Johnson (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Johnson (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Johnson (IL)
3,003
Total Investors in Johnson (IL)
252
Investor Owned SFR in Johnson (IL)
189(6.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
231
SFR Owned
178
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
21
SFR Owned
19
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 189 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Johnson County, IL with 98.5% Ownership, Paying a 57.4% Premium in Q1
In Johnson County, IL, investors own 189 SFR properties, just 6.3% of the market, with individual investors comprising 94.2% of that total. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.5% of investor-owned homes, while institutional ownership is nonexistent. In Q1 2026, landlords defied national trends by paying a 57.4% premium over traditional homeowners and remained net buyers, adding 4 properties to their portfolios.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 189 properties in Johnson County, with individual landlords holding 94.2% of the portfolio.
Cash is the dominant financing method, with 163 properties owned outright compared to only 26 financed. The investor portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 176 of the 189 properties (93.1%) classified as rented. Individual landlords (231) vastly outnumber company landlords (21), a ratio of 11 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 57.4% premium in Q1 2026, averaging $327,000 per property versus $207,700 for homeowners.
This Q1 premium of $119,300 is a sharp reversal from Q3 2025, when landlords paid a 19.6% discount ($40,152 less than homeowners). The pricing behavior in this market is highly volatile, shifting dramatically between quarters. There is no significant price difference observed between individual and company buyers due to low transaction volumes.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 18.2% of all SFR properties sold in Johnson County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of these 4 investor purchases, with zero activity from institutional investors. Three new single-property landlords entered the market, making up 75% of all investor buying activity for the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.5% of investor-owned SFRs in Johnson County.
Single-property landlords alone account for 83.7% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence, holding 0.0% of the market. The remaining 1.5% is held by mid-size landlords with 11-50 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single property tier, with no company crossover point.
Individuals own 100% of properties in the 3-5 and 21-50 property tiers. Even in the largest active tier (6-10 properties), individuals hold a two-thirds majority (66.7%). Companies have their highest concentration in the two-property tier, yet still only own 21.4% of those homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Johnson County is concentrated in zip codes 62972 and 62939.
The highest investor ownership rate is in zip code 62972, where landlords own 13.5% of SFR properties. Zip code 62939 has the highest raw count of investor-owned homes at 80, representing a 7.5% ownership rate. Some zip codes like 62902 and 62908 show no investor ownership.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Johnson County have consistently been net buyers, with a 5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
This net buyer trend has been stable, with investors adding 5 properties to their portfolios in both 2025 (9 buys vs 4 sells) and 2024 (13 buys vs 8 sells). There is no institutional transaction activity, as all buying and selling is conducted by smaller landlords. The data does not indicate any landlord-to-landlord sales.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 16.1% of all Q1 2026 property transactions, acquiring 5 homes.
All 5 of these transactions were made by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with 0% institutional involvement. None of the properties purchased by investors in Q1 were acquired from other landlords, indicating all purchases came from the traditional market. Single-property landlords paid an average of $327,000 for their acquisitions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 189 properties in Johnson County, with individual landlords holding 94.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Johnson County, IL, investors hold a modest 189 single-family residential properties, accounting for 6.3% of the total 3,003 SFRs in the market. This indicates a relatively low penetration of real estate investing activity compared to more saturated regions.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors. They own 178 properties, or 94.2% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 19 properties (10.1%). This highlights a market driven by local, small-scale participants rather than corporate entities.

By entity count, the disparity is even clearer, with 231 individual landlords compared to just 21 company landlords. This 11-to-1 ratio reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' character of the county's rental market.

A strong preference for all-cash acquisitions is evident in the portfolio composition. Investors own 163 properties with cash, far outpacing the 26 properties that are financed. This suggests a fiscally conservative approach to acquisitions or a market where financing is less common for investment properties.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards rental income, with 176 of the 189 properties (93.1%) actively rented. This demonstrates a clear focus on buy-and-hold strategies among the county's investor base.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 57.4% premium in Q1 2026, averaging $327,000 per property versus $207,700 for homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In a striking deviation from typical market behavior, landlords in Johnson County paid a significant premium for properties in Q1 2026. Their average acquisition price was $327,000, which is 57.4% higher than the $207,700 average paid by traditional homeowners, representing a price difference of $119,300.

This Q1 2026 pricing represents a dramatic market reversal. In Q3 2025, landlords secured a 19.6% discount, paying $164,500 compared to the homeowner average of $204,652. This volatility suggests that low transaction volumes can lead to significant price swings based on a small number of atypical purchases.

