Linn (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Linn (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Linn (KS)
3,138
Total Investors in Linn (KS)
1,286
Investor Owned SFR in Linn (KS)
1,000(31.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,169
SFR Owned
855
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
117
SFR Owned
148
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,000 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Linn County Investor Market: High Cash Ownership Dominates a Frozen Transaction Landscape
Investors own 31.9% of single-family homes in Linn County, a portfolio of 1,000 properties entirely owned with cash. This market is defined by small, individual landlords who control 98.0% of investor-owned SFRs, but recent activity has halted, with zero landlord purchases or sales recorded in the last quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,000 SFRs in Linn County, with individual landlords holding 85.5% of the portfolio.
All 1,000 investor-owned properties were acquired with cash, with no financed holdings recorded. A significant 98.5% of the portfolio is actively rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Recent landlord vs. homeowner acquisition pricing data is unavailable due to a complete lack of transactions.
The market shows no recent sales activity, preventing any analysis of price gaps or trends. Historical pricing benchmarks are also extremely limited, with data from 2020-2023 showing an average price of $133,463 but tied to zero recorded properties.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q1 2026, reflecting a complete halt in market activity.
With zero total SFR sales recorded in the quarter, landlords' market share was 0.0%. Consequently, no new mom-and-pop or institutional investors entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio. Pricing data by tier is unavailable due to the lack of recent sales.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Pricing differences between individual and company buyers could not be determined due to zero recent market activity.
Companies represent a larger share of ownership in bigger portfolios, accounting for 40.0% of properties in the 6-10 unit tier, a significant jump from smaller tiers. This suggests a strategic shift as portfolios grow.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 66040 zip code, with 458 properties.
The highest investor ownership rate is found in the 66738 zip code, where investors own 100.0% of the SFR housing stock. The 66010 zip code also shows high penetration at 37.1%.
Historical Transactions
Historical transaction data, including landlord-to-landlord sales and net buyer status, is not available.
The lack of historical buy/sell data prevents analysis of long-term market trends, such as net buyer/seller status or price appreciation from resales. This points to a historically illiquid or sparsely tracked market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of Q1 2026 transactions, as no sales were recorded.
The lack of sales means no price comparisons can be made between investor tiers for the quarter. Similarly, data on inter-landlord trading is non-existent for this period.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,000 SFRs in Linn County, with individual landlords holding 85.5% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Linn County, investors hold a significant 1,000 single-family properties, making up 31.9% of the total 3,138 SFRs. This indicates a substantial investor presence in the local housing market.

Individual investors are the primary force, owning 855 properties, which accounts for 85.5% of the investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, company-owned entities hold 148 properties, or 14.8%.

A defining characteristic of this market is the complete absence of financing among investors. All 1,000 properties are recorded as cash-owned, suggesting investors in this area are not reliant on leverage and may have a lower risk profile.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income. Of the 1,000 properties, 985 are classified as rented, representing a 98.5% rental penetration rate within the investor-owned stock.

The market structure is composed of 1,286 distinct landlord entities. Mirroring property ownership, individuals constitute the vast majority, with 1,169 individual landlords compared to just 117 company landlords.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Recent landlord vs. homeowner acquisition pricing data is unavailable due to a complete lack of transactions.
Detailed Findings

A critical finding for Linn County is the complete absence of recent acquisition price data for both landlords and traditional homeowners. This lack of data stems from zero recorded transactions in the latest quarter.

Consequently, it is not possible to analyze the typical price discount that investors might achieve compared to homeowners, a key metric in other markets. The market's current inactivity prevents any such comparison.

Historical price context is also sparse. Data for the 2020-2023 period indicates an average acquisition price of $133,463, but this figure is associated with zero properties purchased, rendering it an unreliable benchmark for past activity.

The lack of pricing trends or comparative data points to an extremely illiquid market. Investors looking for opportunities in Linn County would face significant challenges in property valuation and market analysis due to the low volume of sales.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q1 2026, reflecting a complete halt in market activity.
Detailed Findings

The investor purchase market in Linn County was entirely dormant in the first quarter of 2026. There were zero SFR purchases made by investors, corresponding with zero total SFR sales recorded in the county.

This halt in activity means landlords captured 0.0% of the market share, a stark indicator of a frozen real estate market. No properties were transacted by any buyer type during this period.

As a result of the inactivity, there was no change in the composition of the investor landscape. No new single-property landlords entered the market, and no acquisitions were made by mid-size or institutional players.

The complete lack of purchasing across all investor tiers, from mom-and-pop to institutional, signals a broader market stall rather than a strategic pullback from a specific investor segment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Ownership in Linn County's investor market is extremely concentrated among small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those holding 1-10 properties, collectively own 98.0% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market, alone accounting for 821 properties, or 80.0% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the market's reliance on first-time or small-scale real estate investing.

Conversely, large-scale investors have a minimal presence. Institutional investors in the 1,000+ property tier own just one property, representing a mere 0.1% of the market share.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) also represent a very small fraction of ownership, collectively holding only 2.0% of the investor-owned properties in the county.

Due to the frozen transaction market, there is no available data on acquisition prices by tier, making it impossible to determine if larger investors pay different prices than their smaller counterparts in this geography.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Pricing differences between individual and company buyers could not be determined due to zero recent market activity.
Detailed Findings

While individuals dominate the overall investor landscape in Linn County, corporate ownership becomes more significant as portfolio sizes increase. In the 6-10 property tier, companies own 12 properties, representing 40.0% of that segment.

