Harper (OK) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Harper (OK) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Harper (OK)
1,153
Total Investors in Harper (OK)
555
Investor Owned SFR in Harper (OK)
512(44.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
530
SFR Owned
482
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
25
SFR Owned
30
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 512 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Individual investors own 44.4% of Harper County's housing, dominating 100% of recent market activity.
Investors own 512 SFR properties in Harper County, representing a significant 44.4% of the market. This ownership is almost entirely controlled by small, individual landlords (94.1% of properties), with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) accounting for 99.6% of the investor-owned housing stock. In the most recent quarter, landlords captured 100% of the 3 total home sales, signaling complete market control.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 512 homes, 44.4% of the market, with individuals holding 94.1%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (442) versus financed (70). Individual landlords are the primary market participants, with 530 individuals compared to just 25 companies. Of the 512 investor properties, 503 are confirmed rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Pricing is volatile, with landlords paying a 12.3% premium over homeowners in Q3 2025.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners shows extreme volatility, swinging from a 57.4% discount ($81,167) in 2025-Q1 to a 16.2% premium ($12,555) in 2025-Q2. The most recent data with a valid comparison shows landlords paying an average of $140,000 versus homeowners at $124,667 in Q3 2025. Data for 2026-Q1 was insufficient for a direct comparison.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords completely dominated the market, acquiring 100% of all 3 SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
All purchases were made by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), with zero activity from institutional investors. The quarter saw the entry of two new single-property landlords, who together acquired 66.7% of the properties sold.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords represent 99.6% of investor ownership, with no institutional presence.
Single-property landlords alone own 420 properties, which is 80.5% of all investor-owned housing in the county. The two-property and 3-5 property tiers hold 8.8% and 9.4% respectively. There are no investors with portfolios larger than 50 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own 94% of investor properties; companies only gain a majority in the 6-10 property tier.
The crossover point where companies become majority owners is the 6-10 property tier, holding 60% (3 properties). Below this tier, individual ownership is dominant, including 95.7% of all single-property investor portfolios. There is no institutional company ownership in the county.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in two zip codes, 73848 and 73834.
The 73848 zip code contains 293 investor-owned properties with a 49.3% ownership rate. The 73834 zip code follows with 203 properties and a 39.9% rate. These two areas account for 96.9% of all investor properties in the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 20 properties while selling only one.
The buy-to-sell ratio for all landlords in 2024 was 20.0, indicating a clear strategy of portfolio accumulation. There was no recorded institutional transaction activity during this period. Data on landlord-to-landlord sales is not available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords captured 100% of Q1 transactions, with all 3 sales going to mom-and-pop investors.
New, single-property landlords paid a slightly higher average price of $98,500 for their two purchases. This was more than the $92,000 paid by the more established small landlord. None of the transactions involved a landlord seller.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 512 homes, 44.4% of the market, with individuals holding 94.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Harper County is exceptionally concentrated, with 512 single-family residential properties, or 44.4% of the total 1,153 SFRs, held by landlords. This high penetration rate indicates that investors are a primary force shaping the local housing market.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual real estate investors, who own 482 properties, accounting for 94.1% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, company-owned properties number only 30, representing a mere 5.9% share.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 530 of the 555 total landlords are individuals (95.5%), compared to just 25 companies (4.5%). This structure points to a market built on small-scale, local investment rather than corporate portfolios.

A defining characteristic of investor holdings in Harper County is the preference for cash ownership. A remarkable 442 properties (86.3%) are owned outright, while only 70 (13.7%) are financed. This suggests a market of financially stable investors with low leverage.

The primary use of these properties is clear, with 503 of the 512 investor-owned homes identified as rentals. This high rental concentration underscores the critical role investors play in providing housing for the local community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Pricing is volatile, with landlords paying a 12.3% premium over homeowners in Q3 2025.
Detailed Findings

Acquisition pricing in Harper County displays significant volatility, a common trait in low-volume markets. Unlike larger markets where investors often secure discounts, landlords here have recently paid premiums. In Q3 2025, landlords paid an average of $140,000, which was $15,333, or 12.3%, more than traditional homeowners paid ($124,667).

