Bennington (VT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bennington (VT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bennington (VT)
12,463
Total Investors in Bennington (VT)
4,069
Investor Owned SFR in Bennington (VT)
2,764(22.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,478
SFR Owned
2,299
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
591
SFR Owned
518
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,764 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Bennington County, Paying 138% Premium Amid Buying Spree
Investors own 2,764 SFR properties in Bennington County (22.2% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 99.8%. In a sharp deviation from national trends, Q1 2026 saw landlords pay a 137.8% premium over homeowners. These small investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9.7 properties for every one sold.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Bennington County landlords own 2,764 SFRs, with individuals controlling 83.2% of the portfolio.
The entire investor portfolio of 2,764 properties is owned with cash, with 0 financed properties reported. Reflecting a strong rental focus, 99.5% of these holdings (2,750 properties) are classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 137.8% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $719,040 per purchase.
This massive premium of $416,612 per property ($719,040 vs $302,428) is a stark reversal of typical investor behavior. The price gap has widened dramatically from prior quarters, such as the 27.9% premium seen in 2025-Q3.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 39.6% of all SFR properties sold in Bennington County during the last quarter.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100.0% of these 19 landlord purchases. New single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone accounted for 18 properties, or 90.0% of all investor acquisitions, with institutional buying entirely absent.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone own 2,595 properties, representing 92.0% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional ownership (1000+ properties) is effectively non-existent, at just 0.0% market share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every landlord tier in Bennington County.
Unlike in larger markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Individuals own 82.6% of single-property portfolios and still hold a 71.4% majority in the two-property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated in Bennington County, with rates exceeding 60% in several zip codes.
The top three zip codes by investor penetration are 05343 (66.7%), 05340 (64.6%), and 05254 (59.8%). By sheer volume, Manchester (05340) leads with 656 investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Bennington County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9.7 properties for every one they sold in Q1.
This strong buying trend is consistent, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.0 in 2025 (168 buys vs 21 sells) and an even higher 24.6 in 2024 (221 buys vs 9 sells). No institutional transactions were recorded in any period.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 40.3% of all Q1 property transactions in Bennington County.
New single-property investors paid the highest prices, averaging $660,286 per transaction. A low 3.7% of their purchases were sourced from other landlords, indicating they primarily buy from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Bennington County landlords own 2,764 SFRs, with individuals controlling 83.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors own 2,764 Single-Family Residential properties in Bennington County, representing a significant 22.2% of the total 12,463 SFRs in the market. This reveals a substantial investor penetration rate within the local housing stock.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals, who own 2,299 properties (83.2%), compared to companies which own 518 properties (18.7%). This composition underscores a market driven by local, small-scale real estate investing rather than large corporate entities.

A defining characteristic of this market is its complete reliance on cash transactions. All 2,764 investor-owned properties were acquired with cash, with zero properties currently financed, indicating a well-capitalized investor base that is not leveraged.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 2,750 properties (99.5%) listed as non-owner-occupied. This high rental concentration highlights the primary strategy of landlords in the county is providing housing inventory for tenants.

The number of landlord entities further reinforces the individual-driven nature of the market. There are 3,478 individual landlords compared to just 591 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 6 to 1.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 137.8% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $719,040 per purchase.
Detailed Findings

In a striking departure from typical market dynamics, landlords in Bennington County paid a significant premium for properties in Q1 2026. The average landlord acquisition price was $719,040, which is 137.8% higher than the $302,428 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price gap translates to an extra $416,612 per property, indicating intense competition for desirable rental assets or a focus on a higher-end segment of the market not typically targeted by owner-occupiers.

The trend shows this premium is accelerating. While landlords also paid more in previous quarters, the gap has widened substantially. For instance, the premium was 62.0% in 2025-Q1 and just 27.9% in 2025-Q3, making the current 137.8% premium an exceptional development.

This pricing behavior challenges the common assumption that investors always secure properties at a discount. In Bennington County, investors are actively outbidding other buyers, suggesting a bullish outlook on the local rental market's potential for high returns.

