Noble (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Noble (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Noble (OH)
3,217
Total Investors in Noble (OH)
1,023
Investor Owned SFR in Noble (OH)
926(28.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
916
SFR Owned
831
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
107
SFR Owned
128
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 926 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Noble County's Real Estate Market is Dominated by Small, Individual Investors Who Control 97.7% of Rental Housing
Investors own 926 Single-Family Residential properties in Noble County, representing 28.8% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among 'mom-and-pop' landlords (97.7%), while institutional investors hold a negligible 0.1%. In Q1 2026, landlords were active net buyers, acquiring 29.2% of all homes sold while paying an average of 3.1% less than traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 926 SFR properties in Noble County, with individuals owning 89.7%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties were purchased with cash (900) versus financing (26). Individual investors represent 916 of the 1,023 total landlords, reinforcing their market dominance. Rented properties (914) account for nearly the entire investor portfolio (926), indicating a strong focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 3.1% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $5,960 per property.
The pricing advantage for landlords has narrowed dramatically; the discount was a massive 45.6% ($75,714) in Q1 2025. This quarter-over-quarter trend suggests increasing competition for available properties. Landlords paid an average of $183,400 in Q1 2026, while homeowners paid $189,360.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 29.2% of all single-family homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords drove this activity, accounting for 6 of the 7 investor purchases (85.7%). In contrast, institutional investors made only a single purchase (14.3%). Six new single-property landlords entered the market, signaling fresh interest from small-scale investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.7% of investor-owned homes.
Single-property landlords alone account for 79.7% of the investor-owned housing stock, owning 751 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.1% of the portfolio, or a single property.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6-10 properties, holding 81.2%.
Individuals overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 90.7% of single-property investments and 83.3% of two-property portfolios. The 6-10 property tier represents a clear strategic crossover point where investors adopt a corporate structure for larger-scale operations.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 43724 holding 403 investor-owned homes.
While 43724 has the highest volume, other zip codes show extreme investor saturation. Zip code 45746 is 100.0% investor-owned, and 43711 follows at 90.9%. This highlights a clear distinction between markets with high raw counts and those with high penetration rates.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Noble County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This accumulation trend is consistent over time. In 2025, investors bought 54 properties while selling only 8, a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 7-to-1. In 2024, the ratio was even more pronounced, with 23 buys and only 1 sale.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 23.3% of all single-family home transactions in Q1 2026.
A stark pricing difference emerged, with the institutional investor paying $100,000 for its property, a 51.0% discount compared to the $204,250 average paid by new mom-and-pop buyers. No transactions in Q1 were recorded as landlord-to-landlord sales.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 926 SFR properties in Noble County, with individuals owning 89.7%.
Detailed Findings

In Noble County, investors own 926 single-family homes, which constitutes a significant 28.8% of the total 3,217 SFR properties in the market. This reveals a substantial investor presence in the local housing landscape.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 831 properties, making up 89.7% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 128 properties (13.8%) owned by companies. This counters the common narrative of corporate landlords dominating the market.

A look at entity counts further solidifies this pattern, with 916 individual landlords compared to only 107 company landlords. This nearly 9-to-1 ratio underscores the 'mom-and-pop' nature of real estate investing in the county.

Financing methods reveal a strong preference for all-cash transactions among investors. A remarkable 900 properties in the investor portfolio are owned outright with cash, while only 26 are financed. This suggests investors in this market are well-capitalized and less reliant on traditional lending.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income. Of the 926 investor-owned homes, 914 are classified as rented, confirming that the primary strategy is long-term holding for rental revenue rather than speculation or other uses.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 3.1% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $5,960 per property.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, investors in Noble County purchased properties at an average price of $183,400, securing a 3.1% discount compared to the $189,360 paid by traditional homeowners. This price advantage translated to an average savings of $5,960 per acquisition.

The landlord discount has been inconsistent and has tightened significantly over the past year. In Q1 2025, investors enjoyed a staggering 45.6% discount, paying $90,226 while homeowners paid $165,940. This gap has since shrunk, indicating a more competitive purchasing environment.

