Clackamas (OR) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Clackamas (OR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Clackamas (OR)
125,319
Total Investors in Clackamas (OR)
29,534
Investor Owned SFR in Clackamas (OR)
21,593(17.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
25,730
SFR Owned
17,952
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
3,804
SFR Owned
4,554
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 21,593 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Investors Dominate Clackamas County With 95.9% Ownership As Institutions Become Net Sellers
Investors own 21,593 SFR properties in Clackamas County, representing 17.2% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (95.9%) while institutional investors hold just 0.2% and are actively selling. In a surprising market shift, landlords paid a 1.2% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, reversing a trend of acquiring properties at a discount.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 21,593 SFRs, with individual landlords holding 83.1% of the properties.
Of the total investor portfolio, 11,478 properties are owned outright with cash, while 10,115 are financed. The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 20,999 properties, or 97.2%, classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 1.2% premium over homeowners in Q1, a reversal from previous discounts.
This marks a significant shift from the previous three quarters, where landlords enjoyed discounts of 3.6% to 6.9%. Landlord acquisition prices have appreciated 16.1% since the 2020-2023 period, rising from $628,496 to $729,890 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 20.7% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) were responsible for 93.9% of these landlord purchases, acquiring 214 homes. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) purchased only 2 properties, representing just 0.9% of investor activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in Clackamas County.
Conversely, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.2% of the investor-held housing stock. Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, owning 17,376 properties, or 77.5% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding a 54.2% share.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 85.8% of single-property holdings, their share drops significantly as portfolio size grows. In the 11-20 property tier, company ownership surges to 88.3%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip codes 97045, 97222, and 97055.
The highest raw count of investor properties is in 97045, with 2,582 homes. However, some smaller areas show extreme investor penetration, with zip codes like 97028 reporting an 81.3% investor ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
While landlords overall are strong net buyers, institutional investors are net sellers, divesting local assets.
In Q1 2026, the overall landlord market acquired a net 241 properties (308 buys vs. 67 sells). During the same period, institutional investors were net sellers, with 6 sales and only 2 purchases.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 19.2% of all home transactions in Q1 2026.
Institutional investors paid 5.5% less than new mom-and-pop buyers, averaging $656,910 per property compared to $695,475. Larger investors also relied more on inter-landlord trades, with 50% of institutional purchases coming from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 21,593 SFRs, with individual landlords holding 83.1% of the properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 17.2% share of the single-family residential market in Clackamas County, with a total of 21,593 properties under their control.

The market is defined by the prevalence of small, individual investors. These landlords own 17,952 properties, accounting for 83.1% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, compared to 4,554 properties (21.1%) held by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 25,730 individual landlords vastly outnumber the 3,804 company landlords, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local rental market.

The investor portfolio is almost evenly split between leveraged and free-and-clear assets. Cash purchases account for 11,478 properties, while 10,115 properties are financed, indicating a mix of investment strategies across the market.

A clear focus on rental income is evident, as 20,999 properties, or 97.2% of the investor portfolio, are non-owner-occupied, underscoring the primary role of these homes as rental housing stock for the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 1.2% premium over homeowners in Q1, a reversal from previous discounts.
Detailed Findings

In a notable market reversal, landlords paid more than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average acquisition price of $729,890 compared to the homeowner average of $721,187. This represents a $8,703 premium, or 1.2%, for investor-acquired properties.

This trend breaks from a consistent pattern of investor discounts observed throughout 2025. In Q2 2025, for instance, landlords secured properties at a 6.9% discount, a gap of $50,554, which has now completely eroded and inverted.

The shift to a premium suggests increased competition for limited inventory, forcing investors to bid more aggressively against traditional homebuyers to secure properties in the current market.

Property values for landlord acquisitions have seen significant growth. The average Q1 2026 price of $729,890 is 16.1% higher than the average of $628,496 paid during the 2020-2023 period, highlighting strong price appreciation in the assets investors are targeting.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 20.7% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a powerful force in the Q4 2025 market, acquiring 215 of the 1,037 total SFRs sold, which translates to a 20.7% market share of all purchases.

The vast majority of this activity was driven by small-scale investors. Landlords in the 'mom-and-pop' tiers (1-10 properties) accounted for 214 of the 215 properties purchased, or 93.9% of all investor acquisitions.

New market entrants were particularly active, with 250 new single-property landlord entities acquiring 174 homes. This represents 76.3% of all properties bought by investors, signaling a healthy and growing base of first-time investors in Clackamas County.

In stark contrast, institutional-level activity was almost nonexistent. Investors with portfolios over 1,000 properties purchased only 2 homes during the quarter, making up less than 1% of landlord buying activity.

This data underscores that recent market activity is being fueled by an influx of small, new landlords rather than acquisitions by large corporate entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in Clackamas County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Clackamas County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 95.9% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

This structure challenges the narrative of large-scale corporate ownership. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have a minimal presence, holding only 42 properties, which accounts for just 0.2% of the total investor portfolio.

The foundation of the rental market is built on single-property owners. This tier alone accounts for 17,376 properties, representing 77.5% of all investor-owned homes and demonstrating the importance of first-time investors.

Mid-size investors (11-1000 properties) hold a combined 3.9% of the portfolio, indicating a steep drop-off in ownership concentration as portfolio sizes increase.

The data clearly illustrates a highly fragmented market, with ownership distributed across thousands of small operators rather than consolidated among a few large players, a key characteristic of the local real estate investing landscape.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding a 54.2% share.
Detailed Findings

A distinct shift in ownership structure occurs as investors scale their portfolios. While individuals are the primary owners in smaller tiers, companies take a dominant role in mid-size and larger portfolios.

