Franklin (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Franklin (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Franklin (MO)
35,979
Total Investors in Franklin (MO)
6,524
Investor Owned SFR in Franklin (MO)
6,293(17.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,271
SFR Owned
3,938
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,253
SFR Owned
2,410
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 6,293 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Franklin County with 87% Ownership as Institutions Retreat
In Franklin County, investors own 6,293 SFR properties (17.5% of the market), with 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a dominant 87.3% versus a mere 0.1% for institutional firms. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 5.9% of all homes sold, surprisingly paying a 5.0% premium over homeowners. While small landlords remain net buyers, institutional investors are net sellers, signaling a divestment from the region.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 6,293 SFRs in Franklin County, with individuals holding 62.6% of properties.
Cash purchases are dominant, with 4,808 properties owned outright versus 1,485 financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 6,112 (97.1%) of investor-owned homes classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 5.0% premium over homeowners in Q1, reversing previous discount trends.
This $17,561 premium per property ($371,744 vs $354,183) marks a significant shift from 2025, where landlords saw discounts as high as 17.2% ($64,094) in Q3.
Current Quarter Purchases
Mom-and-pop landlords drove 100% of investor purchases in Q4 2025.
Investors acquired 19 properties, representing 6.1% of all 312 market purchases. New single-property landlords were most active, acquiring 14 properties, while institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 87.3% of investor-owned SFRs in Franklin County.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.1% of the local investor portfolio, or 4 homes. Single-property landlords alone account for 61.9% of all investor-owned housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies take majority ownership once a portfolio grows beyond 5 properties.
While individuals own 78.9% of single-property rentals, companies own 70.5% of portfolios in the 6-10 property tier. This demonstrates a clear trend of incorporation as investors scale their holdings.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Franklin County is highly concentrated in zip codes 63080 and 63084.
The highest investor penetration is in zip code 63079, with an 88.9% ownership rate. Other hotspots include 63073 (43.3%) and 63080 (26.2%), revealing specific neighborhoods with high rental density.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Franklin County are strong net buyers, while the few institutional investors are net sellers.
In Q1 2026, landlords bought 27 properties and sold only 14, continuing a long-term accumulation trend. In contrast, institutional investors were net sellers in 2024, selling 5 properties while only acquiring 3.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 5.9% of all Q1 market transactions in Franklin County.
All 27 landlord transactions were by mom-and-pop investors, with single-property landlords leading with 22 purchases. Inter-landlord activity was minimal, with only one property (4.5% of tier 01 purchases) acquired from another investor.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 6,293 SFRs in Franklin County, with individuals holding 62.6% of properties.
Detailed Findings

In Franklin County, investors own 6,293 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 17.5% of the total 35,979 SFRs in the market. This portfolio is largely controlled by individual investors rather than corporations.

Individual landlords own 3,938 properties, which constitutes 62.6% of the investor-owned market, while companies own the remaining 2,410 properties (38.3%). This highlights the significant role of small-scale operators in the local rental market.

When looking at the number of entities, the dominance of individuals is even more pronounced. There are 5,271 individual landlords compared to 1,253 company landlords, a ratio of more than four to one.

A vast majority of the investor-owned portfolio, 6,112 properties or 97.1%, is classified as rented. This indicates that the primary strategy for real estate investing in this market is long-term rental income rather than short-term holding or flipping.

Financial strategies lean heavily towards cash ownership. Of the investor-owned properties, 4,808 were acquired with cash, compared to only 1,485 that carry financing. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 5.0% premium over homeowners in Q1, reversing previous discount trends.
Detailed Findings

In a surprising turn during Q1 2026, landlords in Franklin County paid an average price of $371,744, which was 5.0% higher than the $354,183 paid by traditional homeowners. This resulted in landlords paying a premium of $17,561 per property.

This trend marks a stark reversal from patterns observed in 2025. For example, in Q3 2025, landlords secured a significant 17.2% discount, paying $64,094 less than homeowners on average. In Q1 2025, they still maintained a 10.3% discount.

