Barnes (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Barnes (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Barnes (ND)
4,253
Total Investors in Barnes (ND)
1,653
Investor Owned SFR in Barnes (ND)
1,492(35.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,429
SFR Owned
1,124
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
224
SFR Owned
388
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,492 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Barnes County with 93.4% Ownership, Securing Major Discounts
Investors own 1,492 SFR properties, a 35.1% share of the Barnes County market, with small landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 93.4% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties at a 25.8% discount compared to homeowners. Landlords remain strong net buyers, acquiring 18 properties while selling only 2 in the last quarter, signaling continued accumulation.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,492 SFRs in Barnes County, with individuals holding 75.3% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (1,237) compared to just 255 that are financed. Of the total portfolio, 1,460 properties are designated as rentals. Individual landlords (1,429) outnumber company landlords (224) by more than 6 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 25.8% discount in Q1 2026, paying $58,263 less than homeowners on average.
This massive Q1 discount is a sharp reversal from 2025, when landlords consistently paid premiums, including a 33.1% premium in Q1 2025. The price for landlords in Q1 2026 was $167,346, compared to $225,609 for traditional homeowners.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 35.3% of all SFR purchases in the most recent quarter, acquiring 12 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of these purchases. Activity was concentrated at the smallest scale, with 10 of the 12 properties (83.3%) purchased by new, single-property landlords.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 93.4% of investor-owned SFRs, while institutions hold just 0.1%.
The ownership structure is highly concentrated at the bottom, with single-property landlords alone owning 1,030 properties, a 66.2% majority share of the entire investor portfolio. The institutional tier consists of a single property.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, holding a 54.5% share in that tier.
Despite this crossover, individuals dominate the largest and most critical tiers, owning 84.5% of single-property portfolios and 80.0% of two-property portfolios. In the 11-20 property tier, company ownership surges to 70.0%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip code 58072, which contains 914 investor-owned properties.
Several zip codes exhibit extremely high investor penetration rates, with 58056 leading at 58.3%. Four other zip codes, including 58429 (54.9%) and 58492 (53.9%), have investor ownership rates over 50%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Barnes County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 18 properties while selling only 2 in Q1 2026.
This net-buyer trend is long-standing, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.7x in 2025 (96 buys vs 11 sells) and 28x in 2024 (84 buys vs 3 sells). Data on institutional transaction activity was not available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 37.5% of all market transactions in Q1 2026, with all 18 acquisitions made by mom-and-pop investors.
New single-property landlords paid an average of $134,400 per home. In a notable sign of market churn, 7.1% of their purchases (1 transaction) were sourced directly from another landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,492 SFRs in Barnes County, with individuals holding 75.3% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Barnes County, investors hold a significant 1,492 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 35.1% of the total 4,253 SFRs in the market. This high penetration rate indicates a strong presence of real estate investing activity in the region.

Ownership is heavily skewed towards individual investors, who control 1,124 properties, or 75.3% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties account for the remaining 388 SFRs (26.0%), highlighting the market's reliance on smaller, non-corporate landlords.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash ownership. A total of 1,237 properties were acquired with cash, dwarfing the 255 properties that are financed. This suggests that investors in Barnes County are well-capitalized and may be less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly focused on rental income, with 1,460 of the 1,492 properties identified as rented. This demonstrates a clear strategy of long-term holds for rental yield rather than short-term speculative flips.

The disparity in entity types is stark, with 1,429 individual landlords compared to just 224 company landlords. This 6.4-to-1 ratio of individuals to companies reinforces the finding that the local rental market is primarily supported by small-scale operators.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 25.8% discount in Q1 2026, paying $58,263 less than homeowners on average.
Detailed Findings

In a dramatic market shift, landlords in Barnes County paid an average price of just $167,346 in Q1 2026, which is 25.8% less than the $225,609 paid by traditional homeowners. This equates to a substantial discount of $58,263 per property, indicating a significant buying advantage for investors in the current climate.

This trend marks a complete reversal from the previous year. Throughout 2025, landlords consistently paid more than homeowners, with premiums reaching as high as 33.1% ($59,031) in Q1 2025. The change from paying a premium to securing a deep discount suggests a cooling market where investors are finding more favorable deals.

