Crawford (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Crawford (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Crawford (GA)
2,943
Total Investors in Crawford (GA)
597
Investor Owned SFR in Crawford (GA)
577(19.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
532
SFR Owned
508
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
65
SFR Owned
75
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 577 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Crawford County, Controlling 94% of Investor Properties and Buying at a 38% Discount
Investors own 19.6% of the Single-Family Residential market in Crawford County, a segment overwhelmingly controlled by small, individual landlords (94.0%). In Q1, investors demonstrated significant pricing power, purchasing properties for 38.4% less than traditional homeowners. Activity remains consistent, with landlords acting as strong net buyers, steadily accumulating properties in the region.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 577 SFR properties in Crawford County, with individuals holding 88.0% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 512 paid in cash versus just 65 financed. Nearly the entire portfolio is rental-focused, as 561 of the 577 properties (97.2%) are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Q1 secured properties for $130,425, a massive 38.4% discount compared to homeowners.
This significant pricing advantage is not an anomaly; landlords consistently paid 36% to 52% below homeowner prices over the last year. The Q1 price gap of $81,286 underscores investors' ability to find and secure undervalued assets.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord purchasing was subdued in Q1, capturing just 10.5% of the 19 total market sales.
Activity was split evenly between small and mid-size investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounting for 50.0% of landlord purchases. One new single-property landlord entered the market, while institutional investors made no acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 94.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 76.7% of all investor-owned housing in the county. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.2% of the local inventory.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single portfolio tier, with no company crossover point.
Even in the smallest tier of single-property owners, individuals hold a commanding 89.4% share (403 properties) versus companies (48 properties). This pattern persists into larger portfolios, with individuals owning 78.3% of properties in the 6-10 unit tier.
Geographic Distribution
The 31078 zip code is the undisputed epicenter of investor activity in Crawford County.
The 31078 zip code contains 259 investor-owned properties, representing 44.9% of all investor holdings in the county. It also has the highest investor ownership rate at 29.8%, significantly above other areas.
Historical Transactions
Investors in Crawford County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8.5 times more properties than they sold in 2025.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with landlords buying 51 properties while selling only 6 in 2025. The pattern held in 2024, with 40 acquisitions versus 6 dispositions. In Q1 2026, they bought 2 properties and sold just 1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for a 7.7% share of all transactions in Q1, purchasing 2 properties.
The two landlord purchases showed a wide price disparity, with a new single-property investor paying $90,000 while a large landlord paid nearly double at $170,850. Neither of the Q1 landlord purchases were from other landlords, indicating acquisitions from the wider market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 577 SFR properties in Crawford County, with individuals holding 88.0% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Crawford County, investors hold a significant 19.6% share of the single-family residential market, totaling 577 properties. This demonstrates a notable concentration of rental housing within the overall stock of 2,943 SFR homes.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by 532 individual landlords who control 508 properties, accounting for 88.0% of the investor-owned market. In contrast, 65 company entities own the remaining 75 properties (13.0%), highlighting a market driven by local individuals rather than corporate entities.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash ownership. A remarkable 512 properties (88.7%) are owned outright, while only 65 (11.3%) are financed. This suggests a financially stable investor base that is not highly leveraged.

The portfolio is almost entirely geared towards rentals, with 561 of 577 properties classified as non-owner-occupied. This 97.2% rental concentration confirms that investor activity is focused on providing housing for tenants, not speculation or secondary homes.

Comparing owner types, both individuals and companies show a strong preference for cash purchases and renting out their properties. This uniform strategy across the board points to a shared market thesis on the stability and returns of rental properties in Crawford County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Q1 secured properties for $130,425, a massive 38.4% discount compared to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Crawford County demonstrate remarkable purchasing power, acquiring properties at a substantial discount. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords paid an average of $130,425, which is 38.4% less than the $211,711 paid by traditional homeowners, creating an immediate equity gap of $81,286 per property.

This trend of deep discounts has been consistent over the past year. In Q3 2025, the gap was even more pronounced, with landlords paying 52.3% less ($127,125 vs. $266,536). This persistent advantage suggests landlords are targeting different types of properties or employing more effective negotiation and off-market strategies.

