Chemung (NY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Chemung (NY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Chemung (NY)
23,904
Total Investors in Chemung (NY)
3,507
Investor Owned SFR in Chemung (NY)
3,467(14.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,157
SFR Owned
2,999
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
350
SFR Owned
518
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,467 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Define Chemung County's Real Estate Market, Acquiring 44% of Homes in Q1
In Chemung County, investors own 14.5% of the SFR market (3,467 properties), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 98.1%. In Q1 2026, investors purchased 43.8% of all homes sold, paying 4.9% less than traditional homeowners, while remaining strong net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,467 SFR properties in Chemung County, with individuals holding 86.5% of them.
A significant 72.4% of investor properties are owned outright in cash (2,510 properties), compared to just 27.6% that are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 3,418 properties (98.6%) classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 4.9% less than homeowners, a discount of $9,149 per property.
The landlord discount has been volatile, peaking at an 11.0% discount in Q1 2025 before briefly turning into a 2.1% premium in Q3 2025. Prices have surged 65.4% from the 2020-2023 average of $107,586 to $177,936 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 43.8% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove this activity, accounting for 55 of 56 properties (98.2%). The market saw an influx of 55 new, single-property landlords, while institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) own a commanding 98.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 81.8% of the total (2,861 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold just 0.1%, or 3 properties total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own most small portfolios, but companies become the majority owner at the 6-10 property tier.
Individuals own 91.5% of single-property portfolios. The crossover to company majority happens at the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 59.8% of the assets.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 14904 (811 properties) and 14845 (709 properties).
The highest investor penetration rate is in 14902, where landlords own 72.2% of SFRs. Zip code 14901 shows both high volume (602 properties) and a high ownership rate (20.6%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers in Q1 2026, purchasing 3.7 properties for every one they sold.
This net buying has been consistent but is decelerating; the buy/sell ratio has decreased from a high of 10.28 in 2024 to 6.55 in 2025. Institutional investors had minimal activity, being slight net buyers in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 43.1% of all Q1 2026 transactions, making 56 purchases.
New, single-property landlords dominated activity and paid an average of $180,255. In contrast, the one mid-size investor purchase was for just $55,000 and was sourced from another landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,467 SFR properties in Chemung County, with individuals holding 86.5% of them.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 14.5% share of the single-family residential market in Chemung County, with a total portfolio of 3,467 properties. This demonstrates a notable presence in the local housing landscape, impacting both sales and the rental market.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals, who own 2,999 properties, or 86.5% of the investor-held inventory. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 518 (14.9%), underscoring that the local real estate investing scene is driven by small-scale operators, not large corporations.

A key indicator of financial strategy is the high rate of cash ownership. Investors in Chemung County own 2,510 properties (72.4%) free of financing, compared to 957 properties (27.6%) that are financed. This suggests a market of financially stable, long-term investors with low leverage.

The portfolio's purpose is clearly defined, with 3,418 properties (98.6%) identified as rented. This near-total focus on rental income highlights the role investors play in supplying housing for the local rental market.

When comparing entity types, the 3,157 individual landlords far outnumber the 350 company landlords. This 9-to-1 ratio of individual-to-company entities reinforces the mom-and-pop character of the county's investor base.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 4.9% less than homeowners, a discount of $9,149 per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Chemung County demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage in Q1 2026, acquiring properties for an average of $177,936. This price point is 4.9% lower than the $187,085 paid by traditional homeowners, representing an average savings of $9,149 per home.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners is not static. After reaching a high of 11.0% ($19,417) in Q1 2025, the discount narrowed and even inverted in Q3 2025, when landlords paid a 2.1% premium. The return to a 4.9% discount in the latest quarter suggests a normalization of purchasing dynamics.

Acquisition prices have seen dramatic appreciation since the pandemic era. The average landlord purchase price of $177,936 in Q1 2026 is 65.4% higher than the $107,586 average seen between 2020 and 2023, reflecting significant market growth.

