Carter (MT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Carter (MT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Carter (MT)
144
Total Investors in Carter (MT)
158
Investor Owned SFR in Carter (MT)
114(79.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
147
SFR Owned
106
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
11
SFR Owned
10
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 114 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Carter County, MT: A Market Defined by 79% Investor Ownership and Zero Recent Sales
Investors own 79.2% of all single-family homes in Carter County, a portfolio of 114 properties. This market is exclusively controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (100%), with individuals owning 93.0% of the inventory. The market shows no recent transactional activity, with zero SFR properties purchased by any buyer type in Q4 2025, indicating a stable, long-term hold environment.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 114 SFR properties, with individuals holding 93.0% of the portfolio.
All 114 investor-owned properties were acquired with cash, with none currently financed. Of these, 113 are classified as rented, highlighting a near-total focus on rental income generation. The investor base consists of 147 individual landlords and 11 company landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No recent sales data is available, indicating extremely low market liquidity.
Without any recent transactions in Carter County, a comparison between landlord and homeowner acquisition prices is not possible. The lack of sales prevents analysis of pricing trends or potential investor discounts.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 0.0% of all SFR properties in Q4 2025, as no sales occurred.
There was zero purchasing activity from any investor tier in Q4 2025. Both mom-and-pop landlords and institutional investors recorded no acquisitions. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 100% of the investor-owned SFR market.
Single-property landlords alone own 79.7% of all investor-held housing (94 properties). No institutional or mid-size investors (11+ properties) have a presence in Carter County. No pricing data is available by tier due to the lack of recent sales.
Ownership by Tier & Type
No pricing data available to compare individual and company buyers.
Individuals are the dominant owners in every tier, holding 93.6% of single-property portfolios and 71.4% of small (3-5) property portfolios. A crossover point where companies become the majority owner does not exist in this market.
Geographic Distribution
The entirety of investor activity is concentrated in a single zip code, MT-Carter-59324.
The zip code MT-Carter-59324 contains all 114 investor-owned SFR properties in the county. This area has an exceptionally high investor ownership rate of 79.2%.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available to assess landlord buying and selling patterns.
The absence of transaction records prevents the calculation of buy/sell ratios for both the overall landlord market and the institutional tier. It is not possible to determine if landlords have been net buyers or sellers over time.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of Q4 transactions, as the market saw zero sales activity.
No transactions were recorded across any investor tier in Q4 2025. Consequently, average purchase prices for all tiers were $0, and there was no inter-landlord trading activity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 114 SFR properties, with individuals holding 93.0% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Carter County's single-family housing market is overwhelmingly dominated by investors, who own 114 of the 144 available SFR properties, representing an extraordinary 79.2% market penetration rate.

The investor landscape is almost entirely composed of individuals, who own 106 properties (93.0%), compared to just 10 properties (8.8%) owned by companies. This structure underscores a market built on local, small-scale real estate investing rather than corporate interests.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the complete absence of leverage. All 114 investor-owned properties are owned outright with cash, with zero properties carrying a mortgage. This signals a highly capitalized and financially conservative investor base.

The portfolio's purpose is clear: 113 of the 114 properties are rented, demonstrating that nearly 100% of investor-held inventory serves as rental housing for the community.

The entity count further reinforces the small-investor narrative, with 147 individual landlords and 11 company landlords active in the county. This high number of entities relative to properties suggests a fragmented ownership base with many owning single properties.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No recent sales data is available, indicating extremely low market liquidity.
Detailed Findings

Analysis of acquisition pricing is not possible for Carter County due to a complete lack of recent, comparable sales data for either landlords or traditional homeowners.

This absence of data is itself a significant finding, pointing to an extremely illiquid and static real estate market. Properties in this area appear to be traded infrequently, if at all, in the current climate.

Without transactions, it's impossible to establish a current market value, track price appreciation, or determine if a price gap exists between investor and homeowner purchases.

The market appears to be characterized by long-term holds rather than active trading, a stark contrast to more dynamic urban and suburban areas.

Future analysis will require new sales to be recorded to generate any pricing insights or trend comparisons for this unique market.

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords purchased 0.0% of all SFR properties in Q4 2025, as no sales occurred.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete standstill in Carter County's real estate market, with zero SFR properties purchased by any buyer type.

As a result, real estate investors, who own a majority of the county's housing stock, made no new acquisitions, accounting for 0.0% of the non-existent market activity.

This lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) and institutional investors (1000+ properties) both recorded zero purchases for the quarter.

The data shows no new entrants into the landlord market, as the single-property tier, a common indicator of new investment, saw no activity.

This frozen market suggests that current owners are not selling and potential buyers are either not present or unable to transact, leading to a period of zero velocity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 100% of the investor-owned SFR market.
Detailed Findings

Ownership in Carter County is exclusively concentrated in the hands of small-scale investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling 100% of the 114 investor-owned homes.

The market is anchored by the smallest investors, as single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 94 properties, a commanding 79.7% of the entire investor portfolio.