Looking at recent quarters reveals this tightening trend. The investor discount was 8.5% in Q3 2025 ($153,302 vs $167,478) and 5.8% in Q2 2025 ($149,652 vs $158,837), showing a clear and consistent narrowing of the price gap leading into 2026.

Although specific property counts by recent timeframe were zero, the price data indicates a general upward trend in acquisition costs for all buyer types. The average landlord purchase price in Q1 2026 ($183,400) is notably higher than in any quarter of 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 29.2% of all single-family homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was a significant factor in Noble County's most recent quarter, with landlords acquiring 7 of the 24 total SFRs sold, capturing 29.2% of the market's sales volume.

The purchasing activity was dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 85.7% of all investor acquisitions, purchasing 6 of the 7 properties.

New entrants are a key driver of market activity. All 6 of the mom-and-pop purchases were made by new, single-property landlords, indicating a healthy influx of first-time investors into the Noble County market.

Institutional buyers (1,000+ properties) had a minimal impact, making only one purchase. This single acquisition accounted for just 14.3% of investor buying activity and a mere 4.2% of total market sales.

The data clearly shows that the new investment in Noble County is flowing from small, independent operators, not large-scale corporations. Each of the 6 new single-property investors represents a distinct entity entering the rental market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.7% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investment properties in Noble County is almost entirely concentrated in the hands of small landlords. Investors owning 1-10 properties, commonly known as 'mom-and-pops', collectively own 97.7% of all investor-held SFRs.

The single-property landlord is the backbone of the local rental market. This tier alone, representing first-time or small-scale investors, owns 751 properties, which accounts for a remarkable 79.7% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

As portfolio sizes increase, the number of properties drops off steeply. Two-property landlords hold 7.0% of the stock, while those with 3-5 properties hold 9.2%. Beyond that, ownership becomes fragmented, with no tier from 21-50 or 101-1000 properties having any presence at all.

The role of large institutional capital in Noble County is virtually nonexistent. Institutional investors in the 1,000+ property tier own just a single property, representing a mere 0.1% of the investor market share. This finding directly challenges the narrative of large corporations controlling local housing.

This distribution highlights a market defined by hyper-local, small-scale investment rather than consolidation by large players. The power and influence in the rental market rest firmly with individual and small-scale operators.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6-10 properties, holding 81.2%.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across different portfolio sizes. While individual investors dominate the overall market, companies assert control as portfolios scale up. The crossover point occurs definitively in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 81.2% of the properties (13 homes).

Individuals are the primary owners of smaller portfolios. They account for 90.7% of single-property holdings (703 properties) and 83.3% of two-property portfolios (55 properties), demonstrating that most investors start and operate on a small scale under personal ownership.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals maintain a strong majority, owning 65 properties, or 74.7% of the total in that segment. This indicates that the transition to a corporate structure is not common until an investor's portfolio approaches a half-dozen properties.

The data suggests a strategic shift as investors grow. The move to a corporate entity for portfolios of 6 or more properties likely reflects a more formalized approach to asset management, liability protection, and potential financing advantages for scaling operations.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 43724 holding 403 investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis of Noble County reveals significant concentration of investor ownership in specific zip codes. The 43724 zip code is the epicenter of activity by volume, containing 403 investor-owned SFR properties, which accounts for 22.5% of its local housing stock.

However, the highest rates of investor ownership are found elsewhere, indicating different market dynamics. Zip code 45746 is entirely investor-owned (100.0%), and 43711 has an investor ownership rate of 90.9%, suggesting these smaller areas are almost exclusively rental markets.

Other areas with high investor saturation include 43717 (76.6% investor-owned), 43780 (52.1%), and 45745 (40.4%). The presence of multiple zip codes where investors own more than half the housing stock points to targeted acquisition strategies in these communities.

The top five zip codes by sheer count of investor properties are 43724 (403), 43780 (164), 43717 (59), 43779 (54), and 43788 (53). These five areas alone account for a substantial portion of all investor activity in the county.

