Scott (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Scott (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Scott (TN)
5,138
Total Investors in Scott (TN)
2,344
Investor Owned SFR in Scott (TN)
1,805(35.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,253
SFR Owned
1,733
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
91
SFR Owned
96
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,805 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Scott County with 96.8% ownership, actively buying while institutions remain absent.
Investors own 35.1% of the SFR market in Scott County, with individuals controlling 96.0% of that portfolio. In Q1, landlords bought 27.5% of homes sold, paying 23.2% less than homeowners, while remaining aggressive net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 1,805 SFRs in Scott County, with individual investors holding 96.0%.
Cash is the preferred financing method, with 1,463 properties owned outright versus 342 with financing. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, as 98.8% of investor-owned properties (1,784 of 1,805) are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 23.2% discount in Q1, paying $213,290 vs. homeowners at $277,743.
This price advantage is highly volatile, having peaked at a 39.7% discount in Q3 2025 and hitting a low of 8.7% in Q1 2025. The data does not provide a price breakdown between individual and company investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 27.5% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, totaling 11 homes.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of these purchases. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 96.8% of investor-owned SFRs in Scott County.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the investor-held housing stock. Pricing data by ownership tier is not available for this geography.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Data on acquisition price differences between individual and company buyers is unavailable for Scott County.
Companies become the majority property holders in the 21-50 property tier, where they own 75.0% of the homes. Despite this, individual investors maintain a strong presence across almost all tiers, even large ones.
Geographic Distribution
The 37841 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 815 properties.
The highest investor ownership rate is found in the 37732 zip code, at a full 100.0%. Other areas like 37892 (41.0%) and 37852 (40.8%) also show extremely high investor penetration.
Historical Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
This trend continued into Q1 2026, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 4-to-1 (16 buys vs. 4 sells). In contrast, institutional investors were neutral in 2025, with one purchase and one sale.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 29.1% of all Q1 market transactions, totaling 16 deals.
New, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $218,159. They sourced 7.7% of their purchases from other landlords, while institutional investors recorded zero transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 1,805 SFRs in Scott County, with individual investors holding 96.0%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant footprint in Scott County, owning 1,805 single-family residences, which constitutes 35.1% of the county's total SFR market (5,138 properties).

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 1,733 properties, a commanding 96.0% share of the investor-held housing stock, compared to just 96 properties (5.3%) owned by companies.

This ownership pattern is mirrored in the entity count, with 2,253 individual landlords comprising the vast majority of the 2,344 total investors in the area, leaving only 91 company investors.

Cash is the predominant acquisition strategy, with investors owning 1,463 properties outright. This is more than four times the number of financed properties (342), indicating a low reliance on leverage among local investors.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 1,784 of 1,805 properties (98.8%) classified as non-owner-occupied, underscoring their role in providing local housing supply.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 23.2% discount in Q1, paying $213,290 vs. homeowners at $277,743.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Scott County demonstrate a strong ability to acquire properties below market rates, paying an average of $213,290 in Q1 2026, which is $64,453 less than the $277,743 paid by traditional homeowners, a 23.2% discount.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners is not static and shows significant volatility. In Q3 2025, investors achieved a remarkable 39.7% discount ($105,128), while the gap narrowed to just 8.7% ($20,876) in Q1 2025.

Landlord acquisition prices have trended upward recently, rising to $213,290 in Q1 2026 from an average of around $160,000 in mid-2025, signaling growing market values.

The year 2025 saw significant fluctuations in what homeowners paid, from $264,749 in Q3 down to $218,063 in Q2, directly impacting the percentage discount that investors were able to achieve each quarter.

Comparing prices from the 2020-2023 period ($164,828) to the most recent quarter ($213,290) reveals significant price appreciation in the assets targeted by investors.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 27.5% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, totaling 11 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investors captured over a quarter of the market share in Q4 2025, purchasing 11 of the 40 total SFRs sold, a significant acquisition rate of 27.5%.

All investor purchasing activity this quarter came from mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who acquired 100% of the 11 homes bought by investors.

The market continues to attract new entrants, with 13 new single-property landlord entities entering the market. These newcomers acquired 10 properties, accounting for 90.9% of all investor buying activity.

Institutional investors were completely absent from the acquisitions market in Q4, purchasing zero properties and ceding all activity to smaller players.

Buying was highly concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum, with only the single-property and two-property tiers recording any purchases for the quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 96.8% of investor-owned SFRs in Scott County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Scott County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) control a combined 96.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, alone owning 1,599 properties. This represents 85.9% of the entire investor portfolio, highlighting the highly fragmented nature of ownership.

The influence of institutional investors is practically nonexistent. The 1,000+ property tier contains just one property, accounting for a mere 0.1% of the investor-owned supply.

There is a steep decline in ownership after the smallest tiers. All mid-size and large investors combined (owning 11 to 1,000 properties) hold only 3.2% of the portfolio.

This distribution reveals a market defined by local, small-scale real estate investing, challenging narratives of large corporate control over housing.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Data on acquisition price differences between individual and company buyers is unavailable for Scott County.
Detailed Findings

The balance of ownership shifts from individuals to companies in the small-medium (21-50 properties) tier, where companies own 3 of the 4 properties (75.0%). This marks the only tier where companies hold a majority.

