Williamson (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Williamson (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Williamson (IL)
26,832
Total Investors in Williamson (IL)
5,231
Investor Owned SFR in Williamson (IL)
6,106(22.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,473
SFR Owned
4,234
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
758
SFR Owned
1,981
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 6,106 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Williamson County, Paying a 40.2% Premium in a Market Shift
Investors own 6,106 SFR properties, 22.8% of the market in Williamson County, IL, with small mom-and-pop landlords controlling 85.4% of that portfolio. In a dramatic Q1 market shift, investors paid a 40.2% premium over homeowners, reversing a trend of discounts. Landlords remain strong net buyers, acquiring properties at a 3.23x greater rate than they sell.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 6,106 properties (22.8% of the market), with individuals holding 69.3%.
Cash purchases heavily outweigh financing, with 5,008 properties owned outright compared to 1,098 with a mortgage. The portfolio is overwhelmingly rental-focused, with 5,704 properties (93.4%) classified as non-owner-occupied. There are 4,473 individual landlords compared to just 758 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors paid a 40.2% premium over homeowners in Q1, a stunning market reversal.
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $280,698, which was $80,548 more than the traditional homeowner price of $200,150. This breaks sharply from 2025, where landlords consistently secured discounts, ranging from 3.1% in Q1 to 27.1% in Q3.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 31.4% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, totaling 75 homes.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove the market, accounting for 68.0% of all investor purchases (51 properties). Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions, highlighting the dominance of small-scale buyers.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 85.4% of all investor-owned housing.
This share represents 5,485 properties owned by landlords in the 1-10 property tiers. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 2 properties, which accounts for 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 76.8% of assets.
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 86.1% of single-property holdings and 53.8% of 6-10 property portfolios. In the largest non-institutional tier (101-1,000 properties), companies control 88.3% of the homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip codes 62959 and 62948 by property count.
Zip code 62959 has 2,293 investor-owned properties (21.9% ownership rate), while 62948 has 1,264 (24.3% rate). However, smaller zip codes like 62903 and 62921 show the highest penetration rates at 100.0% and 50.7%, respectively.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.23 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with landlords purchasing 424 properties while selling only 130 in 2025. In Q1 2026, investors bought 84 homes and sold just 26, continuing to expand their portfolios.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 28.2% of all Q1 property transactions, purchasing 84 homes.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated the activity with 60 transactions. Pricing was highly volatile across tiers, with single-property investors paying $152,484 on average, while mid-sized investors in the 11-20 property tier averaged an unusually high $861,464.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 6,106 properties (22.8% of the market), with individuals holding 69.3%.
Detailed Findings

In Williamson County, IL, real estate investors hold a significant 22.8% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market, totaling 6,106 properties out of 26,832.

Individual investors are the backbone of this market, owning 4,234 properties, which accounts for 69.3% of the investor-owned inventory. Company-owned properties, while substantial at 1,981 homes, represent a smaller 32.4% share.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals when looking at entity counts, with 4,473 individual landlords compared to 758 companies. This reveals a broad base of small-scale investment rather than consolidation under a few large corporate entities.

Investor holdings are primarily for rental purposes, with 5,704 properties (93.4% of the portfolio) being non-owner-occupied. This high rental concentration underscores the role investors play in the local housing supply.

A strong preference for cash ownership is evident, with 5,008 properties owned free and clear. This is more than four times the 1,098 properties that are financed, indicating a well-capitalized investor base in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors paid a 40.2% premium over homeowners in Q1, a stunning market reversal.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic shift in acquisition strategy occurred in Q1 2026, with landlords paying a significant 40.2% premium over traditional homeowners. The average investor purchase price was $280,698, a full $80,548 higher than the homeowner average of $200,150.

This aggressive pricing marks a complete reversal from the previous year. Throughout 2025, investors consistently purchased properties at a discount, paying 27.1% less than homeowners in Q3 ($166,204 vs. $227,981) and 20.6% less in Q2 ($180,101 vs. $226,933).

The trend of landlord discounts, which had been narrowing from a $61,777 advantage in Q3 2025 to just $6,334 in Q1 2025, has been completely erased. The move to paying a substantial premium suggests heightened competition or a strategic focus on higher-value properties to start the new year.