This data reveals two types of investor hubs: high-volume areas like 43724 and high-saturation niche markets like 45746 and 43711. Understanding this distinction is key to analyzing investor strategy across the county. This analysis, based on reliable assessor data, provides a granular view of these concentrations.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Noble County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows that landlords in Noble County are firmly in an accumulation phase. In the first quarter of 2026, they demonstrated a strong net-buyer position, purchasing 7 properties while only selling 1.

This pattern of aggressive buying is not new. Throughout 2025, investors acquired 54 SFR properties and sold just 8, resulting in a net gain of 46 properties for the year and a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.75 to 1.

The trend was even stronger in 2024, a year characterized by 23 investor purchases and only a single sale. This indicates a sustained, multi-year strategy of portfolio expansion among landlords in the county.

The consistent, high buy-to-sell ratio across multiple timeframes signals strong confidence in the local rental market. Investors are clearly choosing to hold and expand their portfolios rather than divest assets.

While data on institutional-only transactions was not available, the overall market trend is unambiguously one of growth and acquisition driven by the broader landlord community.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 23.3% of all single-family home transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 7 of the 30 total SFR transactions in Noble County, accounting for a 23.3% share of all market activity.

The quarter's activity was driven by the smallest and largest ends of the investor spectrum. New, single-property landlords conducted 6 of the 7 transactions, while a single institutional investor was responsible for the seventh.

A significant pricing disparity was evident between these tiers. The average purchase price for the six single-property landlords was $204,250. In contrast, the institutional investor acquired its property for just $100,000.

This price gap represents a 51.0% discount for the institutional buyer compared to the new mom-and-pop investors. This suggests the larger player may be targeting distressed assets or has access to off-market deals unavailable to smaller buyers.

Notably, none of the 7 investor purchases in the quarter were sourced from other landlords. This indicates that investors are acquiring their properties from the general market (e.g., traditional homeowners) rather than trading assets among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Noble County's Housing Market is Defined by Small Landlords, Who Own 97.7% of Investor Properties and Are Active Net Buyers
Holdings
Landlords own 926 SFR properties, representing 28.8% of Noble County's market. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate, holding 831 of these properties (89.7%) compared to just 128 (13.8%) for companies.
Pricing
Landlords paid 3.1% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a discount of $5,960 ($183,400 vs $189,360), though this price advantage has narrowed significantly from 45.6% a year prior.
Activity
In the last quarter, landlords purchased 29.2% of all homes sold (7 properties), with activity driven by 6 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 97.7% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners, but companies become the majority (81.2%) in portfolios that scale to the 6-10 property tier, marking a key strategic crossover.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 7-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 (7 buys vs 1 sell), continuing a multi-year trend of aggressive portfolio expansion.
Market Narrative

In Noble County, the real estate investment landscape is fundamentally shaped by small, independent operators. Investors own a significant 926 single-family homes, comprising 28.8% of the total market. This portfolio is not in the hands of large corporations; rather, individual investors own 89.7% of these properties. The dominance of 'mom-and-pop' landlords is profound, as those owning 1-10 properties control 97.7% of all investor-held housing, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties account for a mere 0.1%. This structure underscores a hyper-local market driven by community-level investment.

Investor behavior in the most recent quarter reveals both active acquisition and strategic purchasing. Landlords bought 29.2% of all homes sold, with six new single-property investors entering the market. They maintained a pricing advantage, paying 3.1% less than traditional homeowners, though this gap has tightened. Transaction patterns confirm a strong accumulation strategy, with landlords acting as decisive net buyers, acquiring 7 properties for every 1 sold in Q1. This continues a multi-year trend of portfolio growth, signaling deep confidence in the local rental market.

The key takeaway from this market report is that Noble County's rental housing is sustained by a broad base of small-scale landlords, not consolidated corporate interests. While companies take over ownership in larger portfolios (6+ properties), the market's foundation is built on new and existing individual investors. The high concentration of investor ownership in specific zip codes, combined with a persistent net-buyer stance, suggests that rental housing will continue to be a critical and growing component of the local real estate ecosystem, managed primarily by local stakeholders.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 12:50 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Noble (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Noble (OH) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-oh-noble/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.