Individual investors overwhelmingly control the entry-level tiers, owning 95.9% of all single-property investor homes and 91.1% of two-property portfolios.

A surprising pattern emerges in larger tiers where individuals, not companies, still dominate. For example, in the 51-100 property tier, individual owners hold 49 of the 51 properties (96.1%).

While individuals are spread across all tiers, companies appear to concentrate their limited holdings. They own 13.6% of properties in the 3-5 home tier and 10.0% in the 6-10 home tier.

Overall, the data shows that Scott County is primarily an individual investor's market. The total company-owned portfolio of 96 properties is dwarfed by the 1,733 properties held by individuals.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 37841 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 815 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is highly concentrated by volume in the 37841 zip code, which contains 815 investor-owned properties. This single area holds more properties than the next four most active zip codes combined.

The 37732 zip code stands out for having a 100.0% investor ownership rate, meaning every SFR property in the area is investor-owned, likely indicating a market of exclusively rental housing.

Several other zip codes show deep investor penetration, including 37892 (41.0%), 37852 (40.8%), 37755 (38.4%), and 37756 (36.4%), identifying them as key sub-markets for investors.

A key distinction exists between concentration by count and by rate. The area with the most investor properties, 37841, has a lower ownership rate (32.8%) than smaller zip codes that are more saturated with investors.

The widespread presence of high investor ownership rates across multiple zip codes confirms that investment properties are a significant and integral part of the overall housing market in Scott County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Scott County are firmly in an accumulation phase, demonstrated by a powerful 10-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in 2025, with 111 properties purchased and only 11 sold.

The pace of acquisitions has been strong and steady, growing from 78 properties bought in 2024 to 111 in 2025 and kicking off 2026 with 16 purchases in the first quarter.

Institutional investors operate with a completely different strategy. They were effectively net-neutral in 2025 (1 buy, 1 sell), showing none of the aggressive accumulation seen among smaller landlords.

The consistently low volume of sales from investors, with just 11 properties sold in 2025 and 11 in 2024, points to a prevailing buy-and-hold strategy across the market.

The sustained, net-positive acquisition activity quarter after quarter signals strong and ongoing confidence among local investors in the Scott County real estate market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 29.1% of all Q1 market transactions, totaling 16 deals.
Detailed Findings

Landlords represented a major force in the Q1 market, accounting for 29.1% of all activity with their involvement in 16 of the 55 total SFR transactions in Scott County.

Transaction activity was entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors, who were responsible for 14 deals. Institutional investors remained on the sidelines with zero transactions.

New entrants appear to pay a premium. Single-property investors paid an average price of $218,159, which is considerably higher than the $150,000 average paid by investors purchasing their second property.

The market shows very little churn between investors. Inter-landlord trading is minimal, with only 1 of the 13 properties (7.7%) bought by new investors coming from an existing landlord.

Activity was heavily skewed towards the smallest investors, as single-property landlords alone accounted for 13 of the 16 total landlord transactions in the first quarter.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Scott County with 96.8% ownership, actively buying while institutions remain absent.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,805 SFR properties, representing a significant 35.1% of Scott County's market. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate, holding 1,733 properties (96.0%) compared to just 96 (5.3%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1, landlords paid 23.2% less than homeowners, securing a substantial discount of $64,453 per property ($213,290 vs. $277,743).
Activity
Landlords acquired 27.5% of all SFRs sold in the last quarter (11 properties), with activity driven entirely by mom-and-pop investors as 13 new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 96.8% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a nearly non-existent share of just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies take majority control (75.0%) in the 21-50 property tier, marking a clear crossover point.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, with a 4-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 (16 buys vs 4 sells), while institutional investors were neutral in 2025 (1 buy vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

In Scott County, TN, the real estate investment landscape is defined by small, individual players. Investors own 1,805 single-family residences, a significant 35.1% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who hold 96.0% (1,733 properties), leaving a mere 5.3% (96 properties) for companies. The market structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) commanding a 96.8% share of investor housing, while large institutional firms are virtually absent, controlling only 0.1%.

Investor activity demonstrates strong market confidence. In the most recent quarter, landlords acquired 27.5% of all homes sold and were involved in 29.1% of total transactions. They are aggressive net buyers, purchasing four properties for every one they sold in Q1. This buying activity is exclusively fueled by small investors, including 13 new single-property landlords who entered the market. Financially, investors demonstrate a strategic advantage, securing properties for 23.2% less than traditional homeowners in Q1, a discount of $64,453 per home.

The data paints a clear picture of Scott County as a market dominated by local, small-scale landlords, not corporate giants. The high investor ownership rate (35.1%), particularly in zip codes like 37732 (100.0%) and 37892 (41.0%), indicates that rental properties are a fundamental component of the local housing supply. The sustained net buying from mom-and-pop investors, coupled with a lack of institutional presence, suggests the market's future will continue to be shaped by the decisions of thousands of individual owners rather than a few large firms.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:59 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Scott (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Scott (TN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tn-scott/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.