Hamilton (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Hamilton (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Hamilton (IL)
1,900
Total Investors in Hamilton (IL)
396
Investor Owned SFR in Hamilton (IL)
332(17.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
350
SFR Owned
280
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
46
SFR Owned
56
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 332 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Hamilton County's investor market is dominated by small, individual landlords who control 98.8% of rental properties and secure massive purchase discounts.
Investors own 332 single-family properties in Hamilton County, IL, representing 17.5% of the market. The landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (98.8%), with individuals owning 84.3% of all investor-held homes. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties at an 84.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners and have remained consistent net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 332 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 84.3% share.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 286 owned with cash versus only 46 financed. Nearly the entire portfolio is actively rented, with 323 of 332 properties classified as non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured an 84.3% price discount in Q1, paying just $13,000 versus $82,929 for homeowners.
This massive Q1 discount of $69,929 continues a trend of landlords paying significantly less than homeowners, with previous quarterly discounts ranging from 13.9% to 30.8%. After peaking in 2024 at $104,094, the average investor acquisition price has seen volatility, dropping to $84,914 in 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 18.2% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of investor purchase activity, acquiring 2 properties. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made no purchases. The activity included two new single-property landlord entities entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 98.8% of Hamilton County's investor-owned housing.
Single-property landlords alone own 80.0% of the investor-held SFR stock (272 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ homes own just one property, representing a mere 0.3% market share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners across all small-scale portfolio tiers, owning 88.7% of single-property portfolios.
Companies gain a slightly larger foothold in two-property portfolios but still only account for 34.3% of ownership in that tier. A crossover point where companies become the majority owner does not exist in this market, as individual ownership remains dominant.
Geographic Distribution
The 62859 zip code contains the highest number of investor-owned properties, with 234 homes.
However, the highest concentration of investor activity is in the 62817 zip code, where 26.1% of all homes are investor-owned. This is followed by 62860 at 25.0%, showing pockets of high investor penetration outside the volume leader.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Hamilton County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 30 properties while selling only 13 in 2025.
This trend of accumulation continued into Q1 2026, with 3 buys versus 2 sells. Transaction volume has also grown, increasing from 20 total transactions in 2024 to 43 in 2025, signaling a more active market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 17.6% of all Q1 2026 property transactions in Hamilton County.
All 3 landlord transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors in the smallest tiers. No properties were acquired from other landlords this quarter, suggesting investors are buying from homeowners or other sources.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 332 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 84.3% share.
Detailed Findings

In Hamilton County, IL, investors hold 332 single-family residential properties, accounting for 17.5% of the total 1,900 SFRs in the market. This demonstrates a significant, yet not dominant, investor presence in the local housing ecosystem.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals over corporations. Individual investors own 280 properties, making up 84.3% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 56 properties (16.9%). This pattern extends to the landlords themselves, with 350 individual landlords compared to just 46 company entities.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for all-cash ownership. A substantial 286 properties (86.1% of the portfolio) are owned outright without financing, compared to only 46 properties that carry a mortgage. This suggests a fiscally conservative or cash-heavy investor base.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals. Of the 332 investor-owned homes, 323 are actively rented, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income rather than speculative holding or personal use. The high rental saturation points to a market structured around providing long-term housing.

The ratio of properties to landlords reveals a highly fragmented market. With 396 landlords owning 332 distinct properties, the average portfolio size is less than one property per entity (factoring in co-ownership), underscoring the prevalence of small-scale, local real estate investing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured an 84.3% price discount in Q1, paying just $13,000 versus $82,929 for homeowners.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic pricing disparity emerged in Q1 2026, where landlords acquired properties for an average of just $13,000. This was a staggering 84.3% less than the $82,929 average paid by traditional homeowners, resulting in a per-property discount of $69,929.

