Crawford (AR) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Crawford (AR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Crawford (AR)
15,881
Total Investors in Crawford (AR)
3,012
Investor Owned SFR in Crawford (AR)
2,983(18.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,644
SFR Owned
2,262
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
368
SFR Owned
792
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,983 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small investors dominate Crawford County with 85% ownership, securing deep discounts while institutions pivot to net buyers.
Investors own 18.8% of the SFR market in Crawford County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a massive 85.2% of that portfolio versus just 0.5% for institutional firms. In Q1, landlords bought properties at a 35.6% discount compared to homeowners. All investor segments are now net buyers, with institutions reversing a two-year selling trend.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 2,983 SFR properties in Crawford County, with individuals holding 75.8%.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (2,430) versus financed (553). Individual landlords (2,644 entities) outnumber companies (368) by more than 7-to-1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 35.6% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $88,589.
The landlord discount has remained significant, exceeding 24% in every quarter of the last year. The discount peaked in Q2 2025 at 46.5%, a staggering $110,262 difference per property.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 20.1% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, making up 85.7% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors accounted for only 7.1% of acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 85.2% of investor-owned homes.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.5% of the investor portfolio. Single-property landlords alone own 63.2% of all investor-held SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own 89.7% of single-property rentals, but companies take over in larger portfolios.
The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies first reach majority ownership (50.3%). In portfolios of 11-50 properties, companies own nearly 75% of the homes.
Geographic Distribution
The 72956 zip code contains the highest volume of investor properties at 1,841.
The highest concentration of investors is found elsewhere, with the 72934 zip code having a 37.3% ownership rate. The 72935 zip code follows closely behind at a 35.9% investor ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 3.47 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
Institutional investors have reversed their recent selling trend, becoming net buyers in Q1 (3 buys vs 1 sell) after being net sellers in both 2025 and 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 17.7% of all property transactions in Q1 2026.
New single-property landlords paid an average of $115,460, while institutional investors paid 6.6% less at $107,800. First-time buyers also sourced 23.1% of their properties from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 2,983 SFR properties in Crawford County, with individuals holding 75.8%.
Detailed Findings

Investors own 18.8% of the 15,881 total Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties in Crawford County, establishing a significant rental market presence.

The ownership base is overwhelmingly composed of individual landlords, who own 2,262 properties (75.8%) compared to the 792 properties (26.6%) held by companies. This 3-to-1 ratio in property count highlights a market driven by personal investment rather than corporate acquisition.

A low-leverage strategy is prevalent among landlords, with 2,430 properties owned outright with cash, far outnumbering the 553 properties that are financed. This indicates a financially stable and risk-averse investor base.

The vast majority of the portfolio is actively used for rentals, with 2,880 of the 2,983 properties classified as non-owner-occupied.

The disparity in entity types is even more pronounced, with 2,644 individual landlords compared to just 368 company landlords, confirming that the market is supported by a large number of small-scale operators.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 35.6% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $88,589.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Crawford County consistently achieve deep purchasing discounts, paying an average of $160,305 in Q1 2026 while traditional homeowners paid $248,894.

This significant price gap translates to a 35.6% discount, saving investors an average of $88,589 per property and giving them a substantial competitive advantage.

This is not an isolated event but a persistent market feature. The discount reached a remarkable 46.5% in Q2 2025, when landlords paid $126,907 compared to homeowners at $237,169.

The consistency of this double-digit discount suggests that investors are successfully targeting off-market, distressed, or undervalued properties that are not typically accessible to retail homebuyers.

While overall market prices have fluctuated, the ability of landlords to purchase assets well below the homeowner average remains a defining characteristic of the local investment landscape.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 20.1% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were highly active, purchasing 40 of the 199 total SFR properties sold, which amounts to a 20.1% market share of all acquisitions.

The quarter was defined by the entry of new investors, with 26 new single-property landlords acquiring 20 homes and accounting for 47.6% of all investor buying activity.

Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) overwhelmingly led the charge, collectively responsible for 36 purchases, or 85.7% of the investor total for the quarter.

Institutional buyers (1000+ properties) played a minor role, acquiring just 3 properties and representing only 7.1% of investor purchasing volume.

This purchasing behavior reinforces that market growth is fueled by new and small-scale investors, not by large, consolidated entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 85.2% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Crawford County is unequivocally controlled by small-scale landlords. Those owning between 1 and 10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively hold 85.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, owning 1,955 properties. This represents 63.2% of the entire investor portfolio, making first-time and small investors the most significant group by a wide margin.

Conversely, institutional investors from Tier 09 have a minimal impact, owning just 14 properties in total. This amounts to a mere 0.5% market share, challenging any narrative of Wall Street dominance in the local rental scene.

This distribution highlights a highly fragmented market built on grassroots real estate investing, where individual decision-making and local knowledge prevail.

Mid-size investors (owning 11-1000 properties) hold the remaining 14.3% of the portfolio, bridging the gap between small landlords and the nearly non-existent institutional presence.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own 89.7% of single-property rentals, but companies take over in larger portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolio tiers, holding 89.7% of all single-property rentals (1,782 properties) and 79.5% of two-property portfolios (155 properties).

