Knott (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Knott (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Knott (KY)
3,526
Total Investors in Knott (KY)
1,323
Investor Owned SFR in Knott (KY)
1,049(29.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,240
SFR Owned
966
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
83
SFR Owned
88
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,049 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Knott County With 99.6% Ownership, Driving Market Activity
Investors own 29.8% of all Single-Family Residential properties in Knott County, a market overwhelmingly controlled by small-scale operators. In Q1 2026, landlords flipped from securing deep price discounts to paying a 19.3% premium over homeowners, while 100% of investor purchase activity came from new, single-property landlords.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,049 SFR properties in Knott County, with individuals holding 92.1%.
The vast majority of investor properties, 1,011 out of 1,049, were acquired with cash, with only 38 being financed. The market consists of 1,240 individual landlords compared to just 83 operating as companies. Rental properties account for 1,036 of the total investor portfolio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 19.3% premium in Q1, a stark reversal from deep discounts in 2025.
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $166,500, which was $26,955 more than traditional homeowners. This marks a significant shift from 2025, when they secured discounts as high as 79.0% ($105,929) in Q3 and 76.6% ($136,970) in Q2.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 34.6% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of investor purchases, with all 9 properties acquired by new, single-property investors. No mid-size or institutional investors made acquisitions this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.6% of investor-owned SFRs in Knott County.
Single-property landlords alone own 88.4% of the investor-held housing stock, totaling 945 properties. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just a single property, representing a mere 0.1% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every portfolio tier, with no company majority.
In the single-property tier, individuals own 92.3% of homes (877 properties). This dominance continues into the 3-5 property tier, where individuals still own 92.9% (52 properties), showing no crossover point to company control.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 41822 and 41839, with ownership rates exceeding 30%.
The highest investor ownership rate is found in zip code 41743, where 46.2% of homes are investor-owned. Other high-penetration areas include 41834 (44.0%) and 41725 (40.9%), indicating pockets of intense investment.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Knott County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10 properties for every 2 sold in Q1.
This strong buying trend is consistent over time, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 18.3 in 2025 (55 buys vs. 3 sells) and 5.8 in 2024 (46 buys vs. 8 sells). There was no recorded transaction activity for institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 31.2% of all Q1 property transactions in Knott County.
All 10 landlord transactions were conducted by new, single-property investors, who paid an average of $166,500. Only 10% of these purchases were from other landlords, indicating that most acquisitions are from the traditional market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,049 SFR properties in Knott County, with individuals holding 92.1%.
Detailed Findings

In Knott County, investors hold a significant 1,049 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 29.8% of the total 3,526 SFRs in the market. This demonstrates a substantial investor presence within the local housing landscape.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals, who own 966 properties, or 92.1% of the entire investor portfolio. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 88, accounting for only 8.4% of the total, underscoring the market's reliance on small-scale real estate investing.

This individual dominance is further reflected in the number of active landlords. There are 1,240 individual landlords compared to only 83 company entities, a ratio of nearly 15 to 1. This highlights that the rental market is primarily supplied by local, small-scale operators rather than large corporations.

A defining characteristic of the Knott County investor market is its reliance on cash transactions. An overwhelming 1,011 properties (96.4%) in the investor portfolio are owned outright with cash, while a mere 38 properties (3.6%) are financed. This suggests a market with low leverage and investors who are not heavily dependent on traditional lending.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income, with 1,036 of the 1,049 properties classified as rented. This focus on non-owner-occupied units confirms that the primary strategy for investors in this region is providing long-term rental housing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 19.3% premium in Q1, a stark reversal from deep discounts in 2025.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic shift in acquisition strategy occurred in Q1 2026, with landlords paying an average price of $166,500 per property. This price was 19.3% higher than the $139,545 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a $26,955 premium and indicating a more aggressive purchasing environment.

This Q1 premium marks a complete reversal of the trend seen throughout 2025. In Q3 2025, landlords achieved a staggering 79.0% discount, paying just $28,214 compared to the homeowner average of $134,143. Similarly, in Q2 2025, they paid $41,930, a 76.6% discount against the homeowner price of $178,900.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown extreme volatility. It swung from a $136,970 landlord discount in Q2 2025 to a $26,955 landlord premium in Q1 2026. This suggests that landlord purchasing power and strategies are highly fluid and responsive to changing local market conditions.

