Hickman (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Hickman (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Hickman (TN)
8,011
Total Investors in Hickman (TN)
2,416
Investor Owned SFR in Hickman (TN)
1,963(24.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,209
SFR Owned
1,762
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
207
SFR Owned
255
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,963 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Hickman County's Rental Market, Controlling 97.7% of Properties
Investors own 1,963 single-family properties in Hickman County, TN, representing 24.5% of the total market. Individual, small-scale landlords are the primary drivers, holding 97.7% of this portfolio, while institutional investors own a minimal 0.2%. In Q1, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a significant 22.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,963 SFR properties in Hickman County, with individuals holding a dominant 89.8% share.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 1,658 paid in cash versus only 305 financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 1,928 properties identified as rented. Individual landlords (2,209) vastly outnumber company landlords (207) by more than 10 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 22.7% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $72,436.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been volatile, ranging from a high of 23.1% in Q2 2025 to a low of 8.8% in Q3 2025. This fluctuation suggests landlords are opportunistic buyers, capitalizing on deals as they arise. Landlord acquisition prices have generally trended upwards from the 2020-2023 average of $270,001.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 29.0% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025, purchasing 20 of the 69 available properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominated acquisition activity, accounting for 90.5% of all investor purchases. The market saw an influx of new investors, with 22 new single-property entities making their first purchase, far outpacing the single property bought by an institutional-scale investor.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 97.7% of all investor-owned single-family homes in Hickman County.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.2% of the investor-held housing stock, or 4 properties total. The market is anchored by single-property landlords, who alone own 1,598 properties, representing 78.6% of the entire investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios larger than 10 properties, despite individuals owning 88.2% of all investor-held homes.
The crossover point occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 95.7% of homes. Below this threshold, individuals are the clear majority, owning 91.1% of single-property portfolios and 62.5% of 6-10 property portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in the 37033 zip code, which holds 663 investor-owned properties, 24.2% of its housing stock.
The highest rate of investor ownership is found in the 38462 zip code, where 50.0% of properties are investor-owned. The top 5 zip codes by investor-owned count contain a combined 1,689 properties, showing significant geographic clustering of rental homes within Hickman County.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Hickman County are strong net buyers, acquiring 27 properties while selling only 8 in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with landlords purchasing 123 properties and selling just 31 in 2025. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) are neutral or divesting, with 1 buy and 1 sell in Q1 2026 after being net sellers in Q2 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 26.5% of all property transactions in Q1, making 27 purchases out of 102 total market sales.
A massive price gap exists between investor tiers, with single-property buyers paying an average of $205,764, while institutional investors paid 44.7% less at $113,700. In Q1, 31.8% of properties purchased by new, single-property landlords were acquired from other investors, indicating a healthy level of inter-landlord trading.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,963 SFR properties in Hickman County, with individuals holding a dominant 89.8% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 24.5% share of the single-family residential market in Hickman County, with a total portfolio of 1,963 properties. This concentration indicates a strong rental and investment presence within the local housing ecosystem of 8,011 total SFR properties.

Individual investors are the backbone of the rental market, owning 1,762 properties, which accounts for 89.8% of all landlord-owned homes. In contrast, company-owned entities hold just 255 properties, or 13.0%, challenging the narrative of corporate dominance in this area.

A clear preference for debt-free ownership is evident, as cash-owned properties (1,658) outnumber financed ones (305) by more than five to one. This suggests a market of financially stable investors who are not heavily leveraged, potentially leading to more stable rental pricing and fewer distressed sales.

The investor portfolio is overwhelmingly focused on generating rental income. Of the 1,963 properties, 1,928 are classified as rented, highlighting the primary strategy of these owners is providing housing for tenants rather than short-term speculation.

The disparity between entity types is stark, with 2,209 individual landlords compared to only 207 company landlords. This 10.7-to-1 ratio reinforces that the market is defined by small, independent operators rather than large-scale corporate entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 22.7% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $72,436.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Hickman County demonstrate a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties in Q1 2026 for an average of $246,429, a full $72,436 less than the $318,865 paid by traditional homeowners. This 22.7% discount signals a sophisticated purchasing strategy, likely focused on off-market deals or properties requiring renovation.

The discount achieved by investors is not static, showing significant quarterly fluctuations throughout the past year. After securing a 23.1% discount in Q2 2025 ($267,833 vs $348,434), the gap narrowed to just 8.8% in Q3 2025 ($339,012 vs $371,673), before widening again. This variability indicates a market where deal availability ebbs and flows.