A distinct shift toward corporate ownership occurs as investors scale their operations. Companies surpass individuals for the first time in the 6-10 property tier, where they own a 50.3% majority.

This trend of incorporation accelerates significantly in larger tiers. Companies own 74.7% of properties in the 11-20 portfolio size and 73.5% in the 21-50 tier, solidifying their dominance as portfolio size increases.

This pattern suggests a natural business progression where investors adopt formal company structures for liability protection, financing, and operational efficiency as their holdings grow.

Despite this trend, the presence of individual owners persists across most tiers, demonstrating the continued viability of personal ownership even at a larger scale.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 72956 zip code contains the highest volume of investor properties at 1,841.
Detailed Findings

Investor holdings are most concentrated by sheer volume in the 72956 zip code, which contains 1,841 investor-owned properties, an 18.6% local ownership rate.

However, the highest market penetration occurs in different, smaller zip codes. The 72934 area leads all of Crawford County with a 37.3% investor ownership rate, demonstrating intense investor focus.

Following closely are zip codes 72935 (35.9% rate) and 72959 (27.8% rate), indicating specific sub-markets where landlords have an outsized presence.

This data reveals dual investment strategies at play: targeting populous areas like 72956 for the number of available properties, while focusing on smaller zips like 72934 for higher market saturation.

For any real estate investor, this geographic breakdown highlights distinct pockets of opportunity, differentiating between markets with high raw counts and those with high investor density.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 3.47 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Overall landlord market sentiment in Crawford County is strongly positive, with investors acting as decisive net buyers. In Q1 2026, they purchased 52 properties while selling only 15, a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.47x.

This aggressive accumulation is a continuation of a long-term trend. Landlords added a net 152 properties to their portfolios in 2025 and a net 212 properties in 2024.

A pivotal shift is underway with institutional investors (1000+ tier). After two consecutive years as net sellers, they reversed course in Q1 2026 to become net buyers, acquiring 3 properties and selling just 1.

This institutional turnaround, from divesting (net -4 properties in 2025) to accumulating, suggests a renewed strategic interest in the Crawford County market from its largest players.

The sustained, high-volume buying from the broader landlord community signals robust, continuing demand for rental assets across the region.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 17.7% of all property transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1, investors were a significant force in the market, participating in 52 of the 294 total SFR transactions and capturing a 17.7% share of all activity.

The quarter's transaction volume was overwhelmingly driven by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 45 of the 52 total landlord purchases.

A distinct pricing hierarchy is evident among buyers. Institutional investors demonstrated their market leverage by paying an average of $107,800 per property, which is 6.6% less than the $115,460 average paid by new single-property landlords.

The data also points to a liquid secondary market among investors. Nearly a quarter (23.1%) of all properties purchased by new landlords were acquired from other existing investors.

This dynamic suggests that while new entrants are actively joining the market, more experienced institutional players can secure better pricing, likely through superior deal-sourcing channels.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small investors dominate Crawford County with 85% ownership, securing deep discounts while institutions pivot to net buyers.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,983 SFR properties in Crawford County, AR (18.8% of the market), with individual investors holding a 75.8% majority (2,262 properties) compared to companies at 24.2% (792 properties).
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q1, paying an average of 35.6% less than homeowners and securing an $88,589 discount per property ($160,305 vs $248,894).
Activity
In the most recent quarter, landlords acquired 20.1% of all properties sold, with activity overwhelmingly led by small investors who accounted for 85.7% of landlord purchases.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 85.2% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a marginal 0.5%, underscoring a market driven by local operators.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to corporate structures as investors scale.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 3.47x buy/sell ratio in Q1 (52 buys vs 15 sells), and institutional investors have reversed course to become net buyers after two years of selling.
Market Narrative

The property ownership landscape in Crawford County, AR is firmly in the hands of small, independent investors. Landlords control 2,983 single-family homes, representing 18.8% of the total market. This portfolio is dominated by individuals, who own 75.8% of these properties, compared to just 24.2% held by companies. The market structure heavily favors mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a combined 85.2% of all investor-owned housing, while large institutional firms (1000+ properties) have a minimal presence at just 0.5%.

Investor activity reveals sophisticated and aggressive acquisition strategies. In the first quarter, landlords were involved in 17.7% of all transactions and demonstrated a strong net-buyer stance, acquiring 3.47 properties for every one sold. They also possess a significant pricing advantage, securing homes for 35.6% less than traditional homeowners on average. A key market shift is the re-entry of institutional investors as net buyers, reversing a multi-year trend of divestment and signaling renewed confidence in the area.

The key takeaway for Crawford County is that its rental market is built and sustained by local, small-scale entrepreneurs, not distant corporations. These investors are adept at finding undervalued assets, which creates a consistent price gap between their purchases and those of typical homeowners. The resurgence of buying from all investor types, including institutions, points to a robust and growing demand for rental housing in the region, suggesting continued strength and investment opportunity.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 20, 2026 at 09:04 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Crawford (AR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Crawford (AR) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ar-crawford/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.