Morgan (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Morgan (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Morgan (IN)
23,254
Total Investors in Morgan (IN)
2,003
Investor Owned SFR in Morgan (IN)
2,011(8.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,670
SFR Owned
1,423
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
333
SFR Owned
596
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,011 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Morgan County with 86% ownership, acquiring properties at a 44% discount as institutions stay on the sidelines.
Investors own 2,011 SFR properties in Morgan County (8.6% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 86.0% versus just 5.8% for institutional investors. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties at a 43.8% discount compared to homeowners, and recent activity shows small investors account for 100% of purchases while large institutions made zero acquisitions.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,011 SFR properties in Morgan County, with individuals holding 70.8%.
The portfolio is heavily cash-based, with 1,602 properties owned outright versus 409 financed. An overwhelming 94.3% of these properties are rented, underscoring a strong focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 43.8% less than homeowners, securing a $70,000 discount.
The price gap widened significantly from the previous active quarter, growing from a 28.2% discount ($55,000) in Q2 2025. Landlord acquisition prices show a steep downward trend, falling from a $219,232 average in 2020-2023 to just $90,000 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 16.7% of all SFR homes sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were the only active buyers, accounting for 100% of all investor purchases (11 properties). In contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions, showing a complete lack of activity in the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 86.0% of investor-owned SFRs in Morgan County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 5.8% of the investor-held housing stock. Recent purchasing data shows institutional investors have become completely inactive, making 0.0% of Q4 2025 purchases, reinforcing the dominance of small investors.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners starting in the 11-20 property tier.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 86.0% of single-property holdings, companies take over as portfolios scale, controlling 58.6% of properties in the 11-20 tier and 98.2% in the 21-50 tier. The provided data does not show price differences by owner type.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 46151 holding 928 properties.
The top markets by ownership rate are different from the top markets by count, led by 46125 with a 100.0% investor rate. Zip codes 46151, 46158, and 46113 together account for 84.7% of all investor-owned properties in the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were net buyers in 2024, with a 1.41 buy-to-sell ratio.
The trend held for institutional investors as well, who were aggressive net buyers with a 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio, acquiring 9 properties while selling only 1. The provided data does not specify what percentage of these purchases were from other landlords.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 14.3% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors drove all activity, paying an average of $90,000 for single-property acquisitions, while institutional investors made zero transactions. None of the investor purchases came from other landlords, indicating all acquisitions were sourced from the general market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,011 SFR properties in Morgan County, with individuals holding 70.8%.
Detailed Findings

Landlord-owned properties comprise 8.6% of the total Single Family Residential market in Morgan County, with a portfolio size of 2,011 homes.

The market is dominated by individual investors, who own 1,423 properties (70.8% of the total), compared to 596 properties (29.6%) owned by companies. This pattern extends to the entity level, where there are 1,670 individual landlords versus just 333 company landlords.

A significant majority of investor-owned properties, 1,896 homes or 94.3%, are classified as rented, highlighting the primary strategy of generating rental income within this market.

Financial strategies lean heavily towards cash ownership. Investors own 1,602 properties with cash, nearly four times the 409 properties that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base that is less reliant on leverage.

The prevalence of individual owners and cash purchases suggests that the typical real estate investor in Morgan County is a small-scale, local operator rather than a large, debt-fueled institution.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 43.8% less than homeowners, securing a $70,000 discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Morgan County demonstrate a consistent ability to acquire properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners. In the first quarter of 2026, the average landlord acquisition price was $90,000, a full $70,000 (43.8%) below the average homeowner purchase price of $160,000.

This pricing advantage for investors has been widening. The 43.8% discount in Q1 2026 is substantially larger than the 28.2% discount ($55,000) observed in Q2 2025, indicating an increasing effectiveness at sourcing below-market deals.

A striking trend is the sharp decline in the average price investors are paying. The Q1 2026 average of $90,000 is less than half the average of $219,232 paid during the 2020-2023 period, signaling a strategic shift towards lower-cost assets or a significant market correction in the properties investors are targeting.

This trend suggests that investors are successfully navigating the market to find value, possibly by focusing on distressed properties or off-market opportunities not typically pursued by traditional homebuyers.

The consistent and growing price gap highlights a clear strategic difference in acquisition methods between professional investors and the general public.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 16.7% of all SFR homes sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords acquired 11 of the 66 total SFR properties sold in Morgan County, capturing a 16.7% market share of all purchases.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of investor acquisitions, highlighting their role as the primary driver of market demand.

New market entrants were particularly active, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) purchasing 8 properties, which represents 72.7% of all investor buys for the quarter.

Conspicuously absent were larger players. Institutional investors (owning 1,000+ properties) made zero purchases, indicating a complete halt in their acquisition activity in this market during Q4 2025.

This data paints a clear picture of a market fueled by new and small investors, with no participation from institutional capital in the most recent quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 86.0% of investor-owned SFRs in Morgan County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Morgan County is fundamentally defined by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control 86.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment by a wide margin, holding 1,232 properties, which accounts for 58.9% of the entire investor portfolio on their own.

Despite common narratives about corporate landlords, institutional investors (Tier 09) have a very limited presence, owning just 121 properties or 5.8% of the investor market. Their influence is dwarfed by the cumulative impact of thousands of smaller owners.

The remaining tiers, representing mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties), collectively hold just 8.2% of the market, further emphasizing the concentration of ownership at the smallest scale.