This contrasts sharply with smaller tiers, where company ownership is much lower. Companies own just 11.4% of single-property portfolios and 10.4% of 3-5 property portfolios, indicating a clear crossover point where business formalization becomes more common.

Individuals maintain a strong majority in the smallest tiers, owning 88.6% of single-property portfolios and 89.6% of those with 3-5 properties. This reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' character of the market's entry level.

The data suggests that as investors scale their operations beyond a handful of properties, they are more likely to use a corporate structure. The 6-10 property tier appears to be the primary threshold for this transition in Linn County.

Comparative pricing analysis between individual and company buyers is not possible, as the complete lack of recent transactions provides no data on acquisition costs for either owner type.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 66040 zip code, with 458 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals specific pockets of high investor concentration within Linn County. The 66040 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership by volume, containing 458 investor-owned properties.

In terms of market penetration, the 66738 zip code stands out with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, meaning every single-family home in the area is investor-owned. This represents an absolute saturation of the local market.

Other areas with high investor activity include the 66056 zip code, with 205 properties and a 28.5% ownership rate, and the 66010 zip code, which has a 37.1% investor ownership rate.

This data illustrates that investor ownership is not evenly distributed. Investors appear to be targeting specific zip codes, leading to both high raw counts in some areas and extremely high ownership percentages in others.

A detailed property search within these top zip codes could reveal the specific attributes that make them attractive to investors, from property characteristics to rental demand.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
Historical transaction data, including landlord-to-landlord sales and net buyer status, is not available.
Detailed Findings

There is no available historical transaction data for landlords in Linn County. This prevents any analysis of long-term buying and selling patterns, such as determining whether investors have historically been net buyers or net sellers.

Analysis of market liquidity, specifically the volume of landlord-to-landlord transactions, cannot be performed. It is impossible to know what percentage of acquisitions have historically come from other investors.

Trends in buy and sell prices over time are also unknown. Without this data, calculating typical profit margins or tracking price appreciation within the investor market is not feasible.

The absence of this information suggests that Linn County is a market with either very low historical transaction volume or one where such transactions are not comprehensively tracked in available property datasets.

For both existing and prospective investors, this lack of historical data presents a challenge for market forecasting and strategic planning.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of Q1 2026 transactions, as no sales were recorded.
Detailed Findings

The transaction market for real estate investors in Linn County was completely inactive during the first quarter of 2026. Landlords participated in zero transactions, as there were no recorded SFR sales in the market.

This lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes. Transaction volume for both mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) was zero.

Consequently, no purchase price data is available for the quarter. It is impossible to compare the acquisition prices across different investor tiers, a key indicator of buying strategies.

Data on the sources of investor purchases is also absent. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords, a measure of internal market churn, could not be calculated due to the zero-transaction environment.

The complete halt in transactions indicates a deeply illiquid market where neither acquisitions nor dispositions were occurring, signaling a potential pause in all real estate investor activity.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Linn County's Investor Market: High Cash Ownership Dominates a Frozen Transaction Landscape
Holdings
Investors own 1,000 SFR properties in Linn County, representing a significant 31.9% of the market. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 855 properties (85.5%) compared to companies with 148 (14.8%).
Pricing
Comparative pricing data for Q1 2026 is unavailable, as a complete lack of market transactions prevented any analysis of landlord acquisition prices versus those of traditional homeowners.
Activity
Investor activity in Linn County came to a complete standstill in Q1 2026, with zero properties purchased by landlords out of zero total market sales. No new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small landlords, with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) owning 98.0% of the housing stock. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible share of just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
While individuals are the primary owners, companies significantly increase their ownership share in larger portfolios, accounting for 40.0% of properties in the 6-10 unit tier, marking a key crossover point.
Transactions
No transactions were recorded in Q1 2026, meaning investors were neither net buyers nor net sellers. The buy/sell ratio was zero, indicating a completely illiquid market for the quarter.
Market Narrative

In Linn County, Kansas, the real estate investor market is a study in contrasts, characterized by deep market penetration but a complete lack of recent activity. Investors own 1,000 single-family residential properties, a substantial 31.9% of the county's entire SFR stock. The market is fundamentally shaped by small, individual landlords, who own 85.5% of these properties. This dynamic is further emphasized by the tier distribution: mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.0% of investor-owned homes, while institutional firms hold a mere 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Linn County is defined by a conservative, cash-heavy approach. A remarkable 100% of the 1,000 investor-owned properties were acquired with cash, with no financed holdings recorded. This strategy aligns with the market's recent performance, which came to a complete standstill in the first quarter of 2026. There were zero transactions recorded for any buyer type, resulting in a 0.0% market share for investors and no new entrants. This lack of sales activity means no pricing comparisons between investors and homeowners can be made, reflecting a deeply illiquid environment.

The key takeaway from Linn County is a mature, highly concentrated investor market that is currently dormant. While investors have a strong foothold, the absence of transactions signals a pause in both acquisitions and dispositions. The market structure, heavily skewed towards cash-owning individuals, suggests a stable, long-term hold strategy rather than speculative flipping. Any future market movement will likely be driven by these thousands of small landlords rather than any large institutional players, who have virtually no presence in the area.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 08:09 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Linn (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Linn (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ks-linn/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.