Stutsman (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Stutsman (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Stutsman (ND)
6,435
Total Investors in Stutsman (ND)
1,497
Investor Owned SFR in Stutsman (ND)
1,302(20.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,436
SFR Owned
1,243
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
61
SFR Owned
68
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,302 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Individual Investors Dominate Stutsman County, Acquiring Properties at a 57.2% Discount
Investors own 20.2% of Stutsman County's SFR properties, with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 98.7% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 57.2% less than traditional homeowners, signaling a deep value acquisition strategy while institutional investors remained neutral.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 1,302 SFR properties in Stutsman County, with individuals owning 95.5%.
The majority of investor properties, 1,079, are owned outright with cash, compared to just 223 that are financed. Of the 1,302 properties, 1,269 are rentals, demonstrating a strong focus on non-owner-occupied strategies. Individual landlords (1,436) vastly outnumber company landlords (61).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Q1 2026 paid 57.2% less than homeowners, a massive $151,399 discount.
The price gap has been extremely volatile, swinging from landlords paying a 184.1% premium in Q1 2025 to securing deep discounts in Q3 2025 (32.8%) and Q1 2026 (57.2%). This volatility points to a market with low transaction volume where individual deals can heavily skew averages.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 12.8% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, accounting for 4 of the 5 landlord purchases (80.0%). The market saw 2 new single-property landlords enter during the quarter, signaling continued interest from small-scale investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.7% of Stutsman County's investor-owned housing.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 3 homes, a mere 0.2% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords are the largest group, holding 929 properties, which is 68.8% of the entire investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier, owning 98.6% of homes in the 6-10 property bracket.
Companies fail to gain a majority share at any level, holding just 4.5% of single-property portfolios and 6.3% of 3-5 property portfolios. In the small-medium tier (11-20 properties), individuals own 100% of the 12 properties.
Geographic Distribution
Jamestown's 58401 zip code is the center of investor ownership, with 866 properties.
While Jamestown has the highest volume, several rural zip codes show extreme investor penetration rates, including 58475 (100.0% investor-owned) and 58483 (52.3% investor-owned). This points to distinct investment strategies between the county's urban hub and its surrounding rural areas.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 7.6 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
This accumulation trend continued in Q1 2026, with 6 buys versus 2 sells. In stark contrast, institutional investors were neutral in 2025, with an equal number of acquisitions and dispositions (1 buy, 1 sell), indicating a different strategy from the broader market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors participated in 10.7% of all single-family transactions in Q1 2026.
A significant pricing difference emerged between investor tiers, as institutional buyers paid 23.1% less than new single-property landlords ($113,474 vs $147,627). Notably, none of the investor purchases in the quarter were from other landlords, suggesting a lack of churn within the investor community.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 1,302 SFR properties in Stutsman County, with individuals owning 95.5%.
Detailed Findings

In Stutsman County, landlords own 1,302 single-family residential properties, which constitutes a significant 20.2% of the total 6,435 SFRs in the market.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals. Individual investors own 1,243 properties, or 95.5% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own just 68 properties (5.2%). This highlights a market driven by local, smaller-scale real estate investing rather than corporate consolidation.

A striking financial pattern emerges from the data: 1,079 investor-owned properties are held free and clear (cash), while only 223 are financed. This high cash-to-debt ratio suggests that investors in this market are well-capitalized and may be less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is almost entirely focused on rental income, with 1,269 of the 1,302 properties classified as rented. This near-total focus on non-owner-occupied assets confirms the primary strategy of local landlords is providing rental housing.

The number of unique landlord entities reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' narrative. There are 1,436 individual landlords compared to only 61 company landlords, a ratio of more than 23 to 1, indicating a highly fragmented and decentralized rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Q1 2026 paid 57.2% less than homeowners, a massive $151,399 discount.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic pricing advantage for investors materialized in the first quarter of 2026. Landlords acquired properties at an average price of $113,497, a staggering 57.2% less than the $264,896 paid by traditional homeowners, creating an average discount of $151,399 per property.

This deep discount marks a significant shift from a year prior. In Q1 2025, landlords paid an average of $608,968, a 184.1% premium over homeowners, indicating that recent acquisitions are likely of a very different type or quality, such as distressed or off-market properties.

