Broadwater (MT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Broadwater (MT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Broadwater (MT)
741
Total Investors in Broadwater (MT)
245
Investor Owned SFR in Broadwater (MT)
195(26.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
225
SFR Owned
175
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
20
SFR Owned
21
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 195 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Define Broadwater County's Market, Owning 99.5% of Rental Homes
In Broadwater County, landlords own 195 single-family properties, representing 26.3% of the total market. The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small, individual investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) holding 99.5% of the investor-owned portfolio while institutional ownership is non-existent. In the last active quarter (Q4 2025), landlords purchased 50% of all homes sold, with all activity coming from a single new landlord.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 195 SFR properties in Broadwater County, with individuals holding a dominant 89.7% share.
Cash is the preferred method of acquisition, with 149 properties owned outright compared to 46 that are financed. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 192 of the 195 properties (98.5%) being non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord purchases were recorded in Q1 2026; 2025 data shows volatile pricing without a consistent investor discount.
Pricing for landlords fluctuated significantly throughout 2025, swinging from a 2.2% discount in Q2 to a 5.0% premium in Q3. Overall, average landlord purchase prices rose from $264,440 in the 2020-2023 period to $356,303 in 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 50% of the market in Q4 2025, with a single purchase accounting for all investor activity.
All landlord purchase activity (100%) was driven by the mom-and-pop segment, specifically a new single-property landlord entering the market. Institutional investors made zero purchases, holding 0.0% of the quarter's acquisition volume.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total control of the market, owning 99.5% of investor-held SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 169 properties, making up a massive 86.2% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have absolutely no presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate ownership across all portfolio sizes in Broadwater County, with no company crossover point.
In the critical single-property tier, individuals own 156 homes (91.8%) versus just 14 for companies. Even in the largest local tier (6-10 properties), individuals maintain an 80% ownership share.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Broadwater County is highly concentrated, with the 59644 zip code containing 89% of all investor-owned properties.
While the 59644 zip code holds the highest count of investor properties (174), the 59641 zip code has the highest investor ownership rate at 66.7%, though this is based on only two properties. The 59643 zip code also shows a high penetration of 39.0%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Broadwater County were strong net buyers in 2024 and 2025, but activity has since neutralized.
Investors added a net of 17 properties in 2025 (18 buys vs. 1 sell) and a net of 7 in 2024 (10 buys vs. 3 sells). However, in Q1 2026, the trend paused with an equal number of purchases and sales (1 each).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 50% of all Q4 2025 market transactions, with all activity occurring between investors.
The single investor purchase in the quarter was from another landlord, indicating a 100% inter-landlord transaction rate. Activity was exclusively within the single-property landlord tier, with no institutional participation.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 195 SFR properties in Broadwater County, with individuals holding a dominant 89.7% share.
Detailed Findings

In Broadwater County, investors hold a significant 26.3% share of the single-family residential market, totaling 195 properties out of 741 available SFRs. This indicates a substantial portion of the local housing stock is utilized for rental purposes.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors rather than corporate entities. Individuals own 175 properties, accounting for 89.7% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies hold just 21 properties (10.8%).

A similar pattern is seen in the number of active landlords, with 225 individuals compared to only 20 companies. This high ratio of landlords to properties suggests that most investors own just one or two properties, a hallmark of a classic mom-and-pop market.

Financing trends reveal a strong preference for all-cash acquisitions. Investors own 149 properties free and clear, more than three times the 46 properties that are financed. This reliance on cash highlights a fiscally conservative approach to real estate investing in the region.

The strategic focus of these holdings is clear: 192 of the 195 investor-owned properties are rented. This 98.5% rental penetration rate underscores that the primary goal for investors in this market is generating rental income, not speculative flipping or other strategies.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord purchases were recorded in Q1 2026; 2025 data shows volatile pricing without a consistent investor discount.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition activity paused in Q1 2026, with zero properties purchased by landlords in Broadwater County. This halt in activity follows a period of inconsistent pricing throughout the previous year.

Unlike in many larger markets, landlords in this area do not consistently purchase properties at a discount compared to traditional homeowners. In Q3 2025, landlords paid an average of $450,760, a 5.0% premium of $21,446 over the homeowner price of $429,314.