This ownership structure indicates that the local rental market is shaped not by Wall Street but by local community members and small business owners.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners starting in the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A clear organizational shift occurs as investors scale their portfolios in Morgan County. While individual investors form the backbone of the market, companies become the preferred ownership vehicle for larger holdings.

Individuals overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level tiers, owning 86.0% of single-property portfolios and 76.5% of two-property portfolios.

The crossover point happens at the 11-20 property tier (Tier 05), where companies first achieve majority ownership, holding 34 properties (58.6%) compared to 24 held by individuals (41.4%).

This trend accelerates dramatically in the next tier. For landlords owning 21-50 properties, companies control 54 of 55 homes, a near-total dominance of 98.2%.

This pattern suggests that while individuals are crucial for market entry, scaling a portfolio beyond 10 properties typically involves incorporation for liability, financing, or operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 46151 holding 928 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Morgan County is not evenly distributed, but instead highly concentrated in a few key zip codes. The zip code 46151 is the undeniable center of activity, containing 928 investor-owned properties alone.

The top three zip codes by property count, 46151 (928 properties), 46158 (537 properties), and 46113 (238 properties), collectively represent 1,703 homes, or 84.7% of the entire investor-owned portfolio in the county.

Interestingly, the areas with the highest raw counts of investor properties are not the same as those with the highest percentage of investor ownership. Zip code 46125 leads with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting a small, fully saturated rental area, followed by 46111 at 19.5%.

In contrast, the volume leader 46151 has a more moderate ownership rate of 9.2%, indicating it is a large residential area with significant investor presence rather than an investor-exclusive enclave.

This geographic clustering reveals targeted investment strategies, with investors focusing their capital on specific neighborhoods within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords were net buyers in 2024, with a 1.41 buy-to-sell ratio.
Detailed Findings

During 2024, landlords in Morgan County were actively expanding their portfolios, operating as clear net buyers. They acquired 82 properties while selling only 58, resulting in a net addition of 24 homes to their collective holdings.

This activity translates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 1.41, signaling a market characterized by accumulation and long-term confidence among investors.

The trend of acquisition was even more pronounced among institutional investors (1,000+ properties). This segment purchased 9 properties and sold only 1 during 2024, reflecting a strong 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio and a decisive strategy of portfolio growth.

While the data for 2024 shows a period of accumulation, more recent quarterly data from late 2025 indicates a potential shift, particularly with institutional players halting new purchases.

The 2024 figures establish a baseline of expansionary behavior against which current market slowdowns can be measured.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 14.3% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In the most recent quarter of activity (Q4 2025), landlords participated in 13 of the 91 total SFR transactions, accounting for a 14.3% share of the market.

This activity was exclusively driven by mom-and-pop investors. Landlords in the 1-10 property tiers conducted all 13 transactions, while institutional investors remained completely on the sidelines with zero transactions.

First-time or single-property investors were the most active group, responsible for 10 transactions at an average purchase price of $90,000.

A key insight from the quarter is the source of these properties. A full 100% of investor acquisitions came from non-landlord sellers, meaning investors bought exclusively from traditional homeowners or other sources. This 0% landlord-to-landlord transaction rate suggests a lack of portfolio churn among existing investors.

This dynamic points to a market where small investors are expanding by absorbing housing stock from the general market rather than trading properties amongst themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Morgan County with 86% ownership, acquiring properties at a 44% discount as institutions stay on the sidelines.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,011 SFR properties, representing 8.6% of the market in Morgan County, Indiana. Ownership is skewed towards individuals, who hold 1,423 properties (70.8%), while companies own the remaining 596 (29.6%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, investors paid 43.8% less than traditional homeowners, acquiring properties for an average of $90,000 compared to the homeowner price of $160,000, a steep $70,000 discount.
Activity
Landlords captured 16.7% of all SFR sales in Q4 2025, with mom-and-pop investors accounting for 100% of this activity. The quarter saw 10 new single-property landlords enter the market, while institutional purchases were zero.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 86.0% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, large institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a minor share of just 5.8%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties. This trend solidifies in larger tiers, with companies owning 98.2% of portfolios in the 21-50 property range.
Transactions
Landlords were net buyers in 2024 with a 1.41 buy-to-sell ratio (82 buys vs 58 sells). Institutional investors were also strong net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 1 sold.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Morgan County, Indiana is overwhelmingly shaped by small, individual investors, not large corporations. Investors own 2,011 SFR properties, making up 8.6% of the total housing stock. The ownership base is granular, with individual investors holding 70.8% of these properties. Further analysis from our property ownership by owner type report data reveals that 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 homes) control a massive 86.0% of the investor-owned market, while large institutional firms (1,000+ homes) hold a mere 5.8% share.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions. In the most recent quarter, these landlords captured 16.7% of all home purchases, with 100% of that activity driven by small-scale investors. Their purchasing power is amplified by significant discounts; in Q1 2026, they paid an average of $90,000, a staggering 43.8% less than traditional homeowners ($160,000). While historical data from 2024 shows all investor segments, including institutions, were net buyers accumulating properties, recent activity in Q4 2025 shows institutional buyers have completely paused acquisitions.

The key takeaway for Morgan County is that its rental landscape is a 'Main Street' phenomenon. The market is defined by local operators and new entrants who are adept at finding deals and are currently the sole source of investor-driven housing demand. The absence of institutional buying, coupled with the continued dominance of small landlords, suggests a stable, community-integrated rental market that defies the national narrative of corporate consolidation. Future trends will depend on whether these small investors continue to absorb housing stock from the general market and if or when larger capital decides to re-enter this submarket.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:47 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Morgan (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Morgan (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-in-morgan/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.