Landlords owning two properties hold another 17 homes (14.4%), and those with 3-5 properties control 7 homes (5.9%), reinforcing the small-portfolio structure of the market.

There is a complete absence of larger investors. Mid-size (11-1,000 properties) and institutional landlords (1,000+ properties) have zero footprint in the county, indicating this market is not on the radar of large-scale capital.

Due to the lack of transactional activity, it is not possible to compare acquisition prices between tiers or analyze historical pricing trends for these small landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
No pricing data available to compare individual and company buyers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across all existing portfolio sizes in Carter County, negating any trend of corporate dominance in larger tiers.

In the single-property tier, individuals own 88 of 94 properties (93.6%). Their presence remains strong even in the largest local tier (3-5 properties), where they control 5 of 7 properties (71.4%).

Unlike in larger markets, there is no crossover point at which companies become the majority owners. Individuals maintain a strong majority across the board, highlighting a localized, non-corporate ownership environment.

Companies have a minimal presence, owning just 6 single-property portfolios, 2 two-property portfolios, and 2 small (3-5) portfolios.

Without any recent sales transactions, a comparison of acquisition prices between individual and company investors cannot be conducted.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The entirety of investor activity is concentrated in a single zip code, MT-Carter-59324.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor ownership in Carter County is uniform and highly concentrated, with all activity occurring within the single zip code of MT-Carter-59324.

This area contains all 114 investor-owned SFR properties, which comprise 79.2% of the total 144 SFRs in the market, one of the highest penetration rates observed.

This data indicates that high investor ownership is not a pocketed phenomenon but a county-wide characteristic.

There are no other regions within the county to compare, making MT-Carter-59324 the sole hub of rental housing and investor activity.

This level of concentration in a single zip code highlights a market with a very specific and localized housing economy.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available to assess landlord buying and selling patterns.
Detailed Findings

A lack of available historical transaction data for Carter County makes it impossible to analyze long-term buying and selling behaviors of landlords.

Key metrics such as buy-to-sell ratios, which indicate whether investors are in an accumulation or disposition phase, cannot be calculated.

Similarly, the degree of inter-landlord trading remains unknown. We cannot determine what percentage of transactions historically involved one landlord selling to another.

Price analysis is also precluded, meaning there is no data to compare average buy prices versus sell prices over time to infer potential profit margins.

This data gap suggests a market with very low turnover, where properties are held for extended periods with few to no sales occurring between investors or to other buyer types.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of Q4 transactions, as the market saw zero sales activity.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 registered zero single-family residential transactions in Carter County, resulting in a 0.0% market share for landlords.

This complete lack of activity extended across every investor tier, from single-property landlords to larger portfolio owners. No group recorded a single purchase or sale.

As a result of the inactive market, the average purchase price for every investor tier was $0 for the quarter.

There was no evidence of inter-landlord trading, with the percentage of properties bought from other landlords at zero across the board.

This data paints a picture of a dormant market where capital is not currently being deployed, and assets are not being exchanged among investors or any other parties.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Investors own 79% of homes in Carter County, a static market dominated by small landlords with zero recent sales.
Holdings
Landlords own 114 single-family properties in Carter County, MT, representing an extremely high 79.2% of the total market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 106 of these properties (93.0%), while companies own the remaining 10 (8.8%).
Pricing
No pricing analysis is possible as there were no SFR sales recorded in Q4 2025 for either landlords or homeowners, indicating a highly illiquid market.
Activity
There was zero purchase activity in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 of the 0 properties sold (0.0% share). Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during this period of inactivity.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert complete control over the investor market, owning 100% of the 114 investor-held homes. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across all portfolio sizes, holding a 93.6% share of single-property portfolios. A crossover point where companies become the majority does not exist in this market.
Transactions
No recent transaction data is available, preventing an analysis of whether landlords are net buyers or sellers. The market recorded zero buys and zero sells in Q4 2025.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Carter County, Montana, is fundamentally shaped by real estate investors, who own an exceptional 79.2% of the entire SFR housing stock, totaling 114 properties. This market is the domain of the small, local landlord; 100% of these properties are held by mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 homes), with no presence from mid-size or institutional players. Ownership is further concentrated among individuals, who control 93.0% of the investor-owned portfolio, often with properties owned free and clear, as 100% of the portfolio is held with cash.

Investor behavior in Carter County is characterized by stability and a lack of transactional velocity. The fourth quarter of 2025 saw zero purchase activity from any buyer type, landlord or otherwise, signifying a dormant market. This absence of sales makes typical pricing analysis, such as comparing landlord-paid prices to those of traditional homeowners, impossible. The data strongly suggests a long-term buy-and-hold strategy is the norm, with properties serving as stable rental housing rather than speculative assets to be traded.

The key takeaway from this market report is that Carter County represents a unique, closed-loop rental economy. The extremely high investor penetration, coupled with 100% mom-and-pop ownership and zero recent sales, paints a picture of a mature, illiquid market where housing assets rarely change hands. This environment provides stable rental inventory but offers little opportunity for new investors or traditional homebuyers seeking to purchase a property.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 10:08 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Carter (MT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Carter (MT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mt-carter/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.