This significant discount, while extreme in the current quarter, is part of a consistent pattern. In the preceding four quarters, landlords consistently paid less than homeowners, with discounts of 18.8% in Q3 2025, 13.9% in Q2 2025, and 30.8% in Q1 2025. This suggests investors are systematically finding undervalued or off-market opportunities.

Acquisition prices for investors have been volatile over the past few years. The average price during the 2020-2023 period was low at $38,857, before surging to a peak of $104,094 in 2024. Prices then moderated to $84,914 in 2025, indicating a fluctuating market rather than steady appreciation.

The data highlights that landlords and homeowners operate in different pricing tiers within the same market. Homeowners appear to be competing for market-rate properties, while investors are successfully targeting lower-cost acquisitions, likely including distressed sales or properties needing renovation.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 18.2% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords played a modest role in the market, purchasing 2 of the 11 total SFR properties sold in Hamilton County. This activity gave investors a 18.2% share of all purchases during the period.

The entirety of investor purchasing activity was driven by the smallest players. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of the 2 homes bought by investors, reinforcing their role as the primary source of new acquisitions.

In contrast, large-scale institutional investors (owning 1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, making zero purchases in Q4. This lack of activity highlights a market dominated by local investors rather than national corporations.

New entrants continue to fuel the market. The single-property tier saw 2 new entities purchase 1 property, indicating that new, first-time landlords are still finding opportunities in Hamilton County.

The other purchase was made by a landlord in the two-property tier, further concentrating Q4 activity at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 98.8% of Hamilton County's investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Hamilton County is the epitome of a fragmented market, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 98.8% of all investor-owned SFRs. This concentration at the small end of the scale defines the local rental market.

First-time or single-holding investors are the most significant group, with the single-property tier alone accounting for 272 properties. This represents 80.0% of the entire investor-owned housing stock, making them the backbone of the market.

The next tiers show a steep drop-off in ownership. Two-property landlords hold 35 properties (10.3%), and those with 3-5 properties own 27 homes (7.9%). This confirms that very few investors scale beyond one or two properties.

The presence of large-scale investors is negligible. Mid-size landlords are almost non-existent, and institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold only a single property in the county. This 0.3% share underscores the absence of a corporate landlord presence.

This distribution reveals a market accessible to small, local capital rather than one dominated by large, out-of-state firms. The ownership structure is fundamentally local and small-scale.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners across all small-scale portfolio tiers, owning 88.7% of single-property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate ownership in every small portfolio tier in Hamilton County. In the largest tier, single-property landlords, individuals own 244 of the 272 properties, an 88.7% share, compared to just 11.3% for companies.

While company ownership increases modestly as portfolio sizes grow, individuals maintain a strong majority. For landlords owning two properties, individuals still hold 65.7% of the homes, with companies at 34.3%.

In the 3-5 property tier, the pattern continues, with individuals owning 20 properties (74.1%) versus 7 for companies (25.9%). This indicates that even as landlords begin to scale, they are far more likely to be individuals or family trusts than formal corporate entities.

The data shows no crossover point where companies overtake individuals. In this market, the operational model for SFR rentals is fundamentally based on individual ownership, regardless of portfolio size among smaller landlords.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 62859 zip code contains the highest number of investor-owned properties, with 234 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Hamilton County is geographically concentrated, with the 62859 zip code hosting the largest number of investor-owned properties at 234. In this area, investors own 16.5% of the housing stock.

However, the highest rate of investor ownership is found elsewhere. The 62817 zip code has the highest penetration, with investors owning 26.1% of its SFR properties (31 homes). This indicates a smaller but more investor-saturated market.

The zip code 62828 also shows significant investor presence, with 53 properties owned by investors, representing an 18.7% ownership rate. This highlights that multiple areas within the county are attractive to investors.

A notable contrast exists between the area with the most investor properties (62859) and the area with the highest investor ownership rate (62817). This common pattern shows that total volume doesn't always equate to market saturation.