Overall price trends show significant fluctuation. The average acquisition price for landlords in 2024 was $172,517, which dropped to $67,038 in 2025 before rebounding to $166,500 in the first quarter of 2026. This highlights a lack of consistent price appreciation and a market characterized by sharp, short-term movements.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 34.6% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the market in the last quarter, with landlords purchasing 9 of the 26 total SFRs sold, capturing a 34.6% market share. This level of activity underscores their role as a primary source of demand in Knott County.

The entirety of investor purchasing activity was driven by the smallest operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made up 100.0% of all investor acquisitions, demonstrating that market growth is fueled exclusively by small-scale investors.

Drilling deeper, all 9 properties acquired by landlords were purchased by single-property investors (Tier 01). This indicates that market entry by new landlords is the sole driver of investor purchasing, with no acquisitions from existing mid-size or large-scale landlords.

The concentration of activity in the smallest tier is absolute. The 9 properties were purchased by 10 different entities, confirming that these are new entrants building their portfolios from scratch rather than a single investor buying multiple properties.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the market, acquiring zero properties. This reinforces the narrative that the Knott County investment landscape is defined by local, small-scale participants, not large corporate entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.6% of investor-owned SFRs in Knott County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Knott County is almost entirely composed of small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) command a near-total 99.6% share of all investor-owned SFRs, highlighting an extreme concentration of ownership among small-scale operators.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) forms the bedrock of the rental market, alone accounting for 945 properties. This represents 88.4% of all investor-owned housing, showing that the market is overwhelmingly sustained by individuals who own just one rental home.

Ownership quickly dissipates in larger tiers. Two-property landlords hold 62 properties (5.8%), and those with 3-5 properties hold 56 (5.2%). Beyond this, ownership becomes negligible, with only 5 properties held by investors with more than 10 homes.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a virtually nonexistent footprint in Knott County. This tier controls just a single property, which accounts for only 0.1% of the investor market. This finding directly counters any narrative of large-scale corporate takeovers in this area.

The data clearly shows a market structure built on a broad base of new and small investors. The path to portfolio growth appears limited, with very few landlords expanding beyond a handful of properties, which maintains the hyper-localized, small-scale character of the rental market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every portfolio tier, with no company majority.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across all small-to-mid-size portfolio tiers in Knott County, with no evidence of a shift toward corporate ownership as portfolios grow. In the largest tier with a detailed breakdown (3-5 properties), individuals own 52 of 56 properties, a commanding 92.9% share.

This pattern holds true for smaller portfolios as well. Among two-property landlords, individuals own 57 properties (91.9%) compared to just 5 for companies (8.1%). For single-property landlords, the split is 877 individual-owned properties (92.3%) versus 73 for companies (7.7%).

Unlike in larger urban markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. The data suggests that even as investors scale their portfolios to 3-5 properties, the overwhelming majority continue to operate as individuals rather than formalizing as corporate entities.

Company ownership remains a small fraction of the market regardless of portfolio size. The consistent 7-8% share for companies across the first few tiers indicates a stable but minor role for corporate structures in the local investment scene.

This dynamic reinforces the highly personalized nature of the Knott County rental market. The data indicates that tenants are far more likely to be renting from an individual landlord than a property management company or a large corporate owner, regardless of the size of their landlord's portfolio.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 41822 and 41839, with ownership rates exceeding 30%.
Detailed Findings

Investor holdings are heavily concentrated in specific zip codes within Knott County. The 41822 zip code leads by volume with 143 investor-owned properties, representing a 32.4% ownership rate. Following this, the 41839 zip code has 71 investor properties but a higher penetration rate of 36.8%.

While some regions lead by sheer count, others stand out for the high percentage of investor ownership. Zip code 41743 has the highest saturation, with investors owning 46.2% of the SFR housing stock. Close behind are 41834 (44.0%) and 41725 (40.9%), revealing hyper-local pockets where nearly half of the homes are rentals.

There is a distinction between the areas with the highest count of investor properties and those with the highest percentage. For example, 41822 leads in total count (143), but its 32.4% ownership rate is lower than several other zip codes, suggesting it is a larger area with more overall housing units.

The data for zip code 41760 appears incomplete, but other top regions show significant investor presence. Zip codes 41831 (88 properties, 27.4% rate) and 41701 (80 properties, 25.4% rate) also demonstrate a strong investor footprint, with over a quarter of homes being investor-owned.

