Chenango (NY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Chenango (NY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Chenango (NY)
11,425
Total Investors in Chenango (NY)
2,699
Investor Owned SFR in Chenango (NY)
2,261(19.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,484
SFR Owned
2,062
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
215
SFR Owned
229
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,261 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Chenango County, Controlling 98.8% of Investor Properties
Investors own 2,261 SFR properties in Chenango County, representing 19.8% of the total market, with small landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 98.8% share. In Q1, landlords secured properties at a 29.1% discount compared to homeowners and acted as aggressive net buyers, acquiring 16 properties while only selling 3.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,261 SFRs in Chenango County, with individuals holding a 91.2% majority.
Investor portfolios are heavily weighted towards cash ownership, with 1,715 properties owned outright versus 546 that are financed. Of the 2,699 total landlords, 2,484 (92.0%) are individuals, reinforcing the market's mom-and-pop character.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 29.1% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $60,334 per property.
The pricing dynamic has been highly volatile, as this quarter's deep discount reverses a trend from 2025, where landlords paid premiums of 13.2% in Q3 and 7.5% in Q1. The average landlord acquisition price has risen from $121,972 in the 2020-2023 period to $147,000 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 42.9% of all SFR purchases in the most recent quarter, buying 15 homes.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of these purchases. Activity was driven by new entrants, with 13 of the 15 properties (86.7%) purchased by single-property landlords.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 91.1% of all investor-owned housing in the county. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, owning just 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 58.8% of homes.
Despite this crossover, individuals dominate the overall market, owning 91.8% of single-property portfolios and 88.0% of two-property portfolios. Companies hold a total of 229 properties compared to 2,062 for individuals.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 13460 zip code holding 221 investor-owned properties.
Several zip codes exhibit extremely high investor penetration, including 13072 (36.7%), 13124 (34.8%), and 13801 (31.3%). The top three zip codes by count (13460, 13801, 13780) are also among the leaders in ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 16 properties while selling only 3 in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation is consistent over time, with landlords maintaining a high net-buyer status throughout 2025 (260 buys vs. 32 sells) and 2024 (281 buys vs. 28 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transaction activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 42.1% of all Q1 market transactions, totaling 16 property acquisitions.
New, single-property landlords drove this activity with 14 transactions, but they paid the highest average price at $155,571. These new investors rarely purchased from other landlords, with only 7.1% of their deals being inter-landlord trades.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,261 SFRs in Chenango County, with individuals holding a 91.2% majority.
Detailed Findings

In Chenango County, investors hold a significant 19.8% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market, totaling 2,261 properties. This highlights a substantial rental and investment presence within the county's housing stock of 11,425 SFRs.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 2,062 properties, accounting for 91.2% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 229 properties (10.1%) held by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the landlord entity count, where 2,484 of the 2,699 total landlords (92.0%) are individuals. This points to a highly fragmented market composed of many small-scale operators.

A key financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash transactions. Investors own 1,715 properties outright, more than triple the 546 properties that are financed. This suggests a market with low leverage and investors who have significant capital.

The portfolio is almost entirely composed of rental properties, with 2,248 designated as rented. This demonstrates that the overwhelming majority of investor-owned homes in the area are actively contributing to the rental supply.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 29.1% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $60,334 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, acquiring properties for an average price of $147,000. This was a substantial 29.1% less than the $207,334 average paid by traditional homeowners, representing a $60,334 discount per transaction.

This pricing advantage marks a dramatic reversal from the previous year. In 2025, investors frequently paid more than homeowners, including a 13.2% premium in Q3 ($199,792 vs. $176,564) and a 7.5% premium in Q1 ($160,344 vs. $149,123). The shift to a deep discount suggests changing market conditions or more strategic acquisitions.

The long-term price trend shows significant appreciation in the market. The average acquisition price of $147,000 in Q1 2026 is 20.5% higher than the average of $121,972 during the 2020-2023 pandemic-era boom.

