Licking (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Licking (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Licking (OH)
55,370
Total Investors in Licking (OH)
5,940
Investor Owned SFR in Licking (OH)
6,057(10.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,907
SFR Owned
4,055
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,033
SFR Owned
2,108
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 6,057 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Licking County with 87% Ownership as Institutions Retreat
Investors own 6,057 SFR properties in Licking County (10.9% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a commanding 86.9% versus a mere 5.8% for institutional firms. In Q1, landlords purchased 20.6% of all homes sold while securing a 5.8% price discount compared to homeowners. This activity is driven by small investors, as institutions have become net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 6,057 properties in Licking County, with individuals holding a 66.9% majority.
Investors hold more than twice as many properties in cash (4,124) as with financing (1,933). The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 96.1% of investor-owned properties identified as rentals (5,821 of 6,057).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Licking County landlords paid 5.8% less than homeowners in Q1, a $20,686 discount.
The 5.8% Q1 discount has narrowed significantly from the 23.6% discount seen in Q2 and Q3 of 2025. Landlord acquisition prices have shown strong appreciation, rising from an average of $250,119 in 2024 to $333,544 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 21.8% of all SFR properties sold in Licking County last quarter.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 84.5% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero acquisitions, showing a complete absence from the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a dominant 86.9% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold just 5.8% of the investor-owned housing stock. Q1 transaction data shows single-property landlords paid some of the highest average prices among active investors, and institutions are not currently acquiring more properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Pricing data by individual versus company owner type is not available for Licking County.
Companies become the majority property owners starting in the 6-10 property tier, where they control 73.8% of assets. Recent growth is dominated by individuals, who make up most of the new, single-property landlord entrants.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Licking County is heavily concentrated in Newark's 43055 zip code, with 2,743 properties.
The highest investor penetration rate is in Buckeye Lake (43008) at 38.9%. This contrasts with Newark (43055), which has the highest raw count but a more moderate 14.8% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Licking County landlords are strong net buyers, while institutional investors are divesting.
In Q1 2026, the overall landlord community bought 3.6 properties for every one they sold. In contrast, institutional investors were net sellers in 2025, selling 10 properties while only buying 8.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 20.6% of all Q1 transactions, purchasing 137 properties.
Institutional investors made zero purchases, so a price comparison is not possible. New mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01) paid a high average price of $342,374, while investors in the 3-5 property tier were most likely to buy from other landlords (28.6% of their deals).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 6,057 properties in Licking County, with individuals holding a 66.9% majority.
Detailed Findings

In Licking County, investors own 6,057 single-family residential properties, accounting for 10.9% of the total 55,370 SFRs. This indicates a significant, but not dominant, investor presence in the local housing market.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individual investors. Individuals own 4,055 properties (66.9%), while companies own 2,108 (34.8%). This pattern extends to the entity level, with 4,907 individual landlords compared to 1,033 company landlords.

Cash is the preferred financing method for investors in this market. Portfolios contain 4,124 properties owned outright versus 1,933 that are financed, a ratio of more than two-to-one. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base less reliant on leverage.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals. Of the 6,057 investor-owned homes, 5,821 are rented, representing a 96.1% rental concentration. This underscores the focus on generating rental income rather than short-term flipping or other strategies.

On average, company landlords have larger portfolios than individuals. With 2,108 properties distributed among 1,033 entities, the average company owns approximately 2.0 properties, compared to the much smaller portfolios held by the 4,907 individual landlords who own 4,055 properties.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Licking County landlords paid 5.8% less than homeowners in Q1, a $20,686 discount.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $333,544. This was 5.8% less than the $354,230 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a substantial discount of $20,686 per property.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners is narrowing sharply, signaling increased market competition. The Q1 2026 discount of 5.8% is a fraction of the massive 23.6% discount investors enjoyed in Q2 and Q3 of 2025 and the 27.8% gap in Q1 2025.