The data for 2024 and 2025 shows a steady market, with average acquisition prices of $171,535 and $183,227 respectively. The jump to a $280,698 average price in Q1 2026 indicates a sharp acceleration in the types of properties investors are targeting.

This reversal from disciplined, discount-focused buying to aggressive, premium-level acquisitions is the most significant pricing dynamic in the Williamson County market, signaling a potential shift in investor sentiment and strategy.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 31.4% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, totaling 75 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was robust in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 75 of the 239 total SFR homes sold in Williamson County, capturing a 31.4% market share of all purchases.

The purchasing activity was heavily concentrated among smaller investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, were responsible for 51 of these purchases, representing 68.0% of all investor acquisitions for the quarter.

First-time or single-property investors were the most active group, with 42 distinct entities purchasing 33 properties in this tier alone. This indicates a healthy influx of new participants into the local rental market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no purchasing activity, acquiring 0 properties in Q4. This absence underscores that the market's momentum is driven by local and small-to-mid-sized players, not large-scale corporations.

Mid-size landlords also contributed to the activity, with those in the 11-100 property tiers collectively purchasing 22 properties, or 29.3% of the investor total, demonstrating a broad base of acquisition across various smaller portfolio sizes.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 85.4% of all investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Williamson County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a combined 85.4% of all investor-held SFRs.

This concentration at the small end of the market is striking. Single-property landlords alone (Tier 01) own 3,068 properties, making up 47.8% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the critical role of individual, small-scale owners in providing rental housing.

The combined share of mid-to-large investors (those owning 11-1,000 properties) stands at just 14.5% of the market. The ownership is progressively smaller in higher tiers, showing a classic pyramid structure.

Any narrative of large-scale corporate ownership is unsupported by the data in this county. Institutional investors in the 1,000+ property tier have a near-zero footprint, holding just 2 properties out of the 6,106 investor-owned homes.

This distribution, detailed in the property ownership by owner type report, shows a highly fragmented market where the typical landlord is not a corporation but an individual or small business with a handful of properties.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 76.8% of assets.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors own the most properties overall, a clear transition point exists where companies take control of larger portfolios. The crossover occurs in the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 76.8% of the properties (282 homes) compared to individuals' 23.2% (85 homes).

Individuals overwhelmingly command the smaller end of the market. They own 86.1% of single-property investor homes and maintain a majority through the 6-10 property tier, where they still own 53.8% of the assets.

Company ownership share increases steadily with portfolio size. It grows from just 13.9% in the single-property tier to 46.2% in the 6-10 property tier, before surging to a dominant position in all tiers of 11 properties or more.

The highest concentration of corporate ownership is found in the medium-large (51-100) tier, where companies own 130 properties, a 94.2% share. This indicates that scaling beyond 50 properties is almost exclusively achieved through a corporate structure.

Even in the large 101-1,000 property tier, individuals still have a presence, owning 21 properties (11.7%), but companies clearly dominate with 158 properties (88.3%).

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip codes 62959 and 62948 by property count.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor ownership in Williamson County is highly concentrated. The zip code 62959 is the clear epicenter of activity, with 2,293 investor-owned SFRs, representing an ownership rate of 21.9%.

Following 62959, the next most active area by sheer volume is 62948, which contains 1,264 investor properties and has an even higher penetration rate of 24.3%. Together, these two zip codes represent a significant portion of the county's investor activity.

A different pattern emerges when analyzing ownership percentage. The zip codes with the highest rates of investor ownership are often smaller markets. For example, 62903 shows a 100.0% investor ownership rate, and 62921 follows at 50.7%, suggesting these areas may have housing stock particularly suited for rentals.

This highlights a key distinction: the areas with the most investor properties are not necessarily the ones with the highest investor market share. High-volume areas like 62959 (21.9%) and 62918 (18.3%) have substantial but not majority investor ownership.

The comprehensive property datasets reveal that investors are targeting specific pockets within the county, leading to both high-volume hubs and high-concentration niche markets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.23 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Williamson County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In the first quarter of 2026, they demonstrated this by purchasing 84 properties while only selling 26, resulting in a net gain of 58 homes.

This behavior establishes a clear buy-to-sell ratio of 3.23, meaning investors acquired over three times as many properties as they divested. This signals strong confidence in the local rental market and a long-term holding strategy.