This trend of paying a premium continued from the prior quarter, as landlords in Q2 2025 paid $90,222 on average, a 16.2% premium over the homeowner price of $77,667. This pattern may suggest investors are targeting specific properties or competing heavily for limited inventory.

However, the market has seen dramatic shifts. In Q1 2025, the situation was reversed, with landlords acquiring properties at a steep 57.4% discount, paying just $60,333 compared to the homeowner average of $141,500. This $81,167 price gap highlights the market's lack of consistent pricing behavior.

Overall price trends show appreciation from the pandemic era. The average acquisition price during 2020-2023 was $66,427, which rose to $88,875 in 2024 and $105,632 across 2025. This indicates a steady increase in property values in the region.

Due to extremely low transaction volume, no properties were recorded as purchased by landlords in 2026-Q1, preventing a direct price comparison with homeowners for the current quarter.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords completely dominated the market, acquiring 100% of all 3 SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In a powerful demonstration of market control, landlords acquired all 3 of the single-family homes sold in Harper County during the last quarter of 2025, capturing 100% of the market's purchase activity. This total dominance, while based on low volume, shows that investor demand is the primary driver of sales.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from mom-and-pop investors. Those in the 1-10 property tier accounted for all 3 acquisitions, reinforcing the theme of a market driven by small, local landlords.

New market entrants were a key part of the quarter's activity. Two new single-property landlords (Tier 01) made their first acquisitions, purchasing 2 of the 3 available homes and representing 66.7% of the quarter's investor purchases.

The remaining purchase was made by one entity in the small landlord tier (6-10 properties), who acquired a single property. This highlights activity at both the entry-level and slightly more established small investor segments.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing landscape, with 0% of acquisitions. This confirms that Harper County's real estate market operates entirely outside the scope of large-scale corporate investment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords represent 99.6% of investor ownership, with no institutional presence.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Harper County is the definition of a small-investor market. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a staggering 99.6% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The foundation of this market is the single-property landlord. This entry-level tier (Tier 01) accounts for 420 properties, representing an 80.5% share of all investor holdings. This signifies that the vast majority of landlords are individuals with a single rental property.

Slightly larger investors are present but hold much smaller shares. The two-property tier holds 46 properties (8.8%), and the small landlord tier (3-5 properties) holds 49 properties (9.4%). Together, these first three tiers make up 98.7% of the entire investor portfolio.

There is a complete absence of large-scale investment. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have a 0.0% share of the market, and there are no investors recorded in any tier above the 21-50 property bracket.

This distribution underscores a market characterized by grassroots investment, where local individuals, rather than corporations, provide the bulk of the rental housing supply.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own 94% of investor properties; companies only gain a majority in the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the definitive owners in Harper County, holding 95.7% of properties in both the single-property and two-property tiers. This dominance continues into the 3-5 property tier, where individuals still own 44 of 49 properties (89.8%).

The only exception to individual dominance occurs in the 6-10 property tier. Within this small bracket, companies own 3 of the 5 properties, giving them a 60.0% majority share. This tier represents the sole crossover point where a corporate structure becomes the preferred ownership method.

Overall, individual investors own 482 of the 512 investor-held properties, a 94.1% share, while companies own just 30 properties (5.9%). This distribution confirms that personal ownership is the standard for nearly all investors in the market.

In the largest active tier (21-50 properties), the 2 properties recorded are owned by individuals, showing that even at slightly larger scales, personal ownership can persist.

There is no evidence of corporate or individual ownership in any tier above 50 properties, highlighting the complete lack of medium or large-scale investors in Harper County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in two zip codes, 73848 and 73834.
Detailed Findings

Geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in Harper County is extremely concentrated. The vast majority of activity is located in the 73848 zip code, which is home to 293 investor properties. This area also has the highest investor penetration rate at 49.3%.

The second most significant area for investors is the 73834 zip code, with 203 investor-owned SFRs. This region has an investor ownership rate of 39.9%, also exceptionally high.

Together, these two zip codes, 73848 and 73834, contain 496 of the 512 total investor properties in the county. This represents 96.9% of all investor holdings, indicating that investment opportunities and activity are confined to these core areas.