This geographical analysis points to a targeted investment strategy, with certain neighborhoods and communities being clear favorites for landlords. These high-concentration zones likely offer favorable conditions for rental investment, such as higher demand or lower acquisition costs.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Knott County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10 properties for every 2 sold in Q1.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Knott County are firmly in an accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated this by purchasing 10 properties while only selling 2, establishing a strong net-buyer position in the market.

This aggressive buying behavior is not a new phenomenon. In 2025, the trend was even more pronounced, with landlords acquiring 55 properties and selling just 3. During 2024, they purchased 46 properties and sold 8. This sustained pattern signals long-term confidence in the local rental market.

The buy-to-sell ratio highlights the intensity of this accumulation. The ratio was 5-to-1 in the most recent quarter, but it was a staggering 18.3-to-1 for the full year of 2025. This indicates an exceptionally low level of portfolio churn and a strong focus on holding assets.

The data shows no transaction activity from institutional investors (1,000+ tier). This confirms that the net-buying pressure in the market is driven entirely by small and mid-sized landlords, reinforcing their role as the primary force shaping the local housing landscape.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 31.2% of all Q1 property transactions in Knott County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a significant role in market liquidity during Q1, participating in 10 of the 32 total SFR transactions, which translates to a 31.2% share of all market activity. This highlights their importance as a consistent source of capital and sales in the region.

All investor transaction activity this quarter came exclusively from the smallest tier. Single-property landlords accounted for all 10 transactions, reinforcing that market dynamism is currently driven by new entrants rather than existing portfolio holders.

These new investors paid an average purchase price of $166,500 in Q1. With no activity from other tiers, it's impossible to compare pricing strategies, but this figure sets the benchmark for entry-level investment in the current market.

Inter-landlord trading was minimal. Only 1 of the 10 properties purchased by investors (10.0%) was acquired from another landlord. This suggests that new investors are primarily sourcing their deals from the open market or directly from homeowners, not from other investors liquidating their assets.

The absence of transactions from institutional or mid-sized tiers is notable. This lack of activity from larger players suggests that the transaction market, much like the ownership landscape, is completely dominated by small, independent operators.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors are the entire market in Knott County, owning 99.6% of rental homes and driving all purchase activity.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,049 SFR properties, representing 29.8% of Knott County's market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 966 properties (92.1%) compared to just 88 (8.4%) for companies.
Pricing
In a sharp market reversal, landlords paid 19.3% more than homeowners in Q1 2026 ($166,500 vs $139,545), a premium of $26,955 that contrasts with deep discounts seen throughout 2025.
Activity
Investors purchased 34.6% of all homes sold in the last quarter (9 properties), with 100% of this activity coming from 10 new, single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market with a 99.6% ownership share of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just a single property (0.1%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes, maintaining over 91% ownership even in the 3-5 property tier. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners in Knott County.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 5x buy/sell ratio in Q1 (10 buys vs 2 sells), a trend consistent with prior years. Institutional investors recorded no transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The market report for Knott County, KY, reveals a housing market where small, independent investors are not just the majority, but effectively the entire market. Landlords own 1,049 single-family homes, comprising a significant 29.8% of the total SFR stock. This ownership is almost exclusively in the hands of individuals, who control 92.1% of the investor-owned properties. The market structure is defined by its granular nature: mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.6% of investor housing, while institutional firms with 1,000+ properties have a negligible footprint of just one home.

Investor behavior in Knott County is characterized by aggressive acquisition and a recent shift in pricing strategy. In the first quarter, 100% of landlord purchases were made by new, single-property investors, who acquired 34.6% of all homes sold. These new entrants paid an average of $166,500, a 19.3% premium over traditional homeowners, reversing a trend of deep discounts seen in 2025. Furthermore, landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring five properties for every one they sold in Q1, signaling sustained confidence and a focus on long-term holds fueled by an overwhelming preference for cash purchases over financing.

The key takeaway from this analysis is that Knott County's rental market is a closed loop of hyper-local, small-scale capitalism. There is no significant corporate or institutional presence; instead, the market is shaped by individuals entering the space one property at a time. This creates a unique dynamic where market growth, pricing, and housing supply are dictated by the actions of hundreds of small operators, not a handful of large ones. This structure suggests a resilient but potentially fragmented rental market, deeply embedded in the local community fabric.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:51 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Knott (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Knott (KY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ky-knott/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.