Evans (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Evans (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Evans (GA)
2,699
Total Investors in Evans (GA)
993
Investor Owned SFR in Evans (GA)
938(34.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
924
SFR Owned
836
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
69
SFR Owned
105
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 938 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Evans County, Owning 34.8% of SFRs and Acquiring Properties at Deep Discounts
Investors own 938 Single-Family Residential properties in Evans County, representing a significant 34.8% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among 'mom-and-pop' landlords (97.7%), with individuals holding 89.1% of the portfolio. In the most recent quarter, these investors captured 37.5% of all home sales, paying a staggering 82.4% less than traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 938 properties, 34.8% of Evans County's SFR market, with individuals holding 89.1%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 820 paid in cash versus only 118 financed. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 916 of 938 properties (97.7%) classified as non-owner-occupied. There are 924 individual landlords compared to just 69 company landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 82.4% less than homeowners, a massive $1,174,325 average discount.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been consistently large, ranging from 36.7% to 75.8% in the preceding three quarters before widening dramatically. Average landlord acquisition prices have risen from $161,474 during 2020-2023 to $250,675 in Q1 2026, signaling significant market appreciation.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 37.5% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter.
All (100.0%) of the landlord purchases were made by mom-and-pop investors, specifically those in the single-property tier. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions. These purchases were made by 4 new entities, signaling fresh capital entering the market at the smallest scale.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 97.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero ownership presence in Evans County. The market is highly concentrated at the lowest tier, with single-property landlords alone holding 728 properties, a 77.0% share of all investor-owned housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 11 or more properties.
While individuals dominate smaller tiers, owning 94.9% of single-property portfolios, companies control 90.9% of portfolios in the 11-20 property range. This clear crossover point highlights different scaling strategies between owner types.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Evans County is hyper-concentrated, with 99.7% located in one zip code: 30417.
The 30417 zip code contains 935 of the 938 total investor-owned properties in the county and has an investor ownership rate of 34.8%. Another zip code, 30452, has a higher rate of 40.0% but on a tiny base of just two properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.8 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
In 2025, landlords purchased 41 properties while selling only 6, resulting in a net gain of 35 homes. This follows a similar trend from 2024, where they bought 45 and sold 3. In contrast, institutional investors were neutral, with one purchase and one sale in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 44.4% of all SFR transactions in the first quarter of 2026.
All (100%) of this transaction activity was driven by single-property investors, who paid an average of $250,675. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, indicating these new investors are acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 938 properties, 34.8% of Evans County's SFR market, with individuals holding 89.1%.
Detailed Findings

In Evans County, real estate investing is a significant force, with landlords controlling 938 Single-Family Residential properties. This constitutes a substantial 34.8% of the 2,699 total SFRs in the market, indicating a high level of investor penetration.

Ownership is heavily skewed towards individual investors, who own 836 properties, or 89.1% of the investor-held portfolio. Companies own the remaining 105 properties, accounting for just 11.2%. This structure underscores a market dominated by smaller, private landlords rather than large corporations.

The entity count further reinforces this pattern, with 924 individual landlords compared to only 69 companies. This nearly 13-to-1 ratio of individual-to-company entities highlights the granular, small-scale nature of real estate investment in the county.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash purchases. A remarkable 820 properties (87.4%) are owned outright, with only 118 (12.6%) carrying a mortgage. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio's purpose is clear, with 916 of the 938 properties (97.7%) being non-owner-occupied. This near-total focus on rental units confirms that the primary strategy for investors in Evans County is generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 82.4% less than homeowners, a massive $1,174,325 average discount.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic pricing disparity defines the Evans County market. In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties for an average of $250,675, while traditional homeowners paid an average of $1,425,000. This represents an extraordinary $1,174,325 discount per property, or 82.4% less, suggesting investors are targeting a completely different segment of the market or that a low number of high-value sales skewed the homeowner average.

This significant discount is not an anomaly, though its magnitude in Q1 2026 is an outlier. The gap has been substantial in previous quarters, with landlords securing discounts of 64.1% in Q3 2025, 36.7% in Q2 2025, and 75.8% in Q1 2025. This persistent trend highlights investors' ability to identify and purchase lower-priced properties.

Despite acquiring properties at a discount relative to homeowners, the overall cost for investors is rising. The average acquisition price has climbed steadily from a 2020-2023 average of $161,474 to $234,894 in 2024, and now $250,675 in the first quarter of 2026.

The data does not contain a split between individual and company prices, but the overall market trend points towards consistent price appreciation for investor-acquired assets over the past several years.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 37.5% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the market in the latest quarter, with landlords purchasing 3 of the 8 total SFRs sold, a market share of 37.5%. This demonstrates continued strong demand from the investor segment in Evans County.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from the smallest investors. All 3 properties were acquired by landlords in the 'single-property' tier, meaning these were either first-time investors or existing landlords adding a single property to a new entity. This highlights that market growth is driven from the ground up.

Consequently, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) represented 100.0% of all investor buying activity, while institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made no purchases. This reinforces the local, small-scale character of the investor landscape.

The data reveals that 4 distinct entities were responsible for the 3 purchases in the single-property tier. This indicates some properties may have been co-purchased and shows that new entrants are the primary drivers of current investor acquisition activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 97.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Evans County is dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a combined 97.7% of all investor-owned SFRs. This concentration at the smaller end of the spectrum is a defining feature of the local market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no footprint in the county, holding 0.0% of the investor-owned housing stock. This market operates entirely without the presence of large, corporate landlords.

The concentration is most pronounced in the very first tier. Single-property landlords alone own 728 properties, which accounts for 77.0% of the entire investor portfolio. This underscores the importance of first-time and small-scale investors as the backbone of the rental market.

