Worth (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Worth (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Worth (IA)
2,461
Total Investors in Worth (IA)
340
Investor Owned SFR in Worth (IA)
282(11.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
293
SFR Owned
236
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
47
SFR Owned
57
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 282 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Worth County's Investor Market, But Activity Halted in Late 2025
Investors own 282 Single-Family Residential properties in Worth County, representing 11.5% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 96.2% of the portfolio. After a period of being strong net buyers, landlord acquisition activity came to a complete stop in the last quarter of 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 282 SFR properties in Worth County, with individuals holding a dominant 83.7% share.
The majority of investor-owned homes are held free and clear, with cash-owned properties (223) outnumbering financed ones (59) by nearly 4-to-1. Of the 282 properties, 271 are classified as rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income generation across the portfolio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord acquisition pricing shows high volatility, with investors securing a 58.5% discount in Q3 2025.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is inconsistent due to low transaction volumes. Landlords paid a $104,625 discount in Q3 2025 ($74,143 vs $178,768) but paid a $15,804 premium in Q2 2025. Purchase activity by landlords dropped to zero in the latest recorded quarters.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing activity in Worth County came to a halt in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0% of the 10 homes sold.
With zero properties purchased by landlords, both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors were completely inactive during the quarter. This marks a significant pause in acquisition activity compared to historical trends.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate, controlling 96.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 70.9% of the investor-owned housing stock, representing 205 properties. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in Worth County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios of 11 or more properties.
In the 1-10 property range, individuals own a clear majority. However, for landlords in the 11-20 property tier, companies own 83.3% of the homes. Anomaly exists where a single large portfolio (101-1000 tier) is held by an individual.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 50459 (Northwood) zip code with 88 properties.
While 50459 has the highest count of investor properties, the 50440 (Grafton) zip code has the highest penetration rate at 17.1%. The 50448 (Joice) zip code also shows a high concentration with a 16.0% investor ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Worth County have been strong net buyers, purchasing 7.3 times more properties than they sold in 2025.
This net buying trend was consistent, with a 7.33 buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (22 buys vs. 3 sells) and a 3.0 ratio in 2024 (27 buys vs. 9 sells). There is no institutional transaction activity, as they have no presence in the county.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord transaction activity was zero in Q4 2025, accounting for 0% of the 11 total market transactions.
This inactivity was uniform across all tiers, from single-property landlords to the largest operators in the county. As a result, there were no inter-landlord trades during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 282 SFR properties in Worth County, with individuals holding a dominant 83.7% share.
Detailed Findings

In Worth County, investors hold 282 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 11.5% of the total 2,461 SFRs in the market. This highlights a significant, yet not dominant, investor presence in the local housing landscape.

Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals over corporations. Individual landlords own 236 properties, making up 83.7% of the investor portfolio, while company-owned properties number just 57, or 20.2%.

A defining characteristic of the Worth County investor market is the preference for cash purchases. There are 223 cash-owned properties compared to only 59 that are financed, a ratio of 3.8 to 1. This suggests that many local investors are not reliant on leverage to build their portfolios.

The portfolio is clearly focused on generating rental income. A total of 271 properties are identified as rented, accounting for 96.1% of all investor-owned SFRs. This indicates that the primary strategy for the vast majority of local landlords is long-term holding for rental revenue.

The market structure is composed of 340 distinct landlord entities, with 293 being individuals and 47 being companies. The higher number of entities compared to properties underscores the prevalence of single-property landlords in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord acquisition pricing shows high volatility, with investors securing a 58.5% discount in Q3 2025.
Detailed Findings

Acquisition pricing for landlords in Worth County is highly variable, a common trait in markets with low transaction volumes. In Q3 2025, landlords paid an average of $74,143, a staggering 58.5% less than traditional homeowners who paid $178,768. This represents a discount of $104,625 per property.

This pricing advantage was not consistent across recent quarters. In Q2 2025, the trend reversed, with landlords paying a 9.5% premium, or $15,804 more than homeowners ($182,400 vs. $166,596). This volatility suggests that individual transactions, rather than broad market trends, heavily influence quarterly averages.

Looking at the broader trend, average acquisition prices for investors have declined significantly from a high of $182,400 in Q2 2025 to $74,143 in Q3 2025. This fluctuation highlights the challenge of identifying stable price points in a thinly traded market.