The quarter-over-quarter price gap is highly volatile, swinging from a $23,228 landlord premium in Q3 2025 to a $60,334 landlord discount in Q1 2026. This indicates that investor buying behavior is not static and adapts quickly to market opportunities.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 42.9% of all SFR purchases in the most recent quarter, buying 15 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was a powerful force in the Chenango County market during the last quarter, with landlords acquiring 15 of the 35 total SFRs sold, a market share of 42.9%.

The market's growth is exclusively fueled by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100% of investor purchases, with zero activity recorded from institutional buyers (Tier 09).

New landlords are the primary drivers of acquisition activity. The single-property tier alone purchased 13 homes, representing 86.7% of all investor buying. These purchases were made by 14 distinct entities, signaling a fresh wave of first-time investors entering the market.

Mid-size and large investors were completely absent from the purchasing landscape this quarter. The remaining activity came from an investor buying their second property and another acquiring a property for their 3-5 unit portfolio.

This concentration of activity at the smallest end of the investor spectrum underscores the grassroots nature of the Chenango County rental market, where growth comes from local, small-scale participants rather than large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Chenango County is definitively controlled by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, hold 98.8% of all investor-owned SFRs, refuting any narrative of corporate dominance.

The market structure is highly granular, with the single-property tier (Tier 01) being the largest segment by a wide margin. These 2,077 properties make up 91.1% of the entire investor portfolio, highlighting the importance of first-time and small landlords.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) have a very limited footprint, collectively owning just 26 properties, or 1.1% of the total investor-owned stock.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have virtually no presence in the county. Their share of the market rounds to 0.0%, with only a single property attributed to this tier.

This distribution reveals a market built on a foundation of thousands of individual investment decisions rather than a centralized, corporate strategy, which has major implications for rental market stability and local economic impact.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 58.8% of homes.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the Chenango County market overall, a clear shift occurs as portfolios grow. Companies become the majority property holders within the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), owning 10 properties (58.8%) compared to 7 for individuals.

At the smallest end of the market, individual ownership is nearly absolute. Individuals own 1,931 (91.8%) of single-property landlord homes and 81 (88.0%) of two-property portfolios. This indicates that most investors enter the market as individuals before incorporating.

The transition to a corporate structure happens at a relatively small scale. This suggests that even landlords with modest portfolios see value in incorporating for liability or financial reasons once they surpass five properties.

Even in larger tiers where companies are present, individuals maintain a foothold. For instance, in the 101-1,000 property tier, ownership is split 50/50 between an individual and a company, each holding one property.

Overall, the vast majority of investor-owned properties, 2,062 of 2,261, belong to individuals. This reinforces that the day-to-day reality of the rental market is shaped by personal owners, not faceless corporations.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 13460 zip code holding 221 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Real estate investor activity in Chenango County is not evenly distributed but is instead concentrated in specific zip codes. The zip code 13460 is the epicenter of investment, with 221 landlord-owned SFRs, representing a 23.5% ownership rate.

Following 13460, other key areas for investor ownership by count include 13801 (100 properties) and 13780 (82 properties), demonstrating a clear geographic focus for acquisitions.

When measured by ownership rate, some areas show even higher investor saturation. The zip code 13072 leads with a 36.7% investor ownership rate, meaning more than one in three SFRs are investor-owned. Other high-penetration areas include 13124 (34.8%) and 13801 (31.3%).

There is a strong correlation between the areas with the highest count of investor properties and those with the highest percentage. The zip codes 13801 and 13780 appear in the top three for both metrics, indicating these are mature and desirable markets for landlords.

This geographic clustering suggests that investors target specific neighborhoods, likely driven by factors like rental demand, property values, and local economic conditions, creating pockets of high rental density within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 16 properties while selling only 3 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Chenango County are in a phase of strong portfolio growth, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, landlords were decisive net buyers, with 16 acquisitions against only 3 dispositions.

