Will (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Will (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Will (IL)
211,584
Total Investors in Will (IL)
30,954
Investor Owned SFR in Will (IL)
25,896(12.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
27,734
SFR Owned
20,373
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
3,220
SFR Owned
5,987
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 25,896 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 90% of Will County's Investor Market as Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Investors own 25,896 SFR properties in Will County (12.2% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 90.1% versus just 4.0% for institutional firms. In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties at a 2.1% discount to homeowners, with the broader landlord base acting as strong net buyers while institutional investors continued their trend of being net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 25,896 SFR properties in Will County, with individual landlords holding 78.7%.
Of these holdings, 14,905 properties are financed while 10,991 are owned in cash. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 25,364 properties (98.0%) classified as rented, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 2.1% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a discount of $8,482 per property.
This marks a return to discounts after a volatile period where landlords paid premiums in two of the last four quarters, including a 2.4% premium in Q3 2025. Prices have appreciated significantly from the 2020-2023 average of $233,200 to $393,487 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, acquiring 65.5% of all SFR properties sold.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 97.8% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors acquired just one property, highlighting the market's reliance on small-scale buyers.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a massive 90.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 4.0% of the rental stock. Single-property landlords are the market's backbone, alone controlling 74.7% of all investor-owned homes in Will County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Company ownership becomes dominant in portfolios of 11-20 properties, a key crossover point.
Individual investors control the vast majority of smaller portfolios, including 88.8% of single-property holdings. As portfolio size grows, company ownership accelerates, reaching 95.6% in the 21-50 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 60435, with 2,347 properties owned by investors.
However, the highest penetration rate is in zip code 60543, where investors own 46.2% of SFRs. Zip code 60436 shows a unique combination of high volume (1,399 properties) and high concentration (27.1% rate).
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 1,118 properties while selling only 141 in Q1 2026.
This trend is directly contradicted by institutional investors (1000+ tier), who were net sellers in Q1, selling 15 properties while acquiring only one. This pattern of institutional selling has been consistent for over two years.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 64.0% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, totaling 1,118 properties.
A massive price gap exists between tiers: single-property buyers paid an average of $405,066, while the institutional tier paid just $168,100. Mid-size landlords (3-5 properties) show the most inter-landlord trading, with 30.0% of purchases coming from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 25,896 SFR properties in Will County, with individual landlords holding 78.7%.
Detailed Findings

In Will County, IL, investors hold a significant 12.2% of the single-family residential market, totaling 25,896 properties. This demonstrates a substantial footprint for real estate investing within the local housing ecosystem.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals rather than corporations. Individual investors own 20,373 properties, accounting for 78.7% of the investor-held portfolio, while companies own the remaining 5,987 properties (23.1%).

A similar pattern exists among landlord entities, where 27,734 individual landlords represent 89.6% of all investors, compared to just 3,220 company landlords (10.4%). This highlights that the average company investor holds a larger portfolio than the average individual investor.

The primary strategy for these holdings is generating rental income. An overwhelming 98.0% of the investor-owned portfolio, or 25,364 properties, are currently rented. This signals a mature rental market with high occupancy.

Regarding financing, a majority of investor-owned properties carry a mortgage. The data shows 14,905 properties are financed, compared to 10,991 that are owned free and clear (cash). This 57.6% to 42.4% split indicates a reliance on leverage to build portfolios.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 2.1% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a discount of $8,482 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords in Will County demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $393,487. This was $8,482, or 2.1%, less than the $401,969 paid by traditional homeowners, suggesting more effective negotiation or a focus on off-market deals.

This discount marks a reversal from inconsistent patterns observed in 2025. While landlords secured a similar 2.1% discount in Q2 2025, they actually paid premiums in other quarters, notably paying 2.4% more than homeowners in Q3 2025 and 2.0% more in Q1 2025.

