Coal (OK) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Coal (OK) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Coal (OK)
848
Total Investors in Coal (OK)
237
Investor Owned SFR in Coal (OK)
201(23.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
210
SFR Owned
170
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
27
SFR Owned
32
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 201 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Command 99% of Coal County's Investor Market Amidst a Q4 Activity Freeze
Investors own 23.7% of the SFR market in Coal County, OK, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 99.1% of that portfolio. While historically securing significant price discounts, investor purchasing activity came to a complete halt in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 201 SFRs (23.7% of the market), with individuals holding a dominant 84.6%.
Cash is king in Coal County, with cash purchases (169) outnumbering financed ones (32) by more than 5 to 1. An overwhelming 96.5% of these properties are operated as rentals (194 properties), indicating a strong focus on income generation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors saw a massive 67.6% price discount compared to homeowners in Q1 2025.
This equates to a $156,600 price advantage on an average property ($75,000 vs $231,600), though this is based on very low transaction volume. The discount was more moderate in Q3 2025 at 16.6% ($20,833), showing significant price volatility.
Current Quarter Purchases
Real estate investor purchasing activity completely halted in Q4 2025.
Landlords made zero purchases out of the 2 total SFRs sold in Coal County during the quarter. This marks a significant pause, with both mom-and-pop and institutional tiers recording no new acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs in Coal County.
Single-property landlords alone make up the vast majority, owning 76.8% of the inventory (162 properties). Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence in the county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners across every single portfolio size tier in Coal County.
Even in the largest local tier (6-10 properties), individuals own 64.3% of the properties. Companies never become the majority, holding just 11.1% in the dominant single-property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated, with one zip code (74538) holding 90% of all investor SFRs.
The 74538 zip code contains 181 of the 201 investor-owned properties. In contrast, zip code 74525 has the highest investor penetration rate at 60.0% but only accounts for 3 properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords have been consistent net buyers, acquiring a net of 5 properties in 2024 and 3 in 2025.
In 2025, investors bought 4 properties while only selling 1, resulting in a 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. This accumulation trend was also seen in 2024 with 6 buys and 1 sell, demonstrating a consistent strategy of portfolio expansion.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords represented zero percent of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
No investor tiers recorded any transactions during the quarter, reflecting a complete pause in market activity from both buyers and sellers. This inactivity prevents any analysis of recent pricing or inter-landlord trading.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 201 SFRs (23.7% of the market), with individuals holding a dominant 84.6%.
Detailed Findings

In Coal County, OK, investors hold a significant 201 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 23.7% of the total 848 SFRs in the market. This reveals a substantial investor presence in the local housing landscape.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 170 properties, accounting for 84.6% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies hold the remaining 32 properties (15.9%). This 5-to-1 ratio underscores a market driven by local, smaller-scale real estate investing.

Financial strategies among landlords heavily favor cash. A total of 169 properties were acquired with cash, dwarfing the 32 that are financed. This suggests investors in this market either have high liquidity or are targeting lower-priced assets that don't require traditional financing.

The portfolio is almost entirely geared towards rental income. Out of 201 investor-owned properties, 194 are classified as rented. This 96.5% rental concentration highlights that the primary investor strategy in Coal County is long-term holds for rental revenue, not short-term flips.

The number of unique landlord entities (237) is higher than the number of properties they own (201), which points to a high degree of co-ownership. This pattern is common in family-oriented or small partnership investments, further cementing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors saw a massive 67.6% price discount compared to homeowners in Q1 2025.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic pricing gap emerged in Q1 2025, where landlords acquired properties for an average of $75,000, a staggering 67.6% less than the $231,600 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a massive $156,600 discount, although it's crucial to note this is based on minimal transaction data and could be influenced by a single distressed sale.

The price advantage for investors, while still present, was significantly smaller in a different quarter, highlighting market volatility. In Q3 2025, landlords paid $105,000 compared to homeowners at $125,833, a more conventional discount of 16.6% or $20,833. This fluctuation suggests that investor discounts are highly dependent on the specific properties available at any given time.

