Cuming (NE) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Cuming (NE) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Cuming (NE)
2,393
Total Investors in Cuming (NE)
817
Investor Owned SFR in Cuming (NE)
693(29.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
738
SFR Owned
581
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
79
SFR Owned
118
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 693 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Investors Dominate Cuming County, Acquiring 45% of Homes and Driving Market Activity
In Cuming County, investors own 29.0% of all SFR properties, a share dominated by mom-and-pop landlords who control 98.8% of the investor portfolio. In the last quarter, these small investors bought 45% of all homes sold and are acting as aggressive net buyers, accumulating properties at a rate of 12-to-1 over sales.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 693 SFR properties in Cuming County, with 83.8% held by individuals.
Cash purchases (528) significantly outweigh financed ones (165), a ratio of more than 3-to-1. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 677 of the 693 properties identified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a surprising 33.2% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $294,409.
This reverses a prior trend where landlords typically secured discounts, such as the 55.5% discount seen in Q3 2025. This volatility points to a dynamic pricing environment where investors are willing to pay more for specific, desirable assets.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 45.0% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter.
All 9 of these landlord purchases were made by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties). New single-property landlords were the most active group, responsible for buying 7 of the 9 properties acquired by investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own two-thirds of the entire investor portfolio (494 properties, 66.8%). There is no institutional (1000+ property) ownership recorded in the county, defying the narrative of corporate dominance.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual landlords own the vast majority of properties across all small portfolio tiers.
Companies gain their strongest foothold in the 6-10 property tier, owning 41.8% of properties in that category. However, individuals still maintain majority ownership in every single tier, highlighting their market-wide dominance.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip codes 68791, 68004, and 68788.
The zip codes 68004 and 68791 show remarkable investor penetration rates of 48.4% and 40.3% respectively. These figures indicate that nearly half of the single-family homes in certain areas are investor-owned.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Cuming County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 12 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This strong net-buying trend has been consistent over time, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 5.6x in 2025 (73 buys vs 13 sells) and 7.3x in 2024 (51 buys vs 7 sells). There is no recorded institutional transaction activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 38.7% of all SFR transactions in the first quarter of 2026.
New, single-property investors paid the highest average price at $337,611. Notably, 0% of landlord purchases in Q1 were from other landlords, suggesting they are acquiring all properties from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 693 SFR properties in Cuming County, with 83.8% held by individuals.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a significant footprint in Cuming County, owning 693 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 29.0% of the total 2,393 SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 581 properties, making up 83.8% of the total investor portfolio, while companies own the remaining 118 properties (17.0%).

This market is defined by 817 distinct landlords, with 738 being individuals and 79 classified as companies. This nearly 10-to-1 ratio of individual-to-company entities underscores the local, small-scale nature of real estate investing in the area.

Cash is the preferred method of acquisition, with 528 properties owned outright compared to 165 that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base that is less reliant on traditional lending.

The portfolio's primary function is clear, with 677 properties classified as rented. This near-total rental penetration confirms that the vast majority of these properties are actively serving as housing for tenants.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a surprising 33.2% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $294,409.
Detailed Findings

In a striking departure from typical market behavior, landlords in Cuming County paid significantly more than traditional homeowners in the first quarter of 2026. The average landlord acquisition price was $294,409, a $73,381 premium (33.2%) over the homeowner average of $221,028.

This pricing inversion represents a sharp reversal from previous periods. For instance, in Q3 2025, landlords paid an average of $138,808, securing a massive $173,259 discount (55.5%) compared to homeowners.

The pricing dynamic has been volatile, with landlords also paying premiums in Q2 2025 ($18,694 or 6.9%) and Q1 2025 ($34,639 or 21.9%). This suggests investors are not simply seeking bargains but are competing for specific properties, driving prices up.

Despite recent volatility, long-term price appreciation is evident. The average acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $144,209, which climbed to $210,570 in 2024 and $216,131 in 2025, signaling steady market growth.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 45.0% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity reached a high point in the final quarter of 2025, with landlords purchasing 9 of the 20 total SFRs sold, capturing a 45.0% market share of all acquisitions.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of all investor acquisitions, with zero properties purchased by institutional investors.

New market entrants were a powerful force, with 10 distinct single-property entities acquiring 7 homes. This group alone accounted for 77.8% of all landlord buying activity, signaling a growing interest from new investors.

Beyond new entrants, the remaining activity was minimal, with one two-property landlord and one small landlord (3-5 properties) each purchasing a single home.

The data clearly shows that the current acquisition momentum in Cuming County is fueled exclusively by the grassroots, mom-and-pop segment of the market, not large-scale firms.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Cuming County is defined by small, local operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control a staggering 98.8% of the 693 investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market. This group owns 494 properties, representing 66.8% of all investor-held housing, making it the largest segment by a wide margin.

The next-largest segments are also small-scale: landlords with 3-5 properties hold 105 homes (14.2%), and those with two properties own 76 homes (10.3%).

The concentration at the small end of the scale is stark. The top four tiers combined (1-10 properties) account for 729 of the 739 total properties with tier data available.