The acquisition price trend reveals substantial appreciation in the post-pandemic era. The average landlord purchase price of $393,487 in Q1 2026 is 68.7% higher than the average of $233,200 recorded between 2020 and 2023.

Comparing year-over-year, the average 2025 price ($409,871) was slightly lower than the 2024 price ($419,086), indicating some market cooling before the price stabilization seen in early 2026.

The fluctuating gap between landlord and homeowner prices indicates a dynamic market where investor advantages are not guaranteed and depend heavily on quarterly market conditions and inventory levels.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, acquiring 65.5% of all SFR properties sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 839 of the 1,281 total SFRs sold in Will County. This represents a commanding 65.5% market share of all home purchases for the quarter.

The overwhelming majority of this activity was driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 827 of these purchases, or 97.8% of all investor acquisitions.

First-time or single-property investors were the single most active group, purchasing 744 properties, which accounts for 87.9% of all landlord buying activity. This was carried out by 1,002 distinct entities, signaling a major influx of new landlords into the market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties were nearly absent from the buying market, acquiring only a single property during the entire quarter. This represents just 0.1% of landlord purchases.

This data clearly shows that the market's transactional velocity is not fueled by large corporations but by a broad base of new and existing small landlords expanding their local portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a massive 90.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of Will County's rental market is definitively decentralized and controlled by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, hold 90.1% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the largest segment by a wide margin, owning 19,805 properties. This accounts for 74.7% of the entire investor-owned housing stock, making them the foundational layer of the rental market.

Conversely, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties control only 1,062 homes, or 4.0% of the investor market. This finding challenges the common narrative of large corporate landlords dominating the housing landscape.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) collectively own the remaining 5.9% of the portfolio. This group, while smaller than the mom-and-pop segment, plays a role in the market's professional management tier.

Analysis of these property datasets reveals a highly fragmented market where the collective power of individual and small-scale investors far outweighs that of large institutions, shaping rental availability and pricing at a hyper-local level.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Company ownership becomes dominant in portfolios of 11-20 properties, a key crossover point.
Detailed Findings

A clear trend emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across portfolio tiers: individuals dominate smaller portfolios while companies control larger ones. The crossover point occurs as investors scale beyond 10 properties.

For portfolios of 1-10 properties, individual owners are the majority. They own 88.8% of single-property holdings and still maintain a 50.5% majority in the 6-10 property tier.

The shift to a corporate structure becomes evident in the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 70.1% of the homes. This suggests that scaling to this level often necessitates a formal business entity for liability and financing purposes.

This trend intensifies in larger tiers. In the 21-50 property bracket, company ownership surges to 95.6%, indicating that operating at this scale is almost exclusively done through a corporate structure.

This data illustrates a natural progression in investor behavior, where individuals test the waters with a few properties before incorporating as they build larger, more professional rental businesses.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 60435, with 2,347 properties owned by investors.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis of investor ownership in Will County reveals specific hotspots of activity. The zip code 60435 contains the highest absolute number of investor-owned properties at 2,347, making it the epicenter of rental housing volume.

Following 60435, the zip codes with the next highest counts of investor properties are 60440 (1,890 properties) and 60586 (1,461 properties). These areas represent significant concentrations of rental inventory.

However, the highest concentration or market saturation tells a different story. Zip code 60543 has the highest investor ownership rate, with landlords owning 46.2% of all single-family homes. This indicates a market heavily defined by rental properties.

Other areas with high investor penetration include 60436 (27.1%), 60432 (24.7%), and 60433 (24.5%). These markets have a significant portion of their housing stock controlled by investors.

Notably, zip code 60436 stands out by appearing on both lists: it ranks fourth for total investor property count (1,399) and second for ownership percentage (27.1%). This unique combination marks it as a critical sub-market for both high volume and high density of investor activity.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 1,118 properties while selling only 141 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transactional data from Q1 2026 shows that landlords in Will County are in a strong accumulation phase. They collectively purchased 1,118 properties while selling only 141, making them net buyers by a factor of nearly 8 to 1.