This trend was not uniform, highlighting market volatility. In Q2 2025, landlords secured a small 2.2% discount, paying $6,559 less than homeowners. However, they paid a 4.5% premium in Q1 2025, demonstrating that purchase prices are highly variable and dependent on specific transactions in this low-volume market.

Despite the quarter-to-quarter volatility, a clear long-term appreciation trend is evident. The average acquisition price for landlords has steadily increased from $264,440 during the 2020-2023 period to $356,303 in 2025.

The extremely low number of quarterly transactions means that average prices can be heavily skewed by just one or two deals. The lack of a consistent pricing advantage suggests investors are competing directly with homeowners on price rather than sourcing off-market deals.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 50% of the market in Q4 2025, with a single purchase accounting for all investor activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, real estate investors acquired half of all single-family properties sold in Broadwater County, purchasing 1 of the 2 total homes that transacted. This 50.0% market share demonstrates significant influence even with minimal volume.

The entirety of this activity was concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. A single new landlord, purchasing their first rental property, accounted for 100% of investor acquisitions for the quarter.

This highlights the market's reliance on new mom-and-pop entrants for growth. While established landlords may be holding steady, new capital is flowing in from small-scale, local investors.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties were completely inactive, making zero purchases. Their market share for the quarter was 0.0%.

The data paints a picture of a market defined by grassroots activity. The entry of even one new small landlord can represent the entire investor acquisition volume, underscoring the hyper-local and small-scale nature of Broadwater County's rental market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total control of the market, owning 99.5% of investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Broadwater County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control 99.5% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

Ownership is exceptionally concentrated in the smallest tier. Landlords with just a single property hold 169 homes, which accounts for 86.2% of the total investor portfolio. This signifies that the rental market is primarily supported by individuals with one investment property, not large-scale businesses.

The distribution across other small tiers is minimal in comparison: two-property landlords hold 3.1% of homes, while those with 3-5 properties hold 7.7%.

Contrary to narratives of corporate consolidation in housing, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero footprint in Broadwater County. Their 0.0% ownership share underscores the market's isolation from large, national capital flows.

This ownership structure suggests a stable, locally-driven rental market where the vast majority of landlords are community members, rather than remote corporate entities. The complete absence of mid-size and institutional players is the defining characteristic of this market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate ownership across all portfolio sizes in Broadwater County, with no company crossover point.
Detailed Findings

In Broadwater County, individual investors are the primary owners of rental properties across every portfolio size, a sharp contrast to larger markets where corporate ownership grows with portfolio scale.

The dominance of individuals is most pronounced among single-property landlords, where they own 156 of 169 properties, a commanding 91.8% share. Companies only account for 8.2% of this foundational tier.

There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. In fact, individual ownership remains robust even as portfolio sizes increase. For instance, in the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 86.7% of the homes.

The only tier showing a significant corporate presence is the two-property tier, where ownership is evenly split with 3 properties held by individuals and 3 by companies. However, this is based on a very small sample size and does not reflect a broader trend.

This data indicates that as investors in Broadwater County expand their portfolios, they typically continue to do so under their own names rather than forming corporate entities, reinforcing the market's individual-driven character.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Broadwater County is highly concentrated, with the 59644 zip code containing 89% of all investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The vast majority of real estate investor holdings in Broadwater County are geographically concentrated in a single area. The 59644 zip code is home to 174 of the 195 investor-owned SFRs, representing 89.2% of the entire portfolio.

Within 59644, investors own 26.2% of the total single-family housing stock, making it the clear hub of rental activity in the county.

However, analysis of ownership rates reveals pockets of even higher investor penetration in smaller communities. The 59641 zip code has the highest rate, with investors owning 66.7% of the three total SFRs in the area.

Similarly, the 59643 zip code shows a high concentration with a 39.0% investor ownership rate across its 16 investor-owned properties. This demonstrates a key distinction between where the most rental properties are (by count) and where rentals make up the largest portion of the housing market (by percentage).