The quarter-over-quarter trend shows a clear move toward value purchasing. After paying premiums in early 2025, landlords began securing discounts in Q3 2025, paying 32.8% less than homeowners, a trend that accelerated dramatically into 2026.

While historical data from 2020-2023 shows an average acquisition price of $184,468, the recent Q1 2026 price of $113,497 is significantly lower. This suggests landlords are not chasing price appreciation but are finding opportunities well below the typical market rate.

The wild fluctuations in the landlord-homeowner price gap, from a $394,595 premium in Q1 2025 to a $151,399 discount in Q1 2026, underscore a low-volume market where a few transactions can heavily influence quarterly averages.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 12.8% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Q4 2025 represented a notable portion of the market, with landlords acquiring 5 of the 39 total SFRs sold, capturing a 12.8% market share.

The acquisitions were dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 4 out of the 5 purchases, or 80.0% of all landlord buying activity, reinforcing their role as the primary drivers of the local rental market.

The quarter saw the emergence of new investors, with 2 new entities purchasing their first rental property. These single-property landlords acquired 40.0% of the properties bought by investors in Q4.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) also made a rare appearance, acquiring a single property. This lone purchase accounted for 20.0% of the quarter's investor activity but represents a minimal footprint in the broader market.

Overall purchasing volume was low, with only 5 properties acquired by landlords. This limited activity is characteristic of a smaller market and indicates that investors are selective in their acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.7% of Stutsman County's investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Stutsman County is defined by small, local landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) collectively own 98.7% of all investor-held SFRs, demonstrating a near-total market dominance.

Contrary to narratives of corporate consolidation, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 3 properties, or 0.2% of the local investor-owned housing stock. This highlights a market that operates independently of large-scale capital.

The bedrock of the rental market consists of single-property landlords. This tier alone accounts for 929 properties, representing 68.8% of all investor-owned SFRs. This signifies a highly decentralized ownership base with a low barrier to entry.

Mid-size landlords are exceedingly rare in the county. The tiers representing 11-1000 properties collectively own only 14 properties, or about 1.1% of the total investor portfolio, further emphasizing the market's fragmentation.

The concentration at the smallest scale is profound: landlords owning between 1 and 5 properties control a combined 93.6% of all investor-owned homes, underscoring the granular nature of real estate ownership in the region.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier, owning 98.6% of homes in the 6-10 property bracket.
Detailed Findings

In Stutsman County, individual investors are the primary owners across every single portfolio size, with no crossover point where companies become dominant. This pattern is consistent from first-time landlords to the largest local portfolios.

Even as portfolios grow, individual ownership remains the standard. In the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 69 of the 70 properties (98.6%), while a single property is company-owned. This shows that even established local investors operate primarily as individuals.

Corporate ownership is minimal across the board. Companies own only 42 of the 929 single-property landlord homes (4.5%) and 11 of the 174 homes in the 3-5 property tier (6.3%), playing a minor, supplementary role in the rental market.

The small-medium tier of 11-20 properties is exclusively controlled by individual investors, who own all 12 properties in this category. This complete absence of corporate ownership at a more scaled level is a defining feature of the local market.

The data clearly illustrates that the path to building a rental portfolio in Stutsman County is one followed by individual investors, not corporate entities, signaling a market characterized by personal capital and direct management.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Jamestown's 58401 zip code is the center of investor ownership, with 866 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Stutsman County is heavily concentrated in Jamestown's 58401 zip code, which contains 866 investor-owned SFRs. This single area accounts for the vast majority of the county's rental housing stock.

While Jamestown (58401) leads in sheer volume, its investor ownership rate of 16.5% is moderate. In contrast, several smaller, rural zip codes exhibit much higher market penetration, suggesting targeted investment in these communities.

The zip code 58475 stands out with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, meaning every SFR is a rental property. Similarly, 58483 (52.3%), 58466 (50.0%), and 58496 (45.6%) all show that investors own nearly half or more of the housing stock.

This reveals a dual market dynamic: a high-volume, lower-penetration urban center in Jamestown and low-volume, high-penetration rural pockets. Investors in these smaller areas face little to no competition from traditional homeowners.