This net buying behavior is not a new phenomenon. In 2025, landlords were net buyers of 7,018 properties, and in 2024, they were net buyers of 7,498 properties, demonstrating a consistent, multi-year trend of portfolio expansion.

A completely opposite trend is observed among institutional investors (1000+ properties). In Q1 2026, this tier was a clear net seller, acquiring just one property while divesting 15. This represents a strategic reduction in their local footprint.

The institutional net selling pattern is also a long-term trend. In 2025, they were net sellers of 69 properties (9 buys vs. 78 sells), and in 2024, they were net sellers of 50 properties (9 buys vs. 59 sells).

This stark divergence reveals two different market strategies playing out simultaneously: smaller investors are actively growing their portfolios, while the largest players are methodically reducing their holdings in the area.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 64.0% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, totaling 1,118 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were a driving force in the Will County real estate market, participating in 1,118 of the 1,748 total SFR transactions. This gives investors a majority share of market activity at 64.0%.

Single-property investors dominated this activity, accounting for 1,003 of the 1,118 landlord transactions. This reinforces that new and small-scale investors are the most active participants in the market.

A dramatic pricing disparity exists between investor tiers. New or single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $405,066 per home. In sharp contrast, the single institutional purchase was for $168,100, a 58.5% lower price point, suggesting a focus on lower-value or distressed assets.

The data on transaction sources reveals varying strategies. While only 10.1% of single-property landlord purchases came from other landlords, this figure jumps to 30.0% for landlords in the 3-5 property tier. This indicates that more established small investors are more active in landlord-to-landlord transactions.

Large institutional investors did not purchase any properties from other landlords in Q1, sourcing their single acquisition from outside the existing investor pool. This highlights different acquisition channels for different types of investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Will County Market, Owning 90% as Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Holdings
Landlords own 25,896 SFR properties, representing 12.2% of Will County's market. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 20,373 properties (78.7%) compared to 5,987 (23.1%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $393,487, which is 2.1% less than traditional homeowners ($401,969), securing an $8,482 discount per property.
Activity
Landlords captured 65.5% of all SFR sales in Q4 2025, a period that saw 1,002 new single-property landlords enter the market, underscoring strong grassroots growth.
Market Share
The market is highly fragmented, with small landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 90.1% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 4.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, signaling a key point of professionalization for growing investors.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with 1,118 buys versus 141 sells in Q1 2026. Conversely, institutional investors are net sellers, offloading 15 properties while acquiring only one.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Will County, IL is overwhelmingly shaped by small, local participants, not large-scale institutions. Investors own 25,896 single-family homes, or 12.2% of the total market, providing a substantial portion of the area's rental housing. Critically, these market reports show that 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a massive 90.1% of this portfolio, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties own just 4.0%. The ownership base is primarily comprised of individuals, who hold 78.7% of the properties, with companies holding the remaining 23.1%.

Investor behavior further highlights the dominance of smaller players. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired a staggering 65.5% of all homes sold, with 1,002 new single-property investors entering the market. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated a pricing advantage, paying 2.1% less than traditional homeowners. The most telling trend is the strategic divergence in transactions: the broad landlord base was a strong net buyer (1,118 buys vs. 141 sells), while institutional investors were clear net sellers (1 buy vs. 15 sells), a pattern that has persisted for over two years. This is evident when doing a property search of transactions using assessor data.

The key takeaway is that Will County's housing market is not being consolidated by Wall Street. Instead, it is becoming more fragmented, with a growing base of local investors accumulating properties as the largest institutions strategically divest. This dynamic suggests that rental supply and pricing are influenced by thousands of individual decisions rather than a handful of corporate strategies. For the local market, this means opportunities remain for smaller investors to enter and expand, while the institutional retreat may signal a shift in large-scale capital toward different markets or asset classes.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:28 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Will (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Will (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-will/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.