The trend of being net buyers is not new. It was sustained throughout the previous year, with a total of 424 properties purchased versus 130 sold in 2025. This resulted in a net portfolio expansion of 294 properties for the year.

Transaction volume has remained steady. The 84 purchases in Q1 2026 are comparable to quarterly activity in 2025, which saw volumes like 112 buys in Q3 and 106 in Q2. This indicates a consistent and ongoing pace of investment.

No transaction data is available for institutional (1,000+) investors, which aligns with their near-zero ownership in the county. The market's transaction dynamics are entirely shaped by the activity of small and mid-sized landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 28.2% of all Q1 property transactions, purchasing 84 homes.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords played a major role in market liquidity, participating in 28.2% of all 298 SFR transactions. Their 84 acquisitions highlight their impact on overall market demand.

Activity was concentrated among mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 60 of the 84 landlord transactions. Single-property landlords were the most active single group, with 42 transactions.

A notable pattern in transaction sources emerged among smaller investors. Two-property landlords sourced 50.0% of their purchases from other landlords, and single-property investors acquired 19.0% from their peers. In contrast, no investor with a portfolio larger than 10 properties bought from another landlord, suggesting they acquire inventory from homeowners or other off-market sources.

Average purchase prices showed extreme volatility between tiers, likely due to a small number of unique transactions. While single-property buyers averaged $152,484, the 11-20 property tier recorded an average of $861,464. Conversely, the 51-100 property tier averaged just $12,375, suggesting acquisitions of low-value assets like land or distressed properties.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive, with zero transactions recorded in Q1, reinforcing that all transactional activity is driven by investors with portfolios under 1,000 properties.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small investors dominate Williamson County's real estate market, driving net buying and paying significant premiums
Holdings
Landlords own 6,106 SFR properties, representing 22.8% of the market in Williamson County, IL. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals, who own 4,234 properties (69.3%) compared to companies' 1,981 (32.4%).
Pricing
In a significant market reversal, landlords paid 40.2% more than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average acquisition price of $280,698 versus the homeowner price of $200,150. This marks a stark contrast to 2025, when they consistently secured discounts.
Activity
Investors accounted for 28.2% of all Q1 sales, purchasing 84 properties. Activity was led by the smallest investors, with single-property landlords comprising 42 of the 84 transactions.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market, owning 85.4% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) have virtually no presence, holding just 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties and extend their control in all larger tiers, owning over 94% of assets in the 51-100 property category.
Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers with a 3.23x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (84 buys vs 26 sells), consistently expanding their holdings. Institutional investors are entirely absent from the transaction market.
Market Narrative

In Williamson County, IL, the real estate investment market is firmly in the hands of small, individual operators. Investors control 6,106 Single-Family Residential properties, a notable 22.8% of the total housing stock. This landscape is defined by mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties), who command a staggering 85.4% of the investor-owned portfolio, while institutional ownership is virtually nonexistent at 0.0%. Ownership is split between individuals (69.3%) and companies (32.4%), with corporate structures becoming dominant only in portfolios larger than 10 properties. This data paints a clear picture of a fragmented market built on the activity of thousands of small-scale participants, not a handful of large corporations.

Investor behavior in the first quarter of 2026 signals a newly aggressive market phase. After a year of securing price discounts, investors pivoted to paying a 40.2% premium over traditional homeowners, suggesting intense competition for desirable assets. This activity is part of a broader trend of accumulation, as landlords remain staunch net buyers, acquiring 3.23 properties for every one they sold in Q1. They were active participants in the market, responsible for 28.2% of all transactions, with single-property investors leading the charge. This combination of high-volume purchasing and premium pricing points to strong confidence in the future of the local rental market.

The key takeaway from the Williamson County market is the resilience and dominance of the small landlord. These findings, which can be explored further in detailed Investor Pulse reports, challenge the common narrative of corporate consolidation and instead highlight a dynamic market driven by local capital and entrepreneurial individuals. The shift to premium pricing could impact housing affordability, but the consistent net buying also indicates that investors are a primary source of rental housing supply. For anyone operating in Williamson County, understanding the motivations and strategies of this massive small-investor base is critical to navigating the market effectively.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:28 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Williamson (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Williamson (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-williamson/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.