Comparing recent periods, the average acquisition price for landlords has shown volatility but remains well below homeowner prices. The average price during the 2020-2023 boom era was $166,403, indicating that recent acquisitions are being made at lower price points than during the pandemic-era peak.

The data reveals a clear, sustained pattern of landlords paying significantly less for properties. This ability to acquire assets well below the retail market rate is a cornerstone of the investment strategy in Crawford County, allowing for stronger cash flow and higher potential returns for those engaged in real estate investing.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlord purchasing was subdued in Q1, capturing just 10.5% of the 19 total market sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchase activity in Crawford County was modest in the most recent quarter, with landlords acquiring 2 of the 19 total SFR properties sold, representing a 10.5% market share. This suggests a selective and targeted acquisition strategy rather than aggressive expansion.

The purchasing activity was split between the smallest and a larger tier of investor. A new single-property landlord entered the market, accounting for one purchase (50.0% of investor activity). The other purchase was made by a mid-size landlord in the 101-1000 property tier, also representing 50.0% of the activity.

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) continue to be a key source of new demand, making up half of the quarter's investor acquisitions. This aligns with the overall market structure dominated by smaller-scale investors.

Notably, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties were completely inactive, making zero purchases in Q1. Their absence reinforces the narrative that Crawford County's rental market is driven by local and regional players, not large-scale national corporations.

The low volume of acquisitions this quarter contrasts with a history of steady accumulation, potentially signaling a more cautious investor sentiment or a lack of suitable inventory at target price points.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 94.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Crawford County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a staggering 94.0% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

The foundation of this market is the single-property landlord. This tier alone, comprising 447 properties, accounts for 76.7% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights that the typical landlord is not a large enterprise but an individual with a single rental property.

Mid-size investors play a very small role. Tiers representing 11-100 properties collectively own just 5.4% of the inventory. This indicates a sharp drop-off in ownership after the 10-property mark, with few investors scaling into larger portfolios within the county.

Institutional ownership is virtually nonexistent. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier own a mere 0.2% of the market, equivalent to just a single property. This finding directly counters the narrative of a corporate takeover of suburban housing, at least in this specific geography.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented and decentralized rental market. The reliance on a large base of small landlords for rental housing is the defining structural feature of Crawford County's investment scene.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single portfolio tier, with no company crossover point.
Detailed Findings

In Crawford County, individual investors maintain majority ownership across all portfolio sizes, a clear indicator of a market driven by personal holdings rather than corporate structures. There is no crossover tier where companies become the dominant owner type.

The dominance of individuals is most pronounced at the entry level. Among single-property landlords, 89.4% of the properties (403 homes) are owned by individuals, compared to just 10.6% (48 homes) held by companies.

This trend holds even as portfolio sizes increase. For landlords owning 3-5 properties, individuals still control 77.3% of the assets. In the 6-10 property tier, the individual share remains strong at 78.3%.

The data suggests that as landlords in this market expand their portfolios, they tend to do so under their own names rather than forming LLCs or other corporate entities. This may reflect the local nature of investing or a preference for simpler ownership structures.

The most extreme case is the 21-50 property tier, which is 100% owned by individuals. This complete absence of corporate ownership at a mid-size level is a powerful testament to the individual-centric nature of the Crawford County rental market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 31078 zip code is the undisputed epicenter of investor activity in Crawford County.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Crawford County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 31078 zip code emerging as the primary hub for rental properties. This single area contains 259 landlord-owned homes, nearly half of the county's entire investor portfolio.

Not only does 31078 have the highest count, but it also boasts the highest rate of investor penetration, with 29.8% of its SFR properties owned by investors. This is substantially higher than the county-wide average of 19.6% and signals a deep concentration of rental housing.

Other zip codes show significant but smaller-scale investor presence. The 31030 zip code follows with 87 properties (16.8% rate), and 31066 has 74 properties (21.3% rate), indicating secondary pockets of investment activity.

The analysis reveals a clear pattern of geographic targeting. Investors are not spread evenly across the county but are clustered in specific communities, likely driven by factors like school districts, rental demand, or property values.

This concentration in 31078 suggests that understanding the dynamics of this single zip code is crucial to understanding the health and direction of the entire Crawford County investment market.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Investors in Crawford County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8.5 times more properties than they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows that landlords in Crawford County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. This behavior signals long-term confidence in the local rental market's stability and growth prospects.

