Bear Lake (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bear Lake (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bear Lake (ID)
3,238
Total Investors in Bear Lake (ID)
1,987
Investor Owned SFR in Bear Lake (ID)
1,649(50.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,733
SFR Owned
1,436
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
254
SFR Owned
310
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,649 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Investors Dominate Bear Lake's Market, Owning 50.9% of SFR Homes and Paying Significant Premiums
Investors own 1,649 Single-Family Residential properties in Bear Lake, ID, a 50.9% market share, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 96.1% of that portfolio. In a reversal of national trends, these investors paid 25.1% more than homeowners in Q1 2026. Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 21 properties for every 1 sold, signaling strong confidence in the local rental market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,649 homes, a 50.9% market share, with individuals holding 87.1%.
Cash is the preferred funding method, with 1,145 properties owned outright versus 504 that are financed. The portfolio is almost entirely composed of rentals, with 99.5% of investor-owned properties being non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors paid a 25.1% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $482,638.
This trend of investors paying more is consistent, with premiums reaching as high as 132.8% in Q3 2025 ($698,023 vs $299,820). This pattern suggests investors are targeting higher-value properties than typical homebuyers.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 acquisitions, purchasing 14 properties for a 70.0% market share.
Mom-and-pop investors were the sole drivers of this activity, accounting for 100% of landlord purchases. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions, reinforcing that this is a market for small-scale players.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 96.1% of investor-owned SFRs in Bear Lake.
Single-property landlords alone own 83.8% of the entire investor portfolio. In contrast, institutional investors have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners only in the 21-50 property tier, holding 52.7% of homes.
Individual investors are dominant across all smaller portfolio sizes, owning 85.5% of single-property portfolios and 74.3% of 3-5 property portfolios. There is no institutional activity from either individuals or companies.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 83287 zip code, with 583 investor-owned homes.
The highest investor saturation is in zip code 83223, with a 100.0% ownership rate. Other zips like 83233 (93.8%) and 83239 (87.9%) also show near-total investor control, typical of vacation communities.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 21 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of strong net acquisition is long-term, with landlords maintaining a buy-to-sell ratio of 11.4 in 2025 and 17.6 in 2024. Institutional activity is negligible, with only one purchase and one sale over the past year.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 70.0% of all market transactions in Q4 2025, making 21 purchases.
All 21 of these transactions were made by mom-and-pop investors in the single-property tier, who paid an average of $482,638. Investors are primarily buying from homeowners, with only 9.5% of purchases sourced from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,649 homes, a 50.9% market share, with individuals holding 87.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Bear Lake County is exceptionally high, with landlords holding 1,649 of the 3,238 total SFR properties, a market penetration of 50.9%.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by 1,733 individual landlords who own 1,436 properties (87.1%), compared to 254 company investors holding 310 properties (18.8%). This structure underscores the prevalence of small-scale real estate investing in the region.

Financial strategies lean heavily towards cash, with 1,145 properties (69.4%) held free and clear, more than double the 504 properties that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base less reliant on leverage.

The portfolio's purpose is clear: 1,641 of 1,649 properties are rented, meaning 99.5% of the investor-owned housing stock serves as rental units rather than primary residences.

The data on landlords versus properties (1,987 distinct landlords for 1,649 properties) suggests a high incidence of co-ownership, a common characteristic in vacation and second-home markets where multiple individuals or family members may own a single property.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors paid a 25.1% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $482,638.
Detailed Findings

In a significant departure from national trends, investors in Bear Lake County consistently pay more for properties than traditional homeowners. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average price of $482,638, a $96,837 (25.1%) premium over the homeowner average of $385,801.

This isn't an isolated event; the premium has been even more pronounced in previous quarters. In Q3 2025, investors paid an extraordinary 132.8% more than homeowners ($698,023 vs. $299,820).

The persistent price gap suggests that investors and homeowners are competing in different segments of the market. Investors may be targeting properties with premium features, such as waterfront access or larger lots suitable for vacation rentals, which command higher prices.

This dynamic challenges the common assumption that investors achieve success primarily through discounted acquisitions. In this market, the strategy appears to be acquiring premium assets for which they are willing to pay a higher price, likely due to anticipated rental income.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 acquisitions, purchasing 14 properties for a 70.0% market share.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the primary buyers in the Bear Lake market in Q4 2025, acquiring 14 of the 20 total SFR properties sold, which constitutes a commanding 70.0% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties). Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000+ properties were completely absent from the market, making zero purchases.

Diving deeper, all 14 properties were acquired by investors in the single-property tier. This indicates that market growth is driven by new landlords entering the market or existing small investors adding one property at a time.

The 14 properties were purchased by 21 distinct entities, highlighting a pattern of co-ownership. This structure is common in recreational areas where families or partners often purchase investment properties together.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 96.1% of investor-owned SFRs in Bear Lake.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Bear Lake County is defined by small, independent owners, not large corporations. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a staggering 96.1% of all investor-held SFRs.

Concentration is most extreme at the smallest level, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone accounting for 1,409 properties, or 83.8% of the total investor portfolio. This underscores the grassroots nature of the local rental market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no footprint in this market, with an ownership share of 0.0%. This finding directly refutes any narrative of a corporate takeover of housing in the area.