This pattern of accumulation is not new. Throughout 2025, investors purchased 260 SFRs while selling only 32, a buy-to-sell ratio of more than 8-to-1. The trend was similar in 2024, with 281 buys and 28 sells, a 10-to-1 ratio.

The sustained, high-volume net buying activity indicates strong confidence in the local rental market. Landlords are actively expanding their holdings rather than liquidating assets, signaling expectations of positive returns.

The transaction data shows no activity from institutional investors (1,000+ tier), meaning all recorded buying and selling is being driven by mom-and-pop and mid-size landlords.

The high velocity of acquisitions, especially compared to the low number of sales, is a primary driver of the increasing investor market share in the county.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 42.1% of all Q1 market transactions, totaling 16 property acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were a major force in the market, participating in 16 of the 38 total SFR transactions for a 42.1% share of all activity.

Transaction volume was heavily concentrated among new and small investors. The single-property tier (Tier 01) alone accounted for 14 of the 16 landlord transactions, demonstrating that market entry is robust.

Interestingly, the most active buyers paid the highest prices. New landlords in Tier 01 paid an average of $155,571 per property, significantly more than the $75,000 paid by the Tier 02 buyer and the $99,000 paid by the Tier 03 buyer. This may suggest new entrants are paying a premium to secure their first property.

The data reveals very little churn within the existing investor community. Of the 14 properties purchased by new landlords, only one (7.1%) was bought from another landlord, indicating they are primarily acquiring homes from the traditional homeowner market.

With zero transactions recorded for institutional investors, the Q1 activity confirms that the transactional market in Chenango County is exclusively a mom-and-pop phenomenon, driven by the ambitions of small-scale entrepreneurs.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command Chenango County, Owning 98.8% of Investor SFRs and Driving 42% of Market Activity
Holdings
Landlords own 2,261 Single-Family Residential properties in Chenango County, representing 19.8% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (91.2%) compared to companies (10.1%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $147,000, a significant 29.1% discount compared to the $207,334 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Investors accounted for 42.9% of all purchases in the most recent quarter, with activity dominated by new entrants as 13 single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
The market is defined by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.8% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors own the vast majority of properties, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios sized at 6-10 properties, indicating a shift to formal structures as holdings grow.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 16 properties while selling only 3 in Q1 2026. Institutional investors were completely inactive, recording zero buys or sells.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Chenango County, NY, is fundamentally a story of small, independent operators. Investors own 2,261 Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes 19.8% of the county's total SFR market. This portfolio is not controlled by Wall Street, but by local individuals, who own 91.2% of these homes. The market structure is highly granular, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) commanding an overwhelming 98.8% share, while institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have a negligible 0.0% presence. This data paints a clear picture of a rental market built by and for the community, not by large-scale corporations.

Investor behavior in the county is characterized by aggressive acquisition and savvy pricing. In the most recent quarter, landlords were involved in 42.1% of all market transactions, acting as decisive net buyers with 16 purchases versus only 3 sales. This continues a long-term trend of portfolio accumulation. Financially, they demonstrated significant market power in Q1, securing properties for 29.1% less than traditional homeowners, a discount of $60,334 per home. This activity is fueled by a continuous stream of new entrants; 13 first-time landlords bought a property this quarter, underscoring the market's grassroots dynamism.

The key takeaway for the Chenango County housing market is that real estate investing is a localized, small-scale phenomenon. The market's health and trajectory are tied to the financial decisions of thousands of individual owners, not a few corporate boardrooms. This structure suggests a rental supply that is responsive to local conditions but also highly fragmented. The consistent influx of new landlords and their ability to acquire properties at a discount indicates a competitive and opportunity-rich environment for those looking to enter the rental market. This market's future will be shaped by the continued success and growth of these mom-and-pop investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 12:11 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Chenango (NY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Chenango (NY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ny-chenango/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.