Critically, the data indicates a complete halt in landlord purchasing activity. Landlords acquired zero properties in 2024 and in each of the first three quarters of 2025 according to this dataset. The reported average prices for these periods are based on extremely limited or potentially historical data points and should be interpreted with caution.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity in Worth County came to a halt in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0% of the 10 homes sold.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition activity in Worth County was non-existent in the fourth quarter of 2025. Of the 10 total SFR properties sold in the market during this period, none were purchased by investors, resulting in a 0% market share.

This halt in activity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords, who represent the vast majority of owners in the county, made zero purchases. Likewise, there was no activity from mid-size or institutional investors.

The lack of new acquisitions means there were no new landlords entering the Worth County market in Q4 2025. This contrasts with historical data showing a steady, if small, flow of new investors buying their first rental property.

This period of inactivity stands out, especially when viewed against transaction data from earlier in the year which showed consistent net buying from landlords. The Q4 pause could signal a shift in local investor sentiment or a lack of desirable inventory meeting their criteria.

The complete absence of investor purchases suggests that 100% of Q4 2025 home sales went to other buyer types, such as traditional homeowners, reinforcing that the quarter's market was driven entirely by non-investor demand.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate, controlling 96.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Worth County is defined by small, local operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a commanding 96.2% of all investor-owned single-family homes, demonstrating a highly fragmented market structure.

First-time or single-property landlords are the bedrock of this market. Investors in Tier 01 (1 property) own 205 homes, which represents 70.9% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. This highlights the importance of small-scale real estate investing in the community.

Mid-size landlords hold a minimal footprint. Those owning 11-50 properties control just 3.5% of the market combined (10 properties). This sharp drop-off after the 10-property tier further illustrates the lack of portfolio consolidation in the area.

There is no evidence of institutional-scale investment in Worth County. The largest ownership tier present holds just a single property, and Tier 09 (1,000+ properties) has a 0.0% share, meaning large corporate landlords are not a factor in this local market.

The distribution is heavily front-loaded: landlords owning 1-5 properties (Tiers 01-03) collectively own 88.9% of all investor-held SFRs, cementing the market's reliance on the smallest-scale investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios of 11 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Worth County clearly shifts as portfolio sizes increase. While individual investors form the backbone of the market, companies become the preferred entity for larger holdings. The crossover point occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 5 out of 6 properties (83.3%).

For mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), individual ownership is the standard. Individuals own 86.9% of single-property portfolios and maintain a majority through the 6-10 property tier (66.7%). This indicates that most smaller investors operate without a formal corporate structure.

The highest concentration of company ownership is found in the 11-20 property tier. This suggests that as local investors scale beyond 10 properties, they are more likely to incorporate for liability protection and operational efficiency.

An interesting outlier exists in the market: the single property listed in the 'Large' (101-1000) tier is owned by an individual, not a company. This is unusual for a portfolio of that size and represents a significant holding for a single person.

Across all tiers, individual investors own a total of 236 properties compared to 57 for companies, reinforcing the overall dominance of personal ownership in Worth County's rental market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 50459 (Northwood) zip code with 88 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Worth County is not evenly distributed, with specific zip codes showing higher concentrations. The 50459 zip code, which includes Northwood, is the hub for investor activity, containing 88 investor-owned properties, though this only represents 8.9% of its housing stock.

The highest rate of investor ownership is found in smaller, surrounding zip codes. The 50440 zip code (Grafton) leads with a 17.1% investor ownership rate, followed closely by 50448 (Joice) at 16.0% and 50446 (Kensett) at 15.5%. This indicates a deeper market penetration in these specific communities.

There is a clear distinction between the areas with the highest raw count of investor properties and those with the highest percentage. Northwood (50459) has the volume, but smaller towns like Grafton have a proportionally larger share of their homes owned by investors.

The top five zip codes by investor-owned count are 50459 (88), 50448 (34), 50440 (26), 50446 (25), and 50444 (25). Together, these areas account for a significant majority of the investor activity in the county.

Analyzing these geographic pockets is crucial for understanding local market dynamics, as investor strategies may differ between the higher-volume areas and the higher-penetration communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Worth County have been strong net buyers, purchasing 7.3 times more properties than they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historically, landlords in Worth County have been in a strong accumulation phase. In 2025, they were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 22 properties while selling only 3, a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.33. This indicates a strong appetite for expanding rental portfolios.

