Goshen (WY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Goshen (WY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Goshen (WY)
3,770
Total Investors in Goshen (WY)
1,626
Investor Owned SFR in Goshen (WY)
1,204(31.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,479
SFR Owned
1,074
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
147
SFR Owned
143
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,204 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Goshen County, Controlling 99% of a Market They Are Actively Acquiring
Investors own 1,204 SFR properties in Goshen County, representing a significant 31.9% of the market. This ownership is almost entirely in the hands of small 'mom-and-pop' landlords, who control 99.2% of investor-owned housing. In Q1 2026, landlords continued to be aggressive net buyers, capturing 28.1% of all transactions while securing an average 6.6% price discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,204 SFRs in Goshen County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 89.2% of properties.
The majority of these holdings are owned free-and-clear, with 889 properties held as cash assets versus 315 that are financed. Of the total portfolio, 1,186 properties are confirmed rentals, indicating a strong focus on non-owner-occupied strategies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Q1 2026 purchased properties for 6.6% less than homeowners, an average discount of $18,919 per home.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is highly volatile, swinging from a 75.9% landlord premium in Q1 2025 to a massive 54.2% discount in Q2 2025. This indicates an opportunistic and low-volume market where individual deals can heavily skew quarterly averages.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 32.6% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025, purchasing 14 of the 43 properties on the market.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for nearly all this activity, making up 13 of the 14 landlord purchases (92.9%). Activity was led by new market entrants, with 15 single-property landlords acquiring 11 homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Goshen County, controlling 99.2% of all investor-owned housing.
This market structure is highly concentrated at the smallest scale, with single-property landlords alone owning 78.3% of the portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold just 0.1% of the inventory, with only a single property.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners only in larger portfolios, crossing the 50% threshold in the 6-10 property tier.
In the 6-10 property tier, companies own 55.6% of the homes. Below this level, individual investors are dominant, holding 91.2% of single-property portfolios and 92.2% of two-property portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 82240, which contains 734 investor-owned properties.
While 82240 has the highest count of investor properties, smaller zip codes have far higher saturation rates. Zip code 82242 is 100.0% investor-owned, and 82212 and 82217 both have an investor ownership rate of 71.2%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Goshen County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 18 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation is consistent over time, with landlords maintaining a 6.1x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 and a 6.5x ratio in 2024. The minimal institutional segment shifted from being net sellers in 2024 to net buyers in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 28.1% of all Q1 2026 property transactions, accounting for 18 of 64 total sales.
All 18 of these transactions were driven by mom-and-pop investors, with zero activity from institutional tiers. Notably, 0% of landlord purchases were sourced from other landlords, indicating they are buying from the broader market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,204 SFRs in Goshen County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 89.2% of properties.
Detailed Findings

In Goshen County, investors hold a significant 31.9% of the single-family housing stock, totaling 1,204 properties. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by 1,479 individual landlords, who own 1,074 properties (89.2%), dwarfing the 143 properties (11.9%) held by 147 companies.

This market structure points to a grassroots real estate investing environment rather than one dominated by large corporations. The prevalence of individual ownership suggests that local, small-scale investors are the primary drivers of the rental market.

A key indicator of portfolio stability is the financing method. Investors in Goshen County favor cash purchases, with 889 properties owned outright compared to 315 that carry a mortgage. This 2.8-to-1 cash-to-financed ratio signals a well-capitalized investor base less vulnerable to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 1,186 properties classified as rented. This accounts for 98.5% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio, underscoring the business focus of these property owners.

Comparing entity counts to property counts reveals the scale of operations. The average individual landlord holds a very small portfolio, while the company segment, though smaller, is slightly more concentrated. This reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Q1 2026 purchased properties for 6.6% less than homeowners, an average discount of $18,919 per home.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated a clear pricing advantage, acquiring properties at an average price of $267,265, which is $18,919 (6.6%) below the $286,184 paid by traditional homeowners. This suggests investors are adept at finding undervalued assets or negotiating favorable terms.

However, the pricing dynamic over the past year has been extremely volatile. In Q1 2025, landlords paid a staggering 75.9% premium ($425,600 vs $242,003), while in Q2 2025 they secured a 54.2% discount ($127,242 vs $277,789). These dramatic swings are characteristic of a market with low transaction volumes, where a few atypical sales can heavily influence quarterly averages.

This volatility highlights an opportunistic purchasing environment. Rather than a consistent discount, investors appear to be capitalizing on specific deals as they arise, leading to inconsistent but occasionally very deep price advantages.