The data from 2020-2023 shows an average acquisition price of $482,217, indicating that the Q1 2026 price of $719,040 represents a 49.1% appreciation from the pandemic-era buying period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 39.6% of all SFR properties sold in Bennington County during the last quarter.
Detailed Findings

Landlords demonstrated significant buying power in the most recent quarter, purchasing 19 of the 48 total SFRs sold in Bennington County. This activity gives investors a commanding 39.6% share of all market purchases.

The acquisition activity was exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of all properties bought by investors, totaling 20 purchases when accounting for co-ownership.

New entrants are the primary force in the market. The single-property (Tier 01) category saw 27 new landlord entities acquire 18 properties, making up 90.0% of all investor-bought homes. This signals a healthy influx of first-time landlords.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made zero purchases, highlighting their complete absence from the county's acquisition landscape.

The data shows a clear pattern of a market being shaped from the ground up by new and small investors, rather than being consolidated by large-scale players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of property ownership in Bennington County is extremely concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, hold a near-total monopoly with 99.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The single-property tier is the undisputed backbone of the rental market, with these landlords owning 2,595 properties. This accounts for 92.0% of all investor-held housing, emphasizing the market's reliance on first-time and small-scale investors.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) have a negligible footprint, collectively owning less than 0.2% of the investor-owned properties. This indicates a significant barrier to scaling portfolios in the region.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have virtually no presence, holding only a single property which rounds to 0.0% of the market share. This finding decisively counters the narrative of large corporations dominating the local housing market.

This ownership structure suggests a highly fragmented market composed of thousands of individual decision-makers, which has profound implications for market stability, rental pricing, and property management standards.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every landlord tier in Bennington County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain their dominance across all portfolio sizes in Bennington County, a pattern that sets the region apart. In the largest tier of ownership, single-property landlords, individuals own 2,186 properties (82.6%) versus 459 for companies.

This trend persists as portfolios grow. In the two-property tier, individuals own 90 properties (71.4%), and in the 3-5 property tier, they own 74 properties (78.7%), showcasing their firm grip on the market.

A critical finding is the absence of a 'crossover point' where corporate ownership becomes the norm. In many markets, companies take over as the majority owner in larger tiers, but here individuals are the primary holders at every level.

Even in the small 6-10 property tier, the 2 properties recorded are 100.0% owned by individuals. This suggests that even as local investors scale, they tend to do so under their own names rather than forming corporate entities.

This ownership pattern indicates that the property ownership landscape is defined by personal investment rather than corporate strategy, influencing everything from acquisition methods to landlord-tenant relationships.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated in Bennington County, with rates exceeding 60% in several zip codes.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Bennington County is not evenly distributed but is instead focused in specific pockets with extremely high ownership rates. The zip code 05343 in Winhall leads with a 66.7% investor ownership rate, meaning two out of every three homes are investor-owned.

Following closely are Manchester (05340) with a 64.6% rate and Londonderry (05254) at 59.8%. These figures indicate that certain communities are predominantly rental markets shaped by investor activity.

While some areas lead by percentage, others lead by volume. The 05340 zip code has the highest raw count of investor properties at 656, followed by Bennington (05201) with 361 and Londonderry (05254) with 355.

There is a notable difference between high-rate and high-count areas. For example, the town of Bennington (05201) has a high number of investor properties (361) but a much lower ownership rate of 10.1%, reflecting its larger overall housing stock.

This geographic concentration suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods or towns, likely driven by factors like tourism, local employment centers, or school districts, creating distinct rental-heavy submarkets within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Bennington County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9.7 properties for every one they sold in Q1.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Bennington County are firmly in an accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they purchased 29 properties while selling only 3, establishing a strong net-buyer position with a 9.7-to-1 buy/sell ratio.

This is not a new phenomenon but a continuation of a multi-year trend. In 2025, investors bought 168 properties and sold just 21 (an 8.0 ratio), and in 2024, the activity was even more skewed with 221 buys to only 9 sells (a 24.6 ratio).

