Latimer (OK) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Latimer (OK) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Latimer (OK)
2,099
Total Investors in Latimer (OK)
692
Investor Owned SFR in Latimer (OK)
578(27.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
649
SFR Owned
538
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
43
SFR Owned
54
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 578 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Latimer County Investor Market Defined by Mom-and-Pop Dominance, Cash Purchases, and Deep Discounts
Investors own 27.5% of SFRs in Latimer County, with individuals controlling 93.1% of that portfolio. In Q1, these landlords were strong net buyers and acquired properties at a 51.9% discount to homeowners, reinforcing a market driven by local, cash-heavy investors, not institutions.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 578 SFRs in Latimer County, with individuals holding a dominant 93.1%.
Cash is the primary funding method, with 487 properties owned outright versus 91 financed. Nearly all investor properties (562 of 578) are rented, indicating a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1, landlords paid 51.9% less than homeowners, an average discount of $84,436 per property.
The price gap is highly volatile, swinging from a 201.7% landlord premium in Q1 2025 to a 51.9% discount in Q1 2026. This volatility reflects the low transaction volume in the county.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 23.1% of all SFRs sold in the last quarter, totaling 3 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove all recent activity, with purchases from single-property and small landlords making up 100% of investor acquisitions. Institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 92.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, alone owning 74.4% of the rental stock. Institutional investors have zero presence in the county, holding 0.0% of properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies take majority control at the 21-50 property tier.
The crossover to company-majority ownership occurs at the 21-50 property tier, where companies own 91.7% of properties. Below this, individuals own over 84% of properties in every tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 74578 holding 388 properties, 67% of the county's total.
While 74578 has the highest volume, zip code 74545 shows the highest saturation with a 100% investor ownership rate. Zip codes 74563 and 74578 also show high penetration, with rates of 28.6% and 28.3% respectively.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Latimer County are strong net buyers, acquiring 5.5 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
This net buying trend has been consistent, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 17.5 in 2024 (35 buys vs 2 sells) and 2.0 in Q1 2026 (4 buys vs 2 sells). Acquisition volume has remained steady year-over-year.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 22.2% of all SFR transactions in Q1, making 4 purchases.
New single-property investors paid the highest price at $129,000, more than double the $52,800 paid by more established small landlords. They were also the only group to acquire properties from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 578 SFRs in Latimer County, with individuals holding a dominant 93.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a significant footprint in Latimer County, owning 578 single-family properties, which constitutes 27.5% of the total 2,099 SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individuals rather than companies. Individual landlords own 538 properties (93.1% of the portfolio), while companies own just 54 (9.3%), a dynamic reflected in the entity counts where 649 individual landlords far outnumber the 43 companies operating in the county.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash transactions. Investors own 487 properties outright, more than five times the 91 properties that are financed. This suggests a low reliance on leverage and may indicate a more conservative, debt-averse investor base.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income. Of the 578 investor-owned properties, 562 are classified as rented. This equates to 97.2% of the portfolio, signaling that the primary strategy for investors in Latimer County is buy-and-hold for rental revenue, not short-term speculation.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1, landlords paid 51.9% less than homeowners, an average discount of $84,436 per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Latimer County secured properties at a steep discount in the first quarter of 2026, paying an average of $78,200. This was $84,436 less than the $162,636 average paid by traditional homeowners, representing a 51.9% price advantage for landlords.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners exhibits extreme volatility, which is characteristic of a low-volume market. For example, landlords paid a massive 201.7% premium in Q1 2025 ($497,154 vs $164,769) but then achieved a 46.7% discount just one quarter later in Q2 2025 ($122,458 vs $229,643).

This dramatic fluctuation suggests that quarterly averages are heavily influenced by a small number of unique transactions rather than a stable market trend. One or two distressed or high-value sales can significantly skew the data in any given period.

The sparse transaction data, with many recent quarters showing zero landlord purchases, further highlights the opportunistic and sporadic nature of investor buying in this area. Investors are not consistently buying at a set market rate but are likely targeting specific deals as they arise.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 23.1% of all SFRs sold in the last quarter, totaling 3 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors accounted for 23.1% of the sales activity in the most recent quarter, purchasing 3 of the 13 total SFRs sold in Latimer County.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from mom-and-pop landlords. The acquisitions were split between new investors buying their first property and small landlords expanding their 6-10 property portfolios.

Market growth is happening at the grassroots level, with two new single-property landlords entering the market. These new entrants represented two-thirds of the investor purchasing entities, underscoring the market's accessibility for first-time investors.

In stark contrast to national headlines, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties had zero presence in the purchasing market. Their 0.0% share of acquisitions confirms that Latimer County's activity is driven exclusively by small-scale players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 92.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Ownership in Latimer County is overwhelmingly concentrated among small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a combined 92.8% of all investor-owned housing.

The single-property tier (Tier 01) forms the foundation of the local rental market. These 462 landlords own 74.4% of the entire investor portfolio, highlighting the critical role of first-time and small-scale investors.

As portfolio sizes increase, the number of properties drops off significantly. Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) collectively own just 45 properties, or 7.3% of the total, showing a clear market structure dominated by smaller holdings.

There is absolutely no institutional investor footprint in the county. The 1,000+ property tier holds zero properties, confirming the market is completely insulated from large-scale corporate ownership.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies take majority control at the 21-50 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when comparing ownership by entity type across tiers: individuals control smaller portfolios, while companies are used for larger-scale operations. For portfolios of 1-20 properties, individual ownership is dominant, exceeding 84% in every tier and reaching 100% in the 3-5 property tier.