This pattern suggests a primary population center where most rental demand is met (59644), surrounded by smaller, more rural areas where a few investor-owned properties can constitute a majority of the local housing market.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Broadwater County were strong net buyers in 2024 and 2025, but activity has since neutralized.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data reveals a clear pattern of portfolio accumulation by landlords in Broadwater County over the past two years. In 2025, investors were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 18 properties while selling only 1, for a net gain of 17 properties.

This buying trend was also evident in 2024, when landlords acquired 10 properties and sold 3, resulting in a net increase of 7 properties in their portfolios.

However, this momentum appears to have stalled at the start of the current year. In Q1 2026, transaction activity was perfectly balanced, with landlords purchasing one property and selling one property for a net change of zero.

Institutional investors have played a negligible role in this market's transactions. Their only recorded activity was in 2025, where they bought one property and sold one property, showing no sign of accumulation.

The shift from strong net buying to a neutral position in Q1 2026 could signal a market stabilization, where investors are now holding their portfolios steady after a period of active growth.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 50% of all Q4 2025 market transactions, with all activity occurring between investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords played a role in half of all residential sales in Broadwater County, participating in 1 of the 2 total transactions for a 50.0% market share.

A significant finding is that 100% of the quarter's landlord acquisition activity involved buying from another landlord. This indicates that rather than absorbing housing stock from the traditional market, the transaction represented a transfer of a rental asset between two investors.

All transaction activity was confined to the smallest investor tier. The purchase was made by a single-property landlord, reinforcing the idea that market dynamics are driven by new entrants and small-scale players.

There were no transactions from mid-size or institutional investors, who remained completely on the sidelines during the quarter.

The nature of this transaction, being both entirely within the mom-and-pop segment and an inter-landlord trade, highlights a closed-loop market where rental properties are passed among local investors rather than being bought from or sold to homeowners.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Define Broadwater County's Market, Owning 99.5% of Rental Homes
Holdings
Landlords own 195 single-family properties in Broadwater County, representing 26.3% of the market. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate, holding 175 properties (89.7%) compared to just 21 (10.8%) owned by companies.
Pricing
No landlord purchases were recorded in Q1 2026. Data from 2025 shows volatile pricing where landlords sometimes paid a premium over homeowners, such as the 5.0% premium ($21,446) seen in Q3 2025.
Activity
In the last active quarter (Q4 2025), landlords purchased 50.0% of all homes sold (1 of 2 properties), with the single transaction representing a new single-property landlord entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have virtually total control of the market with a 99.5% ownership share of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across all portfolio sizes, holding 91.8% of single-property portfolios. Unlike larger markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
After being strong net buyers in 2025 (18 buys vs. 1 sell), landlords adopted a neutral stance in Q1 2026 (1 buy vs. 1 sell). Institutional investors are not a transactional force in this market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Broadwater County, Montana, is a definitive example of a locally-driven, small-investor ecosystem. Landlords control a significant 26.3% of the housing stock, with 195 properties. This market is fundamentally shaped by individuals, who own 89.7% of these homes. The ownership structure is granular, with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) commanding a 99.5% share, while institutional capital is entirely absent. This composition, detailed in our latest Investor Pulse reports, points to a stable market insulated from the volatility of large-scale corporate investment.

Investor behavior reflects the market's small scale. Acquisition activity is low-volume; in Q4 2025, a single purchase by a new landlord accounted for 50% of all homes sold. Pricing is volatile and does not show the typical investor discount seen in larger metros, with landlords sometimes paying a premium to acquire properties. After a period of active accumulation in 2024 and 2025, landlords have shifted to a neutral net transaction stance in Q1 2026, suggesting a mature phase of holding rather than expansion.

The key takeaway for Broadwater County is that its rental landscape is defined by grassroots participation. The market's health is tied to the financial capacity of local individuals, not the strategies of national firms. The high concentration of ownership in the 59644 zip code suggests rental demand is localized, while the prevalence of all-cash purchases indicates a low-risk, income-focused investment approach. This market operates on a completely different set of principles than major metropolitan areas, offering a picture of a traditional, community-based rental economy.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 10:08 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Broadwater (MT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Broadwater (MT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mt-broadwater/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.