Despite recent price moderation, acquisition costs for investors remain elevated compared to the pandemic era. The average price during 2020-2023 was $270,001, highlighting a sustained increase in the cost basis for new rental properties entering the market.

The consistent ability of landlords to pay less than retail buyers underscores their role as market makers who often absorb properties that may not appeal to the general public. This can include homes needing significant repairs or those with title or inheritance complexities.

While Q1 2026 prices are down from 2025 peaks, the overall trend points toward long-term appreciation. Investors who purchased between 2020 and 2023 for an average of $270,001 have seen substantial equity gains, even as new acquisition prices remain competitive against the broader market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 29.0% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025, purchasing 20 of the 69 available properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a substantial portion of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 20 of the 69 total SFRs sold, a market share of 29.0%. This high level of activity indicates strong demand for rental housing and continued confidence in the local market.

Small-scale investors were the primary drivers of this activity. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, were responsible for 19 of the 21 investor acquisitions (90.5%). This demonstrates that market growth is fueled by local operators, not large corporations.

The quarter was marked by a significant influx of new entrants. A total of 22 new, single-property landlords entered the market, acquiring 16 properties and representing 76.2% of all investor purchases. This grassroots growth is a key feature of the Hickman County investment landscape.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal impact, acquiring only a single property. This 4.8% share of activity underscores their limited presence and focus compared to the highly active small-investor segment.

The data clearly shows that the new supply of rental properties in Hickman County is overwhelmingly provided by first-time or small-portfolio landlords. This dynamic counters the common perception of large investors dominating housing acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 97.7% of all investor-owned single-family homes in Hickman County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Hickman County is unequivocally dominated by small investors. Landlords with portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 97.7% of all investor-held SFRs, highlighting a deeply fragmented and localized market.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market. This group, Tier 01, owns 1,598 properties, accounting for 78.6% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. This signifies that the majority of landlords are community members with a single rental investment.

Conversely, the presence of institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) is almost nonexistent. This tier controls a mere 4 properties, or 0.2% of the market, which directly contradicts the narrative that large corporations are controlling the local housing supply.

The ownership concentration at the smallest scale is profound. The first two tiers combined, representing landlords with just one or two properties, own 88.7% of the total investor portfolio (1,598 in Tier 01 and 205 in Tier 02).

This distribution reveals a market characterized by grassroots real estate investing. The rental housing supply is provided by a large number of small, independent operators rather than a small number of large, consolidated firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios larger than 10 properties, despite individuals owning 88.2% of all investor-held homes.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors own the vast majority of rental properties overall, a clear structural shift occurs as portfolios grow. Companies become the dominant ownership entity for landlords holding more than 10 properties, signaling a transition from personal investment to a formal business structure.

The tipping point is the small-medium tier of 11-20 properties, where company ownership skyrockets to 95.7% (22 properties). This contrasts sharply with the 6-10 property tier, where individuals still own a 62.5% majority.

Individual ownership is most concentrated at the entry level of the market. Investors with a single property are 91.1% individual-owned (1,485 properties), and those with two properties are 88.2% individual-owned (186 properties).

Even in the 101-1,000 property tier, which is 82.4% company-owned (14 properties), individuals still maintain a presence with 3 properties (17.6%). This indicates that some high-net-worth individuals continue to hold assets in their own name rather than through an LLC or corporation.

This data illustrates a typical investor lifecycle: individuals enter the market and dominate smaller portfolios, but as their holdings scale, they increasingly adopt corporate structures for liability protection and operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in the 37033 zip code, which holds 663 investor-owned properties, 24.2% of its housing stock.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Hickman County is not evenly distributed, with significant concentration in a few key zip codes. The 37033 area leads by sheer volume, with 663 investor-owned SFRs, representing a 24.2% ownership rate within that community.

While 37033 has the highest count, smaller zip codes exhibit the highest penetration rates. For instance, in 38462 and 38461, investors own 50.0% and 47.4% of the housing stock, respectively, indicating these areas are predominantly rental markets.

There is a clear distinction between the leaders in total property count and ownership percentage. The areas with the highest counts, like 37033, 37098 (374 properties), and 37025 (329 properties), have ownership rates in the 20-25% range. This differs from smaller markets like 38462 where the rate is much higher but the total number of homes is lower.

The top five zip codes by property count (37033, 37098, 37025, 37137, and one other) collectively account for a majority of investor activity, showing where rental demand and investment opportunities are perceived to be strongest.