The structural shift occurs decisively in the 21-50 property tier. At this level, companies own 11 of the 12 properties, a 91.7% share, marking it as the crossover point where corporate structures become the norm for managing larger portfolios.

Even within the smallest tiers, companies have a presence. For instance, companies own 31 properties (6.7%) in the single-property tier, suggesting some investors choose to incorporate from their very first purchase.

While individuals own 93.1% of all investor properties in the county, the data shows that scaling operations beyond 20 properties almost always coincides with the adoption of a corporate entity for management and liability purposes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 74578 holding 388 properties, 67% of the county's total.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Latimer County is not widespread but is instead hyper-focused on specific sub-geographies. The vast majority of activity is in zip code 74578, which contains 388 investor-owned properties, or 67.1% of the county's entire investor portfolio.

Certain small areas show complete or near-complete investor saturation. Zip code 74545 is 100% investor-owned, and 74552 has an investor ownership rate of 50.0%, indicating pockets of very high rental density.

The areas with the most investor-owned homes are also the areas with the highest investor penetration rates. The top two zip codes by property count, 74578 (388 properties) and 74563 (110 properties), also boast high ownership rates of 28.3% and 28.6% respectively.

The concentration is extreme: the top three zip codes (74578, 74563, and 74571) collectively account for 545 of the 578 investor properties. This represents 94.3% of the total, demonstrating that investor strategy is geographically targeted rather than county-wide.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Latimer County are strong net buyers, acquiring 5.5 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Latimer County are consistently in a phase of accumulation, acting as strong net buyers. In 2025, they purchased 33 properties while selling only 6, resulting in a net gain of 27 properties for their portfolios.

The buy-to-sell ratio highlights this aggressive growth stance. For every property sold in 2025, another 5.5 were acquired. This trend was even more pronounced in 2024, when 35 properties were bought and only 2 were sold, a ratio of 17.5 to 1.

The pace of acquisitions has been remarkably stable, with 35 purchases in 2024 and 33 in 2025. This suggests a steady, ongoing appetite for investment properties rather than a speculative, cyclical boom.

The low number of sales indicates a dominant buy-and-hold strategy among local landlords. With just a handful of properties sold each year, it is clear that investors are focused on long-term rental income, not short-term flips.

Consistent with other findings, institutional investors were entirely absent from the transaction market, registering zero buys and zero sells in all recorded timeframes.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 22.2% of all SFR transactions in Q1, making 4 purchases.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords represented 22.2% of all market participants, conducting 4 of the 18 total SFR transactions in Latimer County.

A notable pricing difference emerged between investor tiers. First-time investors (Tier 01) paid a significantly higher average price of $129,000 for their two properties. In contrast, more experienced landlords in the 6-20 property range paid an average of just $52,800, suggesting they may be targeting more distressed or value-add opportunities.

All purchasing activity came from small-scale investors. Single-property landlords were the most active, accounting for half of all investor transactions (2 of 4). No institutional investors made any purchases.

The market demonstrated internal liquidity, especially among new buyers. Half of the properties purchased by single-property investors (1 of 2) were acquired from other existing landlords, indicating a healthy flow of assets between investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Latimer County, owning 93% of rentals and remaining strong net buyers.
Holdings
Investors own 578 SFR properties in Latimer County, representing 27.5% of the total market. Ownership is overwhelmingly individual, with local landlords holding 538 properties (93.1%) compared to just 54 (9.3%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at a significant 51.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $78,200 versus the homeowner price of $162,636.
Activity
Landlords purchased 23.1% of all SFRs sold in the last quarter, with mom-and-pop investors accounting for all activity. This included 2 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is controlled by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 92.8% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors have no presence, holding 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual landlords dominate portfolios under 20 properties, but companies become the majority owners in the 21-50 property tier, holding 91.7% of the assets in that segment.
Transactions
Investors are actively growing their portfolios, remaining strong net buyers with a 5.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (33 buys vs 6 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive on both sides of the market.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Latimer County, Oklahoma, is a clear picture of local, small-scale control. Investors own a substantial 578 properties, or 27.5% of the county's single-family housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly driven by individuals, who own 93.1% of these properties, compared to just 9.3% for companies. The ownership structure is highly fragmented; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 92.8% of the investor-owned inventory, while institutional-scale investors have zero presence. This composition points to a market built on grassroots real estate investing, insulated from the large corporate players shaping major metropolitan areas.

Investor behavior in the county is characterized by opportunistic acquisitions and a long-term hold strategy. In the last quarter, landlords purchased 23.1% of all homes sold, with every purchase made by a small-scale operator. They demonstrate a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties in Q1 2026 at a 51.9% discount relative to traditional homeowners. This ability to find deals is coupled with a strong tendency to accumulate assets. In 2025, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5.5 properties for every one they sold, a clear signal of portfolio growth and confidence in the local rental market.

The key takeaway from Latimer County is the resilience and dominance of the mom-and-pop investor. This market operates on a different set of principles than institutionally-driven ones, characterized by cash purchases, deep value-hunting, and a focus on long-term rental income. The low transaction volume creates price volatility, but the fragmented ownership base provides underlying stability. For residents and market observers, this means the local rental market is, and will likely remain, in the hands of local community stakeholders rather than distant corporations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 01:13 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Latimer (OK)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Latimer (OK) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ok-latimer/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.