The net buying behavior was also evident in the preceding year. In 2024, landlords purchased 27 homes and sold 9, resulting in a net gain of 18 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.0. This pattern shows sustained growth in investor holdings over the last two years.

Recent quarterly data confirms this trend. In Q3 2025, investors bought 8 properties and sold 2 (a 4x ratio), and in Q2 2025, they bought 10 and sold only 1 (a 10x ratio). This demonstrates consistent acquisition momentum leading up to the end of the year.

All transaction activity is attributable to individual and small company landlords. With a 0.0% ownership share, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) recorded no buy or sell transactions in any observed timeframe.

This consistent history of net accumulation makes the halt in purchasing seen in other datasets for Q4 2025 particularly noteworthy, suggesting a potential turning point or temporary pause in local investor strategy.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord transaction activity was zero in Q4 2025, accounting for 0% of the 11 total market transactions.
Detailed Findings

In the final quarter of 2025, the investor market in Worth County went dormant. Landlords were involved in zero of the 11 single-family home transactions that occurred, marking their share of market activity at 0%.

The purchasing pause affected investors of all sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who are typically the most active, recorded no transactions. Similarly, the county's few mid-size investors also remained on the sidelines.

Consequently, there was no inter-landlord trading during the quarter. The metric for properties 'Bought From Landlords' was zero across all tiers, indicating a complete lack of liquidity within the existing investor pool.

This absence of activity means there were no new pricing benchmarks set by investors in Q4. Average purchase prices for all tiers were effectively $0, highlighting the complete shutdown in acquisitions.

The data points to a market where all Q4 2025 activity was driven by non-investors, such as traditional homeowners. This abrupt stop contrasts with the consistent net-buying behavior observed in previous quarters and years.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Worth County's investor market is controlled by mom-and-pop landlords, who paused all buying activity in late 2025
Holdings
Landlords own 282 SFR properties, 11.5% of Worth County's market. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 236 properties (83.7%), while companies own the remaining 57 (20.2%).
Pricing
Landlord acquisition prices are volatile in the low-volume market, but they secured a notable 58.5% discount compared to homeowners in Q3 2025, paying $74,143 versus the homeowner average of $178,768.
Activity
Investor purchase activity halted in Q4 2025, with landlords accounting for 0% of all sales. This pause followed a period of strong acquisition, indicating a significant short-term shift in the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) exercise near-total control over the investor market, owning 96.2% of all investor-held SFRs, while institutional investors have no presence in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties, where they control 83.3% of the assets.
Transactions
Prior to their recent pause, landlords were strong net buyers with a 7.33x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (22 buys vs. 3 sells). Institutional investors were not a factor, with zero recorded transactions.
Market Narrative

In Worth County, Iowa, the real estate investor landscape is a hyper-local affair, fundamentally shaped by small, independent operators. Investors own 282 single-family homes, representing 11.5% of the county's total SFR market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly in the hands of individuals, who own 83.7% of these properties (236 homes). The market structure detailed in these Investor Pulse reports defies the national narrative of corporate dominance. 'Mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 homes) control a staggering 96.2% of investor-owned housing, while institutional-scale investors have zero presence.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic, if infrequent, acquisitions and a clear preference for outright ownership. Cash-owned properties outnumber financed ones by nearly four to one, suggesting low leverage and financial stability among local landlords. While pricing can be volatile due to low transaction counts, investors have demonstrated an ability to secure significant discounts, paying 58.5% less than traditional homeowners in one recent quarter. Historically, these investors have been in a phase of accumulation, buying 7.3 times more properties than they sold in 2025. However, this momentum came to an abrupt halt in Q4 2025, when landlord purchasing activity dropped to zero.

The key takeaway for Worth County is that its rental housing market is sustained by its own community members, not outside corporations. The recent pause in buying could signal a response to changing local economic conditions, a lack of suitable inventory, or a deliberate strategic shift to focus on managing existing portfolios. This market serves as a clear example of a traditional, fragmented ownership environment where the largest players are small local businesses and individual families, a dynamic that shapes everything from rental prices to property maintenance standards across the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 01:11 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Worth (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Worth (IA) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ia-worth/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.