Comparing recent yearly performance, the average acquisition price for landlords rose from $164,833 in 2025 to $182,890 in 2024. The most recent quarterly figure of $177,936 suggests prices are stabilizing near these recent highs.

The volatility in the landlord discount may indicate fluctuating competition levels. The period where landlords paid a premium (Q3 2025) could correspond to a time of heightened competition for limited inventory, forcing investors to bid more aggressively.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 43.8% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a dominant force in the most recent quarter's market, purchasing 56 of the 128 total SFRs sold in Chemung County. This 43.8% market share highlights their significant impact on local housing sales and inventory.

The acquisition activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 55 properties, representing 98.2% of all investor purchases and leaving virtually no room for larger players.

A wave of new entrants characterized the quarter, with 55 distinct entities purchasing their first investment property. This influx of new landlords signals strong local interest and confidence in the rental market's potential.

The data reveals a complete absence of institutional buying activity. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier made zero purchases, reinforcing that market dynamics are dictated by local, smaller-scale operators.

Outside of new entrants, only one other transaction was recorded, a single property purchase by an investor in the 21-50 property tier. This further emphasizes that nearly all quarterly activity was focused on building new, single-property portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) own a commanding 98.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Chemung County is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords. Owners with 1-10 properties control 98.1% of all investor-held SFRs, cementing their role as the primary providers of rental housing in the area.

The market's foundation rests on single-property landlords (Tier 01), who alone own 2,861 properties. This constitutes a massive 81.8% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, highlighting the granular nature of ownership.

In stark contrast to the concentration at the small end, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint. Their entire portfolio consists of just 3 properties, representing only 0.1% of the investor market and challenging any narrative of a corporate takeover.

Ownership concentration drops off sharply after the smallest tiers. Portfolios with 11 or more properties combined account for less than 2% of the total investor-owned housing stock.

The combined share of landlords owning just one or two properties (Tiers 01 and 02) stands at 87.5% of all investor-owned homes. This pattern shows that the journey for most local investors does not extend far beyond their first couple of properties.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own most small portfolios, but companies become the majority owner at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Chemung County shows a clear evolution as portfolios grow. While individuals dominate the market overall, companies become the majority owners for investors holding between 6 and 10 properties, controlling 59.8% of the assets in that tier.

At the entry level, individual ownership is nearly absolute. Investors with a single property are 91.5% individual, highlighting that most begin their journey as personal ventures rather than through a corporate entity.

The trend of increasing corporate ownership continues up the ladder. In the 'Large' tier (101-1,000 properties), companies own two-thirds (66.7%) of the assets, indicating that significant scale is typically managed through formal business structures.

The data points to the 6-10 property tier as the critical inflection point where investors are most likely to formalize their operations under a company structure, likely for liability protection and operational efficiency.

Even in the larger tiers, individuals maintain a presence. For instance, individuals own 40.2% of properties in the 6-10 tier and even one of the three properties in the 101-1,000 tier, showing that personal ownership can persist even at scale.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 14904 (811 properties) and 14845 (709 properties).
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Chemung County is highly concentrated geographically. Just three zip codes, 14904 (811 properties), 14845 (709 properties), and 14901 (602 properties), contain 2,122 properties, accounting for 61.2% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

There is a clear distinction between where investors own the most properties and where they dominate the market. Zip code 14902 has the highest investor ownership rate at a staggering 72.2%, yet it is not among the top areas by sheer volume of properties.

Conversely, the area with the most investor-owned homes, 14904, has a more moderate ownership rate of 17.5%. This indicates a large housing market where investors have a strong but not dominant presence.

Zip code 14901 stands out as a critical investor hub, ranking in the top five for both total count (602 properties) and ownership percentage (20.6%). This combination suggests it is a core, stable market for rental property investment.

The data reveals that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods. Understanding these sub-markets is key to analyzing investment strategy, whether it's focused on high-volume acquisition in larger zip codes or market saturation in smaller ones like 14902.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords remain strong net buyers in Q1 2026, purchasing 3.7 properties for every one they sold.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Chemung County continue to be in a phase of accumulation, acting as strong net buyers in Q1 2026. They purchased 56 properties while selling only 15, resulting in a net gain of 41 properties for the investor community.