The top five zip codes by investor property count are 58401 (866), 58467 (105), 58483 (68), 58424 (45), and 58455 (31), collectively representing the core of the county's rental market.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 7.6 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Stutsman County are aggressively expanding their portfolios, consistently acting as net buyers. In 2025, they purchased 68 properties while selling only 9, a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.6 to 1 and a net gain of 59 properties.

The accumulation trend has been consistent over time. In 2024, the net gain was even larger, with 79 buys versus 5 sells. The trend continued into the new year, with a net gain of 4 properties in Q1 2026 (6 buys, 2 sells).

Institutional investors (1,000+ tier) are not participating in this accumulation. During 2025, this tier bought one property and sold one property, resulting in zero net growth. This demonstrates a clear strategic divergence between small, local landlords and large-scale investors.

The high net-buyer ratio across the market signals strong confidence in the local rental economy. Landlords are overwhelmingly choosing to hold and acquire rather than liquidate assets, suggesting a long-term investment horizon.

This sustained period of net acquisition by the dominant mom-and-pop segment, juxtaposed with the neutral stance of institutions, paints a picture of a market being shaped from the ground up by local capital.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors participated in 10.7% of all single-family transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were involved in 6 of the 56 total SFR transactions in Stutsman County, capturing a 10.7% share of market activity.

A clear pricing disparity was evident between the smallest and largest investors. Single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $147,627, while the lone institutional purchase was secured for $113,474, a 23.1% discount compared to the new entrants.

This price gap suggests different acquisition strategies. New mom-and-pop buyers may be purchasing market-rate, turn-key properties, whereas the institutional buyer likely targeted a value-add or distressed opportunity at a lower price point.

Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) dominated transaction volume, conducting 5 of the 6 investor transactions in the quarter. The remaining transaction was by an institutional entity.

Significantly, 0% of landlord purchases came from other landlords. This indicates that investors are buying from homeowners or other sources, and there is very little trading of assets between existing investors, pointing to a buy-and-hold mentality.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Stutsman County's Real Estate is Dominated by Mom-and-Pop Investors Who Control 98.7% of Rentals
Holdings
Landlords own 1,302 SFR properties in Stutsman County, representing 20.2% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 1,243 properties (95.5%), compared to just 68 (5.2%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $113,497, a remarkable 57.2% discount compared to the $264,896 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Landlords purchased 12.8% of homes sold in the last quarter, with mom-and-pop investors accounting for 80.0% of that activity. The market welcomed 2 new single-property landlords.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the rental market, owning 98.7% of all investor-held SFRs. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own a mere 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes in Stutsman County. Companies do not achieve a majority share in any tier, with individuals owning 98.6% of properties even in the 6-10 property bracket.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6 properties in Q1 2026 while selling only 2. In contrast, institutional investors showed a neutral position in 2025, with 1 purchase and 1 sale.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Stutsman County, North Dakota is fundamentally shaped by local, individual investors. Landlords own 1,302 single-family homes, a 20.2% share of the total market, but this ownership is highly fragmented. A staggering 95.5% of these properties (1,243) are held by individuals, with companies owning just 5.2%. This dynamic is further clarified by tier analysis: 'mom-and-pop' landlords with 1-10 properties control 98.7% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional firms with portfolios over 1,000 units own a mere 0.2%, or just 3 homes. This market structure defies the national narrative of corporate landlord consolidation and points to a robust, ground-level rental market.

Investor behavior in Stutsman County is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions and a long-term, buy-and-hold mentality. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords secured properties at an average price of $113,497, a massive 57.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This indicates a focus on finding off-market or distressed deals rather than competing in the open market. Transaction data reinforces this accumulation strategy; landlords were strong net buyers throughout 2024 and 2025 and continued the trend in Q1 2026 with a 3-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. This contrasts sharply with institutional players, who were neutral and not actively growing their local footprint.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Stutsman County's rental market is a model of decentralized ownership. The market's health and stability are tied to the financial decisions of over a thousand individual landlords, not a handful of large corporations. With investors overwhelmingly using cash (1,079 cash-owned vs. 223 financed) and consistently adding to their portfolios, the data suggests a stable and confident local investment community. For homeowners and renters in the county, this means the rental landscape is shaped by neighbors, not distant asset managers, a defining feature of this regional housing ecosystem.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:12 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Stutsman (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Stutsman (ND) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nd-stutsman/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.