The pricing dynamic has been volatile, with landlords also paying a premium of 8.9% in Q2 2025. This fluctuation suggests that market conditions, inventory levels, and competition can dramatically shift the negotiating power between investor and non-investor buyers on a quarterly basis.

Historically, the average acquisition price has been on an upward trajectory. The average price during the 2020-2023 period was $269,873, increasing to $272,871 in 2024 and $312,784 in 2025, before reaching the current Q1 2026 level.

The shift from a consistent discount to a premium payment in the most recent quarter could indicate increased competition for limited housing stock, forcing investors to bid more aggressively to secure properties.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords drove 100% of investor purchases in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 19 SFR properties, making up 6.1% of the 312 total home sales in Franklin County. This activity was exclusively driven by smaller investors.

Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, accounted for 100% of all investor purchases during the quarter. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, making zero acquisitions.

The most active segment was new entrants to the market. Landlords in the single-property tier purchased 14 of the 19 homes (73.7% of investor activity), signaling a healthy influx of new, small-scale investors.

These 14 properties were acquired by 22 distinct entities, suggesting some properties may have been co-owned or that multiple new investors began their portfolios during this period.

The remaining activity came from investors in the two-property tier (2 properties) and the 3-5 property tier (3 properties), reinforcing that recent acquisition momentum is concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 87.3% of investor-owned SFRs in Franklin County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investor properties in Franklin County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, 'mom-and-pop' landlords. Investors owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively hold 87.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.

In stark contrast, large institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 4 properties, which amounts to a mere 0.1% of the investor market. This finding runs contrary to the common narrative of large corporations dominating residential housing markets.

The single-property landlord tier is the bedrock of the local rental market, alone accounting for 3,980 properties, or 61.9% of all investor-owned homes. This highlights the highly fragmented nature of rental ownership in the county.

Mid-size investors (11-1,000 properties) represent a small but notable segment, controlling the remaining 12.6% of the portfolio. This group includes investors in the small-medium (5.5%) and large (1.9%) tiers.

The data clearly illustrates that the Franklin County rental market is not defined by large corporate landlords but by thousands of individual and small-business owners, many of whom own just one or two rental properties.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies take majority ownership once a portfolio grows beyond 5 properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when analyzing ownership structure by portfolio size: as investors grow their holdings, they increasingly operate through corporate entities rather than as individuals.

Individuals dominate the smaller end of the market. They own 78.9% of single-property portfolios and 59.2% of two-property portfolios. Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals still hold a slim majority at 54.2%.

The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier. Here, companies own 70.5% of the properties, marking the first tier where corporate ownership becomes the dominant structure. This suggests that scaling beyond five properties often triggers a strategic decision to incorporate for liability and financial reasons.

This trend accelerates in larger tiers. For investors owning 11-20 properties, company ownership climbs to 87.6%, solidifying the link between portfolio size and corporate structure.

This data reveals a typical investor lifecycle in Franklin County, starting with individual ownership and transitioning to a corporate model as the scale and complexity of their real estate holdings increase.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Franklin County is highly concentrated in zip codes 63080 and 63084.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Franklin County is not evenly distributed, with significant concentration in a few key zip codes. The largest number of investor-owned properties are found in 63084 (965 properties) and 63080 (964 properties).

While some areas have high counts of investor properties, others are defined by an extremely high density of rentals. The most striking example is zip code 63079, where investors own 88.9% of the SFR housing stock, indicating a market almost entirely composed of rentals.

Other areas with very high investor penetration rates include 63073 (43.3%), 63014 (30.3%), 63080 (26.2%), and 63077 (21.8%). These zip codes represent pockets of the county with a much higher-than-average concentration of rental housing.

The top five zip codes by sheer volume of investor-owned homes (63084, 63080, 63090, 63077, and another not listed) collectively house a substantial portion of the county's rental inventory.

Analyzing these geographic patterns helps identify which specific communities are most shaped by investor activity and where rental housing is most prevalent. Some of this information can be found in a detailed property ownership by owner type report.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Franklin County are strong net buyers, while the few institutional investors are net sellers.
Detailed Findings

The overall trend for landlords in Franklin County is one of portfolio growth. Across all recent timeframes, investors have been consistent net buyers, acquiring more properties than they sell.