Comparing prices over time reveals volatility. The average landlord acquisition price of $167,346 in Q1 2026 is significantly lower than the averages seen in 2025 ($261,581) and 2024 ($242,373), pointing to a recent price correction or a shift in the type of assets being acquired.

The price gap reversal is the most significant finding. While landlords paid a $28,998 premium in Q3 2025, they are now securing a $58,263 discount in Q1 2026. This rapid change highlights the dynamic nature of pricing power between investor and retail buyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 35.3% of all SFR purchases in the most recent quarter, acquiring 12 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for over a third of the market in the last quarter, with landlords purchasing 12 of the 34 total SFRs sold, a market share of 35.3%. This demonstrates sustained and significant demand from the investor segment in Barnes County.

The market's new acquisitions are exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made up 100% of all landlord purchases, with zero activity recorded from institutional-scale investors (Tier 09).

New entrants are the primary driver of growth. The single-property tier was the most active, with 14 new entities acquiring 10 properties, representing 83.3% of all investor purchases. This signals a healthy influx of first-time landlords into the market.

In contrast to the influx of new investors, mid-size and large investors were completely absent from the market this quarter. The data shows no purchases from any tier holding more than two properties, reinforcing the market's dependence on small-scale capital.

The two-property tier also showed modest activity, with 2 entities purchasing 2 properties. Together with the single-property tier, these smallest investors were responsible for all landlord acquisition activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 93.4% of investor-owned SFRs, while institutions hold just 0.1%.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Barnes County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a staggering 93.4% of all investor-owned SFRs. This concentration dispels any notion of large-scale corporate dominance in the local market.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market, owning 1,030 properties. This represents 66.2% of the entire investor-owned housing stock, highlighting the critical role of first-time and small investors.

Institutional ownership is virtually non-existent. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) accounts for just a single property, representing a mere 0.1% of the investor portfolio. This starkly contrasts with national headlines about institutional buyers.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) also have a limited footprint, collectively owning only 102 properties, or 6.6% of the portfolio. The ownership share declines sharply as portfolio size increases, reinforcing the market's fragmented nature.

The entire ownership structure is built on a broad base of small landlords. The top four tiers (1-10 properties) combined own 1,452 of the 1,492 investor SFRs, showcasing a market characterized by widespread, small-scale participation rather than consolidated control.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, holding a 54.5% share in that tier.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the overall market, companies strategically control larger portfolios. The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 42 properties (54.5%) compared to the 35 owned by individuals (45.5%).

Individual investors are the driving force in the entry-level tiers. They own 886 of the single-property landlord homes (84.5%) and 132 of the two-property landlord homes (80.0%), confirming their role as the primary participants in the small-scale rental market.

Company ownership becomes much more pronounced in the small-medium tiers. For investors with 11-20 properties, companies own 28 homes, a commanding 70.0% share, suggesting that formal business structures are preferred for managing slightly larger portfolios.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals maintain a strong majority, holding 121 properties (66.5%). This indicates that many landlords operate under their personal name until their portfolio reaches a more substantial size of 6 or more properties.

This pattern reveals a clear lifecycle: individuals initiate real estate investing careers, and as portfolios grow beyond a certain threshold (around 6 properties), ownership tends to shift to more formal company structures to manage assets and liabilities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip code 58072, which contains 914 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor properties in Barnes County is highly concentrated. The zip code 58072 is the clear epicenter of activity, home to 914 investor-owned SFRs, representing 61.3% of all such properties in the county.

Beyond the raw count leader, several smaller zip codes display remarkably high investor ownership rates. The highest penetration is in 58056, where investors own 58.3% of the housing stock, indicating a market dominated by rental properties.

A cluster of zip codes shows investor ownership rates exceeding 50%, a threshold indicating that renters likely outnumber homeowners. These include 58429 (54.9%), 58492 (53.9%), 58480 (52.8%), and 58479 (50.9%).

There is a distinction between the area with the highest count (58072) and those with the highest rates. While 58072 has the most properties, its investor ownership rate is a more moderate 30.3%, suggesting it's a larger, more balanced market compared to the smaller, investor-saturated zip codes.

