Granite (MT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Granite (MT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Granite (MT)
510
Total Investors in Granite (MT)
406
Investor Owned SFR in Granite (MT)
308(60.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
372
SFR Owned
277
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
34
SFR Owned
36
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 308 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Command Granite County's Market, Owning 99.7% of Rental Homes
Investors own 308 SFR properties, a staggering 60.4% of the market in Granite County, MT. This ownership is almost entirely in the hands of small-scale individuals (89.9% of properties). In Q4 2025, these landlords acquired 75.0% of all homes sold, with zero activity from institutional buyers, who remain completely absent from the local market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 308 homes, 60.4% of Granite County's SFR market; individuals own 89.9%.
A significant majority of these properties, 234 out of 308, are owned free-and-clear with cash. All 308 investor-owned properties are classified as rented, indicating a 100% focus on non-owner-occupied investment.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured an 8.6% discount versus homeowners in Q3 2025, a $40,232 savings.
Transaction activity was too low in the most recent quarter for a direct price comparison. The Q3 2025 data shows landlords paid an average of $425,733 while homeowners paid $465,965.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 75.0% of all single-family homes sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for 100% of this activity, with 4 new single-property investors entering the market. No institutional investors made any purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs in Granite County.
Single-property landlords alone make up the vast majority, owning 265 properties or 83.9% of the total. Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies match individual ownership at the 3-5 property tier, a key crossover point.
While individuals own over 91% of single-property portfolios, companies rapidly gain share, reaching a 50/50 split with individuals in the small landlord tier (3-5 properties). This indicates companies focus on scaling past the initial entry-level investment.
Geographic Distribution
Two zip codes, 59858 and 59832, contain 96.4% of all investor-owned properties.
Investor ownership rates are extremely high in these core areas, with 63.3% of homes in zip code 59858 and 61.4% in 59832 being investor-owned. This reveals a highly concentrated investment footprint within the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 12 homes for every 1 they sold in 2024.
This resulted in a net gain of 11 properties for investors during the year, demonstrating a clear strategy of portfolio expansion. There was no recorded transaction activity for institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 80.0% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
All landlord activity came from the single-property tier, with an average purchase price of $589,329. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, suggesting new inventory is being acquired from the traditional market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 308 homes, 60.4% of Granite County's SFR market; individuals own 89.9%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial footprint in Granite County, owning 308 single-family properties, which constitutes a majority 60.4% of the total 510 SFRs in the market. This high penetration rate indicates that investment properties play a dominant role in the local housing landscape.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale, individual ownership. Individual landlords control 277 properties, or 89.9% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 36 properties (11.7%) held by companies. This structure challenges the narrative of corporate dominance in the rental market.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 234 properties (76.0%) owned outright, while only 74 (24.0%) are financed. This high ratio of cash-to-financed properties suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

Analysis of entity counts reveals a broad base of participation, with 406 distinct landlords in the market. Of these, 372 are individuals and 34 are companies, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' nature of real estate investing in the county.

Every investor-owned property (308) is classified as rented, signaling that 100% of the portfolio is dedicated to non-owner-occupied use. This complete focus on rental housing underscores the pure investment motive driving ownership in the region.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured an 8.6% discount versus homeowners in Q3 2025, a $40,232 savings.
Detailed Findings

While recent transactional volume is low, historical data reveals a distinct pricing advantage for investors. In Q3 2025, landlords acquired properties for an average price of $425,733, which was 8.6% below the $465,965 paid by traditional homeowners, resulting in a significant discount of $40,232 per property.

The most recent quarterly data for Q1 2026 shows a landlord acquisition price of $589,329, but a direct comparison is unavailable due to a lack of homeowner transactions in the same period. This highlights the market's low liquidity and the challenge of drawing definitive current-quarter pricing trends.

Historical pricing data indicates a period of appreciation. The average acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $305,111, which climbed to $356,091 in 2024. This trend reflects broader market dynamics of rising property values.

The inconsistent transaction volume, with zero landlord purchases recorded in multiple recent quarters, suggests that investor buying activity in Granite County is opportunistic rather than continuous. Investors appear to enter the market when specific deals become available rather than maintaining a constant acquisition pace.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 75.0% of all single-family homes sold.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the primary buyers in Granite County's Q4 2025 housing market, acquiring 3 out of the 4 total SFR properties sold. This 75.0% market share demonstrates that investors were the driving force behind recent real estate activity.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of all investor acquisitions, with institutional investors making zero purchases.

Market entry is a key theme, as all 3 properties were purchased by investors in the 'single-property' tier. This activity was conducted by 4 distinct entities, indicating that Q4 saw the emergence of new landlords, some of whom may have co-purchased a property.

The complete absence of acquisitions from mid-size (11-1,000 properties) and institutional (1,000+ properties) tiers underscores that market growth is exclusively happening at the grassroots level. This pattern reinforces Granite County as a market defined by small, local investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs in Granite County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Granite County is completely defined by small-scale operators. 'Mom-and-pop' landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, control a near-total 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Ownership is heavily concentrated at the very entry point of the market. Landlords with just a single property (Tier 01) represent the largest group, holding 265 properties, which accounts for 83.9% of the entire investor portfolio.

The next tier, two-property landlords, holds an additional 38 properties (12.0%), meaning investors with one or two properties collectively own 95.9% of all rental homes in the county. This demonstrates an extremely fragmented ownership structure.

