Meigs (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Meigs (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Meigs (TN)
3,080
Total Investors in Meigs (TN)
1,651
Investor Owned SFR in Meigs (TN)
1,165(37.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,568
SFR Owned
1,073
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
83
SFR Owned
97
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,165 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Meigs County, Owning 97.6% of a High-Penetration Investor Market
Investors own 37.8% of all single-family homes in Meigs County, a portfolio of 1,165 properties. This market is defined by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 97.6% of investor housing versus just 0.3% for institutional firms. In Q1 2026, landlords were net buyers, acquiring properties at a 13.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,165 SFR properties in Meigs County, with individual landlords holding 92.1% of the portfolio.
Cash is a major factor, with 900 properties owned outright compared to just 265 that are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 1,159 properties classified as rented. Individual landlords represent the vast majority of entities at 1,568, versus only 83 company landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 13.5% less than homeowners, securing a $58,180 discount on average per property.
The pricing advantage for landlords is volatile, as they paid a premium in early 2025, with a 2.7% premium in Q1 and a 2.2% premium in Q2. Property values have appreciated significantly, with the average 2020-2023 landlord purchase price at $308,403 rising to $373,750 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 11.5% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025, acquiring 3 of the 26 properties on the market.
Mom-and-pop investors accounted for 100% of landlord purchasing activity, all of which occurred in the single-property tier. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero acquisitions, showing no active expansion in the county.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.6% of investor-owned SFRs in Meigs County.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a minimal presence, owning just 3 properties, or 0.3% of the investor-owned market. The market is highly fragmented, with single-property landlords alone accounting for 1,090 properties, which is 92.5% of the entire investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own 94.4% of single-property portfolios, but companies gain a 50% share in the 6-10 property tier.
While individuals dominate the smallest tiers, a clear pattern of incorporation emerges as portfolios grow. In the 3-5 property tier, companies already own a 42.9% share. For the largest local portfolios (51-100 properties), ownership is split 50/50 between an individual and a company.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip codes 37322 and 37880 containing 83% of all investor-owned properties.
Certain zip codes have extremely high investor penetration rates, reaching 100.0% in 37846 and 46.9% in 37880. The area with the most investor properties, 37322 (637 homes), has a lower ownership rate of 34.6% compared to other hotspots.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Meigs County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 4 properties and selling only 1 in Q1 2026.
This net-buying trend has been robust over time, with investors adding a net 39 properties in 2025 and a net 52 properties in 2024. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) have been completely inactive, with zero buys or sells recorded in the available data.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 10.0% of all Q1 2026 transactions, with all 4 purchases made by single-property investors.
These new, entry-level landlords paid an average of $373,750 for their properties. Data shows 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, suggesting acquisitions are primarily sourced from the traditional homeowner market. Institutional investors made no transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,165 SFR properties in Meigs County, with individual landlords holding 92.1% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a substantial footprint in Meigs County, controlling 1,165 single-family residential properties, which constitutes a significant 37.8% of the total 3,080 SFRs in the market. This high penetration rate indicates that real estate investing is a major component of the local housing ecosystem.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by individual, small-scale ownership rather than corporate control. Individual investors own 1,073 properties (92.1% of the investor portfolio), while companies own just 97 properties (8.3%). This is further reflected in the entity count, where 1,568 individual landlords vastly outnumber the 83 company landlords.

Financial strategies among landlords lean heavily towards cash ownership. Of the investor-owned properties, 900 were acquired with cash, compared to only 265 that are currently financed. This 3.4-to-1 cash-to-financed ratio suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less reliant on leverage.

The primary purpose of this portfolio is clear, with 1,159 of the 1,165 properties identified as rented. This near-total focus on rental income underscores the role these properties play in providing housing for the local community.

Overall, the holdings data paints a picture of a market dominated by individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords who often own their properties outright and are deeply integrated into the local rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 13.5% less than homeowners, securing a $58,180 discount on average per property.
Detailed Findings

Landlords demonstrated a strong pricing advantage in the most recent quarter. In Q1 2026, the average acquisition price for an investor was $373,750, a significant 13.5% less than the $431,930 paid by traditional homeowners. This equates to a substantial average discount of $58,180 per property.

