Wallace (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Wallace (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Wallace (KS)
449
Total Investors in Wallace (KS)
301
Investor Owned SFR in Wallace (KS)
238(53.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
268
SFR Owned
207
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
33
SFR Owned
34
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 238 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investors Own 53% of Wallace County, KS SFRs in a Stagnant, Mom-and-Pop Dominated Market
Investors own 238 Single-Family properties, a 53.0% share of the Wallace County market, with 100% of these held by mom-and-pop landlords. The market shows no recent sales activity, with zero landlord purchases in Q1 2026, and all investor properties are owned outright with cash.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 238 SFRs, 53.0% of the market, with individuals holding 87.0% of the portfolio.
All 238 investor-owned properties are held in cash with zero financing recorded. The entire portfolio of 238 homes is non-owner-occupied and classified as rentals, indicating a pure investment focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord acquisition pricing data is available due to a complete lack of recent market transactions.
There were zero recorded landlord purchases in Q1 2026 or during the entire 2020-2023 period. This absence of sales activity prevents any price comparison between landlords and traditional homeowners.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing was nonexistent in Q1, with landlords accounting for 0.0% of market activity.
There were zero total SFR purchases in Wallace County during the quarter, meaning no new landlords entered the market. Activity was flat across all investor tiers, from single-property owners to institutional funds.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exercise total control, owning 100% of investor SFRs.
Single-property landlords are the largest group, holding 189 properties for a 76.5% share. Institutional investors with 1000+ properties have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, with no company crossover point.
Company ownership is minimal across the board, peaking at just 21.4% in the 3-5 property tier. Among the dominant single-property tier, individuals own 85.4% of the homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with the 67758 zip code containing 87.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.
The 67758 zip code holds 208 of the 238 investor properties and also has the highest investor penetration rate at 57.5%. The top three zip codes account for 100% of the county's investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
No historical buy or sell transactions were recorded, preventing analysis of market dynamics.
The absence of transaction data makes it impossible to determine if landlords are net buyers or sellers. There is no information on landlord-to-landlord sales or average buy and sell prices.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords had a 0.0% share of market transactions in Q1, reflecting zero buying or selling activity.
No transactions were recorded for any investor tier, from mom-and-pop to institutional. Consequently, there were no inter-landlord trades during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 238 SFRs, 53.0% of the market, with individuals holding 87.0% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Wallace County, KS, is exceptionally high, with 238 Single-Family Residential properties representing 53.0% of the total 449 SFRs. This deep penetration signals a market heavily influenced by rental activity.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly composed of small, individual investors. Individuals own 207 properties (87.0%), while companies hold just 34 (14.3%), challenging the narrative of corporate landlord dominance in this locale.

A significant financial characteristic of this market is the complete absence of leverage among investors. All 238 investor-owned homes are designated as cash properties, with zero properties showing signs of financing. This suggests a fiscally conservative, debt-averse investor base.

The entire investor portfolio of 238 properties is non-owner-occupied, confirming their use as rental units. This 100% rental rate underscores the clear distinction between investment properties and primary residences in the area.

Interestingly, there are 301 distinct landlord entities for only 238 properties. This higher number of owners than properties indicates that co-ownership is a common practice among investors in Wallace County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord acquisition pricing data is available due to a complete lack of recent market transactions.
Detailed Findings

A defining characteristic of the Wallace County investor market is its extremely low liquidity. There is no available data for landlord acquisition prices in Q1 2026, as no such transactions occurred.

This inactivity extends historically, with records showing zero properties purchased by landlords between 2020 and 2023. Consequently, it is impossible to analyze price appreciation or compare purchasing trends over time.

The lack of sales prevents a comparative analysis between landlord and traditional homeowner acquisition prices. This data gap itself is a key finding, pointing to a stable, buy-and-hold investor environment rather than an active, transactional market.

Without transaction data, key metrics like the typical landlord discount relative to homeowners cannot be calculated for Wallace County. This market's dynamics are driven by long-term holds, not frequent acquisitions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing was nonexistent in Q1, with landlords accounting for 0.0% of market activity.
Detailed Findings

The Wallace County real estate market saw a complete halt in sales activity in Q1 2026, with zero total SFR purchases recorded. As a result, landlords' market share of purchases was 0.0%.

This lack of activity means no new investors entered the market. The count of new single-property (Tier 01) landlords for the quarter was zero, indicating a static ownership landscape.

Activity was uniformly zero across all investor segments. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) and institutional investors (1000+ properties) both recorded zero purchases for the period.

The absence of Q1 purchases highlights a market characterized by long-term holdings rather than speculative or opportunistic buying. Existing owners appear content to hold their assets, and no new inventory was acquired by investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exercise total control, owning 100% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Wallace County is exclusively controlled by mom-and-pop landlords, who own 100% of the 238 investor-held SFRs. This complete dominance by small investors is a defining feature of the market.

First-time or single-asset investors (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, owning 189 properties. This represents a commanding 76.5% of all investor-owned housing stock in the county.

The next largest segment consists of landlords with two properties, who control 36 homes (14.6%). Combined, landlords with one or two properties own over 91% of the investor-held SFRs.

Mid-size and institutional investors are entirely absent. Landlords with portfolios of 11 or more properties, including the 1000+ institutional tier, have no footprint in Wallace County, underscoring its hyper-local character.