This geographic clustering suggests that investors target specific neighborhoods, likely driven by factors such as school districts, affordability, and proximity to employment centers. Understanding these micro-markets is key to analyzing investment strategy in Hickman County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Hickman County are strong net buyers, acquiring 27 properties while selling only 8 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

The overwhelming trend among all landlords in Hickman County is portfolio growth. In Q1 2026, investors were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 27 properties while only selling 8. This buy-to-sell ratio of 3.38 to 1 indicates strong confidence in the market's future.

This pattern of accumulation has been consistent over the past year. In 2025, landlords purchased 123 properties and sold only 31, and in 2024 they bought 111 while selling 26. This sustained net-positive activity demonstrates a long-term strategy of building rental portfolios.

Institutional investors (1,000+ tier) exhibit a starkly different behavior. In Q1 2026, their activity was flat, with one purchase and one sale. This follows a period in Q2 2025 where they were net sellers (2 buys vs 3 sells), suggesting a strategy of portfolio trimming or a complete pause on expansion in this market.

The divergence between the broader landlord market and the institutional segment is significant. While thousands of small investors are actively growing their holdings, the largest players are either inactive or reducing their exposure, reinforcing the theme of a market driven by local operators.

The continuous net buying from the mom-and-pop segment provides liquidity and absorbs housing supply, while the inactivity from institutions suggests this market does not meet the specific buy-box criteria for large-scale capital deployment.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 26.5% of all property transactions in Q1, making 27 purchases out of 102 total market sales.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a crucial role in market activity during Q1, participating in 26.5% of all transactions. Their 27 purchases out of a total of 102 home sales demonstrate that landlords are a consistent and vital source of demand in the Hickman County housing market.

Transaction activity was heavily concentrated among the smallest investors. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were involved in 22 of the 27 investor transactions, showing that market dynamism is driven by new entrants and those with small portfolios.

A dramatic pricing disparity exists between investor tiers, revealing different acquisition strategies. Single-property buyers paid the most at an average of $205,764, likely for rent-ready homes. In contrast, the institutional tier paid just $113,700, a 44.7% discount, suggesting they target distressed or value-add properties that smaller investors avoid.

There is a notable level of trading between investors, especially at the entry level. Nearly a third (31.8%) of homes bought by new single-property landlords were purchased from existing landlords. This indicates a liquid market where investors can efficiently exit positions and new capital can be deployed.

The data shows that while mom-and-pop investors are the most active buyers, institutional players are focused on deep-discount acquisitions. This bifurcation in strategy shapes the types of properties each tier acquires and the prices they are willing to pay.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors command 97.7% of Hickman County's rental market as institutions remain on the sidelines.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,963 single-family homes in Hickman County, TN, representing 24.5% of the market, with individual investors overwhelmingly holding 89.8% of these properties (1,762 homes) compared to 13.0% for companies (255 homes).
Pricing
In Q1, landlords secured properties for 22.7% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $72,436 per property ($246,429 vs. $318,865).
Activity
Investors purchased 29.0% of all homes sold in the latest quarter, an expansion driven by small operators as 22 new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with a 97.7% ownership share, while large institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties and larger, marking a clear shift to corporate structures as holdings scale.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 3.38-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 (27 buys vs. 8 sells), while institutional investors were neutral, with one purchase and one sale.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Hickman County, TN is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors. Landlords own 1,963 homes, which constitutes 24.5% of the total single-family housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 97.7% of all investor-held properties. In sharp contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.2%. Ownership is primarily personal, with individual investors holding 89.8% of the rental properties compared to 13.0% for corporate entities.

Investor behavior in Hickman County is characterized by aggressive acquisition and savvy pricing. In the most recent quarter, landlords purchased 29.0% of all homes sold, demonstrating their significant role in market liquidity. These investors consistently secure properties at a discount, paying 22.7% less than traditional homeowners in Q1. Transaction data reveals that landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 3.38 times more properties than they sold. This expansion is driven almost exclusively by new and small-scale investors, as 22 new single-property landlords entered the market while large institutional players remained neutral or inactive.

The key takeaway for the Hickman County housing market is its resilience and localized nature, driven by community-level investment rather than large-scale corporate capital. The dominance of mom-and-pop landlords suggests a stable rental market less susceptible to the sudden strategy shifts of national corporations. While this provides stability, the high concentration of investor ownership in certain zip codes, reaching up to 50.0%, highlights a significant portion of the housing supply dedicated to rentals, impacting availability for traditional homebuyers.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:47 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Hickman (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Hickman (TN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tn-hickman/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.