Even in Q1 2025, landlords paid a smaller premium of 6.5% ($184,167 vs $172,984). The jump to a 57.4% premium in Q1 2026 is an outlier that signals either a specific high-value acquisition or a shift in the type of properties being targeted by investors.

Overall price trends show appreciation from the pandemic era (2020-2023), when the average investor acquisition price was $147,904. The jump to an average price of $224,385 in 2024 and the high watermark in Q1 2026 reflect broader market price increases despite low local volume.

The data does not provide a clear distinction between company and individual pricing due to the low number of transactions, making it difficult to ascertain if one owner type consistently pays more or less than the other in this specific market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 18.2% of all SFR properties sold in Johnson County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investors were moderately active in Johnson County, acquiring 4 of the 22 total SFR properties sold, which constitutes an 18.2% market share for the quarter. This level of activity, while not dominant, shows consistent investor participation.

The market's activity is exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100% of all landlord purchases in the quarter, with institutional investors (Tier 09) showing no acquisition activity at all.

New entrants are the primary driver of growth. Three of the four properties purchased by investors were acquired by new, single-property landlords (Tier 01). This signifies that 75% of the buying activity came from individuals making their first rental property investment.

The remaining 25% of activity came from an existing landlord in the two-property tier (Tier 02), who added a new property to their small portfolio. This reinforces the pattern of small-scale accumulation rather than large-scale acquisitions.

The data shows a total of 5 distinct entities were involved in the 4 mom-and-pop purchases, indicating some properties may have co-ownership structures, a common feature in smaller, individual-driven markets.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.5% of investor-owned SFRs in Johnson County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Johnson County is the definitive example of a mom-and-pop market. Landlords with 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) own a combined 98.5% of all investor-held SFRs, demonstrating near-total control by small-scale owners.

First-time and single-property investors form the bedrock of this market. The single-property tier (Tier 01) alone holds 164 properties, which is 83.7% of the entire investor portfolio. This concentration underscores the market's reliance on small, individual participants.

In stark contrast to national headlines, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties (Tier 09) have absolutely no footprint in Johnson County, with an ownership share of 0.0%. This market is completely off the radar for large corporate landlords.

Mid-size landlords are also exceptionally rare. Investors in the 11-50 property range (Tiers 05-06) own just 3 properties combined, making up only 1.5% of the investor-owned housing stock.

The distribution is heavily skewed towards the smallest portfolios, with two-property landlords (Tier 02) and those with 3-5 properties (Tier 03) each holding a 6.6% share. This structure indicates a market composed almost entirely of landlords managing just a handful of properties.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single property tier, with no company crossover point.
Detailed Findings

In Johnson County, individual investors maintain majority ownership across all portfolio sizes, a clear indicator of a market dominated by personal holdings rather than corporate structures. There is no crossover tier where companies become the dominant owner type.

The dominance of individuals is most absolute in the small landlord (3-5 properties) and small-medium (21-50 properties) tiers, where they own 100% of the properties. This suggests that even as portfolios grow modestly, they tend to remain under personal ownership.

Even in the single-property tier, where one might expect to see more LLCs for new investments, individuals own 158 of the 164 properties, a commanding 92.4% share.

Companies have their most significant, albeit still minor, presence among two-property landlords, where they own 3 of 14 properties (21.4%). This may represent small business owners or partners beginning to formalize their holdings.

In what constitutes the largest investor tier in the county (6-10 properties), individuals still hold a 66.7% majority, owning 2 of the 3 properties. This reinforces that scale does not equate to corporatization in this market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Johnson County is concentrated in zip codes 62972 and 62939.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis of Johnson County reveals that investor ownership is not evenly distributed but concentrated in specific areas. The zip codes 62972 and 62939 are the primary hubs for investor-owned single-family homes.

The highest rate of investor penetration is found in zip code 62972, where 13.5% of the housing stock is investor-owned. This is more than double the county-wide average of 6.3%, indicating a specific sub-market of interest to landlords.

In terms of sheer volume, zip code 62939 holds the largest number of investor properties, with 80 homes. However, its ownership rate of 7.5% is closer to the county average, suggesting a larger overall housing stock.

Following these two primary areas, zip code 62922 also shows a higher-than-average investor presence, with an ownership rate of 11.6%.