Investor acquisition prices are on a steep upward trajectory. The average price paid by landlords has climbed from $250,119 in 2024 to $295,632 in 2025, and has now reached $333,544 in the first quarter of 2026, reflecting strong market appreciation.

The shrinking discount suggests that investors are having to compete more aggressively for a limited supply of inventory. The significant price advantages seen in 2025 have eroded as the market has tightened.

This trend highlights the dynamic nature of real estate investing, where market conditions can rapidly alter the profitability and strategy required for successful acquisitions. Investors who previously relied on deep discounts may need to adjust their tactics.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 21.8% of all SFR properties sold in Licking County last quarter.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were a significant force in the market, purchasing 100 of the 458 available SFR properties. This represents a 21.8% market share of all purchases for the quarter.

The acquisition activity was overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, were responsible for 87 of the 100 investor purchases, or 84.5% of the total.

A notable influx of new investors entered the market. The single-property tier saw 100 new entities acquire 70 properties, highlighting the area's appeal to first-time landlords and those just beginning to build a portfolio.

Institutional investors were entirely absent from the purchasing landscape. The 1,000+ property tier recorded zero acquisitions in Q4, indicating that large-scale capital was not a factor in the recent market activity.

This distribution of purchasing power, concentrated among new and small landlords, paints a picture of a decentralized and growing grassroots investor community in Licking County, rather than one consolidated by large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a dominant 86.9% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Licking County is defined by small, independent operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) collectively own 86.9% of all investor-held SFRs, demonstrating a highly fragmented market structure.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market. This tier alone accounts for 3,727 properties, representing 59.7% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. This highlights the critical role of first-time and small-scale investors.

In sharp contrast, the institutional footprint is minimal. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier own just 360 homes, a 5.8% share of the investor market. This finding challenges the narrative of large corporate landlords dominating the local housing supply.

Mid-size investors, who own between 11 and 1,000 properties, hold the remaining 7.3% of the rental stock. Their limited share further emphasizes the market's concentration at the smallest end of the investor scale.

This distribution reveals that the local rental market's stability and character are primarily shaped by thousands of individual and small-scale business decisions, not the strategies of a few large firms. Such detailed analysis is often compiled using comprehensive assessor data.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Pricing data by individual versus company owner type is not available for Licking County.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point exists where companies become the dominant owners. While individuals control the majority of properties in smaller portfolios, companies take over at the 6-10 property tier, owning 225 of 305 properties (73.8%).

Company ownership share increases dramatically with portfolio size. This trend is stark in the 21-50 property tier, where companies control 123 of 125 properties, a near-total 98.4% share.

Individual landlords are most concentrated at the entry level of the market. They own 83.7% of all single-property rentals and 62.8% of two-property portfolios, affirming their role as the primary driver of market entry.

This data suggests a common investor lifecycle. Many start as individuals for their first few properties and then incorporate into an LLC or other business entity as their portfolio grows, typically after reaching five properties.

The market structure is thus characterized by a clear division: individual ownership prevails at the small end, while corporate structures are the standard for mid-to-large portfolios in Licking County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Licking County is heavily concentrated in Newark's 43055 zip code, with 2,743 properties.
Detailed Findings

The zip code 43055 in Newark stands out as the epicenter of investor ownership by sheer volume. It contains 2,743 investor-owned SFRs, which accounts for 45.3% of the entire county's investor portfolio.

However, the highest concentration rate is found elsewhere. In Buckeye Lake (43008), investors own 38.9% of the SFR housing stock, indicating a much higher saturation of rental properties in that specific market.

The areas with the most investor properties are not always the ones with the highest ownership rates. For example, Pataskala (43062) has the county's second-highest count of investor properties (724), but its investor ownership rate is a relatively low 7.1%.

Following Newark, other key areas for investor activity by count include Pataskala (724 properties), Johnstown (412 properties), and another Newark zip code, 43056 (409 properties).