Historical pricing data indicates a relatively stable market prior to 2025. The average acquisition price for landlords between 2020-2023 was $117,880, closely followed by the 2024 average of $116,817. The low prices seen in 2025 represent a sharp deviation from this trend.

The number of properties purchased by landlords in recent quarters is zero, making it difficult to establish a reliable current pricing trend. The lack of recent acquisitions means the market has not yet set a new benchmark for investor purchase prices in late 2025 or early 2026.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Real estate investor purchasing activity completely halted in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing came to a standstill in the final quarter of 2025. Of the 2 total SFR properties sold in Coal County, none were acquired by landlords, resulting in a 0% market share for investor purchases during this period. This indicates a complete pause in portfolio growth.

The lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who form the backbone of the local market, made zero purchases. Similarly, there was no activity from mid-size or institutional investors.

This halt in acquisitions is a sharp departure from previous periods of steady buying. The absence of new entrants, particularly in the single-property (Tier 01) category, suggests a potential shift in local market conditions or a lack of desirable inventory for investors.

The data for Q4 2025 shows no new entities entering the market and no existing landlords expanding their portfolios. This inactivity freezes the existing ownership structure, at least temporarily.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs in Coal County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Coal County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs, a figure that highlights the near-complete absence of larger investors.

The market's foundation is built on single-property landlords. This tier (Tier 01) alone accounts for 162 properties, representing a massive 76.8% of the entire investor-owned housing stock. This indicates that the typical investor is a local individual with one rental property.

There is no institutional investor presence in Coal County. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) holds 0.0% of the market, which is expected in a smaller, rural area. This structure means the local rental market is shaped entirely by the decisions of small, independent owners.

Mid-size investors are also exceedingly rare. The small-medium tier (11-20 properties) holds just 2 properties, or 0.9% of the total, reinforcing that the market structure does not scale beyond very small portfolios.

The data on portfolio distribution confirms a hyper-localized market. With nearly every investor-owned property held by an entity with fewer than 10 properties, the dynamics are driven by personal financial decisions rather than large-scale corporate strategies.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners across every single portfolio size tier in Coal County.
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords maintain majority ownership across all existing portfolio sizes in Coal County, with no crossover point where companies take control. In the single-property tier, which comprises most of the market, individuals own 144 of the 162 properties (88.9%).

Even as portfolio sizes increase, individuals remain dominant. In the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 66.7% of the homes, and in the largest active tier (6-10 properties), they still hold a 64.3% majority.

Corporate ownership remains a small fraction of the market at every level. Company-owned properties represent just 11.1% of the single-property tier and only rise to 35.7% in the 6-10 property tier. This structure shows that scaling in this market is primarily done by individuals, not by incorporating.

The data demonstrates a clear and consistent pattern: the path of a real estate investor in Coal County is overwhelmingly an individual endeavor. There is no evidence of a trend toward professionalization or corporatization of rental housing ownership.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated, with one zip code (74538) holding 90% of all investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in Coal County is extremely concentrated. A single zip code, 74538, is home to 181 of the 201 investor properties, accounting for over 90% of the entire portfolio. This indicates a hyper-local focus for investment activity.

The highest rate of investor ownership occurs in a different area, showcasing the difference between volume and saturation. Zip code 74525 has an investor ownership rate of 60.0%, the highest in the county, but this is based on a tiny sample size of just 3 investor-owned properties.

In the primary investment hub of 74538, the investor ownership rate is a substantial 24.7%, meaning nearly one in four single-family homes is investor-owned. This is a significant market penetration for a concentrated area.

