Minidoka (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Minidoka (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Minidoka (ID)
6,218
Total Investors in Minidoka (ID)
1,030
Investor Owned SFR in Minidoka (ID)
938(15.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
905
SFR Owned
745
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
125
SFR Owned
207
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 938 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Minidoka County's Market With 91% Ownership
Investors own 938 SFR properties, 15.1% of the market in Minidoka County, with individual landlords controlling 79.4% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, investors were aggressive net buyers and secured properties at a 23.3% discount compared to homeowners. Small landlords (1-10 properties) account for 91.4% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors hold just one property.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 938 properties in Minidoka County, with individuals holding 79.4% of the portfolio.
Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 653 properties held free of financing compared to 285 that are financed. The vast majority of the portfolio, 887 properties or 94.6%, are non-owner-occupied rental homes.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 23.3% less than homeowners, an average discount of $85,867.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is highly volatile, swinging from a 60.8% landlord discount in Q1 2025 to a 25.0% landlord premium in Q3 2025. The Q1 2026 average landlord acquisition price of $283,353 is below the 2020-2023 pandemic-era average of $319,974.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 21.1% of all homes sold in Minidoka County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 87.5% of all investor purchases, acquiring 14 of the 16 properties. Institutional investors made no acquisitions during the quarter. Eleven new single-property landlords entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 91.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just a single property, representing 0.1% of the market. Single-property landlords are the largest group, holding 588 properties, or 59.3% of all investor housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 92.5% of homes.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 88.9% of single-property rentals, companies scale more effectively into larger tiers. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 65.5% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip code 83350, with 543 investor-owned properties.
Zip code 83318 has the highest investor ownership rate at 19.7%. Following 83350, the next largest concentration is in zip code 83336 with 245 properties, indicating specific neighborhood focuses for investors.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 25 properties while selling only 2 in Q1 2026.
This strong net buying trend is consistent over time, with a net acquisition of 27 properties in 2025 and 45 in 2024. In contrast, the single institutional investor was neutral in Q1, selling one property and buying one.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 21.2% of all Q1 2026 transactions, purchasing 25 properties.
Single-property landlords were the most active, completing 13 transactions at an average price of $334,484. The single institutional transaction was a landlord-to-landlord deal, while new investors sourced only 7.7% of their properties from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 938 properties in Minidoka County, with individuals holding 79.4% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Minidoka County, investors hold a significant 15.1% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market, totaling 938 properties out of 6,218.

Individual investors are the primary force in the local rental market, owning 745 properties, which represents 79.4% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Company investors hold the remaining 207 properties (22.1%), indicating a market largely driven by smaller-scale operators rather than large corporations.

The ownership structure is composed of 1,030 distinct landlord entities, of which 905 are individuals and 125 are companies. This highlights a broad base of small landlords participating in the market.

Cash ownership far outweighs financing. Investors own 653 properties outright (69.6% of holdings), compared to 285 properties (30.4%) that are financed, signaling a well-capitalized investor base.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income, with 887 of the 938 properties (94.6%) classified as non-owner-occupied, confirming the investment-centric nature of these holdings.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 23.3% less than homeowners, an average discount of $85,867.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Minidoka County demonstrated a strong pricing advantage in the first quarter of 2026, acquiring properties for an average of $283,353. This was $85,867, or 23.3%, less than the $369,220 paid by traditional homeowners, suggesting effective negotiation or a focus on off-market deals.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown extreme volatility over the past year. In Q1 2025, investors enjoyed a massive 60.8% discount, but in Q3 2025, they paid a 25.0% premium, indicating that small transaction volumes can cause dramatic swings in quarterly averages.

Recent acquisition prices represent a cooling from the market's peak. The Q1 2026 average price of $283,353 is notably lower than the average of $319,974 recorded during the 2020-2023 boom years.

Analysis of year-over-year pricing for landlords is limited by low transaction counts in the most recent periods, making direct comparisons difficult. However, the data consistently shows landlords operating at different price points than the general market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 21.1% of all homes sold in Minidoka County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 16 of the 76 total SFR properties sold, a market share of 21.1%.

The acquisitions were overwhelmingly driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) purchased 14 of the 16 homes, representing 87.5% of all investor buying activity.

New entrants are a key driver of demand. Eleven different entities purchased their first investment property, acquiring 9 homes and making up 56.2% of all investor purchases for the quarter.

Mid-size and institutional investors showed minimal activity. Only one large landlord (101-1000 properties) made a purchase, acquiring 2 properties, while institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made no acquisitions at all.

This quarter's activity reinforces the trend of a market dominated by new and small landlords, who are actively growing their portfolios while larger players remain on the sidelines.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 91.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Minidoka County is defined by small, independent operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control 91.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, owning 588 properties. This tier alone accounts for 59.3% of investor housing, highlighting the importance of first-time and small-scale investors.

The presence of large-scale investors is negligible. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just one property, making up only 0.1% of the total. This counters the narrative of corporate consolidation in the local housing market.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) also have a limited footprint, collectively owning 81 properties, which is 8.1% of the investor-owned supply.