Other zip codes show minimal investor presence. For instance, 73855 has just 14 investor properties (38.9% rate) and 73851 has only 2 (14.3% rate), confirming the hyper-local focus of the market.

This pattern of concentration in both count and percentage shows that where investors are active, they are a dominant market force, often owning nearly half of the available single-family housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 20 properties while selling only one.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data from 2024 reveals that landlords in Harper County were aggressively expanding their portfolios. Investors purchased 20 SFR properties while only selling one, establishing a clear net-buyer position.

This activity translates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 20.0, a remarkably high figure that signals strong confidence in the local market and a focus on long-term holds over quick flips. For every 20 properties bought, only one was sold.

This accumulation trend aligns with the overall market structure, which is dominated by small, buy-and-hold investors. The transaction data provides quantitative proof of this strategy in action.

Consistent with all other findings, there was no transaction activity recorded for institutional investors in the 1,000+ property tier. Their absence from the transaction logs confirms they are not a factor in the buying or selling dynamics of Harper County.

The significant imbalance between buy and sell volume in 2024 contributed to the high concentration of investor ownership seen today, as landlords steadily absorbed available housing inventory.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords captured 100% of Q1 transactions, with all 3 sales going to mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

In the most recent quarter, landlords were the only buyers in the market, accounting for 100% of the 3 total SFR transactions. This complete capture of sales activity underscores the central role investors play in Harper County's real estate market liquidity.

All transactions were executed by mom-and-pop investors, with zero involvement from institutional players. Two transactions were made by new, single-property landlords, and one was by a landlord in the 6-10 property tier.

A slight pricing difference emerged between the tiers. The two new landlords in Tier 01 paid an average of $98,500 per property, while the one landlord in Tier 04 paid $92,000. This could suggest new entrants are willing to pay a small premium to enter the market.

Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords. This indicates that investors acquired their properties from traditional homeowners or other non-investor sellers, expanding the total investor-owned portfolio rather than trading assets within the existing investor community.

The low transaction volume combined with complete investor dominance highlights a market where nearly all available properties are being absorbed by small-scale rental housing providers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, individual landlords are the dominant force in Harper County, owning 44.4% of all homes and buying 100% of recent sales.
Holdings
Landlords own 512 single-family homes in Harper County, representing a 44.4% penetration of the local market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 482 of these properties (94.1%), compared to just 30 (5.9%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Pricing dynamics in this low-volume market are volatile; in the most recent comparable quarter (Q3 2025), landlords paid a 12.3% premium over homeowners, with an average price of $140,000 versus $124,667.
Activity
Investors completely absorbed the market in the most recent quarter, purchasing 100% of the 3 homes sold. This activity was led by the entry of 2 new single-property landlords.
Market Share
The market is defined by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.6% of investor housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate nearly every portfolio size, with companies only achieving a majority (60.0%) in the small 6-10 property tier. Below this, individual ownership is near-total.
Transactions
Landlords are firmly in an accumulation phase, posting a 20-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2024 (20 buys vs 1 sell). Institutional investors are not active and therefore have no net position.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Harper County, Oklahoma, is uniquely characterized by the profound influence of small, individual investors. Landlords own 512 homes, a remarkable 44.4% of the county's entire SFR stock. This ownership is not driven by corporations, but by local individuals, who own 94.1% of these properties. The market structure is definitively grassroots, with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) controlling 99.6% of the investor-owned housing supply, while institutional investors have no presence whatsoever.

Investor behavior reflects a strategy of market control and accumulation. In the most recent quarter, landlords purchased 100% of the 3 homes sold, with two new single-property investors entering the market. While pricing can be volatile in such a low-volume environment, historical data from 2024 shows landlords were strong net buyers, acquiring 20 properties for every one they sold. This indicates a clear long-term, buy-and-hold approach, with a strong preference for all-cash purchases (86.3% of holdings).

The key takeaway from this market report is that in Harper County, small landlords are not just participants, they are the market. Their activity dictates liquidity, sets demand, and provides the vast majority of rental housing. This creates a stable but highly concentrated ecosystem where nearly half the housing is controlled by a network of small-scale, local investors, a dynamic starkly different from institutionally influenced metropolitan areas.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 01:09 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Harper (OK)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Harper (OK) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ok-harper/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.