Gilliam (OR) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Gilliam (OR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Gilliam (OR)
502
Total Investors in Gilliam (OR)
470
Investor Owned SFR in Gilliam (OR)
374(74.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
438
SFR Owned
330
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
32
SFR Owned
47
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 374 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Gilliam County: A Market Defined by Mom-and-Pop Dominance and Extreme Investor Penetration
Investors own a staggering 74.5% of the single-family housing stock in Gilliam County, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.7% of that portfolio. In the latest quarter, landlords bought 80% of all available homes, and institutional investors remain completely absent from the market, which is characterized by strong net buying from small, individual investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 74.5% of Gilliam County's SFR market; 88.2% of these are held by individuals.
Cash is the dominant financing method, used for 312 out of 374 properties. The entire portfolio of 374 properties is categorized as rented and non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a staggering 46.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q2 2025.
The price gap was substantial, with landlords paying $183,600 versus the homeowner price of $340,000 in Q2 2025. Data for the most recent quarter was insufficient for a direct comparison.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 80.0% of all SFR properties sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for 100% of these purchases. All 4 properties were bought by new, single-property investors, indicating grassroots market entry.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 99.7% of all investor-owned housing in the county.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in this market. Single-property landlords alone own 299 properties, representing 79.1% of the total investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners only in the 6-10 property tier, holding 58.8% of properties.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level, owning 92.4% of single-property portfolios. Across all tiers, individuals own 330 properties compared to just 47 for companies.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 97823 zip code holding 268 properties at an 81.7% ownership rate.
This single zip code accounts for the vast majority of investor holdings in Gilliam County. The only other significant area, zip code 97812, also shows high penetration with a 62.7% investor ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers, acquiring 12 properties while selling only 2 in 2025.
This net-buyer trend was consistent with 2024, which saw 13 purchases versus 3 sales. Institutional investors recorded zero transaction activity, underscoring their absence from the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 71.4% of all Q1 2026 transactions, all by new single-property investors.
These new investors paid an average of $122,900. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, suggesting acquisitions are coming from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 74.5% of Gilliam County's SFR market; 88.2% of these are held by individuals.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Gilliam County is exceptionally high, with landlords holding 374 of the 502 total single-family residential properties, a market penetration of 74.5%.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small, individual investors. Individuals own 330 properties, constituting 88.2% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 47 properties (12.6%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 438 of the 470 total landlords are individuals, a ratio of more than 13 to 1 over company investors (32).

Cash transactions are the prevailing acquisition method. A total of 312 properties in landlord portfolios were acquired with cash, dwarfing the 62 properties that are financed. This indicates a market with low leverage and high equity.

The entire investor-owned portfolio of 374 properties is classified as rented and non-owner-occupied, confirming that these holdings are actively used for rental income rather than personal use or speculation.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a staggering 46.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q2 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Gilliam County demonstrate a capacity to acquire properties at a deep discount relative to traditional homeowners. In Q2 2025, the average landlord acquisition price was $183,600, a full $156,400 (or 46.0%) less than the $340,000 paid by homeowners.

This significant pricing advantage continued from Q1 2025, where landlords paid $208,000 against the homeowner price of $284,000, representing a 26.8% discount.

While acquisition volume is low, the trend suggests investors are adept at finding undervalued assets or negotiating favorable terms. The most recent quarterly data (2026-Q1) showed a landlord price of $122,900, but lacked a comparable homeowner price point.

Acquisition prices have fluctuated, with the 2024 yearly average at $228,077, dropping to $187,000 in 2025. This contrasts with the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $186,274, indicating recent prices are returning to those earlier levels.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 80.0% of all SFR properties sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity defined the market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 4 of the 5 total SFR properties sold, capturing an 80.0% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made 100% of the quarter's investor purchases.

Drilling down further, all 4 properties were acquired by new, single-property (Tier 01) investors. This signals that market growth is driven by new entrants rather than portfolio expansion from existing landlords.

A total of 5 new entities entered the market to acquire these 4 properties, suggesting some co-ownership on at least one purchase.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the purchasing landscape, recording zero acquisitions and reinforcing the county's character as a small-investor market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 99.7% of all investor-owned housing in the county.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Gilliam County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), control 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, owning 299 properties, which accounts for 79.1% of the entire investor portfolio.

In stark contrast, institutional-scale investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have absolutely no footprint in this market, with 0.0% ownership. This defies the common narrative of large corporate landlords dominating residential housing.

The ownership concentration at the small end of the spectrum is clear: two-property landlords hold 10.8% (41 properties), while those with 3-5 properties hold 5.3% (20 properties).

The only other active tier is the medium-large category (51-100 properties), which accounts for a single property, or 0.3% of the market, further highlighting the lack of mid-size or large investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners only in the 6-10 property tier, holding 58.8% of properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary force in Gilliam County's rental market, especially at smaller portfolio sizes. They own 92.4% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 85.4% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings.