Due to the lack of recent transactions across all tiers, no meaningful analysis of acquisition pricing by tier is possible. The market's structure is static, with ownership concentrated in the smallest tiers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, with no company crossover point.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly control the Wallace County rental market at every level. Unlike larger urban markets, there is no portfolio size at which companies become the majority owner.

In the largest ownership tier (single-property landlords), individuals own 164 of the 189 properties, an 85.4% share, demonstrating that the entry point for local real estate investing is dominated by private persons.

Company ownership remains a small fraction even as portfolio sizes increase slightly. The highest concentration of company ownership is in the 3-5 property tier, where they hold only 3 properties for a 21.4% share.

The data clearly shows that corporate or LLC-based ownership structures are not a significant factor in this market. The rental landscape is defined by individuals managing small portfolios.

Given the zero-transaction environment, it is not possible to compare acquisition prices or growth patterns between individual and company owners within these tiers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with the 67758 zip code containing 87.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration defines investor activity in Wallace County. A single zip code, 67758, is the epicenter, containing 208 of the 238 investor-owned properties, which is 87.4% of the total.

This same zip code, 67758, also exhibits the highest rate of investor penetration. Investors own 57.5% of the total SFR stock in this area, indicating a strong rental-market focus.

The entire investor portfolio is contained within just three zip codes. After 67758, the 67762 zip code has 21 investor properties (34.4% rate) and 67761 has 9 properties (34.6% rate).

This hyper-local concentration suggests that investment is driven by local knowledge and opportunity, rather than broad, regional strategies. There is no evidence of geographically diversified portfolios within the county.

The data reveals a clear alignment between the areas with the highest count of investor properties and the highest percentage of investor ownership, reinforcing the singular importance of the 67758 zip code to the local rental market.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical buy or sell transactions were recorded, preventing analysis of market dynamics.
Detailed Findings

The historical transaction log for Wallace County landlords is empty, indicating a market with minimal to no turnover. This lack of activity is a primary market characteristic.

Without buy and sell data, it is impossible to calculate a buy/sell ratio to determine the net position of landlords. The market appears to be in a holding pattern, with no significant accumulation or disposition.

Analysis of inter-landlord trading, a key sign of market liquidity, cannot be performed. The data suggests that when properties are acquired, they are held for the long term, with few sales between investors.

Similarly, institutional investor transaction patterns are nonexistent, as they have no presence or activity in the county.

This lack of transactional history in available assessor data points to a highly stable, illiquid rental market where assets are rarely traded.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords had a 0.0% share of market transactions in Q1, reflecting zero buying or selling activity.
Detailed Findings

The first quarter of 2026 was completely static for Wallace County investors, with zero transactions recorded. This resulted in landlords having a 0.0% share of the zero total market transactions.

Transaction volume was zero across all nine investor tiers. This includes single-property landlords, who represent the vast majority of owners but were not active in the market.

With no purchases made, there is no Q1 data on average purchase prices by tier. It's impossible to assess whether different investor sizes employ different pricing strategies in this market.

The lack of sales and purchases also meant that inter-landlord trading was nonexistent. No properties were bought from other landlords, a sign of the market's overall illiquidity.

The transaction data for Q1 confirms the broader theme seen in historical data: Wallace County is a closed, buy-and-hold rental market with extremely infrequent turnover.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Investors Own Over Half of Wallace County's SFRs in a Cash-Only, Zero-Activity Market
Holdings
Landlords own 238 single-family properties in Wallace County, KS, representing a significant 53.0% of the total market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 207 of these homes (87.0%).
Pricing
No pricing comparison between landlords and homeowners is possible, as zero landlord purchases were recorded in Q1 2026 or in the preceding three years.
Activity
The market was completely inactive in Q1 2026, with landlords purchasing zero properties and accounting for 0.0% of all sales. No new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of the investor-owned housing in Wallace County. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes, holding a majority in every tier. There is no crossover point where companies become the primary owners.
Transactions
No buy or sell transactions were recorded for landlords in Q1, making it impossible to determine a net buyer or seller status. The market shows no signs of active trading.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Wallace County, Kansas, is defined by deep investor penetration and extreme illiquidity. Investors own 238 properties, a staggering 53.0% of the county's total SFR stock. This ownership is almost entirely in the hands of small, local players; individual investors own 87.0% of the portfolio, and mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) account for a full 100% of investor-owned homes. Institutional capital has no footprint here.

Investor behavior is characterized by a buy-and-hold strategy financed entirely with cash. All 238 investor-owned properties show zero mortgage financing. This conservative approach is matched by a complete lack of recent market activity. There were zero landlord purchases or sales in Q1 2026, and no recorded acquisitions from 2020-2023. This prevents any analysis of pricing, discounts, or transactional trends, making the absence of activity the central finding.

The key takeaway from these market reports is that Wallace County operates as a closed ecosystem, disconnected from national real estate investing trends. It is a hyper-local market where a high concentration of rental properties are held long-term by debt-free, individual investors. For outside observers, it represents a case study in a stable, non-transactional rental economy, where assets are held for yield rather than appreciation through frequent sales.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:29 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Wallace (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Wallace (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ks-wallace/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.