This geographic analysis reveals targeted investment strategies, with capital flowing into specific sub-markets and creating pockets of extremely high rental concentration within Barnes County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Barnes County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 18 properties while selling only 2 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Barnes County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 18 SFRs while only selling 2, resulting in a net gain of 16 properties to the rental stock.

This aggressive net-buying behavior is not a new phenomenon. In 2025, investors bought 96 properties and sold only 11, a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.7 to 1. The trend was even more pronounced in 2024, with 84 buys against just 3 sells, a ratio of 28 to 1.

Quarterly data throughout 2025 also shows a consistent pattern of accumulation. For instance, in Q3 2025, landlords bought 23 properties and sold only 2, demonstrating persistent confidence in the local market.

The transaction data underscores a clear market direction where the number of investor-held properties is steadily increasing. This activity counteracts any narrative of investors liquidating their portfolios in the current economic climate.

While the overall landlord market is heavily skewed towards acquisitions, specific data for institutional (1000+ tier) transactions was not available, though their minimal ownership suggests their transaction impact would be negligible.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 37.5% of all market transactions in Q1 2026, with all 18 acquisitions made by mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords played a crucial role in market liquidity, participating in 18 of the 48 total SFR transactions, a 37.5% share. This high level of participation underscores their importance as a consistent source of demand in Barnes County.

All 18 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), with zero activity from institutional investors. This mirrors the purchase data, confirming that small investors are the sole drivers of transactional activity.

The single-property tier was the most active, accounting for 14 of the 18 landlord transactions. These new entrants paid an average price of $134,400, which is significantly less than the $225,000 average paid by the two-property tier investors, suggesting a focus on more affordable, entry-level properties.

The data shows evidence of inter-landlord trading, a sign of a mature rental market. Of the 14 properties purchased by new single-property landlords, one (7.1%) was bought from an existing landlord, indicating some portfolio churn among investors.

No landlord-to-landlord sales were recorded for the two-property tier, suggesting that these slightly more experienced investors may have been sourcing their deals from the open market or directly from homeowners.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Barnes County with 93.4% Ownership, Reversing Trend to Secure Deep Discounts
Holdings
Landlords own 1,492 SFR properties, representing a 35.1% penetration of the Barnes County market. Ownership is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (1,124 properties, 75.3%) over companies (388 properties, 26.0%).
Pricing
In a sharp market reversal, landlords paid 25.8% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, securing an average discount of $58,263 per property ($167,346 vs $225,609).
Activity
Investors purchased 35.3% of homes sold in the last quarter (12 properties), with activity driven entirely by mom-and-pop landlords, including 14 new single-property entities entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 93.4% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.1% (a single property).
Ownership Type
Individual investors command the small-portfolio segment, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, signaling a preference for formal entities as portfolios grow.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (18 buys vs 2 sells), continuing a multi-year trend of portfolio accumulation. Institutional transaction data was not available.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor landscape in Barnes County, North Dakota is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small, individual operators. Investors control a significant 35.1% of the single-family housing market, totaling 1,492 properties. This portfolio is largely in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who own a commanding 93.4% of all investor-held homes. In stark contrast, institutional investors have a negligible footprint, with just a single property (0.1%). Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who hold 75.3% of the properties, reinforcing the community-based nature of the local rental market.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 signals a market ripe with opportunity for savvy buyers. Landlords were involved in 37.5% of all transactions and demonstrated a keen ability to secure favorable pricing, paying 25.8% less than traditional homeowners, a sharp reversal from paying premiums in 2025. This activity is driven by new entrants, with 14 new single-property landlords joining the market. Furthermore, investors are in a clear accumulation phase, operating as strong net buyers with an 9-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in the first quarter, a pattern consistent with prior years.

The key takeaway from this market report is that the Barnes County rental market is not a playground for Wall Street but a thriving ecosystem for local, small-scale investors. The high concentration of ownership among mom-and-pop landlords, coupled with their ability to acquire properties at a discount and their consistent net-buying activity, paints a picture of a stable and growing community-led rental sector. This dynamic suggests that local knowledge and negotiation skills are paramount, and that the health of the housing market is deeply intertwined with the financial success of thousands of individual owners, not a handful of large corporations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 10:58 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Barnes (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Barnes (ND) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nd-barnes/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.