In stark contrast to national headlines, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have absolutely no presence in Granite County's SFR market, with their ownership share at 0.0%. This market operates entirely without the influence of large-scale corporate landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies match individual ownership at the 3-5 property tier, a key crossover point.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary drivers of entry-level investment in Granite County. In the single-property tier, individuals own 245 properties (91.4%) compared to just 23 held by companies (8.6%).

A significant strategic shift occurs as portfolio sizes increase. At the 3-5 property tier, ownership is split evenly, with both individuals and companies holding 6 properties each (a 50/50 share). This marks the crossover point where corporate structures become as common as individual ownership for landlords looking to scale.

Even in the two-property tier, the presence of companies grows, accounting for 15.8% of properties compared to their 8.6% share in the single-property tier. This indicates a consistent trend of professionalization as portfolios expand beyond a single rental unit.

This pattern suggests that while individuals dominate initial market entry, a move toward incorporation is a key strategy for investors who decide to expand their holdings. It reflects a transition from a passive investment to a more structured business operation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Two zip codes, 59858 and 59832, contain 96.4% of all investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Granite County is geographically hyper-concentrated. The vast majority of investment properties are located in just two zip codes: 59858 and 59832. Together, these areas account for 297 of the 308 investor-owned SFRs, representing 96.4% of the county's entire rental portfolio.

The zip code 59858 is the epicenter of investment, containing 235 investor-owned properties. This single zip code holds 76.3% of all investor properties in the county.

Investor penetration in these core areas is exceptionally high. In 59858, investors own 63.3% of all SFR properties, while in 59832 they own 61.4%. These rates are significantly above national averages and indicate that rental properties are the dominant form of housing in these specific communities.

In contrast, other zip codes like 59837 and 59825 have minimal investor presence, with only 10 and 1 properties, respectively. This stark difference highlights that investor strategy is targeted and not evenly distributed across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 12 homes for every 1 they sold in 2024.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Granite County have been in a strong accumulation phase. Transaction data from 2024 shows landlords purchased 12 properties while selling only 1, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of 12.0. This indicates overwhelming confidence in the local market and a focus on portfolio growth.

The net result of this activity was an expansion of the investor-owned portfolio by 11 properties in 2024. This net-buyer status confirms that the high investor ownership rate is not static but has been actively growing.

This expansionary behavior is driven entirely by smaller investors, as institutional-tier landlords had no recorded buy or sell transactions during this period. The growth is organic and stems from the local, mom-and-pop segment of the market.

The high ratio of buys to sells suggests that existing landlords are holding onto their assets while new and existing investors compete for limited inventory, contributing to a tightening of the for-sale market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 80.0% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity dominated the transaction market in Q4 2025, with landlords participating in 4 out of 5 total SFR sales, representing an 80.0% share of all transactions. This high level of involvement shows investors are the most active players in the current market.

The market's activity is exclusively driven by new entrants. All 4 landlord transactions were acquisitions by investors in the single-property tier, signaling that growth is coming from first-time landlords or those adding their first property in the county.

These new investors paid an average price of $589,329 for their properties. This price point provides a benchmark for the cost of entry into Granite County's investment market during the fourth quarter.

Investors are sourcing properties from outside the existing rental pool. Zero percent of the transactions were identified as landlord-to-landlord sales. This indicates that new investors are acquiring properties from traditional homeowners or new construction, thereby converting more of the housing stock into rental properties.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Define Granite County's Housing Market, Owning 60% of Homes with Zero Institutional Presence
Holdings
Landlords own 308 single-family properties, representing a 60.4% majority of the market in Granite County, MT. Individual investors hold 277 of these properties (89.9%), with companies owning the remaining 36 (11.7%).
Pricing
While recent transaction data is sparse, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q3 2025, paying 8.6% less than homeowners with an average discount of $40,232 per property.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 75.0% of all homes sold, with all 3 purchases made by mom-and-pop investors. This activity included 4 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have a near-total monopoly, controlling 99.7% of investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no footprint, owning 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly control entry-level properties, but companies achieve a 50% ownership share in the 3-5 property tier, marking a distinct shift in strategy for larger portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as net buyers with a 12-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2024. All Q4 2025 transactions were acquisitions by new single-property investors.
Market Narrative

In Granite County, Montana, the real estate investing landscape is fundamentally shaped by small, local landlords who own a staggering 60.4% of all single-family homes. The total investor portfolio consists of 308 properties, with individual investors controlling 277 (89.9%) of them. This market structure is highly fragmented; 'mom-and-pop' landlords with 1-10 properties control 99.7% of the rental stock, while institutional investors have zero presence. This counters the common narrative of corporate consolidation and highlights a market driven entirely by grassroots investment.

Investor behavior reflects a confident, expansion-focused strategy. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 75.0% of all homes sold, with all purchases made by new, single-property investors. This pattern of converting owner-occupied housing to rentals is supported by historical data showing landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 12 homes for every one they sold. While recent transaction volume is low, past data from Q3 2025 shows these investors have a purchasing edge, paying 8.6% less than traditional homeowners.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Granite County is a microcosm of a hyper-localized, individual-driven rental market. Ownership is not only dominated by small players but also geographically concentrated, with over 96% of investor properties located in just two zip codes. For anyone analyzing the U.S. housing market, Granite County serves as a powerful example of how, in certain areas, the 'mom-and-pop' landlord is not just a participant but the definitive market force.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 10:13 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Granite (MT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Granite (MT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mt-granite/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.