A distinct crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), where companies take a majority stake for the first time, owning 10 properties (58.8%) compared to 7 owned by individuals (41.2%).

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals maintain a strong majority with 65.0% ownership (13 properties) versus 35.0% for companies (7 properties).

Overall, the portfolio distribution confirms the market's grassroots nature: individuals own 330 of the 374 investor properties, while companies own just 47.

This pattern indicates that as portfolios scale beyond a few properties, investors are more likely to incorporate, but the vast majority of the market remains in the hands of private individuals.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 97823 zip code holding 268 properties at an 81.7% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals extreme concentration of investor ownership within Gilliam County. The 97823 zip code is the undisputed epicenter, containing 268 investor-owned properties.

The investor penetration in this area is exceptionally high, with 81.7% of all SFRs in 97823 owned by investors. This suggests a market heavily tilted towards rentals.

The only other area with significant data, zip code 97812, also displays a very high investor presence, with 106 properties and an ownership rate of 62.7%.

The remaining zip codes listed (97830 and 97843) did not have sufficient data for analysis, reinforcing the idea that investor activity is focused within these two key areas.

This level of concentration indicates that investors are targeting specific communities within the county rather than spreading their holdings evenly.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords remain strong net buyers, acquiring 12 properties while selling only 2 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Gilliam County are in a clear accumulation phase, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In 2025, landlords were strong net buyers, adding a net of 10 properties to their portfolios through 12 purchases and only 2 sales.

This pattern of net acquisition held steady from the previous year. In 2024, investors also added a net of 10 properties, with 13 buys against 3 sells.

The most recent quarterly data from Q3 2025 shows this trend continuing, with 2 properties purchased and only 1 sold.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) posted no transaction activity during any of these periods. The market's transaction flow is driven entirely by smaller, mom-and-pop landlords.

This sustained net-buying behavior indicates strong confidence among local investors and a continuous conversion of properties into the rental housing stock.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 71.4% of all Q1 2026 transactions, all by new single-property investors.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords drove the majority of market activity, participating in 5 of the 7 total transactions for a 71.4% market share.

All 5 of these transactions were purchases made by investors in the single-property (Tier 01) category, reinforcing that market growth comes from new entrants.

The average purchase price for these new landlords was $122,900, a relatively accessible entry point for real estate investing.

Significantly, 0% of these properties were bought from other landlords. This lack of inter-landlord trading means that all new inventory for investors is being sourced from non-investor owners, likely traditional homeowners.

As with all other metrics for Gilliam County, there were zero transactions involving institutional-tier investors, highlighting a market that operates completely independent of large-scale capital.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Command 75% of Gilliam County's Housing Market with Zero Institutional Footprint
Holdings
Investors own 374 single-family properties in Gilliam County, a 74.5% share of the total market. Individual investors hold 330 of these homes (88.2%), while companies own just 47 (12.6%).
Pricing
Landlords acquire properties at a significant discount, paying 46.0% less than homeowners in Q2 2025 ($183,600 vs $340,000).
Activity
In the most recent quarter, landlords purchased 80.0% of all homes sold, with 5 new single-property landlord entities entering the market.
Market Share
Small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control virtually the entire investor market at 99.7%, while institutional investors (1000+) own 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are firmly net buyers, with a 6-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 (12 buys vs 2 sells), and institutional investors are completely inactive.
Market Narrative

In Gilliam County, Oregon, the housing market is defined by an extraordinary level of investor penetration and the complete dominance of small, individual landlords. Investors own 374 single-family homes, representing a 74.5% share of the county's entire SFR stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), who hold 99.7% of all investor-owned properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors have zero presence. The ownership structure is granular, with individuals owning 88.2% of the properties, leaving just 12.6% for companies.

Investor behavior points to a market in a state of active accumulation, driven by new entrants. Landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 80.0% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter. These purchases were made exclusively by new, single-property investors. Financially, these landlords show a distinct advantage, securing properties at steep discounts, including a 46.0% price reduction compared to traditional homeowners in Q2 2025. With 0% of recent acquisitions coming from other landlords, investors are sourcing their inventory directly from the homeowner market.

The key takeaway for Gilliam County is that it operates as a micro-market untouched by institutional capital, where local, individual investors shape the rental landscape. The high ownership concentration, particularly in the 97823 zip code (81.7% investor-owned), indicates a community heavily reliant on rental housing. The continuous influx of new, small landlords and their ability to acquire properties at a discount suggests this trend will persist, further solidifying the county's character as a bastion for the mom-and-pop landlord. This analysis is based on comprehensive assessor data and transaction records, as detailed in this market reports dashboard.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 01:29 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Gilliam (OR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Gilliam (OR) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-or-gilliam/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.