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords purchased 27 homes while selling only 14, resulting in a net gain of 13 properties. This follows a similar pattern from 2025, where they recorded 219 buys versus 107 sells for a net increase of 112 properties.

This accumulation strategy demonstrates sustained confidence in the local rental market among the dominant small-to-mid-sized investor base.

However, the strategy for large institutional investors (1,000+ properties) is the exact opposite. Transaction data from 2024 shows this tier was a net seller, acquiring only 3 properties while divesting 5. This suggests a strategic retreat or portfolio rebalancing away from the Franklin County market by the largest players.

The divergence is clear: the small, local investors who define the market are actively buying and growing, while the handful of institutional players are selling off their limited assets.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 5.9% of all Q1 market transactions in Franklin County.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlord activity accounted for 27 of the 454 total SFR transactions in Franklin County, representing a 5.9% market share. This level of participation is consistent with recent trends.

Once again, acquisition activity was driven entirely by mom-and-pop investors. Landlords in Tiers 01-04 were responsible for 100% of the 27 purchases, with zero activity from institutional or large-scale investors.

New and single-property landlords were the most active group, executing 22 of the 27 transactions. Their average purchase price was $371,744, which was the highest among all buyer types for the quarter.

Transactions between investors were rare. Only one of the 27 properties purchased by landlords was sourced from another landlord. This indicates that investors are primarily acquiring properties from traditional homeowners or new construction, not from an internal market of portfolio trades.

The data paints a picture of a stable, ongoing influx of new, small-scale investors who are absorbing a small but consistent share of the available for-sale housing stock each quarter.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Franklin County with 87% Ownership as Institutions Retreat
Holdings
Investors own 6,293 SFR properties in Franklin County, representing 17.5% of the market. Individual investors are the primary owners, holding 3,938 properties (62.6%) compared to 2,410 (38.3%) for companies.
Pricing
In a surprising reversal, landlords paid a 5.0% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $371,744 per property, which is $17,561 more than homeowners paid.
Activity
Landlord activity accounted for 5.9% of Q1 sales with 27 purchases, all of which were made by mom-and-pop investors. Activity was led by 22 new or single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 87.3% of investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, large institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owner for portfolios of 6-10 properties, where they control 70.5% of the homes. This signals a clear pattern of incorporation with scale.
Transactions
Landlords remain net buyers, acquiring 27 homes and selling 14 in Q1. However, the market's few institutional investors are net sellers (3 buys vs 5 sells in 2024), indicating they are divesting from the area.
Market Narrative

In Franklin County, Missouri, the investor-owned housing market is fundamentally shaped by small, local participants, not large corporations. Investors own 6,293 single-family homes, or 17.5% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who own a commanding 87.3% of all investor-held properties. In sharp contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a nearly nonexistent footprint, holding just 0.1% of the inventory. Ownership is primarily held by individuals (62.6%), though a clear trend shows investors incorporating as their portfolios grow beyond five properties.

Investor activity remains steady, with landlords accounting for 5.9% of all home purchases in Q1 2026. This activity is exclusively driven by mom-and-pop investors, as institutions made zero acquisitions. In a notable pricing shift, these investors paid a 5.0% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1, reversing a historical trend of securing discounts. This may signal intensifying competition for limited inventory. The broader transactional pattern shows that small investors are consistent net buyers, steadily accumulating properties, while the few institutional players in the region are net sellers, indicating a strategic exit.

The key takeaway for the Franklin County housing market is its resilience and fragmentation. The rental landscape is not monolithic but a mosaic of thousands of small-scale owners. This structure suggests that market dynamics are driven by local economic conditions and individual investment decisions rather than broad, corporate strategies. The recent price premium paid by investors, coupled with the retreat of institutional capital, points to a competitive and localized market where small landlords are doubling down on their investments, shaping the future of the local rental supply. For more details, explore other Investor Pulse reports.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 09:09 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Franklin (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Franklin (MO) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mo-franklin/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.