The ownership distribution clearly shows a highly fragmented market, with the overwhelming majority of rental properties managed by local, small-portfolio owners.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 92.5% of homes.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure shifts dramatically as portfolio sizes increase. While individual investors dominate the overall market, companies take majority control starting at the 6-10 property tier, owning 37 of the 40 properties (92.5%).

Individuals are the primary owners in smaller tiers. They own 529 single-property rentals (88.9%), 74 two-property portfolios (82.2%), and 151 properties in the 3-5 unit tier (78.2%).

The crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type is a clear indicator of operational scale. Once a portfolio grows beyond five properties, incorporating becomes the prevailing strategy for investors in Minidoka County.

This pattern continues into the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 36 properties, a 65.5% share, solidifying their control over mid-sized portfolios.

The data suggests that individuals form the foundation of the rental market, while companies are the vehicle of choice for investors aiming for larger-scale operations.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip code 83350, with 543 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Minidoka County is not evenly distributed. The vast majority of activity is concentrated in zip code 83350, which contains 543 investor-owned properties.

While 83350 leads in sheer volume, zip code 83318 exhibits the highest market penetration, with an investor ownership rate of 19.7%. This indicates a particularly high density of rental properties in that area.

The top two zip codes by count, 83350 (543 properties) and 83336 (245 properties), together account for a substantial portion of all investor holdings in the county, showcasing clear geographic preferences.

The difference between the top region by count (83350 at 15.0% rate) and the top region by percentage (83318 at 19.7%) suggests that investors employ different strategies, targeting both larger markets and smaller, high-density areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 25 properties while selling only 2 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Minidoka County are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as decisive net buyers. In Q1 2026, they purchased 25 properties and sold only 2, resulting in a net gain of 23 properties to their portfolios.

This behavior is part of a multi-year trend. In 2025, landlords were net buyers of 27 properties (47 buys vs. 20 sells), and in 2024, they added a net of 45 properties (60 buys vs. 15 sells).

The transaction data reveals a stark contrast between the broader market and the institutional segment. While the overall investor community is expanding, the lone institutional investor (1,000+ tier) was neutral in Q1 2026, with one purchase and one sale.

Market liquidity appears healthy, with consistent transaction volumes over the past several years, although Q1 2026 activity shows a significant acceleration in buying compared to recent quarters.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 21.2% of all Q1 2026 transactions, purchasing 25 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors participated in 25 of the 118 total SFR transactions, capturing a 21.2% share of all market activity.

Activity was heavily skewed towards smaller investors. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active group, responsible for 13 transactions, followed by small landlords in the 3-5 property tier with 6 transactions.

A notable pricing pattern emerged among tiers. The smallest investors in Tier 01 paid the highest average price at $334,484. In contrast, landlords in the 3-5 property tier paid significantly less, at an average of $224,437 per property.

Inter-landlord trading activity varied by size. The single transaction by an institutional investor was sourced from another landlord (100.0%). However, only 1 of the 13 purchases by single-property investors (7.7%) came from an existing landlord, indicating they primarily buy from homeowners.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Define Minidoka County's Market, Owning 91.4% as Institutions Remain on the Sidelines
Holdings
Landlords own 938 SFR properties, representing 15.1% of Minidoka County's market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 745 of these properties (79.4%), with companies owning the remaining 20.6%.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured a significant 23.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $283,353 versus the homeowner price of $369,220.
Activity
Investors purchased 21.1% of homes sold in the most recent quarter, a movement led by small operators. During this period, 11 new single-property landlords entered the market, highlighting grassroots growth.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 91.4% of all investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold just 0.1%, or a single property.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command the small-portfolio segment, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, where they control 92.5% of the assets.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 12.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (25 buys vs. 2 sells). The single institutional investor, however, was neutral with one purchase and one sale.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor landscape in Minidoka County, Idaho, is overwhelmingly characterized by small, independent operators, not large corporations. Investors own 938 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 15.1% of the county's total SFR housing stock. Individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords are the clear majority, holding 79.4% of these investment properties (745 homes), while companies own the remaining 20.6% (207 homes). This structure is further reinforced by tier analysis, which shows landlords with 1-10 properties control a commanding 91.4% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties hold just a single home (0.1%).

In terms of market activity, investors are in a phase of aggressive accumulation. In Q1 2026, they were involved in 21.2% of all home sales and were strong net buyers, acquiring 25 properties while only selling 2. This buying activity comes with a significant financial advantage; investors paid an average price of $283,353 in Q1, a 23.3% discount compared to the $369,220 paid by traditional homeowners. The primary drivers of this activity are new and small investors, with 11 new single-property landlords entering the market in the last reported quarter.

The data paints a clear picture of a fragmented and localized investment market. The dominant trend is the continued growth and activity of individual and small-portfolio landlords who are expanding their holdings, primarily by purchasing from homeowners at a discount. The crossover from individual to corporate ownership at the 6-10 property tier suggests a natural scaling progression for successful investors. With institutional players virtually absent and overall transaction data showing a strong net-buyer position, the narrative in Minidoka County is one of grassroots investment shaping the local rental market. These findings are a key feature of our latest Investor Pulse reports.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 02:47 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Minidoka (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Minidoka (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-id-minidoka/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.