any segment.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across all measured portfolio tiers in Grundy County, with no crossover point where companies become the majority. In the largest tier, single-property owners, individuals hold 197 properties (85.7%) versus 33 for companies (14.3%).

This pattern of individual dominance continues as portfolios grow. For landlords owning two properties, individuals account for 66.7% of the holdings. In the 3-5 property bracket, individuals own 37 properties (82.2%), while companies own just 8 (17.8%).

Even among more established small landlords in the 6-10 property tier, individuals maintain a strong majority, owning 16 properties, or 69.6% of the homes in that segment. This indicates that even as investors scale, they tend to do so under personal ownership rather than forming corporate entities.

The data clearly shows that company ownership, while present, plays a secondary role across the board. The market structure does not show a transition to corporate dominance at any of the small-to-medium portfolio sizes, reinforcing the county's 'mom-and-pop' investor profile.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Grundy County is concentrated in a few key zip codes, with 50638 leading at 105 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Grundy County is not evenly distributed, but concentrated in specific postal codes. The zip code 50638 (Grundy Center) is the epicenter of activity by volume, with 105 investor-owned SFRs, representing a 9.0% ownership rate.

Other areas show significant investor presence as well. The 50669 zip code (Reinbeck) contains 62 investor properties (8.2% rate), and 50680 (Wellsburg) has 47 investor properties (11.5% rate).

Interestingly, the areas with the highest counts are not necessarily those with the highest market penetration. The 50673 zip code (Stout) has the highest investor ownership rate at 14.1%, followed by 50642 (Holland) at 12.1%. This distinction between volume and rate highlights different types of market concentration.

The data for some zip codes, like 50148 and 50601, was incomplete, preventing a full county-wide comparison. However, the available information points to distinct pockets of investment rather than a broad, uniform strategy across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Grundy County have shifted from net buyers to a neutral position, with Q1 buys (2) perfectly matching sells (2).
Detailed Findings

After two consecutive years as net buyers, Grundy County landlords have adopted a neutral market position in the first quarter of 2026. Transaction data shows an equal number of acquisitions and dispositions, with 2 properties bought and 2 properties sold.

This recent equilibrium marks a cooldown from previous periods of portfolio growth. In 2024, landlords were significant net buyers, acquiring 30 properties while selling only 15, for a net gain of 15 homes. The momentum continued in 2025, albeit at a slower pace, with 19 buys against 11 sells, for a net gain of 8 properties.

The quarterly data shows fluctuating but consistent activity. For instance, in Q2 2025 landlords were slight net buyers (5 buys, 4 sells), while in Q3 2025 they were neutral (4 buys, 4 sells), mirroring the most recent quarter's activity.

There is no transaction data available for institutional (1000+) investors, which is consistent with their minimal ownership presence in the county. All recorded transaction activity stems from the small and mid-size landlord segments.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord transactions represented a small fraction of Q1 market activity, accounting for just 2 of the 42 total sales (4.8%).
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords played a minor role in Grundy County's overall transaction market, participating in just 2 of the 42 total SFR transactions. This 4.8% share indicates that the vast majority of market activity involved traditional homebuyers and sellers.

All investor-involved transactions were driven by the smallest segment: single-property landlords. This suggests that recent activity is characterized by new entrants rather than portfolio expansion by existing investors.

The average purchase price for these new landlords was $305,000. This is a notably high figure for the area and, as seen in pricing analysis, represented a significant premium over what traditional homeowners paid during the same period.

An important finding is the lack of inter-landlord trading. Zero percent of the properties purchased by these new investors were acquired from other landlords. This signifies that market entrants are sourcing properties from the general market, not from other investors liquidating their portfolios.

No transactions were recorded for any landlord tier above the single-property level, confirming that larger and institutional investors were entirely inactive in Grundy County during the first quarter.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individual investors define Grundy County's real estate market, controlling 95% of rentals while larger players remain absent.
Holdings
Landlords own 332 SFR properties in Grundy County, representing 8.2% of the total market, with individual investors holding a commanding 259 properties (78.0%) compared to 77 (23.2%) for companies.
Pricing
In a highly unusual Q1 event, a landlord paid a 90.9% premium over a traditional homeowner, with an acquisition price of $305,000 versus the homeowner average of $159,730.
Activity
Q4 landlord purchase activity was minimal, with investors buying just 1 property, a 3.4% share of all sales, driven entirely by two new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the rental landscape, controlling 94.8% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible 0.3% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single investor tier, from single-property (85.7% individual) to the 6-10 property bracket (69.6% individual), with no crossover to company control.
Transactions
After years as net buyers, landlords have become neutral in the market, with Q1 2026 showing a balanced 2 buys versus 2 sells. Institutional transaction data is nonexistent, reflecting their inactivity.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Grundy County, IA is fundamentally shaped by small, individual operators. Investors collectively own 332 single-family residential properties, accounting for 8.2% of the county's total SFR stock. The ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who control 259 of these properties (78.0%), compared to just 77 (23.2%) held by companies. This dynamic is further reinforced by the market's tier structure, where 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) command an overwhelming 94.8% of all investor-owned homes, leaving a mere 0.3% for institutional-scale investors.

Recent market activity signals a cautious and low-volume environment. In Q4, landlords purchased just one property, a 3.4% share of all sales, with the acquisition made by new entrants. A significant anomaly occurred in Q1 pricing, where a landlord paid $305,000 for a property, a 90.9% premium over the average homeowner price of $159,730, reversing a long-standing trend of investor discounts. On the transaction front, landlords have shifted from being strong net buyers in 2024 and 2025 to a neutral stance in Q1 2026, with an equal number of buys and sells (2 each).

The key takeaway for Grundy County is that its rental market is the domain of local, individual investors, not large corporations. The market is characterized by low transaction volumes and a reliance on cash purchases, with growth coming from new, single-property landlords. The absence of institutional players and the dominance of mom-and-pop owners suggest a stable, community-integrated rental market where major shifts are driven by the decisions of individual households rather than corporate strategy. The recent pricing anomaly is likely an outlier rather than a new market standard.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 10:03 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Grundy (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Grundy (IA) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ia-grundy/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.