Several smaller zip codes, including 62860 (25.0%) and 62895 (20.0%), also feature high investor ownership rates, suggesting that investment strategies are targeted at specific neighborhood-level opportunities across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Hamilton County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 30 properties while selling only 13 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Across all timeframes, landlords in Hamilton County have consistently been net buyers, steadily adding to their portfolios. In 2025, they demonstrated strong accumulation with 30 purchases against only 13 sales, for a net gain of 17 properties.

The net buying trend continued into the new year. During Q1 2026, landlords acquired 3 properties and sold 2, resulting in a net addition of 1 property to their collective holdings.

This pattern of accumulation was also present in 2024, when investors purchased 17 properties and sold just 3, for a net gain of 14 homes. This multi-year trend signals long-term confidence in the local rental market.

Market activity has accelerated. The total transaction volume for landlords (buys and sells combined) more than doubled from 20 in 2024 to 43 in 2025, pointing to increased liquidity and more frequent trading.

No transaction data was available for institutional investors, which aligns with their minimal ownership footprint and indicates they are not a factor in the market's transaction dynamics.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 17.6% of all Q1 2026 property transactions in Hamilton County.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords participated in 3 of the 17 total SFR transactions, capturing a 17.6% share of market activity. This represents a continued, stable level of involvement from the investor community.

Transaction activity was exclusively driven by mom-and-pop landlords. Two purchases were made by investors in the single-property tier, and one was made by an investor in the two-property tier. Large-scale investors made no transactions.

None of the landlord purchases in Q1 were from other landlords (0% inter-landlord). This indicates that investors are sourcing their deals from the traditional market, likely buying from retiring homeowners or off-market channels, rather than trading properties among themselves.

Pricing data was sparse due to the low transaction volume. The single purchase in the two-property tier was for $13,000, while the average price for the two single-property tier transactions was not available.

This quarter's activity reinforces the market's key theme: a landscape defined by small, individual investors who are steadily acquiring properties from the general market, not from large institutions or through investor-to-investor portfolio trades.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Hamilton County, owning 98.8% of investor properties while remaining aggressive net buyers.
Holdings
Landlords own 332 SFR properties, 17.5% of Hamilton County's market, with individual investors holding 280 (84.3%) and companies owning just 56 (16.9%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 84.3% less than homeowners, securing a massive $69,929 discount per property ($13,000 vs $82,929).
Activity
Landlords purchased 18.2% of homes sold in Q4 2025, with 100% of that activity coming from mom-and-pop investors, including two new single-property landlords.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.8% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.3%, or a single property.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, owning 88.7% of all single-property landlord homes, with no crossover point to company majority.
Transactions
Landlords are consistent net buyers, with a 2.3x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (30 buys vs 13 sells), and institutional investors recorded no transactions.
Market Narrative

The market report for Hamilton County, IL, reveals a real estate investment landscape fundamentally controlled by small, local participants. Investors own 332 single-family homes, comprising 17.5% of the total market. Ownership is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals, who hold 84.3% of these properties, compared to just 16.9% for companies. The market structure is highly fragmented; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command a 98.8% share of investor-owned housing, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint of just a single home (0.3%).

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions and consistent portfolio growth. In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $13,000, an astonishing 84.3% discount compared to the $82,929 paid by traditional homeowners. This pattern of securing below-market deals is a consistent trend. Furthermore, landlords are persistent net buyers, having acquired 30 homes while selling only 13 in 2025, a trend that continued into the new year. All recent purchasing activity has been driven by mom-and-pop investors, with no acquisitions by institutional players.

The key takeaway from Hamilton County is that its rental housing market is not driven by Wall Street but by Main Street. The data paints a clear picture of a stable, locally-controlled ecosystem where individual investors purchase properties with cash at significant discounts and hold them as long-term rentals. The absence of institutional activity and the dominance of single-property owners suggest that opportunities remain accessible for small-scale investors, shaping a market defined by community-level ownership rather than corporate consolidation.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:06 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Hamilton (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Hamilton (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-hamilton/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.