Mid-size investors also represent a tiny fraction of the market. Landlords with 11-50 properties collectively own just 65 properties, or 3.9% of the investor-owned total. The market structure is clearly composed of a very large base of small players and a very thin middle and top tier.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners only in the 21-50 property tier, holding 52.7% of homes.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of ownership in nearly every segment of the Bear Lake market. They own 85.5% of properties in the single-property tier and continue to hold a strong majority of over 74% in portfolios up to 5 properties.

The transition to corporate-dominated ownership occurs only when portfolios reach a substantial size. In the 21-50 property tier, companies hold a 52.7% majority, suggesting this is the scale at which the benefits of formal incorporation outweigh the complexities for local investors.

Interestingly, the 11-20 property tier shows an even higher concentration of individual ownership (87.5%) than smaller tiers. This anomaly, likely due to a small sample size in that specific tier, reinforces the overall trend of individual control across the sub-institutional landscape.

This crossover point indicates that for most investors in the market, personal ownership is the preferred method until their holdings become a significant business operation requiring a corporate structure for liability and management purposes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 83287 zip code, with 583 investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor holdings are geographically concentrated within Bear Lake County, with the 83287 zip code containing the highest volume of investor-owned properties at 583, representing 63.2% of the homes in that area.

However, volume doesn't tell the whole story. The highest rates of investor saturation appear in smaller communities. Zip code 83223 is 100.0% investor-owned, and 83233 is 93.8% investor-owned, indicating these areas may function almost exclusively as rental or second-home enclaves.

The data reveals a distinction between the market's largest hub of investor activity (83287) and smaller, more intensely saturated vacation spots. For instance, 83261 has 188 investor properties but an 84.3% ownership rate.

This pattern of high concentration, both in terms of absolute count and percentage, confirms the county's status as a major destination for property investment, likely driven by tourism and the demand for short-term rentals.

The top five zip codes by investor count (83287, 83254, 83272, 83261, 83239) together account for 1,544 properties, or 93.6% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 21 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Bear Lake County are in a clear accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 21 properties while selling only one, demonstrating strong market confidence.

This aggressive buying posture is not a new phenomenon. For the full year of 2025, investors bought 103 properties and sold just 9, a ratio of over 11 to 1. In 2024, the ratio was even higher at nearly 18 to 1 (88 buys vs. 5 sells).

Institutional investors are not participating in this accumulation. The only recorded activity for the 1,000+ property tier was a single purchase and a single sale in 2025, resulting in a net-neutral position.

The sustained, high-volume net buying from smaller landlords is a primary driver of market dynamics, increasing the share of homes held as investments and reducing the inventory available for traditional homebuyers.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 70.0% of all market transactions in Q4 2025, making 21 purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing was the dominant force in the Bear Lake market during Q4 2025, with landlords accounting for 21 of the 30 total SFR transactions, a 70.0% share.

This activity was exclusively driven by the smallest investors. One hundred percent of the 21 landlord transactions were conducted by entities in the single-property tier, confirming that new market entrants are fueling demand.

The average purchase price for these acquisitions was $482,638, aligning with data showing that investors are paying a premium compared to traditional homebuyers in this market.

Investors are largely acquiring properties from the existing homeowner market rather than from each other. Only 2 of the 21 purchases (9.5%) were from other landlords, indicating that this activity represents a net transfer of housing stock from owner-occupiers to investors.

There were no transactions by institutional investors, further cementing the conclusion that this is a market shaped entirely by the actions of individual and small-scale landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small investors define Bear Lake's housing market, owning 50.9% of homes and paying 25.1% premiums.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,649 SFR properties, representing a significant 50.9% of Bear Lake's market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 1,436 properties (87.1%), while companies own 310 (18.8%).
Pricing
In a reversal of national trends, landlords paid a 25.1% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $482,638 per property compared to the homeowner price of $385,801.
Activity
In Q4 2025, investors purchased 14 properties for a 70.0% share of all sales. This market growth is fueled entirely by new entrants, with 100% of these purchases made by single-property landlords.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market, holding 96.1% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence at all (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors own the vast majority of smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners (52.7%) once a portfolio grows to the 21-50 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 21 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026. Institutional investors are not a factor, with only a single buy and sell transaction recorded in the past year.
Market Narrative

The Bear Lake, ID housing market is fundamentally shaped by small, independent investors who now own 1,649 single-family homes, a remarkable 50.9% of the county's entire SFR stock. This ownership is not corporate; it's personal. Individual investors hold 87.1% of these properties, and the 'mom-and-pop' segment (1-10 properties) collectively controls 96.1% of the investor market. In stark contrast, large-scale institutional investors have zero presence, a key finding detailed in these Investor Pulse reports.

Investor behavior in Bear Lake defies national norms. They were responsible for 70% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025 and are aggressive net buyers, with a 21-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in early 2026. Most surprisingly, they consistently pay a premium for properties, spending 25.1% more than traditional homeowners in Q1. This suggests a focus on acquiring high-value vacation or rental properties rather than seeking discounts, and that they are primarily buying from homeowners, not just trading assets among themselves.

The key takeaway for Bear Lake is that its market dynamics are driven by a competitive second-home and vacation rental environment fueled by a multitude of individual investors. The high ownership concentration and willingness to pay premiums directly impact housing affordability and availability for local residents. This is not a story of Wall Street buying up homes but of a powerful, decentralized network of small investors actively accumulating properties in a desirable recreational area.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 01:58 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Bear Lake (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Bear Lake (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-id-bear_lake/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.