Conversely, several zip codes, including 62902, 62908, and 62909, have no recorded investor-owned SFR properties. This stark contrast highlights that investor strategy in Johnson County is highly localized, focusing on a few key postal codes while bypassing others entirely.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Johnson County have consistently been net buyers, with a 5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that landlords in Johnson County are in an accumulation phase, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated strong net buying behavior with 5 purchases against only 1 sale, a ratio of 5-to-1.

This pattern of portfolio growth is not new. In the full year of 2025, investors were also net buyers, acquiring 9 properties while selling 4, for a net gain of 5 properties. This was identical to the net gain in 2024, which saw 13 purchases and 8 sales.

The market's transaction flow is handled exclusively by mom-and-pop and mid-size investors. With a 0.0% institutional ownership share, there were no recorded buy or sell transactions from large-scale investors in any of the observed timeframes.

There is no evidence of significant inter-landlord trading in this market. All transactions appear to involve a landlord on one side and a non-landlord (likely a traditional homeowner) on the other, suggesting investors are sourcing properties from the open market rather than from other investors.

The steady, albeit low-volume, net acquisition trend signals confidence among local investors, who continue to gradually expand their rental portfolios in Johnson County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 16.1% of all Q1 2026 property transactions, acquiring 5 homes.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 16.1% of all SFR transactions in Johnson County, purchasing 5 of the 31 properties that changed hands. This represents a solid share of market activity for the quarter.

The entirety of this transaction volume was driven by mom-and-pop landlords. Single-property (Tier 01) and two-property (Tier 02) investors were responsible for all 5 landlord acquisitions, while institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded zero transactions.

A notable pricing pattern emerged among these small buyers. New, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $327,000 per home, aligning with the unusual premium observed when comparing their purchases to homeowner prices in the same period.

Investors sourced all their new properties from outside the landlord community. The data shows that 0% of landlord purchases were from other landlords, meaning all 5 acquisitions were likely sourced from traditional homeowners or new construction.

This lack of inter-landlord trading suggests a less liquid investment market where landlords adopt a buy-and-hold strategy rather than frequently trading assets among themselves. Portfolio growth comes from absorbing properties from the general housing stock.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Hyper-Local Mom-and-Pops Dominate Johnson County, IL with 98.5% Ownership and No Institutional Presence
Holdings
Landlords own 189 SFR properties in Johnson County, IL, representing 6.3% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 178 properties (94.2%), while companies own just 19 (10.1%).
Pricing
In a notable market anomaly, landlords paid a 57.4% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average acquisition price of $327,000 compared to the homeowner average of $207,700.
Activity
Investors purchased 18.2% of homes sold in Q4 2025, with 100% of this activity coming from mom-and-pop landlords. The quarter saw the entry of 3 new single-property landlords, who drove 75% of investor buying.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control, owning 98.5% of all investor housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in the county, holding 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners in every portfolio tier, with no crossover point where companies take a majority. Even in the largest portfolios, individuals maintain control, underscoring the market's non-corporate nature.
Transactions
Landlords are firmly in an accumulation phase, acting as net buyers with a 5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (5 buys vs 1 sell). Institutional investors are completely inactive, with zero recorded transactions.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Johnson County, Illinois, is a hyper-local ecosystem defined by the overwhelming dominance of small, individual landlords. Investors own a total of 189 single-family homes, a modest 6.3% of the county's housing stock. Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who control 94.2% of these properties, compared to just 10.1% for companies. This structure is further reinforced by the near-total control of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who own 98.5% of the investor-held portfolio. Institutional investors have absolutely no presence, making this a market shaped entirely by local participants. These detailed findings are further explored in comprehensive market reports.

Investor behavior in the latest quarter reveals both consistent trends and surprising anomalies. Landlords remained net buyers, a consistent pattern over the past two years, acquiring 5 properties while selling only one in Q1 2026. Activity was driven exclusively by small investors, with three new single-property landlords entering the market. However, in a stark departure from national norms, these investors paid a staggering 57.4% premium over traditional homeowners, with an average purchase price of $327,000. This suggests they may be targeting higher-value properties or facing intense competition for limited inventory.

The key takeaway from Johnson County is that a real estate market can thrive without any corporate or institutional involvement. The landscape is built on single-property investors and small-scale landlords who are steadily growing their portfolios by purchasing from the traditional housing market. The pricing premium anomaly highlights the potential for volatility in low-volume markets, where a few transactions can significantly skew quarterly averages. Ultimately, Johnson County serves as a case study in a purely grassroots rental market, driven by individual capital and long-term hold strategies.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:09 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Johnson (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Johnson (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-johnson/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.