In 2025, the net buying activity was particularly robust, with 51 properties purchased and only 6 sold. This results in a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.5-to-1 and a net gain of 45 properties to the investor-owned portfolio.

This is not a recent phenomenon. The trend was firmly in place during 2024 as well, when investors acquired 40 homes and sold just 6, for a net increase of 34 properties. The consistent, high-volume net buying year-over-year points to a deliberate strategy of portfolio expansion.

The most recent quarter, Q1 2026, continued this pattern on a smaller scale, with 2 properties bought and 1 sold. While the volume is lower, the net positive position remains intact.

Given the absence of institutional transaction data, this accumulation is being driven entirely by the small and mid-size landlords who dominate the county. Their persistent net buying is a primary force shaping the local housing market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for a 7.7% share of all transactions in Q1, purchasing 2 properties.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlord activity constituted 7.7% of all single-family residential transactions in Crawford County, with investors involved in 2 of the 26 total sales. This reflects a measured pace of acquisitions to start the year.

A significant price difference emerged between the two investor transactions this quarter. The single-property landlord acquired their home for $90,000, while the large landlord (101-1000 tier) paid a much higher price of $170,850. This $80,850 gap suggests vastly different acquisition strategies or property targets between small and large investors.

Inter-landlord trading was nonexistent in Q1. Both properties acquired by investors were purchased from non-landlords, meaning 0% of transactions were sourced from within the investor community. This indicates that investors are adding to the total rental stock rather than just trading existing rental assets among themselves.

The transaction volume was split evenly, with one purchase by a mom-and-pop investor and one by a larger entity. This mirrors the quiet but consistent activity seen across the market's different segments.

Overall, the Q1 transaction data portrays a market where investors are selectively acquiring properties from the general homeowner population, with different tiers operating at distinct price points.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Crawford County's real estate market is defined by mom-and-pop investors, who control 94% of rentals and buy at a 38% discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 577 single-family residential properties in Crawford County, representing 19.6% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (88.0%) compared to companies (13.0%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated significant pricing power, paying an average of $130,425, which is 38.4% less than the $211,711 paid by traditional homeowners, a discount of $81,286 per property.
Activity
Investors purchased 10.5% of homes sold in Q1, with activity split between a new, single-property landlord and a larger investor. In total, 1 new landlord entered the market during the quarter.
Market Share
Small, 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the market, controlling 94.0% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence at just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, with no crossover point where companies take control. Even among single-property landlords, individuals own a commanding 89.4% of homes.
Transactions
Landlords are strong and consistent net buyers in Crawford County, acquiring 8.5 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025 (51 buys vs 6 sells). There was no recorded institutional buying or selling activity.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Crawford County, Georgia, is fundamentally shaped by small, individual landlords. Investors own 577 single-family homes, comprising a significant 19.6% of the county's total SFR market. This portfolio is not in the hands of corporations; rather, 88.0% of these properties are held by individual owners. The market structure is highly fragmented, with 'mom-and-pop' investors (owning 1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 94.0% of the rental inventory, while institutional holdings are virtually nonexistent at just 0.2%.

Investor behavior in Crawford County is characterized by strategic acquisitions and steady accumulation. In the most recent quarter, landlords displayed impressive purchasing discipline, acquiring properties for an average of $130,425, a 38.4% discount compared to the prices paid by traditional homeowners. This pricing advantage is a consistent trend. Transaction data reveals landlords are firm net buyers, having acquired 8.5 times more properties than they sold in 2025, a clear sign of long-term confidence in the local market. Activity is driven by new entrants and existing small players, with one new single-property landlord joining the market in Q1.

The key takeaway for Crawford County is that its rental market is a model of decentralized, individual ownership. The narrative of corporate consolidation of housing does not apply here. Instead, the market's stability and the availability of rental housing rely on a broad base of local individuals. Their ability to secure properties at a deep discount and their consistent pattern of net buying indicate a healthy, functioning investment ecosystem that continues to expand its footprint, particularly within concentrated areas like the 31078 zip code, where investor ownership nears 30%.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:50 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Crawford (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Crawford (GA) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ga-crawford/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.