This sustained, high-velocity acquisition pattern signals strong confidence in the local market and a strategic, long-term expansion of rental portfolios across the county.

The data on institutional (1000+ tier) transactions is empty, confirming that large-scale investors are not a factor in the market's transaction dynamics, either as buyers or sellers.

The persistent net buying from smaller landlords is steadily increasing the share of the housing market under investor control, a key trend with long-term implications for housing affordability and availability for owner-occupiers.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 40.3% of all Q1 property transactions in Bennington County.
Detailed Findings

Landlord activity represented a major portion of the market in Q1, with investors involved in 29 of the 72 total SFR transactions. This 40.3% share underscores their role as the most significant single group of buyers in the county.

All 29 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors, with no activity from institutional tiers. New, single-property investors drove the market, accounting for 27 of the 29 transactions.

Interestingly, these new entrants paid the highest prices, with an average purchase price of $660,286. This is significantly higher than the $255,000 average paid by the two-property tier investors, reinforcing the trend of new landlords paying a premium to enter the market.

There is very little inter-landlord trading. Among the most active tier (single-property), only 1 of 27 purchases (3.7%) was from another landlord. This suggests the market is expanding through acquisition from homeowners, not just churning existing rental stock among investors.

The combination of high market share and a focus on acquiring properties from the general market shows that local landlords are the primary drivers of demand and price-setting in Bennington County's real estate ecosystem.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Bennington County, Paying 138% Premium Amid Buying Spree
Holdings
Landlords own 2,764 SFR properties, representing 22.2% of Bennington County's market. Ownership is overwhelmingly individual, with non-corporate investors holding 2,299 properties (83.2%) compared to companies at 518 (18.7%).
Pricing
In a sharp market reversal, landlords paid 137.8% more than homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average price of $719,040 versus $302,428, a premium of $416,612 per property.
Activity
Investors purchased 39.6% of all homes sold in Q1 (19 properties), with 100% of this activity from mom-and-pop landlords. The market saw 27 new landlord entities acquire 18 single-property homes this quarter.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) have a near-total grip on the market, controlling 99.8% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across all portfolio sizes, holding 82.6% of single-property portfolios. The market lacks any tier where companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 9.7x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (29 buys vs 3 sells), a trend consistent with prior years. Institutional investors were completely inactive, recording zero buys or sells.
Market Narrative

In Bennington County, Vermont, the real estate investment landscape is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small, individual landlords. Investors control a substantial 22.2% of the single-family housing market, owning 2,764 properties. This portfolio is almost entirely in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' operators (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 99.8% of all investor-held homes. Individuals, rather than corporations, drive this market, owning 83.2% of the properties. The complete absence of institutional buying and the near-total control by small players paint a picture of a grassroots market, starkly different from national narratives. These findings, derived from comprehensive assessor data, highlight a uniquely fragmented and localized ownership structure.

The behavior of these investors is just as distinctive as their profile. In Q1 2026, landlords were involved in 40.3% of all property sales, acting as aggressive net buyers with a 9.7-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. In a striking anomaly, they paid an average of $719,040, a 137.8% premium compared to traditional homeowners ($302,428). This suggests fierce competition for a limited supply of desirable rental properties. Furthermore, the entire investor portfolio is owned with cash, signaling a well-capitalized investor base that is expanding its holdings by acquiring properties primarily from the owner-occupied market.

The key takeaway from this market reports dashboard is that Bennington County is a landlord's market, but not one controlled by Wall Street. It is fueled by hyper-local, cash-rich individuals who are actively growing their portfolios and are willing to pay a premium to do so. This dynamic of high investor demand, coupled with a willingness to outbid traditional buyers, is a powerful force shaping the county's housing affordability and availability. The concentration of investor ownership in specific zip codes, with rates exceeding 60%, further indicates that this trend is creating distinct, rental-dominated submarkets within the region.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 05:14 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Bennington (VT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Bennington (VT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-vt-bennington/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.