Comparing prices over longer timeframes shows significant appreciation. The average landlord acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $191,619, which rose to $247,149 in 2024. The low transaction volume in recent quarters makes direct trend analysis difficult, but the underlying appreciation is evident.

The data does not contain any purchases for several recent quarters, including Q4 2024 and Q3 2025. This lack of activity further reinforces the idea of a thin market where investors may wait for the right opportunities rather than buying consistently each quarter.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 32.6% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025, purchasing 14 of the 43 properties on the market.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was a major force in the Goshen County market during Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 14 of the 43 available SFR properties, a market share of 32.6%. This level of participation indicates strong and ongoing demand from the investment sector.

The acquisition activity is almost exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 13 of the 14 purchases (92.9%), reinforcing their dominance in the market. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made no purchases during the quarter.

New investors are a key driver of market growth. The single-property tier saw the most activity, with 15 new entities acquiring 11 properties. This represents 78.6% of all landlord purchases, signaling a healthy influx of first-time landlords entering the rental market.

Mid-size investors also showed some activity, with one purchase each from the '6-10 property' and '21-50 property' tiers. While small, this shows that some existing landlords are continuing to expand their portfolios.

The complete absence of institutional buying activity stands in stark contrast to the active participation of smaller landlords. This highlights a market dynamic defined by local individuals and small businesses, not large-scale corporate investment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Goshen County, controlling 99.2% of all investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investor-held real estate in Goshen County is definitively characterized by small, local landlords. The 'mom-and-pop' segment, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, controls a staggering 99.2% of the entire investor SFR portfolio.

Concentration is most intense at the very bottom of the scale. Landlords with just a single property (Tier 01) own 975 homes, which constitutes 78.3% of all investor-owned SFRs. This tier alone forms the backbone of the county's rental housing supply.

Conversely, the presence of large-scale investors is negligible. Institutional landlords (Tier 09) own just one property, representing a mere 0.1% market share. This finding directly counters the narrative of widespread corporate ownership of single-family homes in this market.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) also have a very small footprint. The combined share of all tiers from 'small-medium' to 'large' accounts for less than 1% of the total investor portfolio, further emphasizing the market's fragmented nature.

This distribution reveals a highly accessible market for new and small-scale investors. The lack of large, dominant players suggests a level playing field where individuals can effectively compete and build rental portfolios.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners only in larger portfolios, crossing the 50% threshold in the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the Goshen County market overall, corporate ownership becomes more prevalent as portfolio sizes increase. The critical crossover point occurs in the '6-10 property' tier, where companies own 10 properties, a 55.6% majority share, compared to the 8 properties held by individuals.

In the smallest tiers, individual ownership is nearly absolute. Individuals own 899 of the single-property landlord homes (91.2%) and 107 of the two-property portfolios (92.2%). This indicates that most investors entering the market do so personally rather than through an LLC or other corporate entity.

As portfolios grow to the '3-5 property' range, company ownership increases but individuals still hold a strong majority. In this tier, companies own 30 properties, representing a 23.8% share, while individuals hold 96 properties (76.2%).

This pattern suggests a typical investor lifecycle: individuals often start with one or two properties under their own name. As their portfolio expands beyond a few homes, the strategic and liability benefits of a corporate structure lead them to form a company.

The data illustrates a clear strategic shift. The move to a corporate structure appears to be a function of scale, with the 6-10 property range serving as the inflection point where professionalization of the investment operation often occurs.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 82240, which contains 734 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis of Goshen County reveals a clear distinction between the areas with the highest volume of investor properties and those with the highest percentage of investor ownership. The zip code 82240 is the epicenter of investor activity by sheer count, with 734 investor-owned SFRs, though this represents a 24.2% ownership rate.

In contrast, several smaller zip codes exhibit near-total market saturation by investors. Zip code 82242 stands out with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, followed closely by 82212 and 82217, both at 71.2%. These areas, while containing fewer total properties, are fundamentally rental-dominated communities.

The top five regions by absolute count include 82223 (183 properties), 82212 (116 properties), 82240 (734 properties), and 82221 (64 properties). These areas represent the core of the county's rental stock.

This split between high-volume and high-penetration areas highlights different market dynamics. The high-volume areas like 82240 offer scale and more transaction opportunities, while the high-penetration areas suggest markets where it may be difficult for traditional homeowners to purchase property.