While still robust, the pace of net acquisition has moderated over time. The buy-to-sell ratio stood at 3.73 in Q1 2026, a significant decrease from the ratio of 6.55 in 2025 and an even more aggressive 10.28 in 2024. This suggests a market that is gradually moving toward equilibrium.

The trend of slowing acquisition is also visible in transaction volumes. The 617 properties purchased in 2024 decreased to 576 in 2025. At the same time, dispositions increased from 60 to 88 properties over the same period.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have been almost entirely absent from the transaction market. Their only recorded activity was in 2024, when they were marginal net buyers with two purchases and one sale.

The consistent net-positive buying activity across all recent timeframes signals sustained confidence among local investors in the Chemung County rental market, even as the intensity of acquisitions has cooled from its peak.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 43.1% of all Q1 2026 transactions, making 56 purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was a defining feature of the Q1 2026 market, as landlords participated in 43.1% of all SFR transactions. Their 56 acquisitions out of a total of 130 sales underscore their role in driving market liquidity.

A significant pricing disparity emerged between different investor tiers. New, single-property landlords paid an average of $180,255 per property. In sharp contrast, the one purchase by a mid-size investor (21-50 property tier) was acquired for just $55,000, a 69.5% discount.

Sourcing strategies also differed by investor size. The mid-size investor's acquisition was an inter-landlord transaction, with 100% of their single purchase coming from another investor. This may suggest a focus on off-market or targeted deals.

New entrants, who accounted for 55 of the 56 transactions, primarily bought from the open market. Only 9.1% of their purchases were sourced from other landlords, indicating they are competing directly with traditional homebuyers.

Institutional investors recorded zero transactions in the quarter, confirming their passive role in the current market. All transactional momentum is concentrated within the mom-and-pop segment, particularly with new market participants.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Chemung County's Market with 98.1% of Properties, Institutions Nearly Absent
Holdings
Landlords own 3,467 SFR properties in Chemung County, representing 14.5% of the market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 2,999 properties (86.5%), while companies own 518 (14.9%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 4.9% less than homeowners, an average discount of $9,149 per property ($177,936 vs $187,085).
Activity
Landlords acquired 43.8% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter (56 properties), with activity driven by 55 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties) who own 98.1% of investor housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies take majority control starting at the 6-10 property tier, where they own 59.8% of assets.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 3.73 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (56 buys vs 15 sells), continuing a multi-year accumulation trend. Institutional transaction activity is minimal.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Chemung County, NY is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors. Landlords own 3,467 properties, comprising 14.5% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a staggering 98.1% of all investor-owned homes. In contrast, institutional investors have a nearly non-existent presence, owning just 0.1% of the inventory. Ownership is primarily personal, with individual investors holding 86.5% of properties, though a shift to corporate structures occurs for portfolios larger than six properties. This structure, detailed in comprehensive property datasets, defines a granular, community-based rental market.

Investor activity remains robust, signaling confidence in the local market. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords acquired 43.8% of all homes sold, demonstrating significant purchasing power. This activity was almost entirely driven by 55 new single-property investors entering the market. These investors typically secure a pricing advantage, paying 4.9% less than traditional homeowners in Q1. Furthermore, landlords continue to be aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.7 properties for every one they sold in the quarter, though this pace has moderated from a peak in 2024.

The key takeaway from this analysis is that the Chemung County investor market is the domain of the local entrepreneur, not the large corporation. The narrative of an institutional takeover does not apply here; instead, the market's health and growth are tied to the decisions of thousands of small operators. This dynamic creates a resilient but fragmented rental landscape. For a deeper understanding of these trends, similar analyses are available in our ongoing Investor Pulse reports, which track investor behavior across the country.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 12:12 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Chemung (NY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Chemung (NY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ny-chemung/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.