Significantly, there is a complete absence of large institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties). This underscores that the rental market in Cuming County is a local affair, managed by community-level owners.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual landlords own the vast majority of properties across all small portfolio tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual ownership is the prevailing model across all portfolio sizes in Cuming County. For single-property landlords, individuals own 448 homes (89.8%) compared to just 51 (10.2%) for companies.

This pattern continues in the two-property tier, where individuals hold 58 properties (76.3%), and the 3-5 property tier, with individuals owning 88 properties (83.8%).

The share of company ownership increases with portfolio size, signaling a move toward formal business structures for larger portfolios. Company ownership rises from 10.2% in the single-property tier to 23.7% in the two-property tier, before settling at 16.2% for the 3-5 property tier.

Companies have their most significant presence among landlords owning 6-10 properties, where they hold 23 homes, a 41.8% share of that tier.

Despite this growth in company ownership at higher tiers, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owner. Individuals retain control across the entire spectrum of ownership in this market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip codes 68791, 68004, and 68788.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is not spread evenly across Cuming County but is instead concentrated in a few key areas. The zip code 68788 contains the highest absolute number of investor-owned properties, with 287 homes.

When analyzing by ownership rate, two zip codes stand out as major investor hotspots. In 68004, investors own 104 properties, which represents 48.4% of the area's entire SFR housing stock.

Similarly, the 68791 zip code has a very high investor penetration rate of 40.3%, corresponding to 225 investor-owned homes.

Another area of interest is 68716, where the investor ownership rate is 30.4%, also well above the county average.

This geographic clustering suggests that investors are employing targeted strategies, focusing their capital on specific neighborhoods with favorable conditions for rental properties.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Cuming County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 12 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Cuming County are clearly in an accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords purchased 12 properties while selling only 1, making them strong net buyers.

This is not a recent development but rather a sustained trend. Throughout 2025, investors acquired 73 homes and sold just 13, resulting in a net gain of 60 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 5.6 to 1.

The year 2024 showed an even more aggressive acquisition strategy, with 51 properties purchased and only 7 sold, a ratio of more than 7 to 1.

This sustained, high-velocity net buying across multiple years indicates strong and lasting confidence in the local rental market among Cuming County's investors.

The complete absence of transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) confirms that these market dynamics are driven exclusively by smaller, independent players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 38.7% of all SFR transactions in the first quarter of 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a major role in the Q1 2026 market, participating in 12 of the 31 total SFR transactions, which translates to a 38.7% share of all activity.

This activity was entirely concentrated among mom-and-pop landlords. First-time or single-property investors were the most active, conducting 10 of the 12 landlord transactions.

A distinct pricing pattern emerged among tiers, with new investors in Tier 01 paying a significantly higher average price of $337,611 per property.

In contrast, more experienced small landlords paid substantially less, with the Tier 02 buyer paying $70,000 and the Tier 03 buyer paying $130,000. This suggests new entrants may be paying a premium to enter the market.

Notably, none of the investor purchases in Q1 were from other landlords. This 0% inter-landlord transaction rate indicates that investors are sourcing their inventory entirely from the homeowner market rather than trading properties among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors drive Cuming County's market, controlling 98.8% of rentals and buying 45% of homes sold.
Holdings
Landlords own 693 SFR properties, representing 29.0% of the market in Cuming County, NE. Individual investors hold a commanding 581 properties (83.8%), with companies owning the remaining 118 (17.0%).
Pricing
In a surprising reversal, landlords paid a 33.2% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, an average of $73,381 more per property ($294,409 vs $221,028).
Activity
Landlords purchased 45.0% of all properties sold in the last quarter (9 of 20), with 10 new single-property landlord entities entering the market. All landlord buying activity came from mom-and-pop investors.
Market Share
Small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) completely control the investor market, owning 98.8% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1000+) have no presence, owning 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier, though company ownership share grows from 10.2% for single-property owners to 41.8% for landlords holding 6-10 properties.
Transactions
Landlords are firmly in an accumulation phase, acting as net buyers with a 12-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (12 buys vs 1 sell). There is no institutional transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Cuming County, NE, is characterized by a high degree of investor involvement, but not from the large-scale corporations often seen in national headlines. Investors own a significant 29.0% of all single-family residential properties, totaling 693 homes. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by local, small-scale players: 83.8% of these properties are owned by individuals, and mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command a near-total 98.8% share of all investor-owned housing. The complete absence of institutional ownership paints a picture of a market driven by community-level capital and strategy.

Investor behavior in Cuming County is aggressive and confident. In the most recent quarter, landlords acquired 45.0% of all homes sold, with all purchases made by mom-and-pop operators. These investors are in a clear accumulation phase, acting as strong net buyers with a 12-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026. Their pricing strategies are dynamic; after a history of securing discounts, they paid a 33.2% premium over homeowners in Q1, suggesting they are competing fiercely for desirable assets rather than just seeking bargains.

The key takeaway from Cuming County is that a robust, investor-driven market does not necessarily mean a corporate-dominated one. The data reveals a thriving ecosystem of individual and small-business landlords who are actively growing their portfolios and shaping local housing dynamics. High investor concentration in specific zip codes, like 68004 (48.4%) and 68791 (40.3%), indicates these local experts are executing targeted investment strategies. This market serves as a case study in how grassroots investment can become a primary force in a local housing economy.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:19 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Cuming (NE)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Cuming (NE) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ne-cuming/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.