However, this discount is not a consistent trend. In a notable reversal, landlords were paying a premium in the first half of 2025. They paid 2.7% more than homeowners in Q1 2025 ($439,333 vs. $427,730) and 2.2% more in Q2 2025 ($349,332 vs. $341,831), suggesting a more competitive market during that period.

The long-term price appreciation in Meigs County is evident in investor acquisition costs. Properties purchased during the 2020-2023 period averaged $308,403. By Q1 2026, the average purchase price had climbed to $373,750, marking a 21.2% increase from the pandemic-era baseline.

The data from 2024 and 2025 shows fluctuating prices, with an average of $401,944 in 2024 and $381,358 in 2025, before the Q1 2026 price of $373,750. This volatility highlights the dynamic pricing environment investors navigate.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 11.5% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025, acquiring 3 of the 26 properties on the market.
Detailed Findings

Landlord purchasing activity represented a modest but notable portion of the market in Q4 2025, with investors acquiring 3 of the 26 total SFRs sold, a market share of 11.5%.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by the smallest class of investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100% of the 3 properties purchased by investors. This highlights a market where growth is coming from the ground up.

Specifically, all 3 properties were acquired by investors in the single-property (Tier 01) category. These 3 purchases were made by 4 distinct entities, suggesting at least one co-owned acquisition and an influx of new entrants to the rental market.

In stark contrast, larger investors were completely inactive. Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both recorded zero purchases in Q4 2025.

This quarter's activity reinforces the market's structure: it is the entry-level, single-property landlord who is driving all new investor acquisitions in Meigs County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.6% of investor-owned SFRs in Meigs County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Meigs County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a combined 97.6% of all investor-owned single-family homes. This demonstrates a deeply fragmented market far from the influence of large corporations.

The single-property landlord is the cornerstone of this market. This tier alone accounts for 1,090 properties, representing an astounding 92.5% of the total investor portfolio. The next largest tier, two-property owners, holds just 43 properties (3.6%).

Conversely, institutional-scale investment is almost non-existent. The largest investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) own a mere 3 properties, making up only 0.3% of the investor-owned housing stock. This finding challenges any narrative of a corporate takeover in the region.

Even mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) have a very small footprint, collectively owning just 28 properties, which is 2.4% of the investor market. The data clearly shows that as portfolio sizes increase, the number of properties and entities drops off dramatically.

This distribution underscores that the local rental market's character and stability are shaped by thousands of small, independent operators, not a handful of large firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own 94.4% of single-property portfolios, but companies gain a 50% share in the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the Meigs County rental market, particularly at the entry level. They own 1,033 of the 1,090 single-property portfolios (94.4%) and 41 of the 43 two-property portfolios (95.3%).

A significant shift toward incorporation occurs as landlords scale their operations. In the 3-5 property tier, companies already hold a substantial 42.9% share (6 of 14 properties). This indicates that formalizing as a business is a common step for investors managing even a small handful of homes.

The crossover point to significant company ownership is reached quickly. By the 6-10 property tier, ownership is evenly split, with companies holding 50.0% of the properties. A similar 50/50 split is seen in the 51-100 property tier, though it represents only two properties total.

This pattern reveals a clear business strategy: while individuals can easily manage one or two properties, scaling beyond that in Meigs County often involves creating a formal company structure.

Even with this trend, the sheer volume of properties in the smallest tiers means individual ownership remains the dominant force overall in the county's investor landscape.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip codes 37322 and 37880 containing 83% of all investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a defining feature of investor ownership in Meigs County. Just two zip codes, 37322 (637 properties) and 37880 (326 properties), account for a combined 963 properties, or 83% of the entire investor-owned portfolio in the county.

Investor penetration rates vary dramatically by area, highlighting specific neighborhood targets. The zip code 37846 stands out with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting a small area composed entirely of rental or investment properties. Other hotspots include 37880 (46.9% rate) and 37308 (45.6% rate).

There is a key distinction between the areas with the highest count versus the highest percentage of investor ownership. While 37322 leads by a large margin in the absolute number of investor properties, its 34.6% ownership rate is lower than several other, smaller zip codes. This indicates different investment dynamics across the county.