Investors seeking opportunities should analyze this data carefully. High-count areas may offer more inventory, but high-percentage areas could signal either a saturated market or a niche with strong, proven rental demand.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Goshen County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 18 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transactional data shows a clear and sustained trend of portfolio growth among landlords in Goshen County. In Q1 2026, they were strong net buyers, purchasing 18 properties while selling only 1. This reflects a high degree of confidence in the local rental market.

This behavior is not a recent development. The net-buyer position has been consistent for years, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.1 (61 buys vs. 10 sells) for the full year 2025 and 6.5 (65 buys vs. 10 sells) for 2024. Landlords are consistently accumulating properties rather than divesting.

The small institutional segment (1,000+ properties) has shown more volatile behavior. After being net sellers in 2024 (1 buy vs. 2 sells), they shifted to being net buyers in 2025, acquiring 3 properties and selling 2. This recent accumulation, though tiny in scale, could signal a renewed interest from larger players.

The data does not provide information on inter-landlord transactions, so it is unclear what percentage of purchases are from other investors versus traditional homeowners. However, the high net-positive transaction flow confirms that investors are a primary source of demand in the market.

Overall, the transactional history paints a picture of a market where investors are consistently adding to their holdings, absorbing housing supply with a long-term hold strategy.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 28.1% of all Q1 2026 property transactions, accounting for 18 of 64 total sales.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords played a significant role in market activity, participating in 18 of the 64 total SFR transactions for a 28.1% share. This demonstrates continued, active acquisition from the investor segment.

The entirety of this Q1 activity originated from small-scale landlords. The single-property tier was the most active, with 15 transactions, followed by one transaction each from the two-property, '6-10', and '21-50' tiers. No transactions were recorded for institutional investors.

A critical finding from the quarter is the source of inventory. None of the 18 landlord purchases were from other landlords. This 0% inter-landlord transaction rate indicates that investors are acquiring properties from traditional homeowners or possibly new construction, thereby removing stock from the owner-occupied market.

Pricing strategies vary by tier among the most active buyers. New, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $305,685. In contrast, the single transaction in the two-property tier was for a much lower-priced asset at $36,750, suggesting a different acquisition strategy or property type.

The combination of a high market share and a 0% landlord-to-landlord purchase rate shows that investors are a primary driver of net housing conversion from owner-occupied to rental stock in Goshen County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Goshen County's real estate market is defined by small, local investors who control 99.2% of rental homes and are actively buying more.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,204 single-family residential properties, representing a 31.9% share of the total market in Goshen County. The ownership is dominated by individuals, who hold 1,074 properties (89.2%), compared to just 143 (11.9%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $267,265, securing a 6.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners, which translates to a savings of $18,919 per property.
Activity
Investors were a major force in the market, purchasing 32.6% of all homes sold in Q4 2025. This activity was led by new entrants, with 15 first-time landlords acquiring 11 properties during the quarter.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 99.2% of all investor-held SFRs. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, where they control 55.6% of the homes. This signals a shift to corporate structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, with an 18-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (18 buys vs. 1 sell). While the tiny institutional segment has been volatile, the overall market trend is one of consistent portfolio accumulation.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Goshen County, WY, is fundamentally a story of local, small-scale enterprise. Investors own a substantial 1,204 single-family homes, making up 31.9% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This market is not driven by Wall Street, but by individuals, who own 89.2% of these properties. The distribution is heavily skewed towards 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 99.2% of investor-owned homes, while institutional firms (1,000+ properties) have a near-zero presence at just 0.1%. This structure, detailed in our latest Investor Pulse reports, highlights a market defined by grassroots participation.

Investor behavior in Goshen County is characterized by active and strategic acquisition. In Q1 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 18 properties for every one they sold. They captured 28.1% of all market transactions while demonstrating savvy purchasing, securing properties for 6.6% less than traditional homeowners. This activity is fueled by a constant influx of new participants, with 15 first-time landlords entering the market in Q4 2025 alone. Transactional data further shows that investors are primarily buying from the owner-occupied market, as zero Q1 purchases came from other landlords.

The key takeaway for Goshen County is that the rental market's health and growth depend on the financial stability and continued investment of thousands of individual and small business owners. The market structure defies the common narrative of corporate consolidation, instead revealing a fragmented and competitive environment. This dynamic suggests that policies and market conditions affecting individual investors will have an outsized impact on the availability and affordability of rental housing across the county. The consistent net-buying trend indicates these small investors have long-term confidence in the region.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 06:12 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Goshen (WY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Goshen (WY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-wy-goshen/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.