Mid-size landlords are also a minor segment. Investors owning 11-100 properties collectively hold only 1.3% of the portfolio, further emphasizing the market's reliance on smaller operators.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 11 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the Evans County market overall, ownership strategy shifts decisively as portfolio sizes grow. Companies become the majority owners at the small-medium tier of 11-20 properties, controlling 10 of the 11 properties (90.9%) in that bracket.

This crossover point from individual to corporate dominance occurs sharply above the 10-property mark. In the 6-10 property tier, individuals still hold a slight majority at 53.3%, but this flips dramatically in the next tier up, indicating a strategic shift to corporate structures for liability and management purposes as portfolios scale.

At the smallest end of the market, individual ownership is nearly absolute. In the single-property tier, individuals own 693 of the 728 properties (94.9%). This figure decreases slightly to 84.7% for two-property portfolios and 76.6% for 3-5 property portfolios.

The provided property datasets do not include pricing information broken down by owner type within each tier, but the structural data clearly shows individuals building initial portfolios and companies taking over for larger-scale operations.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Evans County is hyper-concentrated, with 99.7% located in one zip code: 30417.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in Evans County is extremely concentrated. A single zip code, 30417, is home to 935 of the 938 investor properties, representing 99.7% of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

This overwhelming concentration in 30417, which has an investor ownership rate of 34.8%, makes it the undisputed center of real estate investment activity for the region. All other areas have negligible investor presence by comparison.

While the 30452 zip code technically has the highest investor ownership rate at 40.0%, this is based on a statistically insignificant sample of just 2 investor properties out of 5 total SFRs. Similarly, 30420 shows a 16.7% rate from just one investor-owned home.

The data clearly indicates that when analyzing investor trends in Evans County, the focus should be almost exclusively on the dynamics within the 30417 zip code, as it effectively represents the entire investor market.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.8 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a clear trend of portfolio growth among landlords in Evans County. They are consistent net buyers, significantly increasing their holdings over the past two years. In 2025, investors acquired 41 properties and sold only 6, a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 7-to-1.

This aggressive accumulation follows a similar pattern from the prior year. In 2024, the activity was even more skewed towards acquisition, with 45 purchases against just 3 sales, a 15-to-1 ratio. This sustained net buying demonstrates strong confidence in the local rental market.

Quarterly data from 2025 shows this trend holding steady throughout the year, with 12 buys and 1 sale in Q3 and 13 buys versus 2 sales in Q2. Landlords are consistently adding to their portfolios rather than churning assets.

In contrast to the broader market, institutional-level (1,000+ property) transaction activity was neutral in 2025, with one purchase and one sale. This lack of net acquisition aligns with their zero-property footprint in the county's current holdings.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 44.4% of all SFR transactions in the first quarter of 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords played a major role in market liquidity, participating in 4 out of the 9 total SFR transactions, a share of 44.4%. This high level of participation underscores their importance in the local real estate ecosystem.

All of this activity originated from the smallest investor tier. The 4 transactions were all conducted by single-property landlords, reinforcing the theme that market growth and activity are driven by new and small-scale participants.

The average purchase price for these Tier 01 investors was $250,675. With no activity from any other tiers, there is no price spread to analyze, but this figure aligns with the significant discount landlords achieve compared to the general market.

A crucial finding is the source of these properties. None of the 4 properties purchased by investors came from other landlords (0% inter-landlord). This means 100% of new inventory for investors is being acquired from the traditional market, likely from homeowners, converting owner-occupied housing into rental stock.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Evans County, owning 34.8% of SFRs while institutional presence is zero.
Holdings
Landlords own 938 SFR properties, 34.8% of the Evans County market, with individual investors holding 836 of these homes (89.1%) compared to 105 (11.2%) held by companies.
Pricing
Landlords paid 82.4% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, securing an average discount of $1,174,325 per property ($250,675 vs $1,425,000), suggesting a focus on distressed or lower-value assets.
Activity
In the last quarter, landlords purchased 37.5% of all SFRs sold, with 100% of this activity coming from 4 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 97.7% of all investor-owned housing, with single-property owners alone accounting for a 77.0% share, while institutional investors (1000+) own 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owner in portfolios sized at 11-20 properties, where they control a 90.9% share.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 6.8x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (41 buys vs 6 sells), while institutional investors were neutral with one purchase and one sale.
Market Narrative

In Evans County, Georgia, the single-family rental market is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small, independent investors. Landlords control a significant 34.8% of the entire SFR housing stock, totaling 938 properties. This market is built by individuals, who own 89.1% of these homes, compared to just 11.2% for companies. The structure is highly granular, with 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) controlling 97.7% of the rental inventory, while large institutional investors have zero presence. This data, detailed in our full market reports, paints a picture of a localized, ground-up investment landscape.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive acquisition and a keen eye for value. In the most recent quarter, landlords were involved in 37.5% of all home sales, and all of this activity came from new, single-property investors. These investors demonstrate a distinct purchasing strategy, paying an average of 82.4% less than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, a discount of over $1.1 million per property. This suggests a focus on lower-priced housing stock or off-market deals. Furthermore, transaction trends show landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring nearly seven properties for every one they sold in 2025, consistently converting homes from the owner-occupied market into rental inventory.

The key takeaway for Evans County is that the rental market's health and growth are inextricably linked to the financial capacity and activity of thousands of small, local landlords, not distant corporations. This hyper-local concentration, with 99.7% of activity in a single zip code (30417), creates a unique market dynamic where small players dictate terms and trends. The high rate of cash ownership (87.4%) also insulates the local rental market from the volatility of national interest rate changes, suggesting a stable and well-capitalized investor base poised for continued, steady growth.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 06:13 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Evans (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Evans (GA) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ga-evans/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.