The crossover point happens in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04). At this level, companies own 265 properties, or 54.2% of the tier's total, marking the first stage where corporate ownership surpasses individual ownership.

This trend accelerates dramatically in the next tier (11-20 properties), where companies control 256 properties, an overwhelming 88.3% share. This suggests that incorporating is a common strategy for investors managing more than 10 properties.

In contrast, individuals form the backbone of the entry-level market, owning 15,475 homes (85.8%) in the single-property tier and 1,268 homes (74.8%) in the two-property tier.

This pattern reveals a clear lifecycle: investors often start as individuals and transition to a corporate structure as their operations and portfolio size expand.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip codes 97045, 97222, and 97055.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Clackamas County is highly concentrated in specific geographic pockets. The top five zip codes by sheer volume account for a substantial portion of the county's investor-owned housing.

The zip code 97045 leads in raw numbers, with 2,582 investor-owned properties, followed by 97222 (1,565 properties) and 97055 (1,355 properties).

Interestingly, the areas with the highest count of investor properties do not always have the highest ownership rate. For example, 97045 has a 15.1% investor ownership rate, while 97055 has a higher rate of 20.9%.

Several smaller zip codes exhibit extremely high investor saturation. Zip codes 97215, 97030, and 97223 show 100.0% investor ownership, which may indicate build-to-rent communities or data artifacts, while 97028 has a confirmed rate of 81.3%.

This analysis reveals two different types of investor hotspots: large suburban areas with high counts of investor properties and smaller, niche areas with exceptionally high penetration rates.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
While landlords overall are strong net buyers, institutional investors are net sellers, divesting local assets.
Detailed Findings

A significant divergence in strategy is apparent between small and large investors. The overall landlord market continues to be in a strong accumulation phase, consistently operating as net buyers.

In Q1 2026, landlords bought 4.6 times more properties than they sold (308 buys vs. 67 sells), resulting in a net portfolio expansion of 241 homes. This follows a similar pattern from 2025, where they added a net 1,117 properties.

Conversely, institutional investors (1000+ tier) are actively reducing their footprint in Clackamas County. In Q1 2026, they were net sellers, offloading 6 properties while only acquiring 2, a net decrease of 4 properties.

This institutional divestment trend was also present in 2024, when they sold 12 properties and bought only 2. Their brief period as net buyers in 2025 (16 buys vs. 15 sells) appears to have been a short-term anomaly.

This trend suggests that while smaller investors see continued opportunity for growth in the local market, the largest players are strategically exiting their positions.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 19.2% of all home transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a crucial role in market liquidity in Q1 2026, participating in 308 of the 1,600 total SFR transactions, which constitutes a 19.2% market share.

The transaction volume was dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 292 transactions. In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) conducted only 2 transactions, reflecting their limited activity in the market.

A clear pricing advantage emerges with scale. Institutional investors acquired properties for an average of $656,910, a 5.5% discount compared to the $695,475 average paid by new single-property landlords. This suggests more sophisticated deal-sourcing or access to off-market opportunities.

Larger investors frequently trade assets among themselves. Half of all institutional purchases (50.0%) and all purchases by large landlords (101-1000 tier) were from other landlords. This is much higher than the 6.0% rate for new single-property investors, indicating a mature internal market for scaled portfolios.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Investors Dominate Clackamas County With 95.9% Ownership As Institutions Become Net Sellers
Holdings
Landlords own 21,593 SFR properties, representing 17.2% of the market in Clackamas County, OR. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 17,952 properties (83.1%) compared to 4,554 (21.1%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a surprising Q1 2026 reversal, landlords paid a 1.2% premium over traditional homeowners, acquiring properties for an average of $729,890 versus $721,187. This breaks from a prior trend of securing homes at a discount.
Activity
Investors purchased 20.7% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter (215 properties), with activity almost entirely driven by small investors. The market saw 250 new single-property landlords enter during this period.
Market Share
The market structure is defined by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 95.9% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint at just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are dominant in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier (54.2% share). This indicates a common strategy of incorporation as investors scale their operations.
Transactions
While the overall landlord market remains in an aggressive accumulation phase (net buyers with 308 buys vs. 67 sells in Q1), institutional investors are actively divesting, operating as net sellers (2 buys vs. 6 sells).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Clackamas County, OR is robust, with investors owning 21,593 properties, or 17.2% of the total SFR housing stock. The landscape is unequivocally dominated by small, independent operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 95.9% of the investor-owned inventory, with individual investors holding 83.1% of all properties. In stark contrast, institutional firms (1000+ properties) have a minimal presence, owning just 0.2% of the portfolio, challenging the common narrative of a corporate takeover of suburban housing.

Investor behavior in the first quarter of 2026 reveals a highly competitive environment. In a significant market shift, landlords paid a 1.2% premium over traditional homeowners, a reversal from previous quarters where they typically enjoyed discounts. Despite this, acquisition activity remains strong, with landlords purchasing 20.7% of all homes sold in the previous quarter. This activity is fueled by a divergence in strategy: the broader market of small investors continues to accumulate properties as strong net buyers, while large institutional players are actively retreating, acting as net sellers in the region.

The key takeaway for the Clackamas County housing market is that its stability and growth are driven by a large, fragmented base of local investors, not a small group of large corporations. The entry of 250 new single-property landlords in a single quarter signals a dynamic and accessible market for new participants. However, the rising acquisition costs and the strategic retreat of institutional capital may suggest that the market is reaching a mature phase, where deep local knowledge and operational efficiency are becoming more critical for success. These trends are vital for understanding market dynamics and are further explored in our full market reports dashboard.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 01:27 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Clackamas (OR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Clackamas (OR) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-or-clackamas/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.