The top five zip codes by investor-owned count are 37322 (637), 37880 (326), 37308 (114), 37336 (81), and 37826 (6). This list shows a steep drop-off in activity outside of the top few areas.

This hyperlocal data, derived from detailed assessor data, reveals that investment strategies are not uniform across the county but are instead focused on specific, high-opportunity zones.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Meigs County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 4 properties and selling only 1 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

The investor community in Meigs County is in a clear accumulation phase. Transaction data from Q1 2026 shows landlords were net buyers, purchasing 4 SFR properties while selling only 1, for a net gain of 3 properties.

This behavior is part of a persistent, multi-year trend. In 2025, landlords executed 47 purchases against just 8 sales, resulting in a net increase of 39 properties to their portfolios. The activity was even stronger in 2024, with 59 buys and 7 sells, for a net gain of 52 properties.

The buy-to-sell ratio highlights this aggressive growth. For Year 2025, the ratio was nearly 6-to-1 (47 buys vs. 8 sells), and for Year 2024, it was over 8-to-1 (59 buys vs. 7 sells). This indicates a strong conviction in the local market.

In stark contrast to the active small-investor community, institutional landlords (1000+ properties) have recorded no transaction activity. Their portfolio size in the county has remained static, with zero purchases and zero sales across all tracked timeframes.

This transactional history confirms that the growth in investor ownership is being driven entirely by smaller-scale operators who are consistently adding to their holdings.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 10.0% of all Q1 2026 transactions, with all 4 purchases made by single-property investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were involved in 10.0% of the 40 total single-family home transactions in Meigs County. All of this activity consisted of 4 purchases, with no sales recorded in the transaction-level data for the quarter.

The entirety of the quarter's landlord transaction volume was concentrated in the single-property (Tier 01) category. This means all investor buying was conducted by new entrants to the market or existing owners adding their very first rental property.

The average purchase price for these entry-level investors was $373,750. This price point provides a benchmark for new capital entering the Meigs County rental market.

Notably, none of these single-property tier purchases were acquired from other landlords. The 0% 'Bought From Landlords' rate for this tier indicates that new investors are buying their properties from traditional homeowners or other non-investor entities, expanding the overall rental housing stock.

Confirming trends seen elsewhere, institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the transactional market, recording zero activity and holding no share of the quarter's transactions.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Meigs County's housing market is defined by small investors, who own 37.8% of all homes and are actively buying.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,165 SFR properties, representing 37.8% of the Meigs County market, with individual investors holding a dominant 92.1% (1,073 properties) and companies owning just 7.9% (97 properties).
Pricing
Landlords paid 13.5% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, securing an average discount of $58,180 per property ($373,750 vs $431,930).
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 11.5% of all homes sold, with 100% of that activity coming from 4 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.6% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a negligible 0.3%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies achieve a 50% ownership share in the 6-10 property tier, showing a clear trend of incorporation with scale.
Transactions
Landlords are consistently net buyers with a 4-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (4 buys vs 1 sell), while institutional investors remain entirely inactive with no transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Meigs County, Tennessee, is heavily influenced by a large and active base of small, independent investors. This group owns 1,165 properties, a substantial 37.8% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. The market structure defies the national narrative of corporate dominance. Individual investors own 92.1% of these properties, and an even more granular look reveals that 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.6% of the investor-owned inventory, while institutional firms (1000+ properties) hold a mere 0.3%.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic acquisition and consistent growth. In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated their market savvy by purchasing properties for 13.5% less than traditional homeowners, an average savings of $58,180. Transaction data confirms they are in an accumulation phase, operating as consistent net buyers over the past two years. All recent purchasing activity has been driven by new, single-property landlords, indicating the market's growth is fueled by new entrants rather than consolidation by existing players.

The key takeaway from this market report is that Meigs County is a stronghold for the individual real estate investor. The high penetration rate, combined with the fragmented ownership structure, suggests a mature rental market sustained by local capital. The future of the housing landscape here will be shaped not by Wall Street, but by the ongoing decisions of hundreds of small operators who are actively expanding their portfolios and embedding themselves deeper into the community.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:54 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Meigs (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Meigs (TN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tn-meigs/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.