Other zip codes show minimal investor presence. For instance, 74534 and 74572 each have only 7 investor-owned homes, with ownership rates of 25.0% and 10.9% respectively. This further reinforces the dominance of the 74538 area as the center of rental housing.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords have been consistent net buyers, acquiring a net of 5 properties in 2024 and 3 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data reveals a clear pattern of accumulation by landlords in Coal County. Over the full year of 2025, landlords were strong net buyers, purchasing 4 properties while selling only 1, for a net gain of 3 properties.

This trend was even more pronounced in the previous year. In 2024, landlords acquired 6 properties and sold just 1, increasing their collective portfolio by a net of 5 homes. This consistent net buying activity signals a multi-year period of growth.

There is no institutional transaction activity recorded. All buying and selling is attributable to smaller, local landlords, aligning with the ownership data showing zero institutional presence.

The steady pace of acquisition over the past two years makes the complete halt in Q4 2025 (as seen in other data) more significant. It represents a sharp break from the established pattern of consistent, small-scale portfolio growth.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords represented zero percent of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The final quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete freeze in investor transactions. Landlords were involved in 0% of the 2 SFR transactions that occurred in Coal County, indicating they were neither buying nor selling.

This inactivity was consistent across all investor sizes. The typically active mom-and-pop tiers (01-04) recorded zero transactions, as did the non-existent institutional tier.

Due to the lack of purchases, there is no Q4 2025 transaction data to analyze for average purchase prices by tier. This creates a gap in understanding current valuation trends from an investor perspective.

Similarly, inter-landlord trading activity was non-existent. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%, as no acquisitions occurred. This suggests a very illiquid market for rental properties at the close of the year.

The Q4 data confirms the findings from the purchase summary: the local investor market entered a period of dormancy, pausing the consistent accumulation seen in prior years.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, individual landlords control 99.1% of Coal County's investor market, which paused all buying activity in Q4 2025.
Holdings
Landlords own 201 SFR properties, representing 23.7% of Coal County's market. Ownership is dominated by individuals, who hold 170 of these properties (84.6%), compared to just 32 (15.9%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant buying power, securing properties for as much as 67.6% below traditional homeowner prices in Q1 2025 ($75,000 vs. $231,600), though this is based on very low transaction volumes.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity stopped entirely in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0% of the 2 homes sold. No new landlords entered the market, a stark contrast to previous periods of steady acquisition.
Market Share
The market is entirely controlled by small landlords, with those owning 1-10 properties (mom-and-pop) holding 99.1% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, owning 88.9% of single-property rentals and 64.3% of portfolios in the 6-10 property range. Companies fail to achieve majority status at any level.
Transactions
While landlords were net buyers throughout 2024 and 2025 (acquiring 4 properties and selling 1 in 2025), all transaction activity ceased in Q4 2025. There is no institutional transaction activity in this market.
Market Narrative

In Coal County, Oklahoma, the real estate investor market is characterized by its small scale and hyper-local nature. Investors own 201 single-family properties, a notable 23.7% of the total SFR housing stock. The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 84.6% of these properties, compared to just 15.9% for companies. This dynamic is further reflected in the tier distribution, where 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) command a near-total 99.1% share, while large-scale institutional investors have no presence whatsoever.

Investor behavior in Coal County is defined by strategic, small-volume acquisitions and a recent, sudden halt in activity. Historically, landlords have been net buyers, steadily accumulating properties throughout 2024 and 2025. When they do buy, they often secure significant discounts, paying as much as 67.6% below traditional homeowners in early 2025. However, this momentum came to a complete stop in Q4 2025, when landlords made zero purchases, signaling a potential shift in market conditions or a lack of suitable inventory.

The key takeaway for the Coal County housing market is its stability and insulation, driven entirely by small, independent owners. The absence of institutional capital means the market is not subject to large, sweeping strategic shifts. Instead, it moves based on the collective decisions of local individuals. The recent freeze in buying activity, breaking a multi-year accumulation trend, is the most critical development to watch, as it may indicate changing local economic factors or a saturation point for the existing investor base.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 01:04 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Coal (OK)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Coal (OK) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ok-coal/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.