This geographic analysis reveals distinct investment patterns. Some areas attract a high volume of investors due to larger housing stocks, while smaller markets like Buckeye Lake and Etna (20.7% rate) show a much deeper level of investor penetration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Licking County landlords are strong net buyers, while institutional investors are divesting.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Licking County are aggressively expanding their portfolios. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated a strong net buyer position, acquiring 137 properties while selling only 38. This represents a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.6 to 1.

This trend of accumulation is consistent over time. In 2025, landlords were net buyers of 319 properties (500 buys vs. 181 sells), and in 2024, they added a net 329 properties (506 buys vs. 177 sells).

In a significant divergence, institutional investors (1,000+ tier) have shifted to a net selling strategy. During 2025, this cohort sold 10 properties but only acquired 8, marking a retreat from the market. This reverses their net buyer position from 2024.

The data reveals a clear market dynamic: smaller, local investors are actively acquiring properties and building their holdings, while the largest national players are reducing their exposure in Licking County.

This suggests that growth in the local rental market is being fueled from the bottom up, with confidence high among the mom-and-pop segment even as institutional capital pulls back.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 20.6% of all Q1 transactions, purchasing 137 properties.
Detailed Findings

During Q1 2026, investors were a key segment of the market, accounting for 20.6% of all SFR transactions by purchasing 137 of the 664 homes sold. This activity was driven entirely by small and mid-size landlords.

New landlords entering the market paid a premium. Single-property investors (Tier 01) recorded an average purchase price of $342,374, significantly higher than the prices paid by more established small landlords in the 2-10 property tiers, which ranged from $86,667 to $148,860.

Inter-landlord trading is an active part of the market, especially among smaller investors. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier sourced 28.6% of their acquisitions from other investors, indicating a liquid market for existing rental properties.

Activity was concentrated at the bottom of the market. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 118 of the 137 landlord transactions (86.1%), while institutional investors made zero purchases.

A massive price disparity exists across tiers, reflecting different investment strategies. The Large tier (101-1000 properties) paid $630,000 for a single asset, while the Two-property tier averaged just $86,667, suggesting a focus on different property types or locations.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Licking County with 87% Ownership as Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Holdings
Landlords own 6,057 SFR properties in Licking County, representing 10.9% of the market. Individual investors hold a 66.9% majority (4,055 properties), with companies owning the remaining 33.1% (2,108 properties).
Pricing
In Q1, landlords paid an average of $333,544, securing a 5.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners ($354,230), a savings of $20,686 per property.
Activity
Landlords acquired 20.6% of all properties sold in Q1 (137 purchases). The market saw an influx of small investors, with 100 new single-property landlord entities entering in the last quarter.
Market Share
The investor market is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 86.9% of investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 5.8% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command the small-portfolio segment, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios starting at the 6-10 property tier, where they control 73.8% of assets.
Transactions
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers with a 3.6-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 (137 buys vs. 38 sells). Conversely, institutional investors have shifted to net sellers, divesting more properties than they acquired in 2025.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Licking County, OH, is defined by the dominance of small, independent investors. Landlords own 6,057 SFRs, 10.9% of the county's total housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold 86.9% of all investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, large institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, owning just 5.8%. Ownership is also primarily in the hands of individuals (66.9%) rather than companies (33.1%), reinforcing the grassroots nature of the local rental market.

Investor behavior underscores this trend. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 20.6% of all homes sold, acquiring properties at a 5.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity is fueled by an influx of new entrants, with 100 new single-property landlords joining the market in the last quarter. While the broader investor community remains in a strong accumulation phase, buying 3.6 properties for every one sold, institutional players are moving in the opposite direction. They were net sellers in 2025, signaling a strategic retreat from the market.

The key takeaway from these Investor Pulse reports is that the Licking County rental market is not a story of Wall Street consolidation, but one of local entrepreneurial activity. The growth engine is the small, mom-and-pop investor who is actively buying, even as the largest firms divest. This dynamic suggests a resilient and decentralized market where opportunities are being seized by local players, shaping the future of housing in communities like Newark, Pataskala, and Buckeye Lake.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 12:45 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Licking (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Licking (OH) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-oh-licking/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.